BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260416T045306Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20170504T050000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20170506T130000
SUMMARY:From Reasonable Doubt to Undue Scepticism
UID:20260419T052529Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-f5d4878dd-x5n6c
TZID:Europe/London
LOCATION:Malet Street\, London\, United Kingdom\, WC1E 7HX
DESCRIPTION:<p>This conference is part of the Marie&nbsp\;Skłodowska-Curie 'ReaDoubt' project\, which examines reasoning and decision-making under uncertainty&nbsp\;through the lens of the notion of 'reasonable doubt'\,&nbsp\;taken both as a legal standard of proof\, and as a potential norm of reasoning and decision-making more generally.</p>\n<p>The conference will bring together scholars from various disciplines (epistemology\, psychology\, law\, statistics) and practicing professionals (lawyers/judges\, clinicians\, climate scientists\, forensic scientists\, journalists) concerned with the 'reasonableness' of doubt. The goal is not only&nbsp\;to encourage interdisciplinary dialogue\, but also to pay particular attention to everyday practice.</p>\n<p>This should shed new light on epistemological and psychological questions about the nature and dynamics of belief and action\, as well as on difficult judicial issues. Fostering such a dialogue among disciplines\, and between researchers&nbsp\;and practitioners\, should also have implications for currently pressing societal issues such as the role and credentials of experts in democracy\, conspiracy theories\, science denial\, and the epistemology and psychology of the social media &mdash\; in short\, societal concerns rooted in the difficulty of navigating an overwhelming mass of information.</p>\n\n<p>The&nbsp\;programme</a>&nbsp\;includes&nbsp\;keynote papers</a>\,&nbsp\;contributed papers</a>\, as well as a&nbsp\;roundtable</a>&nbsp\;bringing together practitioners in different domains.</p>\n\n<p>Visit the conference's website:&nbsp\;http://readoubtproject.wixsite.com/conference</p>\n<p>Contact: readoubtproject@gmail.com</p>\n\nKeynote&nbsp\;speakers\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>Karen Douglas</a><br>(Psychology\, University of Kent)</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Branden Fitelson</a><br>(Philosophy\, Northeastern University)</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Larry Laudan</a><br>(Philosophy &amp\;&nbsp\;Law\,&nbsp\;University of Texas at Austin)</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Stephan Lewandowsky</a><br>(Cognitive Psychology\,&nbsp\;University of Bristol)</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Paul Roberts</a><br>(Criminal law\,&nbsp\;University of Nottingham)</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Dan Simon</a><br>(Psychology &amp\; Law\,&nbsp\;University of Southern California Gould School of Law)</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n\nThe&nbsp\;"practitioners"\n\n<p>Stephen John</a>&nbsp\;(chair/moderator)<br>(Department of History and Philosophy of Science\,&nbsp\;Cambridge University)</p>\n<p>Alexandra Marks</a></p>\n<p>(Criminal Cases Review&nbsp\;Commission)</p>\n<p>Chris Rapley</a></p>\n<p>(University College London)</p>\n<p>Tom Sheldon</a></p>\n<p>(Science Media Centre)</p>\n<p>David James Smith</a></p>\n<p>(Criminal Cases Review&nbsp\;Commission)</p>\n\n\nProgramme committee\n<p>Anouk Barberousse<br>(Philosophy\, Paris-Sorbonne)</p>\n<p>Isabelle Drouet<br>(Philosophy\, Paris-Sorbonne)</p>\n<p>Roman Frigg<br>(Philosophy\, London School of Economics)</p>\n<p>Ulrike Hahn<br>(Psychology\, Birkbeck College London)</p>\n<p>Adam Harris<br>(Psychology\, University College London)</p>\n<p>David Lagnado<br>(Psychology\, University College London)</p>\n<p>Cheryl Thomas<br>(Judicial Studies\, University College London)</p>\n<p>Marion Vorms<br>(Psychology\, Birkbeck College London&nbsp\;&amp\;&nbsp\;Philosophy\, Paris 1 Panth&eacute\;on-Sorbonne)</p>\n
ORGANIZER;CN=Ulrike  Hahn;CN=Marion Vorms:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
