BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260503T231700Z
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20191101T103000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20191101T120000
SUMMARY:Conscientious Objection in Healthcare\, the Priority Thesis and the Conditional Compatibility Thesis
UID:20260506T000425Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq
TZID:Australia/Melbourne
LOCATION:Menzies Building\, Monash University\, Clayton\, Australia\, 3800
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong>Abstract:</strong> An influential minority of bioethicists working on conscientious objection in healthcare have been identified as advocates of the &lsquo\;incompatibility thesis&rsquo\; &ndash\; the thesis that conscientious objections should never be accommodated in healthcare. They include Julian Savulescu\, Udo Schuklenk\, Alberto Giubilini and Julie Cantor. I&rsquo\;ll argue that none of the arguments these authors provide are sufficient to warrant the incompatibility thesis. Rather the arguments provided support a &lsquo\;priority thesis&rsquo\;\, which has it that healthcare professionals should always prioritize healthcare service provision over the demands of their consciences. I&rsquo\;ll then show that the priority thesis is compatible with the accommodation of conscientious objections in healthcare in several contexts.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Jacqueline Broad:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR