This workshop deals with \;reactivity \;in the scientific use of human categories &ndash\; or as the phenomenon often is referred to in this context\, \;looping effects. Ian Hacking has famously argued that human kinds\, in contrast to natural kinds\, are moving targets because human agents don&rsquo\;t react neutrally to being categorized\, described\, and studied by science\; they feedback into the category in ways that affect the scope and applicability of the original category. Some philosophers of science have worried that the effects of \;reactivity \;would undermine the validity of classification in the human sciences. Others think of \;reactivity \;as a resource to be investigated and exploited. Any intervention and evaluation of the effects of \;reactivity \;also seems to demand some knowledge of its effect size and the mechanisms that underlie it.
\nThis workshop is the second in a series of three workshops on \;Reactivity \;in the Human Sciences generously funded by The Joint Committee for Nordic research councils in the Humanities and Social Sciences (NOS-HS). The focus of this workshop is to evaluate the different\, or potentially shared features\, of \;reactivity\, and to scrutinize its effects on classification in human sciences such as medicine\, psychology\, psychiatry and social science. \;
\nQuestions to be addressed include\, but are not limited to:
\n- What are the social and psychological mechanisms of \;reactivity \;and looping effects?
\n- What are the \;effects \;of looping and \;reactivity \;and how large are these effects?
\n- What kind of \;reactivity \;is desirable and what kind is undesirable?
\n- How might we intervene on undesirable forms of \;reactivity?
\n- What is the role and responsibility of scientists when new and revised classifications undergo looping effects? (Should they\, for example\, aim to be conservative in introducing a category when they suspect that people will over-identify with it?)
\n- What is the relationship between \;reactivity \;and revisionary or emancipatory projects that deal with human categorization (often at the heart of gender studies\, but also increasingly for various areas of psychiatry)?
\nConfirmed speakers:
Alexander Bird (King&rsquo\;s College London)
Eyja Brynjarsdó\;ttir (University of Iceland) Rachel Cooper (Lancaster University)
\nMarion Godman (University of Copenhagen/Cambridge University)
\nSamuli Reijula \;(University of Helsinki)
\nMiriam Solomon (Temple University)
\nCall for abstracts
\nUp to four contributed papers will be accepted for presentation at the workshop. We invite submission of abstracts of maximum 1000 words. Please send an abstract no later than February 14\, 2020 to Marion Godman at \;marion.godman@gmail.com. Travel expenses within Europe and accommodation will be covered. \;In particular\, we encourage submissions from early career scholars and/or from scholars in the Nordic countries. \;If you have any questions\, please do not hesitate to contact \;Marion at \;marion.godman@gmail.com \;
\nDates and Deadlines
Submission Deadline: February 14\, 2020
Notifications: March 13\, 2020
Workshop: June 15-16\, 2020