BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20261002T215309Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20171025T091500
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20171027T130000
SUMMARY:The Burman Lectures in Philosophy 2017 by Jenann Ismael
UID:20261008T203248Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:c469:93ff:feda:b6b0%3
TZID:Europe/Berlin
LOCATION:Umeå University\, Umeå\, Sweden
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong><em><br></em></strong></p>\n<p><strong><em>Determinism\, Time\, and Totality</em></strong></p>\n<p>Prof. Jenann Ismael\, University of Arizona</p>\n<p><strong>Lecture I:&nbsp\; Determinism and the Causal Order</strong></p>\n<p>Wednesday October 25\, 13.15-15\, h&ouml\;rsal F\, Humanities Building</p>\n<p><em>Abstract</em>: Could a LaPlacean intelligence\, given full information about the laws and the initial conditions of a deterministic universe\, predict the decision of every other system in that universe?&nbsp\; The common wisdom is: yes\, and indeed\, that is just what determinism means.&nbsp\; But the possibility of counterpredictive devices - i.e.\, devices designed to act counter to any prediction of their behavior that is made known to them - seems to place limits on this predictive ability.&nbsp\; I look at what those limits are\, and what it teaches us about determinism.</p>\n<p><strong>Lecture II:&nbsp\; Time and Transcendence</strong></p>\n<p>Thursday October 26\, 13.15-15\, h&ouml\;rsal F\, Humanities Building</p>\n<p><em>Abstract</em>: The paradox of predictability forces us to drive a wedge between the on-the-ground causal order and a transcendent view of the world (a view from outside of space and time).&nbsp\; The second lecture in the series explores the significance of the fact that determinism is not a feature of the on-the-ground causal order\, but rather something that emerges from a transcendent view.&nbsp\; This reveals a deep connection between the problem of fatalism and the problem of determinism\, and suggests that they are both aspects of the problem of how to reconcile the transcendent vision of the universe with the view from within.&nbsp\;</p>\n<p><strong>Lecture III: Totality</strong></p>\n<p>Friday October 27\, 13.15-15\, h&ouml\;rsal F\, Humanitiets Building</p>\n<p><em>Abstract</em>: The notion of totality emerges in the first two lectures as a pivot point that turns an immanent view of the world into a transcendent view.&nbsp\; In the last lecture\, I will explore what we might call &lsquo\;the logic and the metaphysics&rsquo\; of totality. I show how it is connected to a set of interesting philosophical problems (set theoretical paradoxes\, grounding and truth-maker principles\, disputes in cosmology). I raise questions that I hope will prompt some new interest in the topic. Finally\, I bring the discussion back to the notion of human freedom and say something about how we should understand our little part of totality.</p>\n<p>All interested are welcome to these lectures!</p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
