BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260606T192629Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20210512T133000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20210512T170000
SUMMARY:The Population and the Individual
UID:20260613T072124Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm
TZID:Europe/London
LOCATION:Department of History and Philosophy of Science\, Cambridge\, United Kingdom
DESCRIPTION:<p>We're delighted to announce a one-day workshop on 'the Population and the Individual'\, featuring talks from&nbsp\;Alex Voorhoeve&nbsp\;(London School of Economics)\,&nbsp\;Bastian Steuwer&nbsp\;(Rutgers University)\,&nbsp\;Susanne Burri&nbsp\;(London School of Economics)\, and&nbsp\;Caspar Hare&nbsp\;(Massachusetts Institute of Technology).&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>We can think about policies designed to stop the COVID-19 pandemic\, such as mass vaccination\, from at least two very different perspectives: in terms of how they affect the prospects of each affected individual\; and in terms of their expected population-level effects. Policies that look best from the second\,&nbsp\;<em>ex-post</em>\, perspective may look more problematic when viewed through the former\,&nbsp\;<em>ex-ante</em>\, lens. For example\, vaccinating children may be an effective way to stop transmission of disease\, and\, hence\, improve population outcomes\, but problematic when we consider that\, given their low risk\, children stand to gain little from a vaccine with unknown side effects. How\, then\, should we conceptualise the relationship between these two perspectives on policy? Do these perspectives shift depending on whether we are thinking about cases of risk imposition or risk reduction? If we prefer the ex-ante perspective\, what is the most ethically perspicacious way of classifying the population? And\, how do these issues relate to other debates around the&nbsp\;<em>identified victim bias</em>? By bringing together four leading experts\, this workshop attempts to address these important ethical questions regarding our response to the COVID-19 pandemic.&nbsp\;</p>\n<p><strong>Schedule</strong></p>\n<p>13:30 BST: Start</p>\n<p>13:45 BST:&nbsp\;<strong>Alex Voorhoeve</strong></p>\n<p><em>Why the Value of a Statistical Life is the wrong metric for balancing lives and livelihoods</em></p>\n<p>15:00 BST:&nbsp\;<strong>Bastian Steuwer</strong></p>\n<p><em>Identifiable\, Anonymous and Statistical Victims</em></p>\n<p>16:15 BST: Break</p>\n<p>16:30 BST:&nbsp\;<strong>Susanne Burri</strong></p>\n<p><em>How Should We Think About Morally Permissible Risk Imposition When a Threat is Poorly Understood? A Duties of Care Approach</em></p>\n<p>17:45 BST: Break</p>\n<p>17:50 BST:&nbsp\;<strong>Caspar Hare</strong></p>\n<p><em>To be confirmed</em></p>\n<p>19:05 BST: Discussion</p>\n<p>19:30 BST: End</p>\n<p>Zoom links will be emailed to those who register for the event.&nbsp\;You can register for the event through this link:&nbsp\;https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/the-population-and-the-individual-tickets-142771991871.</p>\n<p>This event is part of a series of workshops at the University of Cambridge funded by the British Academy as part of a larger project on 'Rethinking the Ethics of Vaccination'.&nbsp\;For further information on the planned events\, get in touch with the organisers\,&nbsp\;Stephen John&nbsp\;or&nbsp\;Emma Curran (ejc97@cam.ac.uk).</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Emma J. Curran;CN=Stephen John:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
