BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260501T044429Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20190308T040000
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20190308T040000
SUMMARY:Cinema #11 CFP Film and Ethics
UID:20260503T110631Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq
TZID:America/Toronto
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong><em>CINEMA</em><em>&nbsp\;</em>11<em> </em>CFP: FILM AND ETHICS</strong></p>\n<p><strong>edited by </strong><strong>Patr&iacute\;cia Castello Branco (Ifilnova) and </strong><strong>Susana Viegas (Ifilnova)</strong></p>\n<p><strong>&nbsp\;</strong>&nbsp\;</p>\n<p><em>Cinema: Journal of Philosophy and the Moving Image</em> welcomes submissions to its 11th issue on <em><strong>Film and Ethics</strong></em><strong>.</strong></p>\n<p>This issue will be dedicated to explore film as a medium of ethical experience.&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>A special focus will be given to enquire film&rsquo\;s aesthetic/ethical relationship: film&rsquo\;s path from normative ethics to applied ethics\; the extent to which aesthetic form\, or style\, determine ethical meaning\; the way it instigates ethical understandings and cultural-political awareness and how it involves ethical/political statements.&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>Exploring the issue of film and<em> </em>ethics also provides a rich way of revisiting the legacy of film theory\, especially with regard to cinema&rsquo\;s ideological and political dimensions\, since film&rsquo\;s aesthetics and ethics have always enjoyed a close\, if sometimes troubled\, relationship. Examples can be found in such different developments such as Jean Epstein&rsquo\;s notion of the &lsquo\;enhanced moral value&rsquo\; of <em>photogenie</em>\; the political and moral capacities of montage by Eisenstein\; Kracauer&rsquo\;s and Andr&eacute\; Bazin&rsquo\;s moral and aesthetic realism\, <em>Cin&eacute\;ma Verit&eacute\;&rsquo\;s</em> concerns about the ethics of the medium and its claimed objectivity\; documentary film&rsquo\;s ethical enquires on &lsquo\;realism&rsquo\;\; Jean Luc-Godard&rsquo\;s famous statement &lsquo\;<em>les travellings sont affaire de morale&rsquo\; </em>(&lsquo\;tracking shots are a question of morality&rsquo\;)\, and Werner Herzog&rsquo\;s notion of Ecstatic truth. On the other hand\, the films of Lars von Trier\, Quentin Tarantino\, Michael Haneke\, or the New French Extremism\, are recent examples of ethical experiences done <em>against</em> ethics itself.</p>\n<p>The very same insight of the intricate relationship between aesthetics and ethics in film can be found in philosophy. Stanley Cavell&rsquo\;s books on popular film genres forays into finding a means to articulate the ethics of everyday life\, and we can find in Gilles Deleuze&rsquo\;s book on cinema deep readings on the ethics of the aesthetics of the films of Dreyer\, Bresson\, Rossellini\, Rohmer\, Godard\, Kurosawa and Mizoguchi. Levinas&rsquo\; philosophy has being used to evaluate the ethical encounter with the &lsquo\;Other&rsquo\;\; and phenomenological approaches to cinematic ethics have been stressing the emotional engagement\, embodied experience\, and moral empathy produced by film&rsquo\;s aesthetics and content.</p>\n<p>This issue of <em>Cinema: Journal of Philosophy and the Moving Image</em> will privilege essays that endorse the perspective of film <em>as </em>ethics. Studies on the ethics <em>of</em> film\, or on ethics <em>in</em> film will also be accepted.</p>\n<p>Themes of interest include\, but are not limited to\, the following subjects:&nbsp\;</p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>Aesthetics as ethics (example: ethical meaning of montage\, long takes\, deep focus\, etc.)\;</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>The moral and political signiﬁcance of aesthetics in film\;</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Phenomenological approaches to film&rsquo\;s ethics: emotional engagement\, embodied experience\, and moral empathy\;</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Philosophy\, ethics and film (ex: Lacan\, Foucault\, Levinas\, Derrida\, Ricoeur\, Badiou\, etc.)\;</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Philosophical views on the aesthetic/ethic relationship (Kant\, Plato\, Heidegger\, Nietzsche\, Nussbaum\, etc.)\;</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Agamben&rsquo\;s view on <em>Gesture</em> in cinema: its political and ethical consequences\;</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Deleuze&rsquo\;s modes of existence\;</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>The ethical and moral dynamic of the classical Hollywood film genres: the melodrama\, the western\, etc.\;</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Film&rsquo\;s use for moral pedagogy or for political propaganda and censorship\;</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Film criticism and values\;</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>The ethics of &lsquo\;objectivity&rsquo\; and &lsquo\;truth&rsquo\; in documentaries\;</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>Technology and ethics in different recording and/or exhibition formats: digital versus analogical film\; movie theatre\, personal transportable devices\, TV\, internet\, etc.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Submissions are accepted in English\, Portuguese and French and should be sent toPatr&iacute\;cia Castello BrancoorSusana Viegas.</p>\n<p>Prospective authors should submit a short CV along with the abstract.</p>\n<p>Abstract proposals (max. 500 words) are due on <strong>March 8th</strong>\, 2019\, and a notice of acceptance will be sent to the authors on March 15\, 2019.</p>\n<p>A selection of authors will be invited to submit full papers according to the journal&rsquo\;s guidelines. Acceptance of the abstract does not guarantee publication\, since all papers will be subjected to double blind peer-review.</p>\n<p>For further information or questions about the issue\, please contact the Editors <a class="western">Patr&iacute\;cia Castello Branco</a> or <a class="western">Susana Viegas</a>.</p>\n<p><em>Cinema</em> also invites submissions to its other sections: Interviews\, Conference Reports and Book Reviews. Please consult theweb site of the journal for further details.</p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
