BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN VERSION:2.0 CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:PUBLISH BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20240329T070742Z DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20191101T103000 DTEND;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20191101T120000 SUMMARY:Conscientious Objection in Healthcare\, the Priority Thesis and the Conditional Compatibility Thesis UID:20240329T070742Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6f97df9687-7c6q9 TZID:Australia/Melbourne LOCATION:Menzies Building\, Monash University\, Clayton\, Australia\, 3800 DESCRIPTION:
Abstract: An influential minority of bioethicists working on conscientious objection in healthcare have been identified as advocates of the &lsquo\;incompatibility thesis&rsquo\; &ndash\; the thesis that conscientious objections should never be accommodated in healthcare. They include Julian Savulescu\, Udo Schuklenk\, Alberto Giubilini and Julie Cantor. I&rsquo\;ll argue that none of the arguments these authors provide are sufficient to warrant the incompatibility thesis. Rather the arguments provided support a &lsquo\;priority thesis&rsquo\;\, which has it that healthcare professionals should always prioritize healthcare service provision over the demands of their consciences. I&rsquo\;ll then show that the priority thesis is compatible with the accommodation of conscientious objections in healthcare in several contexts.
ORGANIZER;CN=Jacqueline Broad: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR