BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260406T010700Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20200902T141500
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20200902T151500
SUMMARY:Moral Decision Guides: Counsels of Morality or Counsels of Rationality?
UID:20260406T082552Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-f5d4878dd-4s97k
TZID:Europe/London
LOCATION:London\, United Kingdom
DESCRIPTION:<p>Abstract:&nbsp\; Many moral philosophers advocate the use of decision guides (such as "Maximize expected value" or "Do what's most likely to be right") to help agents make decisions when they are uncertain about the circumstances or consequences of their actions. Such decision guides enable agents to apply their moral theory <em>indirectly</em> to their choices when direct application is impossible. But what are these decision guides?&nbsp\; Some theorists view them as a special kind of moral principle\, while others view them as generic principles of rational choice.&nbsp\; In this paper I explore this debate\, and argue that the decision guides used to make moral decisions&nbsp\; must be accepted as a special kind of moral principle.</p>\n<p>NB: Participants are expected to read the papers in advance. Papers will be shared with registered participants 2 weeks in advance of the workshop. Link to register here:&nbsp\;<a href="https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/workshop-mistakes-ignorance-and-blameworthiness-tickets-116059594371">https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/workshop-mistakes-ignorance-and-blameworthiness-tickets-116059594371</a></p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Claire Field:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
