BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260915T101801Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20121206T110000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20121206T110000
SUMMARY:Morality or Ethics: Real Differences or Mere Semantics?
UID:20260915T101801Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:1876:beff:feed:47f9%3
TZID:Europe/London
LOCATION:Gent\, Belgium
DESCRIPTION:<p>Hosted by CEVI at the University of Gent in association with CAPPE\,&nbsp\;University of Brighton<br><br>Anglophone philosophy began to supplant discussions of morals with&nbsp\;deliberations on &lsquo\;ethics&rsquo\; in the 1980s. In reaction to both&nbsp\;assertions of a &lsquo\;primacy&rsquo\; of morality by established interests and&nbsp\;competing claims for either moral universalism or moral relativism\,&nbsp\;&lsquo\;morality&rsquo\; fell out of favour\, to be replaced by &lsquo\;ethics&rsquo\;.&nbsp\;Bernard Williams&rsquo\; Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy is the seminal&nbsp\;text representing this shift. In a similar vein\, critical theorists&nbsp\;influenced by Habermas have used a distinction between ethics and&nbsp\;morality to rethink the ethical limits of particular communities\, a&nbsp\;defence of moral universalism that has come to be widely questioned in&nbsp\;recent years.<br><br>At the same time\, however\, these moves - whatever their original merits&nbsp\;- have been made problematic as both the elusiveness of the concept of&nbsp\;&lsquo\;ethics&rsquo\; and the business of &lsquo\;doing ethics&rsquo\; proliferate so&nbsp\;wildly that they have arguably become uselessly empty. Ethics is&nbsp\;everywhere - in the media\, in politicians&rsquo\; &ldquo\;policies&rdquo\; and even in&nbsp\;the market\; and codes of conduct and &nbsp\;organisational policies are replete&nbsp\;with ethics. Consider for example the development of &lsquo\;professional&nbsp\;ethics&rsquo\;\, &lsquo\;research ethics&rsquo\;\, &lsquo\;business ethics&rsquo\;\, public service&nbsp\;integrity and standards and &lsquo\;bio-medical ethics&rsquo\;. While these sound&nbsp\;differently eccentric from &lsquo\;getting the morality right&rsquo\;\, they&nbsp\;constitute a contemporary mantra influencing political standards\, policy&nbsp\;and professional practice.<br><br>The result is that &lsquo\;ethics&rsquo\; comes with as much baggage - different&nbsp\;though that baggage is - as &lsquo\;morality&rsquo\;. The contemporary mantra of&nbsp\;&lsquo\;getting the ethics right&rsquo\; obscures and impedes thinking about&nbsp\;the good\, the right and the just no less effectively - perhaps more&nbsp\;effectively? - than the moralism of &lsquo\;morality&rsquo\;.<br><br>This workshop thus seeks to:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>explore and describe the conceptual and linguistic distinctions&nbsp\;between &lsquo\;ethics&rsquo\; and &lsquo\;morals&rsquo\;\;&nbsp\;place the phenomena of the use of these two concepts in their context&nbsp\;and explore the impasses they present in juxtaposition\; and</li>\n<li>begin to find ways to move beyond these impasses to make possible a&nbsp\;clear consideration of what it might mean to say something is an ethical&nbsp\;or a moral problem that avoids both moralism and the empty formulae of&nbsp\;ethics - or to make clear why this cannot be done.</li>\n</ul>\n<p>We welcome discussion and position papers that speculate\, question and&nbsp\;think as much as (if not more than) polished pieces\; and we hope to&nbsp\;attract a group of scholars who will want to develop something more&nbsp\;substantial from this small starting-point.<br><br>Contributions that will take no more than 20 minutes to present (though&nbsp\;we will pre-circulate papers submitted early enough) are sought from&nbsp\;scholars from any disciplinary or trans-disciplinary position\, whether&nbsp\;their offer is philosophical and conceptual or explores the question&nbsp\;through a particular paradigm\, perspective\, discipline or problem. The&nbsp\;intention of the organizers is to choose a small number of papers in&nbsp\;order to leave space for discussion and reflection and to privilege&nbsp\;contributions where contributors will attend both full days of the workshop. Those wishing to offer a paper should send their abstract (no&nbsp\;more than 300 words)\, name\, contact details and affiliations to both&nbsp\;e-mail addresses below by Thursday December 6th at 12pm. Responses -&nbsp\;acceptances and rejections with regret - will be mailed the following&nbsp\;week. Non-presenting contributors are also welcome to participate\, though&nbsp\;there are limited places to do so. They should e-mail name\, contact&nbsp\;details and affiliations to both e-mail addresses below by Thursday&nbsp\;December 6th by 12pm. Responses - acceptances and rejections with regret&nbsp\;- will be mailed the following week</p>\n<p>A fee of 120 Euros will be charged for administration\, conference pack\,&nbsp\;refreshments and lunches for both days.&nbsp\;There may be a publication arising from this project but this is not a&nbsp\;primary intention of the workshop and will only be considered after the&nbsp\;workshop has taken place.&nbsp\;<br><br>All enquiries should be sent to all three of the&nbsp\;organisers:<br><br>Prof. Bob Brecher\, CAPPE\, University of Brighton -&nbsp\;r.brecher@brighton.ac.uk<br>Prof. Tom Claes\, Director\, CEVI\, Ghent University - Tom.Claes@UGent.be&nbsp\;<br>Paul Reynolds\, Edge Hill University -&nbsp\;reynoldp@edgehill.ac.uk</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Bob Brecher;CN=Tom Claes;CN=Paul  Reynolds:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
