BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260604T164220Z
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20170922T103000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20170922T120000
SUMMARY: "Is the citizenry the state?"
UID:20260606T131126Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm
TZID:Australia/Melbourne
LOCATION:Monash University\, Clayton\, Australia\, 3800
DESCRIPTION:<p>Abstract: When a liberal democratic state wages a war\, signs a treaty\, or bans travellers\, does its enfranchised citizenry do those things? One way into this is to ask whether a liberal democratic state is identical to its citizenry\, where the citizenry is understood&nbsp\;as a structure that is instantiated by all (and only) those who are eligible to register to vote (within not-disproportionate cost to themselves) and who enjoy other basic civil/political liberties within that state's territory. This paper is co-authored\; one&nbsp\;of us thinks the answer is 'yes' and the other thinks the answer is 'no.' Our aim in the paper is to articulate the considerations on both sides and leave it to the reader to decide how they weigh up. To that end\, we work through four considerations: group-level&nbsp\;control (including the particularity\, scope\, directness\, and robustness of that control)\, group-level unity\, individual-level influence\, and individual-level voluntariness. &nbsp\;</p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
