BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN VERSION:2.0 CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:PUBLISH BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260605T134034Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20210623T094500 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20210624T170000 SUMMARY:Theoretical and Empirical Challenges to Retraction UID:20260608T152230Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Warsaw LOCATION:Warsaw\, Poland DESCRIPTION:

DESCRIPTION:

\n

Retraction \;(the act of "taking back" a previous assertion due to\, e.g.\, a change in perspective) has been appealed to in the debate between contextualism and relativism about "perspectival expressions" (predicates of taste\, epistemic modals\, aesthetic adjectives\, moral terms\, epistemic vocabulary etc.). This phenomenon has been taken to favor relativism (at least in one of its forms) over its rivals. Recently\, various \;challenges to using retraction data to support relativism have surfaced in the literature\, of both a theoretical and an empirical nature. This workshop focuses on assessing these challenges\, presenting new ones\, and ascertaining whether relativism can answer them\, as well as on surveying extant experimental studies and showcasing novel ones.

\n

Among the main questions tackled by the presentations at the workshop are the following:
- What are the best theoretical arguments in favor \;of and against using retraction to support relativism?
- Is retraction mandatory? Under which conditions?
- Is relativism committed to taking retraction as being mandatory?
- What are the linguistics markers of retraction?
- How robust is the phenomenon of retraction?
- What exactly do the experimental studies \;on retraction show vis-à\;-vis \;the contextualism/relativism \;debate?
- What can approaches within frameworks like speech act theory tell us about retraction? Etc.

\n

PROGRAM

\n

(All times are in CEST)

\n

WEDNESDAY\, JUNE 23
9.45: Welcome
10.00-11.15: \;Teresa Marques (University of Barcelona)\, "How Expressives Enact Norms in Conversation\, and How to Retract Them"
11.30-12.45: \;Andrei Mărășoiu (University of Bucharest)\, "'I never said that!' \;&ndash\; What Is Plausible Deniability?"
Lunch
14.00-15.15: Laura Caponetto (Vita-Salute San Raffaele University)\, "'Actually\, Scratch That': A Tour into the Illocutionary Fabric of Retraction"
15.30-16.45: \;Leï\;la Bussiè\;re-Caraes (University of Amsterdam)\, "Retraction and Common Ground"
17.00-18.15: \;Filippo \;Ferrari (University of Padua)\, "Mental Retraction?"

THURSDAY\, JUNE 24
10.00-11.15: \;Jeremy Wyatt &\; \;Joseph Ulatowski \;(University of Waikato)\, "Testing Taste Talk: Retraction and Beyond"
11.30-12.45: Markus Kneer (University of Zurich)\, "Norms of Retraction: Myth and Reality"
Lunch
14.00-15.15: \;James Beebe (University at Buffalo)\, "The Realism of Contextualism versus the Antirealism of Relativism"
15.30-16.45: \;Joshua Knobe (Yale University)\, "Proposition or Update? Two Accounts of Retraction"
17.00-18.15: \;Niels Skovgaard-Olsen (Georg-August University Gö\;ttingen)\, \;"Norm Conflicts and Epistemic Modals"

\n

ORGANIZATION

\n

The workshop is part of the \;project \;Semantic Relativism about Perspectival Expressions: A Reassessment and Defense \;(OPUS 17 \;project no. \;2019/33/B/HS1/01269) and is organized by Dan Zeman\, with the support of the Faculty of Philosophy\, University of Warsaw. Please write to danczeman@gmail.com if you want to participate.

\n

For more information\, including the abstracts of the talks\, see

ORGANIZER;CN=Dan Zeman: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR