BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260616T062551Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20190715T060000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20190719T130000
SUMMARY:Irresponsibility and Politics
UID:20260620T123332Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm
TZID:America/New_York
LOCATION:15 West 16th Street\, New York\, United States
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong>TOPIC DESCRIPTION:</strong></p>\n<p><strong></strong>The political has always had two contending valences: justice and power.&nbsp\; Ethical politics demands that power conform to justice\, while realpolitik empowers power for power's sake.&nbsp\; Putting justice first requires tremendous responsibility\, individuals and groups distancing themselves from base selfishness for the sake of the higher common good.&nbsp\; Respecting the dignity of each person\, modern political thought conceives ethical politics in the form of democracy\, the regulation of power as an expression of the will of the people.&nbsp\; Authoritarianism\, in contrast\, consolidates power in the will of the unquestioned Leader.&nbsp\; From the viewpoint of the former\, the latter represents political "irresponsibility."&nbsp\; Interestingly\, however\, the leading theorist of authoritarian governance\, the Nazi jurist Carl Schmitt\, and one of the leading theorists of ethical politics\, Emmanuel Levinas\, both criticize irresponsibility by characterizing it in precisely the same manner\, as an abstract detached freedom: "political romanticism" for Schmitt\, and the "temptation of temptation" for Levinas.&nbsp\; For both thinkers irresponsibility promotes a pure freedom\, choice\, over whatever is chosen.&nbsp\; Schmitt's "solution" is the supremacy of the resolute will of the Leader and the obedience of the people\; Levinas's "solution" is "difficult freedom\," acknowledging the primacy of the other person\, morality\, and the protection of all others\, justice\, based in morality.&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Starting with Kierkegaard's notion of aesthetic freedom\, and taking up their criticisms of irresponsible freedom\, the 2019 LPSS will examine and criticize Schmitt's politics of power in view of Levinas's ethical politics of justice\, which will be illuminated and elaborated.</p>\n<p><strong><strong>APPLICATION INSTSRUCTIONS</strong></strong><br><br>Ten scholars of philosophy and/or political philosophy or related disciplines (professors and graduate students) are accepted to participate in this round-table seminar. Some additional auditors will also be accepted. <br><br>Send Letter of Intent and CV attachments to levinas.center@gmail.com <br><br>Please note: There are no registration fees. The LPSS provides no financial support. Lunches and some dinners are arranged as voluntary group events.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Richard Cohen;CN="Jolanta Saldukaitytė":
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR