BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260606T082122Z
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20150929T120000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20150929T133000
SUMMARY:Bringing the Rhetorica ad Herrenium to the Rectoratsrede: Considerations on Heidegger's National Socialist Rhetoric
UID:20260611T163225Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm
TZID:Australia/Melbourne
LOCATION:221 Burwood Hwy\, Burwood\, Australia\, 3125
DESCRIPTION:<p>After an introduction (which I won't read due to time) reflecting on the key role of <em>Sein und Zeit</em>'s sections 27\, 35-38\, and&nbsp\;their depictions of modern <em>Gesellschaft </em>in literature on the great philosopher's Nazism\, Part 2 of this paper justifies a specific look at Heidegger's rhetoric in the period of his most extreme activism as Rector of Freiburg.&nbsp\; This has been skirted but never (as far as I am aware) systematically studied in the growing literature on the interconnection of Heidegger's thought and politics. &nbsp\;Part 3 looks at the arrangement or <em>dispositio</em> of the famous Rectorship speech\, drawing on the categories of the Roman rhetorical&nbsp\;tradition.&nbsp\; It notes that Heidegger's call to&nbsp\;retrieve 'the essence of&nbsp\;science' from the Greeks to animate&nbsp\;University reform so the German University&nbsp\;can assume spiritual&nbsp\;<em>Fuhrung</em> in the new Reich enacts the 'authentic historicity'&nbsp\;formally described in SZ division II (culminating at sec. 74). &nbsp\;In doing so\, we will show\, the speech actively calls forth and then enacts in the peroration that <em>Kamfgemeinschaft</em> (battle community) of teachers and students the great philosopher envisages for his <em>Gefolgschaft</em>. Part 4 looks at Heidegger's <em>'elocutio</em>'\, if that Roman term can stand for Heidegger's style in the speech.&nbsp\; We note&nbsp\;here how the speech&nbsp\;exemplifies at least 11 of the 13 features of&nbsp\;the "fanatical&nbsp\;language" of&nbsp\;the Nazi leadership\, as analysed by John&nbsp\;M.&nbsp\;Young in <em>Totalitarian Language</em>\, before focusing&nbsp\;on&nbsp\;Heidegger's (no less than) 16 biconditionals in the 47 paragraphs and the way that\, coupled with his extraordinarily otiose language\, Heidegger's rhetoric operates&nbsp\;by&nbsp\;claiming exclusive access to vital but&nbsp\;esoteric truths\,&nbsp\;presented less as contestable 'ontic' validity-claims than&nbsp\;hieratic 'ontological' revelations.&nbsp\;&nbsp\;The concluding remarks call for further rhetorical analyses of&nbsp\;Heidegger's national socialist speeches and lectures\, as&nbsp\;an under-explored&nbsp\;field in understanding both the imbrication of his politics and thought and its continuing fascination\, despite everything we (as against scholars two decades ago) now know.</p>\n<p>Matt Sharpe teaches philosophy at Deakin\, and is the author of <em>Camus\, Philosophe </em>(Brill 2015)<em>.</em></p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Sean Bowden:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
