BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260606T094121Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Helsinki:20130524T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Helsinki:20130525T180000
SUMMARY:The Contemporary Significance of Ordinary Language Philosophy
UID:20260611T203159Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm
TZID:Europe/Helsinki
LOCATION:Tehtaankatu 2\, Turku\, Finland\, 20500
DESCRIPTION:<p>The Contemporary Significance of Ordinary Language Philosophy<br> <br> In recent years\, there has been a revival of interest in the main<br> representatives of the so-called ordinary language tradition in 20th<br> century analytic philosophy. The overall aim of the conference is to<br> contribute to this revival of interest\, by considering how the works of<br> thinkers in this tradition might be still be relevant\, and how careful<br> investigations of ordinary language use can matter to issues at the top<br> of today's philosophical agenda. In this connection\, it will be<br> important to take into account the many differences in philosophical<br> outlook and methodology that exist between philosophers such as<br> Wittgenstein\, Austin\, Ryle\, Strawson and so on. The question of how deep<br> these differences go\, and\, indeed\, whether we can talk of an ordinary<br> language "tradition" here at all\, should lead us to consider the<br> character of the contemporary revival mentioned above. To what extent<br> can this revival usefully be described as a unified movement motivated<br> by a common dissatisfaction with more mainstream forms of analytic<br> philosophy? And to what extent do the differences between the various<br> contemporary attempts at revival make such a description misleading?</p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
