Interaction between Peter Singer and Christian ethicists\, to the extent that it has happened at all\, has been unproductive and often antagonistic. Singer sees himself as leading a &lsquo\;Copernican Revolution&rsquo\; against a sanctity of life ethic\, while many Christians associate his work with a &lsquo\;culture of death.&rsquo\; In his recent book\, Charles Camosy argues that this polarized understanding of the two positions is a mistake. While their conclusions about abortion and euthanasia may differ\, there is surprising overlap in Christian and Singerite arguments\, and disagreements are interesting and fruitful. Christians and Singerites can even make common cause in matters such as global poverty and the dignity of non-human animals.
\nPeter Singer is Australia&rsquo\;s best-known public intellectual. He is Laureate Professor at the University of Melbourne&rsquo\;s Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics and Ira W. DeCamp Professor of Bioethics at Princeton University&rsquo\;s Center for Human Values.
\nCharles Camosy is a theologian and ethicist at Fordham University\, whose work focuses on bioethics\, Catholic social teaching\, and distributive justice.
\nTony Coady was Boyce Gibson Professor of Philosophy at the University of Melbourne from 1990-1998 and is now Vice Chancellor&rsquo\;s Fellow and Professorial Fellow in the Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics at that university.
\nThis lecture is co-sponsored by Newman College
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR