BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260605T013708Z
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20161028T100000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20161028T113000
SUMMARY:Natural Laws
UID:20260606T214229Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm
TZID:Australia/Melbourne
LOCATION:Monash University\, Clayton\, Australia\, 3800
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong>Abstract: </strong></p>\n<p>In this paper\, we describe an internally coherent world-view\, within which there are certain things that deserve the name of &lsquo\;laws of nature&rsquo\; even though they fail to fit the things that philosophers have hitherto said about laws of nature.</p>\n<p>In particular\, many philosophers have assumed that laws of nature are exceptionless regularities. And that entails that the very idea of a &lsquo\;miracle&rsquo\;\, as an &lsquo\;exception to the laws of nature&rsquo\;\, is internally incoherent. Our description of laws of nature\, by contrast\, makes it a coherent possibility that there could be exceptions to the laws of nature.</p>\n<p>Laws of nature are\, at one level\, contingent\; and yet they also manifestly possess a kind of necessity that is aptly called &lsquo\;natural necessity&rsquo\;. We analyse this &lsquo\;natural necessity&rsquo\; as a species of &lsquo\;conditional necessity&rsquo\;. It is a necessity that is conditional on what we call the essential natures of whatever the world does happen to contain.</p>\n<p>This part of our theory overlaps with a widely-held approach sometimes called the &lsquo\;strong theory of laws&rsquo\;. But to this we add a further claim\, namely: that these entailments are also conditional on an absence of interference from things that lie outside what we will call the &lsquo\;natural realm&rsquo\;. Our primary task in this paper is to elucidate this notion of &lsquo\;the natural realm&rsquo\;.</p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
