BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260515T131509Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20170928T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20170928T170000
SUMMARY:Should We Explain Racism in Terms of Patchy Endorsements?
UID:20260518T024919Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq
TZID:Europe/Berlin
LOCATION:Thunbergsvägen 3H\, Uppsala\, Sweden
DESCRIPTION:<p>Many people who sincerely assert that all races are equal nevertheless exhibit tendencies to treat blacks differently from whites. For example\, they tend to prefer a white a job applicant over an equally qualified black applicant\, give a black person less speaking time than a white person\, and make less eye contact with a black person than a white person.</p>\n<p>Neil Levy has recently introduced what he takes to be a new mental state kind: <em>patchy endorsement</em>. He also argues that mental states of this kind explain the racist tendencies that many people exhibit.</p>\n<p>In this talk\, I argue that we should not explain the tendencies in terms of patchy endorsements. I start off by suggesting that we should only appeal to such states in our explanations of the tendencies if we have a case for thinking that the states can provide better causal explanations of them than states of kinds that we are already familiar with. I then consider the ability of patchy endorsements to provide causal explanations of the tendencies\, and suggest that that we have no such case. Finally\, I conclude that we should not explain the tendencies in terms of patchy endorsements.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Sebastian Lutz:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
