BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260405T152615Z
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20190830T070000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20190830T090000
SUMMARY:How to Model the Epistemic Probabilities of Conditionals
UID:20260405T231618Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-f5d4878dd-4s97k
TZID:Australia/Melbourne
LOCATION:Old Arts\, Parkville\, Australia\, 3010
DESCRIPTION:<p>Branden Fitelson (Northeastern) will present "How to Model the Epistemic Probabilities of Conditionals" in Old Arts 224 at 11 on 30 August.&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>Title: How to Model the Epistemic Probabilities of Conditionals<br><br>Abstract:&nbsp\;David Lewis (and others) have famously argued against Adams's Thesis (that the probability of a conditional is the&nbsp\;conditional probability of its consequent\, given it antecedent) by proving various "triviality results." In this paper\, I argue for&nbsp\;two theses -- one negative and one positive. The negative thesis is that the "triviality results" do not support the rejection of&nbsp\;Adams's Thesis\, because Lewisian "triviality based" arguments against Adams's Thesis rest on an implausibly strong understanding of&nbsp\;what it takes for some credal constraint to be a rational requirement (an understanding which Lewis himself later abandoned in other&nbsp\;contexts). The positive thesis is that there is a simple (and plausible) way of modeling the epistemic probabilities of&nbsp\;conditionals\, which (a) obeys Adams's Thesis\, and (b) avoids all of the existing triviality results.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Shawn Standefer:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
