BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260605T101439Z
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20170726T113000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20170726T133000
SUMMARY:By Soil\, by Blood\, or by What? Children\, Citizenship\, and Immigration
UID:20260608T004211Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm
TZID:Australia/Melbourne
LOCATION:University of Melbourne\, Melbourne\, Australia\, 3010
DESCRIPTION:<p>Abstract:</p>\n<p>Do states have a right to exclude prospective immigrants as they see fit? According to statists&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>the answer is a qualified yes. For these authors\, self-determining political communities have a&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>prima facie right to exclude\, which can be overridden by the claims of vulnerable groups such&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>as refugees and children born in the state's territory. However\, proponents of open borders&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>have accused statists of providing a theory that cannot in fact protect children born in the&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>territory from being excluded from the political community. The grounds for exclusion that&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>affect newcomers by immigration\, also affect newcomers by birth\, or so the accusation goes. In&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>this essay\, I defend statism against this criticism and provide a liberal justification for the&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>inclusion of children born within the state's borders. My account leads to some surprising&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>implication for citizenship law\, as well as immigration arrangements in the area of asylum and&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>unauthorized immigration.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Holly Lawford-Smith:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR