BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260606T125243Z
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20191011T070000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20191011T080000
SUMMARY:Prior's Puzzle Generalized
UID:20260612T062352Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm
TZID:Australia/Melbourne
LOCATION:Old Arts\, Parkville\, Australia\, 3010
DESCRIPTION:<p>Justin D'Ambrosio (ANU) will present "Prior's Puzzle Generalized" at 11 in Old Arts 224 on 11 October.</p>\n<p>Abstract:&nbsp\;Prior's puzzle is the puzzle of why\, given the assumption that&nbsp\;<em>that</em>-clauses denote propositions\, substitution of "the proposition that&nbsp\;<em>P</em>" for "that&nbsp\;<em>P</em>"&nbsp\;within the complements of many propositional attitude verbs is invalid. I show that there are two variants on Prior's puzzle---a quantificational variant and a pronominal variant---that have the same source and warrant the same solution as the original puzzle. I then show that neither the original puzzle nor its variants are specific to&nbsp\;<em>that</em>-clauses or propositional attitude verbs. Rather\, they arise in the complements of&nbsp\;<em>all</em>&nbsp\;kinds of attitude verbs\, in adjectival positions\, in adverbial positions\, and in a variety of other positions as well. These variants\, together with the generalization to other grammatical categories\, show that a wide range of proposed solutions to Prior's puzzle fail\, or are radically incomplete. But the quantificational variant of the puzzle also has a more dire consequence: it threatens to undermine Lewis's method of defining theoretical terms via Ramsification. I go on to discuss the relative merits of two approaches to the generalized puzzle\, and conclude that one has significant advantages.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Shawn Standefer:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
