BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260606T211157Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20161107T080000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20161107T090000
SUMMARY:“Visual Properties and Social Groups”
UID:20260613T115056Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm
TZID:America/New_York
LOCATION:365 Fifth Ave.\, New York\, United States\, 10016
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong>Visual Properties and Social Groups</strong></p>\n<p>In the middle of the 1990&rsquo\;s\, social psychologists started to examine social perception &ndash\;i.e.\, individuals&rsquo\; perceptions of other individuals&ndash\; in terms of&nbsp\;&lsquo\;entitativity&rsquo\;. <em>Entitativity</em> is referred to the degree in which a collection of human individuals is perceived as being bonded together in a cohesive unit. Some social psychologists have been interested in the linkage of social perception with (i) our judgments about the entitativity of groups\; (ii) mechanisms of learning and attending to groups\; and (iii) the attribution of shared goals and shared traits to groups. Based\, partly\, on our perceptions of groups\, we may predict their behavior well\, decide to join or leave a group\, and\, in general\, form perceptual beliefsabout their goals and traits. The problem I tackle here is: what does this literature suggest regarding the nature of our visual experiences about social groups? I focus on the visual properties we see instantiated in groups of individuals to predict their behavior\, to join or to leave them\, and to form perceptual beliefs about their goals and traits. I will make the case that visual properties related to <em>perceived </em><em>cohesiveness</em> or <em>unity</em> are seen as being instantiated in social groups.</p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
