BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN VERSION:2.0 CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:PUBLISH BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20240329T140407Z DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20171130T190000 DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20171130T190000 SUMMARY:Habits and Routines: Philosophical\, Psychological\, and Organizational Approaches to Automatic Actions UID:20240329T141100Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6f97df9687-7c6q9 TZID:America/Toronto DESCRIPTION:
CALL FOR ESSAYS
\nHABITS AND ROUTINES
\nPHILOSOPHICAL\, PSYCHOLOGICAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL APPROACHES TO AUTOMATIC ACTIONS
\nXXVI volume of
\nPraxiology: The International Annual of Practical Philosophy and Methodology
\nSubmission Deadline: 1st December\, 2017
\nEDITORS
\nPiotr T. Makowski (Adam Mickiewicz University\, Poznan\, Poland)
\nPrzemysław G. Hensel (University of Warsaw\, Poland)
\nTOPIC
\nThe theme of automatic behavior has been attracting attention of researchers working in philosophical action theory\, cognitive and developmental psychology\, and organization science for over three decades. It has been widely recognized that a significant portion of human everyday automatic practices are constituted by habitual and routine behavior. Still\, the research on habits and routines in psychology and organization science vary significantly. While in psychology habits are identified and interpreted as one of the standard types of automatic behavior (Wood &\; Rü\;nger\, 2016)\, in organization science habits and organizational routines are usually distinguished (Hodgson\, 2008). What is more\, organization researchers are divided as for the character of routines and habits: some of them believe that routines &ndash\; as much as habits &ndash\; constitute &lsquo\;mindless automaticity&rsquo\; (Ashforth &\; Fried\, 1988\; Gersick &\; Hackman\, 1990\; Louis &\; Sutton\, 1991) which explains inertia and suboptimal behavior\, others claim that routines are &lsquo\;effortful accomplishments&rsquo\; (Feldman\, 2000\; Feldman &\; Pentland\, 2003\; Pentland &\; Rueter\, 1994) and allow flexibility and change. Yet others try to show that some organizational habits are mindful (Turner &\; Cacciatori\, 2016). All these differences are significant for the philosophy of action. The goal of the volume is to create a platform for discussing the interrelations between philosophical\, psychological\, and organizational approaches to habits and routines. Contributions to the volume might address (but are not limited to):
\nSUBMISSION PROCESS
\n