BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260605T140501Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20120115T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20120115T090000
SUMMARY:Contemporary Confrontations Between Art\, Morality\, and Politics
UID:20260608T165139Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm
TZID:Europe/London
LOCATION:Paris\, France
DESCRIPTION:<p>This conference will investigate the intersections of art\, morality\, \nand politics\, with particular focus on the shifting dynamic between \nthese cultural and social forces over the last fifty years. Throughout \nthe twentieth century\, the de-functionalization of art seen in radical \npractices such as <em>Dada</em> and <em>Fluxus</em>\, along with the \nsecularization of its institutions and the affirmation of its \ntransgressive role\, have loosened the ties between art and traditional \nnotions of morality.  Even the aestheticised Kantian ideal of a \ncommunity of taste has been abandoned\; it seems that art\, alongside \nmorality and politics\, no longer congregate around a shared political \nproject of emancipation.</p>\n<p>The recent cases of censorship (Larry Clark\, at the Museum of Modern \nArt in Paris and David Wojnarowicz at the National Portrait Gallery in \nWashington in 2010)\, of vandalism motivated by active fundamentalism \n(Andre Serrano&rsquo\;s <em>Piss Christ</em> destroyed in Avignon\, France\, 2011)\,\n and the vitality of self-righteous lobbying groups against art\, suggest\n that the interactions between these three spheres are neither clearly \ndefined nor consistently controlled.</p>\n<p>This conference seeks to explore the ambiguous\, yet constant\, \nconnections between the potential influences of art and the norms or \nauthorities that engage with it.  We will question both aesthetic \nautonomism and moralism in relation to art. Can art be defined as a \nclosed field structure? Should it be assessed on its own criteria \nregardless of political or moral values or should it be constrained by \nthem?</p>\n<p>Within the political sphere\, the logic of cultural policy (through \ncuratorial choices of museums\, the distribution of grants\, public \ncommissions\, etc.) reinforces the dependency of artists on the State\, \nand pits freedom of creation against the preservation of public \ninterest.  With these considerations in mind\, the spaces of art become \ncharged: is the museum to be considered as part of the public space\, and\n thus be subjected to the rules of social life\, or can it be a reserved \nspace\, an area for allowed transgression? New technologies add another \nand more complex arena in which to consider these questions\, straddling \npublic and private\, virtual space partly escapes legislation and \nforcibly raises the question of what is visible and presentable.</p>\n<p>Reflection on the epistemological divides separating art\, morality\, \nand politics\, allows for a redefinition of the ongoing cultural \ndialogues which constitute contemporary thought.  The analysis of the \nintersections of these three cultural notions will further understanding\n of the role each of them has in the community\, and contribute to \nphilosophical discourse regarding the renewal of their respective stakes\n in this new century.</p>\n<p>Researchers and practitioners wishing to present their research \nduring the conference are invited to propose papers that may address the\n following themes.</p>\n<ul>\n<li>The function of art: autonomism\, aesthetic moralism and immoralism</li>\n<li>Aesthetic imagination and moral imagination</li>\n<li>The relationship between neuro- aesthetics and neuro-ethics</li>\n<li>Judging artworks: assessment and recognition.</li>\n<li>The institution of the space of art: a space of asylum or of control?</li>\n<li>The relationship between the artistic and political avant-gardes</li>\n</ul>\n<p>These suggestions are only intended to encourage the confrontation of\n normative theory with the socio-political facts in order to promote the\n interdisciplinary perspectives that such a confrontation reclaims.</p>\n<p><strong>Guidelines for submission</strong></p>\n<p>The conference languages will be English and French. Abstract \nproposals should address a major issue related to the conference&rsquo\;s \ntopics and should be between 300 and 400 words in length. Abstracts \nshould be suitable for blind review. Submission deadline is 15 January \n2012. Notification of acceptance will be provided by 1 March 2012. Preferred format for all submissions is RTF attachment \nsubmitted by electronic mail to both Pauline Colonna d&rsquo\;Istria (<a  target="_blank"  title="p.colonnadistria[@]hotmail.fr">p.colonnadistria@hotmail.fr</a>)\, Florian Gait&eacute\; (<a  target="_blank"  title="florian[@]floriangaite.fr">florian@floriangaite.fr</a>) and  Roberto Merrill (<a  target="_blank"  title="nrbmerrill[@]gmail.com">nrbmerrill@gmail.com</a>) with &ldquo\;Art\, Morality\, and Politics: Submission&rdquo\; in the subject line of the email.</p>\n<p><strong>Fee</strong></p>\n<p>The conference fee is 50 &euro\; and can be paid in cash at the conference desk.</p>\n<p><strong>Accommodation</strong></p>\n<p>You will soon find information on accommodation on the conference&rsquo\;s <a target="_blank">webpage</a>. \nFor additional information\, please write to Pauline Colonna d&rsquo\;Istria (<a href="mailto:p.colonnadistria@hotmail.fr">p.colonnadistria@hotmail.fr</a>)\, or Florian Gait&eacute\; (<a href="mailto:florian@floriangaite.fr">florian@floriangaite.fr</a>)\, or Roberto Merrill (<a target="_blank">nrbmerrill@gmail.com</a>)</p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
