BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260924T113423Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20210705T170000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20210705T183000
SUMMARY:'Dworkinian Positivism' 
UID:20260924T154931Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:30b9:5bff:fe8c:d64d%3
TZID:Europe/London
LOCATION:Oxford\, United Kingdom
DESCRIPTION:<p>ABSTRACT.&nbsp\;According to the one-system view\, law is a branch of political morality. This paper assumes this claim as true and interrogates its implications for the concept of law that legal participants ought to adopt. As I argue\, there is a relatively direct path from the one-system view to an argument that prescribes the positivist concept of law on normative grounds. Even if jurisprudential questions ultimately depend on moral considerations\, the latter might still weigh in favor of a version of positivism. The positivist view\, I will argue\, is more consistent with reasonable disagreement and democratic authority than non-positivist views\, and it offers a clearer view of the situations under which law should be resisted and reformed. Positivism is also more consistent with Dworkinian integrity than nonpositivism. We ought to adopt the positivist concept of law\, precisely because of the moral considerations that the one-system view sees as continuous with legal theory.</p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
