Abstract: Accounts of episodic memory function differ according to whether they target &lsquo\;memory&rsquo\; or &lsquo\;remembering&rsquo\;. While &lsquo\;memory&rsquo\; refers to the capacity to encode\, store\, and retrieve information (a &lsquo\;preservative&rsquo\;\, &lsquo\;diachronic&rsquo\; activity)\, &lsquo\;remembering&rsquo\; describes the psychological activity of generating a representation about the past in the present (a &lsquo\;generative&rsquo\;\, &lsquo\;synchronic&rsquo\; activity). Based on this distinction\, I will argue that an account of episodic memory function needs to be an account of the function of &lsquo\;remembering&rsquo\; rather than &lsquo\;memory&rsquo\;. Such an account\, however\, requires us to proceed from &lsquo\;form&rsquo\; to &lsquo\;function&rsquo\;\; that is\, it requires us to first specify the features of the kind of representations that remembering generates before we can ask why it might do so. After providing a characterization of the representational structure of remembering I will evaluate whether the most common views of episodic memory function can account for its form. It will turn out that neither preservationism (the idea that episodic memory must be for recalling the past)\, nor simulationism (the ideat that episodic memory must be for imagining the future) can adequately account for the representational structure of remembering. Instead\, I will propose an alternative account according to which remembering functions to stabilize human communication about the past.
\nZoom meeting room details:
\nLink: https://univ-grenoble-alpes-fr.zoom.us/j/95146807125?pwd=TWpMSDVCdVJ6cmVkVGVnUVFPZjRvUT09
\nMeeting ID: 951 4680 7125
\nPasscode: \; 631879
\nMore info:
\nhttps://www.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/phil-lang/BochumGrenobleColloquium.html
\n\n ORGANIZER;CN=Nikola Andonovski;CN=Kourken Michaelian;CN=Anco Peeters;CN=Markus Werning: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR