BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260405T040709Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20200617T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20200617T140000
SUMMARY:Statistical Resentment\, Or: What’s Wrong with Acting\, Blaming\, and Believing on the Basis of Statistics Alone
UID:20260405T092352Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-f5d4878dd-4s97k
TZID:Europe/London
LOCATION:Guildford\, United Kingdom\, GU2 7XH
DESCRIPTION:<p>Event begins at 16:10 BST.</p>\n<p>Direct link to zoom meeting:&nbsp\;https://surrey-ac.zoom.us/j/97959261887</a></p>\n<p>Optional pre-read talk\; paper available at Eventbrite:&nbsp\;https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/108836847942</p>\n<p>Abstract:</p>\n<p>Statistical evidence &ndash\; say\, that 95% of your co-workers badmouth each other &ndash\; can never render resenting your colleague appropriate\, in the way that other evidence (say\, the testimony of a reliable friend) can. The problem of statistical resentment is to explain why. </p>\n<p>We put the problem of statistical resentment in several wider contexts: The context of the problem of statistical evidence in legal theory\; the epistemological context &ndash\; with problems like the lottery paradox for knowledge\, epistemic impurism and doxastic wrongdoing\; and the context of a wider set of examples of responses and attitudes that seem not to be appropriately groundable in statistical evidence. </p>\n<p>Regrettably\, we do not come up with a fully general\, fully adequate\, fully unified account of all the phenomena discussed. But we give reasons to believe that no such account is forthcoming\, and we sketch a somewhat messier account that may be the best that can be had here.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Kenneth M. Ehrenberg:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR