BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260605T000200Z
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20120511T120000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20120511T140000
SUMMARY:Connect Argumentation Theory with Justification Logic
UID:20260606T202635Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm
TZID:Australia/Melbourne
LOCATION:Common Room\, Old Quad\, University of Melbourne (Parkville)\, Melbourne\, Australia
DESCRIPTION:<p>Argumentation theory studies the activities in which rational agents debate with each other.&nbsp\; In artificial intelligence\, since the late 1980s there has been research that tries to use formal methods to approach argumentation theory.&nbsp\; One perspective taken by those formal accounts for argumentation is that given a set of arguments\, to decide which arguments to accept\, we should look at not only the inner structure of each argument\, but also the relationship among those arguments.&nbsp\;</p>\n<p><br></p>\n<p>&nbsp\;&nbsp\; One very young trend in the formal approach to argumentation is to study argumentation under the framework of modal logic.&nbsp\; Two possible advantages of doing so are: (1) this is a new angle to look at argumentation\, which might lead to new insights\, and (2) technics in modal logic become available for studying argumentation.&nbsp\; In my talk\, I would like to sketch a new way to connect argumentation theory with modal logic &ndash\; I would like to sketch a way to connect argumentation theory with justification logic.</p>\n\n<p>(Since it is just a work-in-progress presentation\, please excuse me that there will be no solid results presented\, but just a rough shape.)</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Che-Ping Su:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
