BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260429T222941Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/Winnipeg:20170518T050000
DTEND;TZID=America/Winnipeg:20170520T130000
SUMMARY:Colour Primitivism and Non-Reductive Minds
UID:20260501T133625Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq
TZID:America/Winnipeg
LOCATION:Inn at the Forks\, 75 Forks Market Road\, Winnipeg\, Canada
DESCRIPTION:<p>Colours are routinely experienced as being on things in one&rsquo\;s environment and in important ways correlate to base physical properties like light wavelength and reflectance. However\, colours possess features (hues\, similarities\, opponencies) which wavelengths and reflectances arguably lack. Are colours not reducible to physical properties but instead primitive? Are colours are &lsquo\;in the head&rsquo\;? The first idea is that colours are <em>primitive </em>or <em>non-reductive</em>\, the second is that colours are <em>subjective</em> or <em>mind-dependent</em>.</p>\n<p>This creates a fascinating space of options. On the subjective side\, colours might be reducible to neural features\, or they might resist this reduction and best be construed as primitive mental properties. On the objective side\, colours might be reducible to properties like light wavelength and reflectance\, or they might be properties of cars and trees that cannot be reduced to basic physics. Our questions are:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>What does each option say about the mind and in particular about whether or not the mind is reducible to basic physical properties and things?</li>\n<li>How does recent scientific evidence bear on these options?</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Colour is an intriguing case because the tremendous knowledge we possess about the physical bases of colour perception have in various ways failed to yield a compelling reductive theory of colour.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Derek Brown:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR