Causation is arguably one of the most controversial and persistent topics in the philosophy of the life sciences. Some (e.g. Reutlinger 2013\; Anjum and Mumford 2018) have tried to develop monistic theories of causation\, while others (e.g. Woodward 2010\; Joffe 2013) maintain that causation in the life sciences is pluralist. It has been accepted by many (e.g. Mayr 1961\; Dickins and Barton 2013) that there is a clear distinction between proximate causation and ultimate causation in evolutionary biology\, whereas recently some (e.g. Francis 1990\; Laland et al. 2011\; Haig 2013) are highly sceptical. The significance of the notion of causation in biology has also been debated (Darden 2013). The conference aims to examine the issues relate to causation in the life sciences. The questions to be address include but are not limited to:
\nWhat is the best approach to causation in the life sciences?
\nWhich better captures the concept of causation in the life sciences: causal pluralism or causal monism?
\nIs the concept of causation in the life sciences special in any sense?
\nIs the concept of causation in the life sciences reducible to that in the physical sciences?
\nIs the concept of causation in the life sciences teleological?
\nIs the distinction between proximate causation and ultimate causation tenable?
\n*For more information\, please click here.
\n**The conference is part of the BA/Leverhulme-funded project &lsquo\;The Metaphysical Foundations of Evidential Pluralism&rsquo\; (2020-2022).
ORGANIZER;CN=Yafeng Shan: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR