BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260501T213007Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20160417T230000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20160417T230000
SUMMARY:Why does Davidson (or why do we) require a semantic theory? 
UID:20260505T220329Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq
TZID:Europe/Zurich
LOCATION:Zürichbergstrasse 43\, Zürich\, Switzerland\, 8050
DESCRIPTION:<p>CFA / CFP <br>Why does Davidson (or why do we) require a semantic theory? <br>Doctoral Workshop <br>University of Zurich\, April 18 2016. <br> <br>Davidson used the expression &ldquo\;theory of meaning&rdquo\; for what is called here a &ldquo\;semantic theory&rdquo\;. Theories of meaning can be analytic or constructive. In the first case\, it is a theory that relates to language in general and elucidates the concept of meaning. In the second case\, it is a theory that relates to a particular language (e.g. English)\, and specifies the meaning of each expression or sentence of that language. This workshop is interested in the constructive sense of &ldquo\;theory of meaning&rdquo\; &ndash\; in semantic theories. <br>A good part of contemporary analytic philosophy of language is set in a framework which presupposes the requirement of a semantic theory in philosophy. But\, to reformulate the title question: What is the philosophical importance of a semantic theory? There are two main motives for Davidson. i) Natural languages consist or include a potential infinity of sentences. Then\, it is argued\, the only way for them to be learnable is by generating the potentially infinite set of sentences from a finite set of semantic rules. This in turn requires that natural languages function in the same way as a formal language. ii) The notion of meaning is problematic and in need of explanation. Classical conceptual analysis has proved to be unsatisfactory. A semantic theory\, however\, provides all there is to know. It specifies the meaning of every sentence of the language in question and thus captures all there is to meaning. <br>The workshop offers the opportunity to critically examine the philosophical purpose of semantic theories\, especially in relation but not limited to the two arguments mentioned or to Davidson. <br> <br> <br>The workshop will be chaired by Dr. Miguel Holtje. <br>Structure of the sessions: Paper presentation (30 minutes)\, discussion (30 minutes). <br> <br>If you are interested please send in either <br>a long abstract (300-500 words) <br>or a paper with a short abstract (fewer than 200 words). The paper should be suitable for a 30 minute presentation. <br> <br>Please send your application to Sebastian Wyss\, sebastian.wyss@uzh.ch. <br> <br>A long abstract is sufficient to apply for participation. However\, we recommend to send in the full paper (in the application or later) in order to allow for better comments and discussion. <br> <br>Dates: <br>Submission of application: February 22\, 2016 <br>Notification of acceptance: March 1\, 2016 <br>Submission of full paper: April 4\, 2016 (optional) <br>Workshop: April 18\, 2016</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Sebastian Wyss:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
