BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260916T014802Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20190118T070000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20190118T083000
SUMMARY:Ceteris Paribus laws? Generic Sentences?
UID:20260916T014826Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:cc4b:43ff:fe63:b1f2%3
TZID:America/New_York
LOCATION:1117 Cathedral of Learning\, University of Pittsburgh\, Pittsburgh\, United States
DESCRIPTION:<p>Abstract:&nbsp\;Laws in some special sciences (such as biology\, economics etc.) appear to be non-universal and to have exceptions. These laws are expressed by adding ceteris paribus clauses by some researchers. However\, this move led to a debate in philosophy of science. Driven by this debate\, philosophers are attempting to explicate the meaning of ceteris paribus clauses in different ways. On the other side\, since the 1980s\, triggered by non-monotonic reasoning studies\,&nbsp\;a variety of theories about&nbsp\;the interpretations of generic sentences has been developed &nbsp\;by linguists\, psychologists\, logicians and computer scientists. Generic statements\, such as "birds fly"\, "seeds germinate"\, express rules or laws\, but unlike universal statements\, generic statements tolerate exceptions. Because they tolerate exceptions\, ceteris paribus laws and generic statements are very similar. Now\, fruitful theories are developed about&nbsp\;ceteris paribus clauses and generics. How to evaluate these theories? Could they influence each other? How can these theories impact the controversy about ceteris paribus laws?&nbsp\;</p>\n&nbsp\;
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR