BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260608T144635Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20180224T040000
DTEND;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20180224T050000
SUMMARY:Evidence\, Causality\, and Sequential Choice
UID:20260619T072602Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm
TZID:America/Los_Angeles
LOCATION:100 Academy Way\, Irvine\, United States\, 92617
DESCRIPTION:<p><a href="https://www.lps.uci.edu/grad/students.php">Gerard Rothfus\, University of California\, Irvine</a></p>\n<p>Evidence\, Causality\, and Sequential Choice</p>\n<p>This talk explores the significance of sequential choice arguments for the evidential vs. causal decision theory debate. After considering Arif Ahmed&rsquo\;s recent argument that causalists fall prey to dynamic inconsistency\, I show\, using an example due to Brian Skyrms\, that evidentialists fare little better in this regard. I then examine the normative import of these results and consider various ways those concerned to make causalists (or evidentialists) dynamically consistent might proceed.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Jeffrey Barrett;CN=Simon Huttegger;CN=Brian Skyrms:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR