Philosophers are now used to paying close attention to the results of theoretical and experimental work in the sciences. This has been long-standing practice in the philosophy of the sciences\, and it is now common in the philosophy of mind. The practice is growing in the philosophy of language and in ethics\, where there is controversy over the authority of linguistic and moral intuitions. The practice is less common in aesthetics\, but it is beginning to develop\, most notably in appeals to theories of vision in disputes about pictorial perception\, and reference to empirical work on the emotions and imagination in the discussion of our engagement with fiction. Such interventions are controversial in some quarters\; more controversial still are claims that work in the neurosciences and in evolutionary psychology can deepen\, perhaps even revolutionise\, our philosophical conceptions of the arts. Some argue that such studies will not make any positive contribution to understanding the nature and value of artistic experiences\; the most we can hope for from them is that light be shed on empirical side-constraints.
\nA number of postgraduate bursaries are available thanks to the generous \;support of the Analysis trust.
\nAttendance fee: £\;25 for staff / £\;10 for postgraduates
To register please e mail \;
Registration closes Friday 8th of June 2012
Enquires should be addressed to Dr. Jon Robson (jonvrobson@googlemail.com)
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR