BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN VERSION:2.0 CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:PUBLISH BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260605T011415Z DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20180726T121500 DTEND;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20180726T131500 SUMMARY:Who's on First? UID:20260606T211743Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Australia/Sydney LOCATION:University of Melbourne\, Melbourne\, Victoria\, Australia\, Australia DESCRIPTION:

According to 'X-Firsters'\, there's some essential feature that all normative properties and relations have in common in virtue of which they're normative. Much has been said about the debate between X-Firsters: proponents of Reasons-First\, Value-First\, and Fittingness-First disagree about what the best candidate for that essential feature is. But surprisingly little has been said about whether or why one should be an X-Firster about normativity. My goals are two-fold. First\, I argue that one shouldn't be an X-Firster about normativity because X-First views are implausible for plenty of domains that are analogous to normativity (e.g.\, descriptive properties and relations need not have any essential feature in common). Second\, I develop a natural alternative view that illustrates how rejecting X-First views makes available a range of interesting\, plausible \;options in \;metaethics. \;

ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR