This workshop will bring together several philosophers working directly on formal representations of ignorance. While the notion of ignorance is a familiar one\, philosophers have struggled to model the epistemic state in a formal logic of belief. A well-known attempt equates ignorance with indifference in degree of belief represented by additive probability. This strategy amounts to modeling an individual&rsquo\;s epistemic state with an uninformative prior probability distribution such that all events in a partition of the relevant sample space are assigned equal probability. However\, the attempt has proven to be futile for a number of reasons. In recent years\, John Norton has issued plausible criteria a formal representation of ignorance ought to fulfill and demonstrated that the probability calculus is unable to satisfy such criteria\, delivering a fatal blow to probabilists. The challenges laid out by Norton have invited some to seek amendments to classical probability or alternative models that overcome the challenges. The proposed workshop will largely focus on the problems with formal representations of ignorance and consider ways that they may be resolved or exacerbated.
\nInvited Speakers
Peter Brö\;ssel\, Assistant Professor
\; \; \; Ruhr University\, Bochum &\; Visiting Scholar\, Pitt HPS
Jennifer Carr\, Assistant Professor
\; \; \; UC\, San Diego
Ben Eva\, Postdoctoral Fellow
\; \; \; MCMP\, LMU Munich
Susanna Rinard\, Assistant Professor
\; \; \; Harvard
Miriam Schoenfield\, Assistant Professor
\; \; \; UT\, Austin &\; Visiting Fellow\, NYU
Teddy Seidenfeld\, H.A. Simon University Professor of Philosophy and Statistics
\; \; \; Carnegie Mellon University
Organizers and Speakers
Yann Bené\;treau-Dupin\, Postdoctoral Fellow
\; \; \; Pitt Center for Philosophy of Science
Lee Elkin\, PhD Candidate
\; \; \; MCMP\, LMU Munich &\; Visiting Scholar\, Pitt HPS
John D. Norton\, Distinguished Professor
\; \; \; Pitt HPS
SPONSOR: The Center for Philosophy of Science