BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260417T031536Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20210501T050000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20210501T050000
SUMMARY:Between Formal and Informal Methods in Philosophy
UID:20260423T202002Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-f5d4878dd-x5n6c
TZID:Europe/Warsaw
LOCATION:Warsaw\, Poland
DESCRIPTION:<p>The last decade had shown that philosophers became more aware of the importance of finding an adequate methodology of philosophy. This is partly reflected in the growing number of works\, which aim to take into consideration the tension between what seems to be excluding alternatives approaches towards this problem. Thus\, there are debates over adequacy\, limits\, and applications of formal and&nbsp\;informal&nbsp\;methods\, naturalism and anti-naturalism\, experimental and armchair philosophy. Importantly\, this resulted not merely in vivid metaphilosophical debates over competitive approaches towards methods of philosophy\, but also in the development of new approaches towards particular &lsquo\;old&rsquo\; philosophical questions. Hence\, one notices a growing number of formal analyses of the key philosophical notions of truth\, belief\, existence\, imagination\, or modality\, as well as a growing number of experimental research. Others argue that blindly applied formal methods can result in oversimplifying the subject of philosophical investigation and that the application of experimental methods in philosophy results in changing the &lsquo\;love of wisdom&rsquo\; into the &lsquo\;love of surveys.&rsquo\; Finally\, others put into question the very idea that there is only one correct method of doing philosophy.<br>&nbsp\; In virtue of the variety of possible approaches towards the question of philosophical methods\, we would like to discuss this question during a workshop. We invite submissions for a 40-minute presentation (this includes a time for a discussion) linked to the question of methods of philosophy. Examples of relevant themes include (but are not limited to):</p>\n<ul>\n<li>conceptual engineering\,</li>\n<li>formal/informal&nbsp\;methods in philosophy\,</li>\n<li>naturalism/anti-naturalism in philosophy\,</li>\n<li>experimental/armchair philosophy\,</li>\n<li>the paradox of analysis\,</li>\n<li>inference to the best explanation\,</li>\n<li>methods of particular philosophical disciplines.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><br><strong>Keynote Speakers:</strong>&nbsp\;Sven Ove Hansson&nbsp\;(Royal Institute of Technology\, Stockholm) Hannes Leitgeb&nbsp\;(Ludwig-Maximilians-Universit&auml\;t M&uuml\;nchen) Stephen Neale&nbsp\;(The City University of New York) &nbsp\; The workshop will take place in Warsaw\, on September 20th-21st.&nbsp\;Notice that the workshop is preceded by&nbsp\;<em>The third Context\, Cognition and Communication Conference</em>:&nbsp\;http://ccc-conference.org/index.html&nbsp\;<br><br><strong>Submission details:</strong>&nbsp\;The submission deadline:&nbsp\;<strong>01/05/2021</strong>&nbsp\;Notification of acceptance:&nbsp\;<strong>01/06/2021</strong><br>Submissions should contain two files and should be sent to [m.sendlak@uw.edu.pl]. &nbsp\;<br><strong>Organizers:</strong>&nbsp\;Maciej Sendłak (Institute of Philosophy\, University of Warsaw) Paweł Grabarczyk (Institute of Philosophy\, University of Ł&oacute\;dź &amp\; IT Copenhagen) Tadeusz Ciecierski (Institute of Philosophy\, University of Warsaw)</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Tadeusz Ciecierski;CN=Pawel Grabarczyk;CN="Maciej Sendłak":
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
