BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260605T033944Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20120312T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20120312T170000
SUMMARY:Vicarious Representation
UID:20260607T003737Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm
TZID:Europe/Paris
LOCATION:29 rue d'Ulm\, Paris\, France\, 75005
DESCRIPTION:<p>Detailed Program:</p>\n\n<p>9.30 - 10.45: Pierre Jacob (IJN)\, "Vicarious Pain: Imagination\, Mirroring or Perception?"</p>\n<p>Among possible vicarious experiences\, I will concentrate on the experience of vicarious pain\,&nbsp\;whereby one shares another's standard pain. I will argue for an-imagination-based account of&nbsp\;vicarious pain. Then I will critically examine two prominent rival accounts: the mirroring based account&nbsp\;and the perception-based account.</p>\n\n<p>10.45 - 11.00: Coffee break</p>\n\n<p>11.00 - 12.15: Fran&ccedil\;ois R&eacute\;canati (IJN)\, "Vicarious Mental Files"</p>\n\n<p>Mental files are primarily singular terms in the language of thought : they serve to think about&nbsp\;objects in the world. But they have a derived\, metarepresentational function : they serve to&nbsp\;represent how other subjects think about objects in the world. To account for the metarepresentational use of files I will introduce the notion of an &bdquo\;indexed file‟\, i.e. a file that&nbsp\;stands\, in the subject‟s mind\, for another subject‟s file about an object. Indexed files\, I will&nbsp\;argue\, are a simulative device: by deploying a mental file just like the file in the mind of the&nbsp\;indexed person\, one puts oneself in the other person‟s shoes (or frame of mind)\, by looking at things her way. In the talk I will present the essentials of the theory and\, time permitting\, I will provide an analysis of attitude ascriptions and other phenomena in terms of indexed files.</p>\n\n<p>12.15 - 14.00: Lunch break</p>\n\n<p>14.00 - 15.15: Fr&eacute\;d&eacute\;rique de Vignemont (IJN)\, "Feeling Another's Tactile Sensations" Through empathy\, one can share another person's affective states\, including pain. But what&nbsp\;about sensory states\, and in particular\, tactile experiences with no affective dimension? Can&nbsp\;they be shared? It has been recently found that some individuals report feeling touch on their&nbsp\;own body when they see other people being touched. I shall review here several possible&nbsp\;interpretations of this phenomenon\, which is\, on my view\, misleadingly labelled as visuotactile synaesthesia.&nbsp\;In particular\, I will explore the following hypothesis: what can be shared&nbsp\;between self and other is not tactile experience itself\, but the representation of the body that is&nbsp\;used as reference frame for tactile experience.</p>\n\n<p>15.15 - 15.30: Coffee break</p>\n\n<p>15.30 - 16.45: J&eacute\;r&ocirc\;me Dokic (IJN)\, "Subjective and Quasi De Se Imagination"</p>\n<p>The topic of this talk is what Vendler called &ldquo\;subjective imagination&rdquo\;\, which consists in&nbsp\;imagining actions and emotions &ldquo\;from the inside&rdquo\;\, as opposed to imagining them &ldquo\;from&nbsp\;outside&rdquo\;\, and what Recanati calls &ldquo\;quasi de se imagination&rdquo\;\, namely the type of mental state&nbsp\;one is in when one imagines\, for instance\, being Rudolf Lingens. I will put forward an&nbsp\;analysis of subjective and quasi de se imagination within the framework of Currie and&nbsp\;Ravenscroft‟s recreative account of imagination. In particular\, I shall argue that subjective&nbsp\;imagination involves the recreation of introspective or metacognitive experiences (about our&nbsp\;own actions and emotions). Since the relevant experiences fall short of explicit selfascriptions\,&nbsp\;one can recreate them without recreating any explicit self-ascription. This is what&nbsp\;makes certain forms of subjective and quasi de se imagination possible.</p>\n\n<p>16.45 - 17.00: Coffee Break</p>\n\n<p>17.00 - 18.15: Alvin Goldman (Rutgers\, The State University of New Jersey)\, "Mindreading&nbsp\;by Simulation: The Roles of Imagination and Mirroring"</p>\n<p>The general contours of the simulation approach to mindreading were laid down in the last&nbsp\;twenty-five years. I will first present a sketch of the simulation view\, starting with the original&nbsp\;model -- addressed to the mindreading of propositional attitudes -- and proceeding to a later&nbsp\;variant that addresses emotions\, bodily sensations\, and intentional motion. Then I will&nbsp\;explore more recent and novel findings that are especially pertinent to simulation theory. Finally\, I will argue that simulation theory is fully consistent with up-to-date views on the&nbsp\;neural bases of theory of mind and evolutionary perspectives on mindreading.</p>\n\n<p>Contact: <a href="mailto:joulia.smortchkova@gmail.com"><u>joulia.smortchkova@gmail.com</u></a></p>\n\n<p>Information:</p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
