BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260914T120954Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20191130T184500
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20191130T184500
SUMMARY:Forms\, Kinds\, Essences (Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy)
UID:20260914T121018Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:dcf7:d8ff:fe11:7ebf%3
TZID:America/Toronto
DESCRIPTION:<p>*Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy (LAHP)*<br><br>(https://dbs-lin.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/philosophy/pla/)<br><br>LAHP invites the submission of papers in answer to the following call:<br><br><br>*Forms\, Kinds\, Essences*<br><br>*Extended deadline: 30 November 2019*<br><br><br>Volume 23.2 of Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy will explore the&nbsp\;<br>history of the closely related concepts of form\, kind\, and essence.&nbsp\;<br>These concepts have been the subject of considerable recent research\, in&nbsp\;<br>particular within metaphysics and philosophy of science. Yet much of the&nbsp\;<br>historical background remains under-researched.<br><br>Possible topics for papers are any historical treatment of these&nbsp\;<br>concepts within philosophy.<br><br>Naturally\, Aristotle remains the locus classicus\, and papers on&nbsp\;<br>Aristotle and form (eidos\, morphē)\, kind (genos)\, and essence (to ti ēn&nbsp\;<br>einai) are very welcome. However\, other figures are also highly&nbsp\;<br>relevant. Platonic ideas are without a doubt an important precursor to&nbsp\;<br>Aristotle&rsquo\;s notions. And later treatments of these issues in ancient or&nbsp\;<br>medieval philosophy would also fit well into the volume. All three&nbsp\;<br>concepts later received much criticism during the early modern period\,&nbsp\;<br>among others from Descartes\, Locke\, and Giordano Bruno\, to such a degree&nbsp\;<br>that these concepts more or less fell out of favour &ndash\; although\, they&nbsp\;<br>were also defended or used by philosophers such as Leibniz\, Bacon\, and&nbsp\;<br>Spinoza. Papers dealing with the criticism of forms\, kinds\, and essences&nbsp\;<br>in early modern philosophy\, as well as their defense\, would likewise be&nbsp\;<br>of interest. Despite the early modern critique\, forms\, kinds\, and&nbsp\;<br>essences remained parts of philosophy\, although they were occasionally&nbsp\;<br>seen as eccentric and peripheral. Things changed again in the early 20th&nbsp\;<br>century: especially the concept of essence (Wesen) resurfaced in&nbsp\;<br>Husserl\, as well as Jean Hering and Roman Ingarden. Further\, Peter&nbsp\;<br>Geach&rsquo\;s essentialism and his thesis of sortal-relative identity have&nbsp\;<br>been more or less forgotten\, while Saul Kripke&rsquo\;s modal rehabilitation of&nbsp\;<br>essentiality has become part of the mainstream.<br><br>According to the current publication plans of Logical Analysis and&nbsp\;<br>History of Philosophy\, our issue will appear in print in late 2020.&nbsp\;<br>Since Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy is a peer-reviewed&nbsp\;<br>journal\, we will need to receive submissions by 30 November 2019.<br><br>Ludger Jansen (Bochum/Rostock) and Petter Sandstad (Rostock) will serve&nbsp\;<br>as Guest-Editors for this volume. For further inquiries\, please contact<br><br>Ludger Jansen (ludger.jansen@uni-rostock.de)<br>Petter Sandstad (petter.sandstad@uni-rostock.de)</p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
