BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260526T155606Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Vienna:20210528T131500
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Vienna:20210528T151500
SUMMARY:Against Parsimony
UID:20260531T052247Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq
TZID:Europe/Vienna
LOCATION:Vienna\, Austria
DESCRIPTION:<p>The Slovak-Austrian Philosophy of Language Network (https://danzeman.weebly.com/slovak-austrian-cooperation.html) announces an online talk by Martin Vacek (Slovak Academy of Sciences)\, entitled "Against Parsimony".&nbsp\;The talk is on Friday\, MAY 28\, 13.15 CEST\, and is hosted by the Vienna Language and Mind seminar\, University of Vienna. Please write to danczeman@gmail.com or matteopascucci@yahoo.com&nbsp\;if you want to participate.</p>\n<p><br> Here is the abstract of the talk:</p>\n<p><strong><br></strong> It is almost a platitude to claim that there are disagreements between metaphysical theories since (analytic) metaphysics is about arguments and counterexamples. Next\, such disagreements occur primarily at the level of their metaphysical commitments and concern the so-called metaphysical parsimony. Finally\, metaphysical parsimony as a theoretical virtue values the minimizing of theoretical commitments which come in two kinds: ontological and ideological. I argue that the distinction between ontology and ideology is too coarse-grained and the &ldquo\;counting&rdquo\; is not an exclusive guide to the truth. To motivate a finer-grained analysis I will formulate additional methodological principles against metaphysical parsimony.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Dirk Kindermann;CN="Max Kölbel";CN=Matteo Pascucci;CN=Dan Zeman:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
