BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260525T043932Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20200531T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20200531T130000
SUMMARY:George Berkeley's Two Ways of Representing: Berkeley on Language and Likeness
UID:20260615T033427Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq
TZID:Europe/Zurich
LOCATION:Alte Unversität\, Rheinsrpung 9\, Basel\, Switzerland
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong>CfP &ndash\; George Berkeley&rsquo\;s Two Ways of Representing: Berkeley on Language and Likeness</strong></p>\n<p><strong></strong><strong>&nbsp\;</strong></p>\n<p>From October 8th to 10th 2020\, the International Berkeley Society will convene at the University of Basel for a three-day conference focusing on George Berkeley&rsquo\;s views on representation\, broadly construed. In his 1989 monograph\, <em>Berkeley: An Interpretation\,</em> Kenneth Winkler argues that Berkeley sees representation as working in one of two ways: either in the same way that a word signifies an idea or by means of resemblance. The aim of this conference is to explore that distinction\, the role it plays in Berkeley&rsquo\;s own philosophy\, and the extent to which it was accepted by other Early Modern thinkers.</p>\n<p>We are interested in papers that look at Berkeley&rsquo\;s views on language\, his theory of resemblance\, and the role that representation plays in his philosophy more widely. We would also be interested in papers that consider whether Berkeley&rsquo\;s predecessors (e.g.\, Descartes\, Locke)\, his contemporaries (e.g.\, William King\, Anthony Collins)\, and subsequent thinkers (e.g. Hume\, Shepherd) accepted this distinction &ndash\; and their connection to Berkeley&rsquo\;s thought. We are especially interested in papers connecting Berkeley to non-canonical figures or those which defend novel interpretations of Berkeley&rsquo\;s own thought. Papers might address questions such as:</p>\n<p>&middot\; What is Berkeley&rsquo\;s view on the connection between representation and resemblance?</p>\n<p>&middot\; Is Winkler right to attribute two types of representation to Berkeley?</p>\n<p>&middot\; Do Berkeley&rsquo\;s contemporaries accept the distinction between signification and representation?</p>\n<p>The total time allocated for each paper will be 50 minutes\, with 30 minutes presentation and 20 minutes for a Q&amp\;A. There will be no parallel sessions. We especially encourage those from underrepresented backgrounds to apply. We will also reserve a certain number of spaces for graduate students.</p>\n<p>Please submit an abstract of no more than 350 words suitable for blind review to (<a href="https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=ibs2020">https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=ibs2020</a>.). The deadline for abstract submissions is <strong>May 31st\, 2020.</strong> We encourage individuals to identify if they are graduate students or a member of a traditionally underrepresented group at the end of their abstract.</p>\n<p>While we cannot cover accommodation\, thanks to the generous support of the International Berkeley Society some limited travel funding may be available for graduate students.</p>\n<p>Any questions should be directed to either Manuel Fasko (<a href="mailto:manuel.fasko@philos.uzh.ch">manuel.fasko@philos.uzh.ch</a>) or Peter West (<a href="mailto:westp@tcd.ie">westp@tcd.ie</a>).</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Peter West;CN=Manuel Fasko:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
