BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260604T231916Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20190305T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20190307T120000
SUMMARY:Masterclass on Anti-Exceptionalism about Logic
UID:20260606T195236Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm
TZID:Europe/Rome
LOCATION:Palazzo del Broletto\, Piazza della Vittoria\,15\, Pavia\, Italy\, 27100
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong>IUSS Philosophy Masterclass<br></strong><em>
Epistemology of Mathematics and Logic Project
</em></p>\n<p>IUSS/UniSR PhD in Cognitive Neurosciences and Philosophy of Mind
<br>NEtS Centre @ IUSS Pavia
<br>www.iusspavia.it- www.nets.iusspavia.it</p>\n<p>In collaboration with the <em>Anti-Exceptionalism About Logic Project</em>\, University of Bergen</p>\n<p><strong>Ole Hjortland</strong> (Unibversity of Bergen)- <em>IUSS Visiting Scholar</em><br><strong>
Benjamin Martin&nbsp\;</strong>(University of Bergen)
</p>\n<p><strong><br></strong></p>\n<p><strong>Anti-Exceptionalism about Logic
</strong></p>\n<p><em>March 5-7\, 2019</em></p>\n<p><em><br></em></p>\n<p>i)<strong> Lecture I</strong> (March 5\, 14:00-16:00\, Room 1.14)</p>\n<p>
Session One: <em>What is logical exceptionalism?</em><br>
Session Two: <em>Early anti-exceptionalism</em></p>\n<p>ii) <strong>Lecture II</strong> (March 6\, 16:00-18:00\, Room 1.15)</p>\n<p>Session One: <em>Contemporary anti-exceptionalism</em><br>Session Two: <em>Looking at logical methodology</em></p>\n<p>iii) <strong>Lecture III</strong> (March 7\, 11:00-13:00\, Room 1.14)</p>\n<p>Session One: <em>Abductivism &amp\; selection criteria</em><br>Session Two: <em>Challenges to anti-exceptionalism</em></p>\n<p>The historical consensus is that logic is special in some sense. For example\, that logical laws are both formal and general in a way that other laws are not\, and that logical knowledge is immediate and non-inferential in a way that other knowledge is not. Yet\, it is now recognised there are significant problems facing logical exceptionalism\, due both to general philosophical concerns over apriori sources of evidence\, and exceptionalism&rsquo\;s failure to accommodate actual logical practice. In response to these concerns\, logical anti-exceptionalism proposes that the special nature of logic and its laws have been significantly exaggerated. In this masterclass we provide an overview of the debate between exceptionalism and anti-exceptionalism: we outline the ways in which logic has historically been considered special\, explain how past and current versions of anti-exceptionalism challenge this view\, and discuss the challenges facing anti-exceptionalism.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Andrea Sereni;CN=Maria Paola Sforza Fogliani:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR