BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260922T130845Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20190426T113000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20190426T133000
SUMMARY:Art and Achievement
UID:20260922T130845Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:fc13:84ff:feef:467f%3
TZID:America/New_York
LOCATION:Cambridge\, United States
DESCRIPTION:abstract:&nbsp\;\n<br>\nAn increasingly popular view in the philosophy of art is that some artworks are good at least partly because they are achievements. This view&nbsp\;was introduced to explain why two works that look the same\, such as an original painting and a perfect copy\, can differ in artistic merit. An&nbsp\;achievement theory can say that the original is normally better because it is normally a greater achievement. Achievement theories have&nbsp\;since been used to answer other questions\, and they are now a serious alternative to traditional theories of artistic merit. This paper has&nbsp\;three aims. The first is to articulate the achievement theory more fully and explicitly than its advocates have. The second is to show that the&nbsp\;theory should be rejected\, by raising three problems for it. The third is to show that appealing solely to the excellence\, aptitude\, and&nbsp\;ineptitude a work manifests yields a distinct\, and better\, theory of artistic merit.
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR