BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260605T143939Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Brussels:20180323T053000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Brussels:20180324T130000
SUMMARY:Epistemic Normativity: Its Shape And Nature
UID:20260608T200423Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm
TZID:Europe/Brussels
LOCATION:Campus Belval\, Esch-Belval\, Luxembourg
DESCRIPTION:<p>This workshop focuses on the following questions. </p>\n\n<p>&bull\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Do epistemological principles have normative implications and\, if so\, what is the source of their normativity? </p>\n<p>&bull\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Are all relevant epistemic principles unified by their common source? </p>\n<p>&bull\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Is epistemic normativity identified by what it is about\, proper believing and proper belief-forming methods\, or can other normative sources\, like self-interest or morality\, exert independent normative pressure on believing? </p>\n<p>&bull\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; How does the right conception of epistemic normativity\, whatever it is\, fit into a general framework of normativity? </p>\n<p>&bull\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Is it true that belief or epistemic systems in general aim at truth and what role would this fact play in a conception of epistemic normativity? &nbsp\;</p>\n<p>&bull\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Do conceptions of epistemic normativity mirror the options we find in ethical theory so that we can distinguish virtue-based accounts from consequentialist and deontological approaches? </p>\n<p>&bull\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Does epistemology participate in other debates which have their original home in practical philosophy\, like the question what role an agent&rsquo\;s perspective plays in deontic and evaluative notions\, and are there pressures to provide unified answers to these questions? </p>\n
ORGANIZER;CN=Frank Hofmann;CN=Christian Piller:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR