In Conversation: Exploring the Philosophy of Money and Finance &ndash\; Series III
\nA series of interviews with contributors to The Philosophy of Money and Finance (Hardcover\, OUP 2024\; Paperback\, fall 2025)
\nSchedule
\n"Truth in Financial Accounting"
Author: Christopher J. Cowton (Emeritus\, University of Huddersfield)
Interviewer: Lisa Warenski (CUNY Graduate Center)
Date and Time: 15 January 2026\, 18:00 CET
"Green Central Banking" \;
Authors: Peter Dietsch (University of Victoria)\; Clé\;ment Fontan (University of Louvain)
Interviewer: Jens van't Klooster
Date and Time: 25 March 2026\, 18:00 CET
"On the Wrongfulness of Bank Contributions to Financial Crises"
Author: \;Richard Endö\;rfer (University of Gothenburg)
Interviewer: Kobi Finestone (Univeresity of San Diego)
Date and Time: 01 June 2026\, 18:00 CET
"Bitcoins Left and Right: A Normative Assessment of a Digital Currency"
Authors: Lars Lindblom and Joakim Sandberg
Interviewer: Violet Victoria
Date and Time: October (TBA) 2026\, 18:00 CET
Slurring Terms Across Languages (STAL) is an international and interdisciplinary network whose primary aim is to promote work on slurs\, pejoratives\, expressives and evaluative terms in general\, from languages that have been seldom discussed in the recent philosophical and semantic literature\, and in particular\, from sign languages and non-Indo-European languages. Its main aim is to bring to light new empirical data and uncover novel interesting phenomena that may have the potential to challenge current theories. Empirical studies of the expressions mentioned from such languages\, comparisons with English slurs\, as well as wider cross-linguistic approaches and developments of extant theories in application to the new data or previously neglected phenomena are encouraged too.
\nThe network's coordinators are \;Isidora Stojanovic \;(Pompeu Fabra University/CNRS-Institut Jean Nicod) &\; \;Dan Zeman \;(University of Porto). More information about the network and its activities can be found at \;https://sites.google.com/view/stalnetwork. To contact the network coordinators\, please write to stalnetwork@gmail.com.
\nThe STAL Seminar features monthly\, online talks by researchers tackling issues \;related to the study of slurs\, pejoratives\, expressives and evaluative terms in general\, from less studied languages. The meetings in the 2025-2026 academic year take place on MONDAYS\, 14:30-16:00 Central European Time (CET). The list of speakers is the following (exact dates to be provided soon):
\n- OCTOBER 2025: Luvell Anderson (University of Illinois\, Urbana-Champaign)
\n- NOVEMBER 2025: Claire Horisk (University of Missouri)
\n- DECEMBER 2025: Xavier Villalba (Autonomous University of Barcelona)
\n- JANUARY 2026: Daisy Dixon (Cardiff University)
\n- FEBRUARY 2026: Elisabeth Camp (Rutgers University)
\n- MARCH 2026: Leopold Hess (Jagiellonian University)
\n- APRIL 2026: Robin Jeshion (University of Southern California)
\n- MAY 2026: Yim Binh Felix Sze (The Chinese University of Hong Kong)
\n- JUNE 2026: Mingya Liu (Humboldt University of Berlin)
ORGANIZER;CN=Isidora Stojanovic;CN=Dan Zeman: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Lisbon:20251001T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Lisbon:20260630T170000 SUMMARY:Polysemy in the Evaluative Sphere UID:20260614T124426Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:Europe/Lisbon LOCATION:Faculty of Letters\, University of Porto\, Via Panorâmica s/n\, Porto\, Portugal DESCRIPTION:POLYSEMY IN THE EVALUATIVE SPHERE
\nIn-person: Faculty of Letters\, University of Porto\, Via Panorâ\;mica s/n
\nOnline: Zoom
\nThis is a biweekly seminar pertaining to the project Slurs and the Lexicon: A Rich-Lexicon Approach to Slurs and Other Evaluative Expressions - LEXISLUR (2023.05952.CEECIND\; PI: Dan Zeman). The main aim of the project is to offer a polysemy account fit for evaluative expressions and to assess to what extent a unified approach to the entire evaluative sphere is feasible. Much work on polysemy can be found in lexical semantics - the branch of semantics that studies the meaning of words\, their internal structure and interrelations\, etc. However\, while the debate about polysemy of various expressions has produced an impressive amount of work\, not much material on the polysemy of evaluative expressions exists in that area. The purpose of this seminar is twofold: first\, to get acquainted with the essential literature on polysemy (via in-person sessions dedicated to reading and discussing the relevant papers)\; second\, to feature current work on polysemy as applied to evaluative expressions (via online talks by invited speakers). In this way\, participants will both acquire knowledge about polysemy in general and see how the discussions in lexical semantics can be applied to the evaluative sphere.
\nIn-person meetings
\nNext meeting: NOVEMBER 5\, 15:00-16:30 WET: \;Marina Ortega André\;s &\; Agustin Vicente\, "Polysemy and co-predication"\, \;Glossa \;4(1)\, 2019.
\nPast meetings: \;OCTOBER 15\, 16.30-18.00 WET: \;Michelle Liu\, "Polysemy and Philosophy"\, \;Philosophy Compass \;20: e70040\, 2025.
\nFuture readings:
\nNicholas Asher\, Lexical Meaning in Context: A Web of Words\, Cambridge University Press\, 2011 (excerpts).
\nRobyn Carston\, "Polysemy: pragmatics and sense conventions"\, Mind &\; Language 36(1): 108-133\, 2021.
\nJohn Collins\, "Copredication as illusion"\, Journal of Semantics 40(2-3): 359-389\, 2023.
\nSteven Frisson\, "Semantic underspecification in language processing"\, Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1): 111-127\, 2009.
\nLotte Hogeweg &\; Agustin Vicente\, "On the nature of the lexicon"\, Journal of Linguistics 56(4): 865-891\, 2020.
\nRay Jackendoff\, Semantic Structures\, MIT Press\, 1990 (excerpts).
\nIngrid Lossius Falkum &\; Agustin Vicente\, "Polysemy"\, Oxford Bibliographies Online\, 2020.
\nJames Pustejovsky\, The Generative Lexicon\, MIT Press\, 1995 (excerpts).
\nPetra Schumacher\, "When combinatorial processing results in reconceptualization: Towards a new approach of compositionality"\, Frontiers of Psychology 4: 677\, 2013.
\nAgustin Vicente\, "Polysemy and word meaning"\, Philosophical Studies\, 175(4): 947-968\, 2018.
\nAgustin Vicente\, "Approaches to co-predication"\, Journal of Pragmatics 182: 348-357\, 2021.
\nOnline talks
\nNext talk: NOVEMBER 21\, 11:00-12.30 WET: Marina Ortega-André\;s (University of the Basque Country)\, "When this chef says pot: The importance of the speaker's identity in understanding ambiguous words"
\nPast talks: \;OCTOBER 31\, 11:00-12:30 WET: \;Michelle Liu (Monash University)\, "Ad Hoc Concepts\, Polysemy\, and Verbal Disputes"
\nFuture talks (schedule and titles TBA): \;John Collins &\; Agustin Vicente\, Tamara Dobler\, Jessica Keiser\, Michelle Liu\, Ingrid Lossius Falkum\, Emanuel Viebahn
ORGANIZER;CN=Dan Zeman;CN=Alba Moreno Zurita: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20251001T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260630T170000 SUMMARY:UK XPHI Online UID:20260614T124427Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:We are delighted to announce the next series of our monthly online workshop devoted to discussion of work in progress in experimental philosophy. The workshop is usually held via Teams\, the second Wednesday of each month\, 16:00-18:00 UK time. \; Details of 2025/26 season TBC
\n \; ORGANIZER;CN=James Andow;CN=Eugen Fischer: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20251009T170000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260604T170000 SUMMARY:Sign\, Language\, Reality Seminar 2025/26 UID:20260614T124428Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:Sign. Language\, Reality (SLR) Seminar Series 2025/26
\nWe are pleased to announce the program for the upcoming academic year of the Sign. Language\, Reality (SLR) Seminar\, hosted by the Faculty of Philosophy\, University of Warsaw and the Polish Semiotic Society. The series brings together scholars working on philosophy of language\, logic\, philosophy of linguistics\, theoretical semiotics\, and related areas.
\nProgram 2025/26:
\n9 October 2025 &mdash\; Franç\;ois Recanati (Collè\;ge de France)
Mental files\, concepts\, and modes of presentation
23 October 2025 &mdash\; Antonina Jamrozik (University of Warsaw)
Why do we need the notion of a lie? Considerations from the case of presuppositional lies
6 November 2025 &mdash\; Edward Zalta (Stanford University)
How to Ground Semantics in Higher-Order Metaphysics
4 December 2025 &mdash\; Thomas Hodgson (University of Gdansk / Shanxi University)
The act-type theory of propositions as a theory of empty names
22 January 2026 &mdash\; Hannes Leitgeb (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)
The Additive Logic of Epistemic Reasons. An Axiomatic Account
19 February 2026 &mdash\; Piotr Stalmaszczyk (University of Lodz)
Conceptual Engineering\, Semiotics and Metalinguistics
19 March 2026 &mdash\; Merel Semeijn (University of Groningen)
Common ground in non-face-to-face settings
16 April 2026 &mdash\; Louis Rouillé\; (University of Liè\;ge)
The dynamics of fictional names: an antirealist perspective
21 May 2026 &mdash\; Diego Feinmann (IPI PAN)
\n\; \; \; \; \; \; \;Reassessing the Link between Relevance and Informativeness
\n\; \; \; \; \; \; \; The contradiction puzzle for logicality
\nParticipation is free and open to all scholars.
\nZoom information:
The seminar will be held online. To join the meeting\, please use the Zoom information below:
https://uw-edu-pl.zoom.us/j/92716044372?pwd=0l7PETAOwqQDBKTMCnheYQN7ag7zx1.1
ID: 927 1604 4372
Code: 697648
We're delighted to invite you to the research seminar of the Department of Theoretical Philosophy at the University of Bucharest. These are organized in partnership with CELFIS\, the Center for Logic\, Philosophy and History of Science at UB. Here are talks scheduled so far:
\nFall 2025:
\nOctober 28\, 5pm: Alexandru Dragomir &\; Andrei Mărăşoiu (University of Bucharest\, \;f2f)\, "The Inconstant Moral Expert: the case of LLMs"
\nNovember 25\, 4pm: Nicholas Rimell (Chinese University of Hong Kong\, hybrid via Zoom)\, "A Metaphysics of Despair"
\nNovember 28\, 2pm: Micah Thomas Pimaro\, Jr. (University of Calabar\, \;f2f)\, "Placide Tempels&rsquo\;s Metaphysics: A challenge or a trap for African philosophy?"
\nDecember 2\, 3pm: Nora Grigore (Romanian Academy\, Institute of Philosophy and Psychology\, f2f)\, "Worthiness and Expediency: a Distinction without a Difference?"
\nDecember 19\, 2pm: Alin Olteanu (Shanghai International Studies University\, ICUB\, \;f2f)\, "Iconic Imagination in Modeling: A Semiotic Approach to Scientific Inquiry"
\nJanuary 16\, 2pm: Marco Facchin (University of Antwerp\, hybrid via Zoom)\, \;"Is mental content an illusion?" \;
\nJanuary 22\, 12pm: Sandra Brâ\;nzaru (University of Bucharest\, CELFIS\, FPSE\, \;f2f)\, "Conceptualising Empathy"
\nFebruary 10\, 4pm: Marian Călborean (OPTI Software &\; University of Bucharest\, f2f)\, "The minimal ontology of time" \;
\nSpring 2026:
\nMarch 27\, 2pm: Erik Myin (University of Antwerp\, \;hybrid \;via Zoom)\, &ldquo\;Of a Different Mind&rdquo\;
\nMarch 30: \;Mariona Eiren Miyata-Sturm (University of Oxford\, f2f)\, &ldquo\;The metacognitive account of aesthetics in science&rdquo\;
\nApril 3: \;René\; \;van Woudenberg (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam\, \;hybrid \;via Zoom)\, "Are LLMs Authors?"
\nMay 11\, 12pm: Gheorge Ştefanov (U. Bucharest\, f2f)\; "Ce nu pot vedea neuroștiințele? &mdash\; \;Gramatica \;libertății: Wittgenstein\, Anscombe și critica determinismului tare"
\nMay 13\, 3pm: Andrei Moldovan (U. Salamanca\, f2f)\, \;&ldquo\;Between Independence and Guidance: A Dilemma for Intellectual Autonomy&rdquo\;
\nMay 19\, 10am: Daian Bica (Heinrich Heine University\, \;hybrid \;via Zoom)\, \;''How to Tame &lsquo\;Abundance&rsquo\;? Roman Frigg&rsquo\;s User Manual''
\nJune 5\, 2pm: Paula Tomi (National University of Science and Technology 'Politehnica' Bucharest\, \;f2f)\, &ldquo\;LLMs and truth pluralism&rdquo\;
\nJune: Alexandru Nicolae (University of Bucharest\, Faculty of Letters\; Romanian Academy\, Institute of Linguistics\, \;f2f)
\nJune: Cătălin Teoharie (University of Bucharest\, CELFIS\, \;f2f)
\nJune: Ioan Muntean (UT Rio Grande Valley\, UI Urbana\, \;f2f)
\nJuly: Mihai Rusu (Babeş Bolyai University\, ICUB\, hybrid)
\nJuly: Constantin Stoenescu (University of Bucharest\, CELFIS\, \;f2f)\, "Revisiting 'The Normative Structure of Science' \;
\nSeptember: Oana Şerban (University of Bucharest\, CCIIF\, \;f2f)
\nPrevious events \;in the series are available at: \;
\n2021-22: \;https://philevents.org/event/show/93365 \;
\n2022-23: \;https://philevents.org/event/show/105249 \;
\nhttps://filosofie.unibuc.ro/category/seminar-cercetare-dft/ \;
\nhttps://icub.unibuc.ro/2022/06/14/workshop-semantic-cognition-and-truth/ \;
\nFor those of you who would like to join some of the meetings but have overlapping commitments\, we will do our best to record the meetings whenever everyone in attendance consents to it\, and to then upload the recordings on the Department's YouTube channel. Previous talks are available here:
\nhttps://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOgUq3dN8CXI4L6DhZT1f_Q
ORGANIZER;CN="Andrei Mărăşoiu": METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260201T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260630T170000 SUMMARY:Inquiry Network WIP Talks (Spring 2026) UID:20260614T124430Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:The Inquiry Network WIP Talks feature presentations of work in progress related to inquiry\, broadly understood. For example\, presentations might discuss (but are not limited to): the epistemology of inquiry\, the metaphysics of inquiry\, ethical norms of inquiry\, historical perspectives on inquiry\, or the structure of scientific inquiry.
We aim to foster the sharing of ideas in an inclusive\, welcoming and low-pressure environment. Papers that are already accepted for publication will not be accepted. We aim to be sensitive to the needs of early-career scholars.
The group meets biweekly on Zoom during each of the Fall and Spring semesters. Meeting times are determined shortly before the beginning of each semester with the goal of finding a time that works for as many members as possible. Special consideration is given to finding a meeting time that works for presenters of accepted papers.
I am excited to share that the \;Reconstructing Carnap Webinar Series \;will resume in \;February 2026! Please find the official flyer attached. All talks will take place from \;4:30 PM to 6:30 PM CET \;(10:30 AM&ndash\;12:30 PM EST).
The webinar can be accessed via the following link: https://meet.google.com/uaq-jqpf-mwr
Schedule of speakers:
The series is organized in collaboration with \;Carnap in Context IV \;(Ö\;AW\, FWF Grant PAT7905424) and \;Rudolf Carnap Digital \;(MCMP\, LMU Munich). \;
ORGANIZER;CN=Caterina Del Sordo;CN=Luca Oliva;CN=Silvano Zipoli Caiani: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260317T170000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20261117T170000 SUMMARY:Wittgenstein's Lecture on Ethics: Online Lecture Series UID:20260614T124432Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:&Eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;-&phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &sigma\;&kappa\;έ&psi\;&eta\;\, ό&pi\;&omega\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&delta\;ύ&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&chi\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&mu\;ό &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Alpha\;&lambda\;έ&xi\;&eta\; &Kappa\;&alpha\;&rho\;&pi\;&omicron\;ύ&zeta\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;\, &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &alpha\;&pi\;&omicron\;&tau\;&epsilon\;&lambda\;&epsilon\;ί &alpha\;&pi\;&lambda\;ώ&sigmaf\; &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &nu\;έ&alpha\; &theta\;&epsilon\;&omega\;&rho\;&eta\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &pi\;&rho\;ό&tau\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&eta\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &rho\;&iota\;&zeta\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&tau\;ό&pi\;&iota\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; ί&delta\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &nu\;&omicron\;ή&mu\;&alpha\;&tau\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\;&sigmaf\;\, &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &kappa\;ί&nu\;&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\; &alpha\;&pi\;ό &tau\;&eta\; &phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &sigma\;ύ&sigma\;&tau\;&eta\;&mu\;&alpha\; &pi\;&rho\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &tau\;&eta\; &phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&chi\;&tau\;ή &epsilon\;&mu\;&pi\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&rho\;ί&alpha\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\;\, ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &eta\; &sigma\;&kappa\;έ&psi\;&eta\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &pi\;&epsilon\;&rho\;&iota\;&omicron\;&rho\;ί&zeta\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&eta\; &lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;ά&sigma\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&eta\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;ώ&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&epsilon\; &tau\;&rho\;ό&pi\;&omicron\; ύ&pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&xi\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&mu\;&mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&omicron\;&chi\;ή&sigmaf\; &sigma\;&tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &pi\;&rho\;&alpha\;&gamma\;&mu\;&alpha\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;. &Sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &pi\;&upsilon\;&rho\;ή&nu\;&alpha\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ή&sigmaf\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &pi\;&rho\;&omicron\;&omicron\;&pi\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή&sigmaf\; &beta\;&rho\;ί&sigma\;&kappa\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &eta\; έ&nu\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&alpha\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &Alpha\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&chi\;&tau\;ή&sigmaf\; &Omicron\;&lambda\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\;\, &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\; &delta\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&alpha\;&mu\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;&eta\;-&kappa\;&lambda\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&sigma\;&tau\;ή&sigmaf\; &epsilon\;&nu\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\; &mu\;έ&sigma\;&alpha\; &sigma\;&tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &omicron\;&pi\;&omicron\;ί&alpha\; &omicron\; ά&nu\;&theta\;&rho\;&omega\;&pi\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &omicron\; &kappa\;ό&sigma\;&mu\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;-&sigma\;&upsilon\;&gamma\;&kappa\;&rho\;&omicron\;&tau\;&omicron\;ύ&nu\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &chi\;&omega\;&rho\;ί&sigmaf\; &nu\;&alpha\; &tau\;&alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ί&zeta\;&omicron\;&nu\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\;\, &sigma\;&upsilon\;&gamma\;&kappa\;&rho\;&omicron\;&tau\;ώ&nu\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ό &pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &omicron\; &Kappa\;&alpha\;&rho\;&pi\;&omicron\;ύ&zeta\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &omicron\;&nu\;&omicron\;&mu\;ά&zeta\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &Mu\;&eta\;-&Tau\;&alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &Tau\;&alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;\, &delta\;&eta\;&lambda\;&alpha\;&delta\;ή &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &sigma\;&chi\;έ&sigma\;&eta\; ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &tau\;&omicron\; έ&nu\;&alpha\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &alpha\;&pi\;&omicron\;&rho\;&rho\;&omicron\;&phi\;ά &tau\;&omicron\; ά&lambda\;&lambda\;&omicron\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &omicron\;ύ&tau\;&epsilon\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&alpha\;&mu\;έ&nu\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &alpha\;&pi\;&omicron\;&lambda\;ύ&tau\;&omega\;&sigmaf\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&chi\;&omega\;&rho\;&iota\;&sigma\;&mu\;έ&nu\;&omicron\;\, &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &epsilon\;&nu\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &sigma\;&epsilon\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&rho\;&kappa\;ή &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&mu\;ό&rho\;&phi\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\; &mu\;έ&sigma\;&alpha\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &chi\;&rho\;ό&nu\;&omicron\;. &Eta\; &pi\;&rho\;&alpha\;&gamma\;&mu\;&alpha\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;\, &sigma\;&epsilon\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ή &tau\;&eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;-&phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &sigma\;ύ&lambda\;&lambda\;&eta\;&psi\;&eta\;\, &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&alpha\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &omicron\;&upsilon\;&sigma\;ί&alpha\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&delta\;&iota\;&kappa\;&alpha\;&sigma\;ί&alpha\; &Sigma\;&chi\;&epsilon\;&sigma\;&iota\;&alpha\;&kappa\;ή&sigmaf\; &Sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;-&Gamma\;έ&nu\;&epsilon\;&sigma\;&eta\;&sigmaf\;\, έ&nu\;&alpha\; &pi\;&lambda\;έ&gamma\;&mu\;&alpha\; &zeta\;&omega\;&nu\;&tau\;&alpha\;&nu\;ώ&nu\; &sigma\;&chi\;έ&sigma\;&epsilon\;&omega\;&nu\; ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &kappa\;ά&theta\;&epsilon\; &mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;ή ύ&pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&xi\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&delta\;ύ&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;έ&sigma\;&alpha\; &alpha\;&pi\;ό &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;&eta\;&lambda\;&epsilon\;&pi\;ί&delta\;&rho\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&eta\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &alpha\;&mu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&beta\;&alpha\;ί&alpha\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&gamma\;&kappa\;&rho\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\;\, &gamma\;&epsilon\;&gamma\;&omicron\;&nu\;ό&sigmaf\; &pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\;ί&zeta\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;&epsilon\; &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &eta\;&rho\;&alpha\;&kappa\;&lambda\;&epsilon\;ί&tau\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&alpha\; &epsilon\;&nu\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &tau\;&omega\;&nu\; &alpha\;&nu\;&tau\;&iota\;&theta\;έ&tau\;&omega\;&nu\;\, &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &epsilon\;&kappa\;&pi\;ό&rho\;&epsilon\;&upsilon\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Epsilon\;&nu\;ό&sigmaf\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &Pi\;&lambda\;&omega\;&tau\;ί&nu\;&omicron\;\, &tau\;&eta\; &mu\;&omicron\;&nu\;&iota\;&sigma\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &omicron\;&nu\;&tau\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;ί&alpha\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Sigma\;&pi\;&iota\;&nu\;ό&zeta\;&alpha\;\, &tau\;&eta\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&lambda\;&epsilon\;&kappa\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &kappa\;ί&nu\;&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Chi\;έ&gamma\;&kappa\;&epsilon\;&lambda\;\, &tau\;&eta\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;-&alpha\;&nu\;ή&kappa\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&nu\; &alpha\;&nu\;&theta\;&rho\;ώ&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &Epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &Chi\;ά&iota\;&nu\;&tau\;&epsilon\;&gamma\;&kappa\;&epsilon\;&rho\;\, &tau\;&eta\; «\;&sigma\;ά&rho\;&kappa\;&alpha\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &kappa\;ό&sigma\;&mu\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;»\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; Merleau-Ponty &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&delta\;&iota\;&kappa\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&iota\;&alpha\;&kappa\;ή &omicron\;&nu\;&tau\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;ί&alpha\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; Whitehead.
\n&Sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\; &kappa\;έ&nu\;&tau\;&rho\;&omicron\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ή&sigmaf\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &sigma\;&kappa\;έ&psi\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&pi\;&tau\;ύ&sigma\;&sigma\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &eta\; &Omicron\;&nu\;&tau\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;ί&alpha\; &Mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&mu\;ό&rho\;&phi\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\;&sigmaf\;\, &sigma\;ύ&mu\;&phi\;&omega\;&nu\;&alpha\; &mu\;&epsilon\; &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &omicron\;&pi\;&omicron\;ί&alpha\; &tau\;&omicron\; &Epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&delta\;&omicron\;&mu\;έ&nu\;&omicron\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &gamma\;&epsilon\;&nu\;&nu\;ά&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&chi\;&eta\;&mu\;&alpha\;&tau\;ί&zeta\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&rho\;&kappa\;ώ&sigmaf\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &epsilon\;&delta\;ώ &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&delta\;ύ&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &eta\; &Pi\;&omicron\;&iota\;&eta\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Kappa\;ό&sigma\;&mu\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &Kappa\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&mu\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &Pi\;&omicron\;ί&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\;\, &delta\;&eta\;&lambda\;&alpha\;&delta\;ή &omega\;&sigmaf\; &eta\; ί&delta\;&iota\;&alpha\; &eta\; &delta\;&eta\;&mu\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &pi\;&rho\;ά&xi\;&eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\; &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &omicron\;&pi\;&omicron\;ί&alpha\; &eta\; &pi\;&rho\;&alpha\;&gamma\;&mu\;&alpha\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;&omicron\;&pi\;&omicron\;&iota\;&epsilon\;ί&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;&omicron\;-&epsilon\;&kappa\;&delta\;&eta\;&lambda\;ώ&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\;. &Eta\; &pi\;&omicron\;&iota\;&eta\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ή &pi\;&eta\;&gamma\;ά&zeta\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &alpha\;&pi\;ό &tau\;&eta\; &delta\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&alpha\;&mu\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &sigma\;&chi\;έ&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &Alpha\;&beta\;ύ&sigma\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;\, &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Mu\;&eta\;&delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\;ό&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Pi\;&alpha\;&nu\;&tau\;ό&sigmaf\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&theta\;ώ&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Chi\;ά&omicron\;&upsilon\;&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &Tau\;ά&xi\;&eta\;&sigmaf\;\, ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &tau\;&omicron\; &Mu\;&eta\;&delta\;έ&nu\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &sigma\;&eta\;&mu\;&alpha\;ί&nu\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &alpha\;&nu\;&upsilon\;&pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&xi\;ί&alpha\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &delta\;&eta\;&mu\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &delta\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&alpha\;&tau\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;\, έ&nu\;&alpha\; &pi\;&rho\;&omicron\;-&omicron\;&nu\;&tau\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό &beta\;ά&theta\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&pi\;ό &tau\;&omicron\; &omicron\;&pi\;&omicron\;ί&omicron\; &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&delta\;ύ&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&omicron\; &Pi\;ά&nu\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&epsilon\;&chi\;ή&sigmaf\; &phi\;&alpha\;&nu\;έ&rho\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\;\, &epsilon\;&nu\;ώ &tau\;&omicron\; &Chi\;ά&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &alpha\;&pi\;&lambda\;ή &alpha\;&tau\;&alpha\;&xi\;ί&alpha\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &pi\;&epsilon\;&delta\;ί&omicron\; &Delta\;&eta\;&mu\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή&sigmaf\; &Alpha\;&beta\;&epsilon\;&beta\;&alpha\;&iota\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\;\, &eta\; &alpha\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&chi\;&tau\;ή &mu\;ή&tau\;&rho\;&alpha\; &tau\;&omega\;&nu\; &mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;ώ&nu\;\, &alpha\;&pi\;ό &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &omicron\;&pi\;&omicron\;ί&alpha\; &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&delta\;ύ&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &eta\; &Tau\;ά&xi\;&eta\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &pi\;&rho\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omega\;&rho\;&iota\;&nu\;ή &mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;&omicron\;&pi\;&omicron\;ί&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\;\, &gamma\;&iota\;&alpha\; &nu\;&alpha\; &epsilon\;&pi\;&iota\;&sigma\;&tau\;&rho\;έ&psi\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &pi\;ά&lambda\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\; &Chi\;ά&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &mu\;έ&sigma\;&alpha\; &sigma\;&epsilon\; έ&nu\;&alpha\;&nu\; &rho\;&upsilon\;&theta\;&mu\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;&omicron\;-&upsilon\;&pi\;&epsilon\;&rho\;&beta\;&alpha\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό &kappa\;ύ&kappa\;&lambda\;&omicron\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&mu\;ό&rho\;&phi\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\;&sigmaf\;\, &gamma\;&epsilon\;&gamma\;&omicron\;&nu\;ό&sigmaf\; &pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&alpha\;&nu\;&tau\;ά &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &eta\;&rho\;&alpha\;&kappa\;&lambda\;&epsilon\;ί&tau\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&alpha\; &alpha\;&rho\;&mu\;&omicron\;&nu\;ί&alpha\; &tau\;&omega\;&nu\; &alpha\;&nu\;&tau\;&iota\;&theta\;έ&tau\;&omega\;&nu\;\, &tau\;&omicron\; &delta\;&eta\;&mu\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό &chi\;ά&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Nu\;ί&tau\;&sigma\;&epsilon\;\, &tau\;&eta\; &zeta\;&omega\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &omicron\;&rho\;&mu\;ή &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Mu\;&pi\;&epsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;&kappa\;&sigma\;ό&nu\;\, &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &pi\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&lambda\;&alpha\;&pi\;&lambda\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Nu\;&tau\;&epsilon\;&lambda\;έ&zeta\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\; &sigma\;ύ&gamma\;&chi\;&rho\;&omicron\;&nu\;&eta\; &epsilon\;&pi\;&iota\;&sigma\;&tau\;&eta\;&mu\;&omicron\;&nu\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &kappa\;&alpha\;&tau\;&alpha\;&nu\;ό&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;&omicron\;-&omicron\;&rho\;&gamma\;ά&nu\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &Pi\;&rho\;ί&gamma\;&kappa\;&omicron\;&zeta\;&iota\;&nu\;.
\n&Mu\;έ&sigma\;&alpha\; &sigma\;&epsilon\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ή &tau\;&eta\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&delta\;&iota\;&kappa\;&alpha\;&sigma\;ί&alpha\;\, &omicron\; &Kappa\;ό&sigma\;&mu\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;&eta\;&chi\;&alpha\;&nu\;&iota\;&sigma\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό &sigma\;ύ&sigma\;&tau\;&eta\;&mu\;&alpha\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;&omicron\;-&pi\;&omicron\;&iota\;&eta\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &delta\;&eta\;&mu\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;ί&alpha\;\, &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &zeta\;&omega\;&nu\;&tau\;&alpha\;&nu\;ή &rho\;&omicron\;ή ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &tau\;&omicron\; ά&mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;&omicron\; &gamma\;ί&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;ή &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &eta\; &mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;ή &epsilon\;&pi\;&iota\;&sigma\;&tau\;&rho\;έ&phi\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\; ά&mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;&omicron\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; έ&tau\;&sigma\;&iota\; &eta\; ύ&pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&xi\;&eta\; &epsilon\;&mu\;&phi\;&alpha\;&nu\;ί&zeta\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &gamma\;&epsilon\;&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή\, &sigma\;&chi\;&epsilon\;&sigma\;&iota\;&alpha\;&kappa\;ή &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &pi\;&omicron\;&iota\;&eta\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή. &Eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;-&phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &sigma\;&tau\;ά&sigma\;&eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&tau\;&omicron\;&pi\;ί&zeta\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &tau\;&omicron\; &kappa\;έ&nu\;&tau\;&rho\;&omicron\; &alpha\;&pi\;ό &tau\;&eta\; &gamma\;&nu\;ώ&sigma\;&eta\; &pi\;&rho\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &tau\;&eta\; &Beta\;&iota\;&omega\;&mu\;&alpha\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &Sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\;\, ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &eta\; &alpha\;&lambda\;ή&theta\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&alpha\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &alpha\;&pi\;&lambda\;ώ&sigmaf\; &epsilon\;&nu\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &epsilon\;&mu\;&pi\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&rho\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&mu\;&mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&omicron\;&chi\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή\, &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&tau\;ά&sigma\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&eta\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\;&iota\;&sigma\;&mu\;&omicron\;ύ &mu\;&epsilon\; &tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &rho\;&upsilon\;&theta\;&mu\;ό &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &kappa\;ό&sigma\;&mu\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &epsilon\;&delta\;ώ &epsilon\;&mu\;&phi\;&alpha\;&nu\;ί&zeta\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &eta\; &Upsilon\;&pi\;έ&rho\;&beta\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &Gamma\;&lambda\;ώ&sigma\;&sigma\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&theta\;ώ&sigmaf\; &eta\; &alpha\;&lambda\;ή&theta\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&alpha\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &mu\;&pi\;&omicron\;&rho\;&epsilon\;ί &nu\;&alpha\; &pi\;&epsilon\;&rho\;&iota\;&omicron\;&rho\;&iota\;&sigma\;&tau\;&epsilon\;ί &sigma\;&epsilon\; &omicron\;&rho\;&iota\;&sigma\;&mu\;&omicron\;ύ&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &delta\;ό&gamma\;&mu\;&alpha\;&tau\;&alpha\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &beta\;&iota\;ώ&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; ά&mu\;&epsilon\;&sigma\;&eta\; &pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&sigma\;ί&alpha\;\, ό&pi\;&omega\;&sigmaf\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&phi\;&alpha\;ί&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &Sigma\;&omega\;&kappa\;&rho\;ά&tau\;&eta\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\; &phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &tau\;&rho\;ό&pi\;&omicron\; &zeta\;&omega\;ή&sigmaf\;\, &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&sigmaf\; &Sigma\;&tau\;&omega\;&iota\;&kappa\;&omicron\;ύ&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &tau\;έ&chi\;&nu\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &beta\;ί&omicron\;&upsilon\;\, &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &Zeta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\; &mu\;&eta\;-&epsilon\;&nu\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &epsilon\;&pi\;ί&gamma\;&nu\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\;\, &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; Wittgenstein &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&alpha\; ό&rho\;&iota\;&alpha\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &gamma\;&lambda\;ώ&sigma\;&sigma\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; Heidegger ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &eta\; &sigma\;&kappa\;έ&psi\;&eta\; &pi\;&lambda\;&eta\;&sigma\;&iota\;ά&zeta\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\; &sigma\;&iota\;&omega\;&pi\;ή &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\;. &Eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;-&phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\;\, &epsilon\;&pi\;&omicron\;&mu\;έ&nu\;&omega\;&sigmaf\;\, &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&gamma\;&kappa\;&rho\;&omicron\;&tau\;&epsilon\;ί &kappa\;&lambda\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&sigma\;&tau\;ό &sigma\;ύ&sigma\;&tau\;&eta\;&mu\;&alpha\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά έ&nu\;&alpha\;&nu\; &Alpha\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&chi\;&tau\;ό &Omicron\;&rho\;ί&zeta\;&omicron\;&nu\;&tau\;&alpha\;\, &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&rho\;&kappa\;ή &kappa\;ί&nu\;&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\; &pi\;&rho\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &tau\;&omicron\; Ά&pi\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&rho\;&omicron\; ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &eta\; &epsilon\;&nu\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &omicron\;&mu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&omicron\;&mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;ί&alpha\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &Kappa\;&alpha\;&theta\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &Epsilon\;&nu\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;/&Pi\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&lambda\;&alpha\;&pi\;&lambda\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;\, &delta\;&eta\;&lambda\;&alpha\;&delta\;ή &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &epsilon\;&nu\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &epsilon\;&kappa\;&delta\;&eta\;&lambda\;ώ&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;έ&sigma\;&alpha\; &alpha\;&pi\;ό &tau\;&eta\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&phi\;&omicron\;&rho\;&omicron\;&pi\;&omicron\;ί&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &pi\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&lambda\;&alpha\;&pi\;&lambda\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;\, &gamma\;&epsilon\;&gamma\;&omicron\;&nu\;ό&sigmaf\; &pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&delta\;έ&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;&epsilon\; &tau\;&eta\; &sigma\;ύ&mu\;&pi\;&tau\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&omega\;&nu\; &alpha\;&nu\;&tau\;&iota\;&theta\;έ&tau\;&omega\;&nu\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &Nu\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό&lambda\;&alpha\;&omicron\; &Kappa\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&zeta\;&alpha\;&nu\;ό\, &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &epsilon\;&xi\;&epsilon\;&lambda\;&iota\;&kappa\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &epsilon\;&nu\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; Teilhard de \;Chardin\, &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &pi\;&omicron\;&lambda\;ύ&pi\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&kappa\;&eta\; &sigma\;&kappa\;έ&psi\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; Morin\, &tau\;&eta\; &delta\;&eta\;&mu\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &phi\;&alpha\;&nu\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&iota\;&alpha\;&kappa\;ή &theta\;έ&sigma\;&mu\;&iota\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; Castoriadis &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\; &phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &pi\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&lambda\;&alpha\;&pi\;&lambda\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; Deleuze.
\n&Sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\; &beta\;&alpha\;&theta\;ύ&tau\;&epsilon\;&rho\;&omicron\; &epsilon\;&pi\;ί&pi\;&epsilon\;&delta\;&omicron\;\, &eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;-&phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\; &omicron\;&delta\;&eta\;&gamma\;&epsilon\;ί &sigma\;&tau\;&eta\; &Sigma\;&iota\;&omega\;&pi\;&eta\;&lambda\;ή &Epsilon\;&pi\;ί&gamma\;&nu\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\;\, ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &eta\; &gamma\;&nu\;ώ&sigma\;&eta\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &pi\;&lambda\;έ&omicron\;&nu\; &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&lambda\;&upsilon\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&chi\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&sigma\;ί&alpha\; &mu\;έ&sigma\;&alpha\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\; &Mu\;&upsilon\;&sigma\;&tau\;ή&rho\;&iota\;&omicron\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &epsilon\;&delta\;ώ &eta\; &phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&tau\;&rho\;έ&pi\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&epsilon\; &sigma\;&tau\;ά&sigma\;&eta\; &delta\;έ&omicron\;&upsilon\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&pi\;έ&nu\;&alpha\;&nu\;&tau\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\; ά&rho\;&rho\;&eta\;&tau\;&omicron\;\, ό&pi\;&omega\;&sigmaf\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; Pascal &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&sigmaf\; &lambda\;ό&gamma\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&sigmaf\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&rho\;&delta\;&iota\;ά&sigmaf\;\, &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; Meister Eckhart &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &epsilon\;&sigma\;&omega\;&tau\;&epsilon\;&rho\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &sigma\;&iota\;&omega\;&pi\;ή\, &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; Levinas &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&omicron\; ά&pi\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&rho\;&omicron\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; Ά&lambda\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; Blanchot &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&omicron\; ό&rho\;&iota\;&omicron\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &gamma\;&lambda\;ώ&sigma\;&sigma\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\;. Έ&tau\;&sigma\;&iota\;\, &eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;-&phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &sigma\;&kappa\;έ&psi\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Kappa\;&alpha\;&rho\;&pi\;&omicron\;ύ&zeta\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&delta\;ύ&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &omicron\;&nu\;&tau\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;ί&alpha\; &delta\;&eta\;&mu\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή&sigmaf\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&mu\;ό&rho\;&phi\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ό&chi\;&rho\;&omicron\;&nu\;&alpha\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &upsilon\;&pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&xi\;&iota\;&alpha\;&kappa\;ό&sigmaf\; &tau\;&rho\;ό&pi\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &zeta\;&omega\;ή&sigmaf\;\, ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &eta\; &pi\;&rho\;&alpha\;&gamma\;&mu\;&alpha\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &alpha\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&chi\;&tau\;ή\, &sigma\;&chi\;&epsilon\;&sigma\;&iota\;&alpha\;&kappa\;ή &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &pi\;&omicron\;&iota\;&eta\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή\, &eta\; &gamma\;&nu\;ώ&sigma\;&eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;ώ&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&epsilon\; &sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\;\, &eta\; &epsilon\;&nu\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &phi\;&alpha\;&nu\;&epsilon\;&rho\;ώ&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &pi\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&lambda\;&alpha\;&pi\;&lambda\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &omicron\; ά&nu\;&theta\;&rho\;&omega\;&pi\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&lambda\;&epsilon\;ί&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &nu\;&alpha\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;έ&chi\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&delta\;&eta\;&tau\;ά &sigma\;&tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &kappa\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&mu\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&delta\;&iota\;&kappa\;&alpha\;&sigma\;ί&alpha\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &delta\;&eta\;&mu\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;ί&alpha\;&sigmaf\;\, &beta\;&iota\;ώ&nu\;&omicron\;&nu\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\; &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &Alpha\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&chi\;&tau\;ή &Omicron\;&lambda\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&delta\;&iota\;ά&kappa\;&omicron\;&pi\;&eta\; &kappa\;ί&nu\;&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;έ&sigma\;&alpha\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\; ά&pi\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&rho\;&omicron\; &mu\;&upsilon\;&sigma\;&tau\;ή&rho\;&iota\;&omicron\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; ύ&pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&xi\;&eta\;&sigmaf\;.
ORGANIZER;CN=Abhijith Jose: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260422T180000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260715T170000 SUMMARY:Representations in Minds\, Brains\, and AI UID:20260614T124434Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:This series was prompted by a recent wave of fascinating new work on the topic of representations. We are honored and happy that so many authors agreed to participate and we hope to provide a platform for further interdisciplinary discussion. Most papers are already available and you can find links here: \;https://www.pe.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/philosophie/ii/bewusstsein/lehre.html.en \;
Schedule
22 April\, \;Rosa Cao \;(Stanford): The Scientist in the Machine \;(paper forthcoming)
29 April\, \;Ken Aizawa \;(Rutgers): \;The Evidence for Representation \;
06 May\, \;Corey Maley \;(Purdue): \;Structural Representation is Analog Representation
13 May\, \;Kevin J. Mitchell \;(Dublin): \;The Origins of Meaning: From Pragmatic Control Signals to Semantic Representation
20 May\, \;Eric Hochstein \;(Victoria\, Canada)): \;Neural Representations as Scientific Posits and Metaphysical Entities
10 June\, \;Manolo Martí\;nez \;(Barcelona): \;The Information-Processing Perspective on Representation
17 June\, \;John Krakauer \;(Johns Hopkins/Champalimaud Foundation) &\; \;Bill Ramsey \;(Nevada\, Las Vegas): \;Mental Representation without Neural Representation
24 June\, \;Nina Poth \;(Radboud\, Nijmegen) &\; \;Annika Schuster \;(Dortmund): \;Mental\, Scientific\, and Artificial Representations
01 July\, \;Lotem Elber-Dorozko \;(Jerusalem) &\; \;Devin Gouvê\;a \;(Holy Cross): \;"Neural Representation" is not a Defective Concept
08 July\, \;Zina B. Ward \;(Florida State): \;Directive Representation and the Job Description Challenge
15 July\, \;Krzysztof Dolega \;(Ruhr-University Bochum): The Gloss on the Machine: Egan's Representations in Mechanistic Explanation \;(paper forthcoming)
All sessions will be on Zoom:
https://ruhr-uni-bochum.zoom-x.de/j/64692924755?pwd=803uh1OEPBkBrEONeL87zJFudGjlw7.1 \; \;
Meeting-ID: 646 9292 4755 | Passwort: 531564
Everybody interested is welcome!
Women have long contributed to the development of theology and philosophy\, yet their voices have often been marginalized\, mediated through restrictive frameworks\, or silenced altogether. At the same time\, women have consistently found innovative means of expression &mdash\; from letters\, diaries\, and poetry to public lectures\, activism\, and today&rsquo\;s digital platforms &mdash\; to engage in theological and philosophical discourse.
This seminar approaches communication not only as a neutral means of expression\, but also as a form of power: the choice of medium\, style\, and platform can grant authority\, negotiate legitimacy\, or challenge dominant structures. From early modern women writing in private correspondence to contemporary digital influencers shaping theological debates\, the act of communication becomes a way to establish intellectual presence\, resist exclusion\, rethink society\, or reshape normative traditions.
The rise of digital culture has introduced new dynamics. Social media\, for example\, can amplify women&rsquo\;s perspectives and create alternative networks of recognition\, while also enabling ideologically charged phenomena &mdash\; such as the &ldquo\;tradwife&rdquo\; movement &mdash\; that recast debates about gender\, religion\, and philosophy. Situating such case studies within longer histories of women&rsquo\;s communicative practices allows us to explore continuities\, ruptures\, and tensions between tradition\, innovation\, and the struggle for authority.
The seminar thus invites critical reflections on the interplay of gender\, communication\, and power\, considering both historical trajectories and contemporary challenges. Contributions may address individual thinkers\, broader cultural movements\, or theoretical frameworks that illuminate how female voices have engaged with and transformed theological and philosophical discourse.
28.04.2026\, 4.30-6pm (Paris time): 2 lectures
\nFloris Verhaart &ndash\; Johanna Dorothea Lindenaer: Memoirist\, Translator\, and Religious Polemicist
\nMargaret Matthews &ndash\; Rhetoric\, Method\, and Genre in Gabrielle Suchon&rsquo\;s Treatise on Ethics and Politics
\n\n05.05.2026\, 4.30-6pm (Paris time): 2 lectures
\nElodie Pinel &ndash\; Vernacular Theology and Authority: Marguerite Porete\, Mechthild of Magdeburg\, Hadewijch of Antwerp
\nLila Braunschweig &ndash\; A Voice of One&rsquo\;s Own: Philosophizing as Feminized Subjects (Impostor Syndrome &\; Authority)
\n\n12.05.2026\, 4.30-6pm (Paris time): 2 lectures
\nElżbieta Filipow &ndash\; Women&rsquo\;s Writing of Harriet Taylor Mill and its Various Modes of Self-expression
\nShamoni Sarkar &ndash\; Karoline von Gü\;nderrode: Fragmentation\, Philosophy\, and Early German Romanticism
\n\n19.05.2026\, 4.30-6pm (Paris time): 2 lectures
\nMaxim Demin &ndash\; Philosophy\, God-Seeking\, and Developmental Psychology: Stolitsa and Volkovich in Late Imperial Russia
\nPatricia Guevara Wozniak &ndash\; The Metaphysical Tenacity of Barbara Skarga &ndash\; Metaphysics in Totalitarianism
\n\n02.06.2026\, 4.30-6pm (Paris time): 2 lectures
\nJake Nicholas Brooks &ndash\; Autonomy Beyond Kant: Butler\, Tronto\, and Interdependence
\nKaimé\; Guerrero Valencia &ndash\; Intervening Assemblages of Trans-formation/Action: Beatriz Nascimento (1942-1995)
\n\n09.06.2026\, 4.30-6pm (Paris time): 2 lectures
\nMarianne Najm Abou-Jaoude &ndash\; Beneficent Communication as Power
\nRoula Azar Douglas &ndash\; Women&rsquo\;s Digital Voices and the Reconfiguration of Public Debate
\n\nFor further information about the talks and the speakers\, please visit the webpage: \;
Le Ré\;seau Arendtien Francophone\, cré\;é\; en 2024\, vise à\; favoriser une synergie entre celles et ceux qui\, des amateurs aux chercheuses\, fré\;quentent la pensé\;e de Hannah Arendt. Dans cette optique\, nous cherchons à\; mettre en place un rendez-vous ré\;gulier pour en discuter les diffé\;rents interpré\;tations et aspects.
\nDu fait de l&rsquo\;é\;tendue de la francophonie\, ces sé\;minaires auront lieu en ligne. Leur principe sera le suivant : les participant-e-s auront tous et toutes pré\;alablement lu un article ou un chapitre ré\;cent\, lequel sera pré\;senté\; trè\;s rapidement par souci de prioriser les é\;changes (10 minutes) par son autrice ou auteur. À\; partir de celui-ci\, un-e membre du ré\;seau ouvrira (5 min) à\; un dé\;bat plus large afin de discuter\, outre l&rsquo\;article\, les diffé\;rents interpré\;tations et aspects de l&rsquo\;&oelig\;uvre d&rsquo\;Arendt (1h30).
\nProgramme 2026\nEn 2026\, nous proposons quatre sé\;ances ordinaires du sé\;minaire et une sé\;ance spé\;ciale : «\; Arendt et la science é\;conomique »\;\, «\; Arendt et le travail »\;\, «\; Liberté\;\, volonté\;\, politique »\;\, «\; Arendt et la violence »\;\, «\; Philosophie\, é\;ducation et politique »\;.
\nLe sé\;minaire est ouvert à\; toutes et tous sans inscription pré\;alable \; n&rsquo\;hé\;sitez pas à\; venir y assister et y participer. Les articles et textes discuté\;s sont disponibles sur le site du RAF. N&rsquo\;hé\;sitez pas non plus à\; nous contacter pour toute demande d&rsquo\;information complé\;mentaire.
\nLe RAF ?\nLe Ré\;seau Arendtien Francophone (RAF) se veut un espace divers et pluriel\, rassemblant une communauté\; de doctorant-e-s\, enseignant-e-s\, chercheurs/ses\, intellectuel-le-s et toute personne inté\;ressé\;e ou engagé\;e dans l'é\;tude et la diffusion de la pensé\;e d'Hannah Arendt en France et le monde francophone. À\; travers cette plateforme\, nous souhaitons favoriser les é\;changes intellectuels\, offrir une visibilité\; accrue aux travaux de recherche et cré\;er des liens solides entre francophones s'inté\;ressant à\; et puisant dans l'&oelig\;uvre de cette autrice majeure du XXe siè\;cle.
\nOutre l&rsquo\;organisation de ce sé\;minaire et d'é\;vè\;nements acadé\;miques lié\;s à\; la pensé\;e d'Arendt\, le ré\;seau actualise continuellement un site web qui met à\; disposition : une bibliographie des textes de langue franç\;aise consacré\;s à\; Arendt ou la mobilisant\, un annuaire des membres du ré\;seau\, un agenda des activité\;s francophones qui lui sont dé\;dié\;es et une lettre d'information mensuelle.
\nN'hé\;sitez pas à\; rejoindre le ré\;seau ou à\; nous contacter pour rejoindre l&rsquo\;é\;quipe d&rsquo\;animation !
\n ORGANIZER;CN="Rémi Zanni": METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260523T130000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260620T170000 SUMMARY:Introduction to Chaos Theory UID:20260614T124437Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:COURSE DESCRIPTION
\nSlowly crystallizing throughout the 20th century and popularized in the 1980s\, chaos theory is a loosely defined set of transdisciplinary scientific research that cuts through virtually every branch of disciplinary sciences\, and even the humanities: for the butterfly effect applies not only to tornadoes but also to the stock exchange\, and self-organization is not limited to ants and termite architecture (termite mounds!)\, but is a crucial element in revolutionary movements\; bifurcation does occur in trees\, but also in decisions humans take\, and vast complexity takes shape in migrating populations\, but no less in the human brain. In short\, chaos theory turns out to be so universal that we might be in the making of an entirely &ldquo\;new science\,&rdquo\; as some authors claim\, or at least of a new paradigm beyond reductionism\, calling for a new metaphysics.
\nBut in talking this way\, are we not confusing chaos theory with cybernetics\, yet another field of transdisciplinary research that originated in the 1940s and as well functions with feedback loops? &hellip\; A total system of control that Heidegger had warned against?
\nWe can never know for sure. In this seminar\, we will treat chaos theory as the flipside of cybernetics\, arguing for unpredictability against control\, for freedom against determinism. For no matter how &ldquo\;adaptive&rdquo\; cybernetic systems may appear to capture each and every step we take\, chaos is essentially ungraspable and always one step further than the system.
\nCOURSE MATERIALS
\nSince the material on chaos theory is vast and at times not easy to digest\, we will focus on some key texts that initially gave shape to the wicked world of chaos theory. While chaos theory is a holistic set of co-dependent concepts which cannot be analyzed in isolation\, each session will zoom in on one of these concepts while maintaining its relations to the whole.
\nPDFs of all the readings will be provided upon registration. No prior knowledge is required.
\nTIME
\n5 SATURDAYS\, weekly\, beginning May 23\, 2026.
1-3 PM \;Eastern US Time.
SESSIONS
\nFACILITATOR
\nHaving lived and studied all around the world\, Hannes Schumacher works at the threshold between philosophy and art. He has carried out intensive research on Hegel and Deleuze\, and he has also published widely on Nishida\, Nāgārjuna\, chaos theory\, global mysticism\, and contemporary art. Hannes is the founder of the Berlin-based publisher Freigeist Verlag and co-founder of the grassroots art space Chaosmos &infin\; in Athens\, Greece. He has facilitated the following courses and groups at Incite Seminars: &ldquo\;Nishida Kitarō: The Logic of Place and the Religious Worldview&rdquo\;\; &ldquo\;Who&rsquo\;s Afraid of Hegel: Introduction to G. W. F. Hegel&rsquo\;s Science of Logic&rdquo\;\; &ldquo\;Chaos Research Group&rdquo\;\; &ldquo\;Reading After Finitude by Quentin Meillassoux&rdquo\;\; &ldquo\;Deleuze &\; Guattari: What is Philosophy?&rdquo\;\; &ldquo\;Plato&rsquo\;s chô\;ra through the lens of Derrida&rdquo\;\; &ldquo\;Anarchia and Archai: Reimagining the Pre-Socratics&rdquo\; (with Carlos A. Segovia)\; &ldquo\;Reading Nietzsche&rsquo\;s Zarathustra&rdquo\; (current)\; &ldquo\;Liana of the Resurrected&rdquo\;\; and &ldquo\;The Body without Organs.&rdquo\;
\nINCITE SEMINARS
\nWe are a mix \;of rogue scholars\, disgruntled academics\, disenchanted buddhists\, enchantment-hungry anarchists\, radical therapists\, and general weirdos looking to create autonomous and accessible forms of &ldquo\;higher education.&rdquo\;
\nWe offer \;online seminars and reading groups to incite personal exploration and inspire community action. Incite Seminars offers \;an educational \;experience. We do so by gathering an engaged group of participants for a dynamic exchange of ideas\, led by skilled facilitators. All of our facilitators have a deep relationship to a subject or topic through intensive study or practice.
\nIncite Seminars is a 100% member-supported learning community. \;We depend on member contributions to continue holding space for radical study and practice groups\, putting on rigorous seminars and courses\, and providing our facilitators and organizers with fair compensation. \;If you are unable to pay the full amount for a session or membership at this time\, we invite you to join us at \;reduced or no cost with our Solidarity option.
ORGANIZER;CN=Glenn Wallis: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=America/Chicago:20260526T090000 DTEND;TZID=America/Chicago:20260530T170000 SUMMARY:New Perspectives in Philosophy of Psychiatry (AAPP 2025/ VMST-14) UID:20260614T124438Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:America/Chicago LOCATION:University of Texas at Dallas\, Richardson\, United States\, 75080 DESCRIPTION:This is a joint conference co-sponsored by the Association for the Advancement of Philosophy and Psychiatry (AAPP) and the Center for Values in Medicine\, Science\, and Technology (CVMST) at UT Dallas. The topic of the conference is New Perspectives in Philosophy of Psychiatry\, although presentations on any topic in philosophy of psychiatry are welcome.
ORGANIZER;CN=Jonathan Y. Tsou;CN=Robyn Bluhm;CN="Şerife Tekin";CN=Peter Zachar;CN=John Sadler: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Brussels:20260528T120000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Brussels:20260530T170000 SUMMARY:Leuven Kant Conference UID:20260614T124439Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:Europe/Brussels LOCATION:Andreas Vesaliusstraat 2\, Leuven\, Belgium DESCRIPTION:Program (please see the website for more details):
\n\;
\n\;
\n\;
\nMay 28
\n\;
\n\;
\nAman Sakhardande (University of Toronto) &ndash\; Is Time an A Priori Representation? Kant contra Locke
\n\;
\nDavid Sommer (University College London) &ndash\; Forma dat esse rei: Lambert and the Origin of Kant&rsquo\;s Transcendental Hylomorfism
\n\;
\nYinfei Xu (University of Bonn / Renmin University of China) &ndash\; The Dual Meaning of Kant&rsquo\;s Concept of Freedom and its Origin: Taking the Dialogue in the New Elucidation as a Point of Entry
\n\nJoel Thiago Klein (Goethe-University Frankfurt / Federal University of Paraná\;) &ndash\; Pratical Reason in Practice: The Case of Revolution and the Issue of Conflicting Moral Duties in Kant's Practical Philosophy
\n\;
\n\;
\nKeynote: Antoine Grandjean (Université\; de Lille) &ndash\; A German Philosopher: A Contextual Reading of the Kant-Constant Controversy
Respondent: Martina Favaretto (University of Groningen)
\n \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \;
\;
\nMay 29
\n\;
\n\;
\nMarí\;a Guadalupe Martinez Fischer (Paranamerican University) &ndash\; The Idea of the &ldquo\;State of Nature&rdquo\; in the Critique of Pure Reason
\n\nShahab Vesali (KU Leuven) &ndash\; The Dual Sense of Self-Consciousness in Kant &rsquo\;s Critique of Pure Reason
\n\;
\nCaleb Reidy (University of Pittsburgh) &ndash\; Objective Validity as Truth-Entailing in Kant
\n\;
\nBennet Salzmann (University of Heidelberg) &ndash\; Kant&rsquo\;s Stoic Concept of Moral Progress
\n\;
\nCarolina Paulsen (Federal University of Pelotas / University of Hamburg) &ndash\; From Egoism to Cosmopolitanism: Kant&rsquo\;s Vision of Human Nature and the Path to Perpetual Peace
\n\;
\n\;
\nKeynote: Melissa Merritt (University of New South Wales) &ndash\; Kant and Stoic Cosmopolitanism
Respondent: Marijana Vujosevic (Leiden University)
\n\;
\n\;
\n\nMay 30
\n\;
\n\;
\nYuyue Zhang (Tsinghua University) &ndash\; Pure Music and the Unity of Kant&rsquo\;s Aesthetic System
\n\;
\nKavin Chada (Indiana University) &ndash\; A Third Kind of Causality in Kant&rsquo\;s Third Critique?
\n\;
\nMartin Obreque (Diego Portales University / Complutense University of Madrid) &ndash\; &ldquo\;Freiheit ist das ursprü\;ngliche Leben&rdquo\;: The Concept of Life in Kant&rsquo\;s Critical Philosophy
\n\;
\nCarlina Schreiber (University of Cologne) &ndash\; Kant on &ldquo\;Inner Morality&rdquo\; and Political Obligation
\n\;
\nMichael Kryluk (University of Friburg) &ndash\; Kant and Democracy: Republicanism vs Despotism\, Representation vs Populism
\n\n\;
\nKeynote: Konstantin Pollok (Johannes-Gutenberg University Mainz) &ndash\; Kant&rsquo\;s Road to Perpetual Peace: On the Concluding Remark of the Doctrine of Right
\n\nRespondent: Egyle Hannah do Nascimiento Lopes (Federal University of Paraná\; / University of Vechta)
\n\n\n\;
\nOrganizers: Karin de Boer (KU Leuven)\, David Del Bianco (KU Leuven)\, Shahab Vesali (KU Leuven)\, Henny Blomme (Université\; libre de Bruxelles)
ORGANIZER;CN=Karin de Boer;CN=Luis Fellipe Garcia;CN=Shahab Vesali;CN=Henny Blomme: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260528T163000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260924T170000 SUMMARY:Inner Speech Colloquium UID:20260614T124440Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:We are happy to announce another season of the online Inner Speech colloquium starting next month\, with a new list of speakers: \;
\n- May 28th - Gary Lupyan (University of Wisconsin-Madison)
\n- June 25th - \;Kasia Jaszczolt (University of Cambridge)
\n- July 16th - \;Romain Bourdoncle (Collè\;ge de France) &\; Axel Baptista (Institut Jean Nicod)
\n- August 20th - Aleksandr Fadeev (University of Leuven)
\n- September 24th - Keith Frankish (University of Sheffield) \;
\nTimes are all 16:30 CEST
\nMore info about the first talk coming soon. We hope to see many of you there next month! For more information or to subscribe to the mailing list\, contact: jonida.kodra@uni-osnabrueck.de
\nBest regards\,
\nJonida Kodra\, Daniel Mü\;ller and Mathijs Geurts (University of Osnabrü\;ck and \;University of Salzburg)
ORGANIZER;CN=Jonida Kodra;CN=Mathijs Geurts;CN="Daniel Lennart Müller": METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Bucharest:20260529T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Bucharest:20260531T170000 SUMMARY:Measuring the Mind - Conceptual Issues in Psychology\, Psychiatry and Cognitive Science UID:20260614T124441Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:Europe/Bucharest LOCATION:Faculty of Philosophy\, Splaiul Independentei\, 204\, Romania DESCRIPTION:Psychology\, psychiatry\, and cognitive science increasingly rely on sophisticated measurement technologies while remaining tied to inherited assumptions about what is being measured. Many constructs&mdash\;emotion\, memory\, attention\, intelligence\, disorder&mdash\;are still treated as if they were stable\, homogeneous\, mind‑independent natural kinds with latent quantitative essences\, even as empirical work reveals pervasive heterogeneity\, context‑sensitivity\, and replication failure across domains such as affective neuroscience\, psychopathology\, and social cognition. At the same time\, related debates in the philosophy of biology\, metaphysics\, and cognitive ontology emphasize conceptual relativity and the need to re‑engineer scientific categories in light of concept‑laden evidence.
\nThis conference asks what follows for \;measurement \;and \;classification \;if psychological and psychiatric categories are better understood as populations of variable\, situated instances or relational patterns\, rather than as tokens of fixed types. How should we think about constructs\, latent variables\, and diagnostic entities if variation is ontologically primary and averages are statistical abstractions? When do our instruments partially constitute the phenomena they purport to detect? To what extent do replication &ldquo\;failures&rdquo\; reveal construct instability or ontological mismatch rather than methodological error?
\nWe invite contributions from philosophy of psychology and psychiatry\, philosophy of cognitive science\, philosophy of biology\, metaphysics and metametaphysics\, as well as empirically oriented work in psychology\, psychiatry\, and neuroscience that engages these conceptual issues. Topics include\, but are not limited to: cognitive and psychiatric ontology\; natural kinds\, homeostatic property clusters and relational or internal realism\; measurement theory\, psychometrics and the &ldquo\;quantitative imperative&rdquo\;\; classification and re‑classification in psychiatry and cognitive science (e.g.\, RDoC\, HiTOP)\; construct instability and the replication crisis\; predictive processing and constructionist theories of mind and emotion\; and the concept‑ladenness of evidence and data‑driven ontology re‑engineering.
\nOur aim is to articulate and critically assess conceptual frameworks that could underpin a &ldquo\;variation‑first&rdquo\; science of mind\, in which explanation\, generalization\, and measurement are explicitly aligned with the heterogeneous\, context‑bound phenomena they target.
\nThe conference is organised by the Faculty of Philosophy\, University of Bucharest\, and is open to \;MA and PhD students\, early PhDs and postdocs\, as well as established researchers in philosophy of psychology\, psychiatry\, cognitive science\, philosophy of biology\, and related empirical fields.
\nDate: May 29-31
\nFormat: mixed \;(in‑person and online)
\nContact email:measuringthemind@gmail.com
\nOrganizers: \;
\nDrd. Daniela Nica
\nDrd. Sandra Branzaru
\nConference programme / Agenda Day 1
\n09:00 &ndash\; 10:00 \;(Keynote speaker)
Laurențiu Staicu \;(in person) &mdash\; University of Bucharest\, Faculty of Philosophy\, Romania
Are Mental Disorders Natural Kinds?
10:00 &ndash\; 11:00 \;(Keynote speaker)
Markus Eronen \;(online) &mdash\; Department of Theoretical Philosophy\, University of Groningen\, The Netherlands
Causal Complexity and Psychological Measurement
11:00 &ndash\; 12:00 \;(Keynote speaker)
Marco Viola \;(online) &mdash\; Università\; degli Studi Roma Tre\, Italy
The Fox and the Grapes. The Impact of Neuroimaging Data on Cognitive Ontology
\n12:00 &ndash\; 12:30
Diogo Telles-Correia / Elena Popa \;(online) &mdash\; University of Lisbon\, Psychiatry Department\, Lisbon\, Portugal / Universidad de Sevilla\, Department of Philosophy
Competing yet Persistent Paradigms in Psychiatry: Pluralism and the Dynamics of Scientific Change
\n12:30 &ndash\; 14:00
Lunch break
14:00 &ndash\; 15:00 \;(Keynote speaker)
Jana Uher \;(online) &mdash\; School of Human Sciences\, University of Greenwich\, United Kingdom
Measuring the Mind? Psychometrics versus Genuine Measurement
15:00 &ndash\; 16:00 \;(Keynote speaker)
Jolien Francken \;(online) &mdash\; Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences\, University of Amsterdam\, The Netherlands
Cognitive Ontology and the Search for Neural Mechanisms: Three Foundational Problems
16:00 &ndash\; 17:00 \;(Keynote speaker)
Andrei Miu \;(in person) &mdash\; Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory\, Department of Psychology\, Faculty of Psychology and Sciences of Education\, Babeș-Bolyai University\, Cluj-Napoca\, Romania
Emotion and Cognition: More Similar than Different?
18:00 &ndash\; 19:00 \;(Keynote speaker)
Steven Gouveia \;(in person) &mdash\; Mind\, Language and Action Group\, University of Porto\, Portugal
Measuring Predictive Minds and AIs
Day 2
\n09:00 &ndash\; 09:30
Aidan Runagall-McNaull \;(online) &mdash\; Uehiro Institute\, Oxford University\, United Kingdom
Dynamic\, Context-Sensitive Evaluative Attitudes
09:30 &ndash\; 10:00
Volodymyr Tymoshenko \;(in person) &mdash\; University of Bucharest\, Faculty of Philosophy\, Romania
Why Theory of Mind Fails as a Framework for Understanding Autism
10:30 &ndash\; 11:00
Pä\;ivi Hä\;kkinen \;(online) &mdash\; University of Eastern\, Finland
What Becomes of Identity: Measuring Psychological Constructs &ndash\; The Case of Shyness
11:00 &ndash\; 11:30
Eric Lampe \;(in person) &mdash\; Otto-von-Guericke-Universitä\;t Magdeburg\, Germany
Metaphysical Commitment and the Explanatory Power of Structuralist Methodologies in the Mind Sciences
12:00 &ndash\; 14:00
Lunch break
14:00 &ndash\; 14:30
Ranjeet Kumar Verma \;(online) &mdash\; Indian Institute of Technology\, Indian School of Mines\, Dhanbad
Measuring the Mind or Constructing It? A Vedāntic Critique of Psychological Measurement
14:30 &ndash\; 15:00
Cristiano Bacchi / Giacomo Piselli Fioroni \;(in person) &mdash\; School of Psychology\, University of Padua / Berlin School of Mind and Brain\, Humboldt-Universitä\;t zu Berlin / University of Perugia
What Is &ldquo\;Disordered&rdquo\; in &ldquo\;Mental Disorder&rdquo\;? Questions of Boundaries
15:00 &ndash\; 15:30
Kardelen Kü\;ç\;ü\;k \;(online) &mdash\; The University of Western Ontario\, Canada
How Should We Understand Precision in Psychiatry?
16:00 &ndash\; 16:30
Tobias Sandoval \;(online) &mdash\; University of Texas\, Austin\, United States of America
Background Conditions and Emotional Kinds
\n16:30 &ndash\; 17:00
Ariel Gonç\;alves \;(online) &mdash\; Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais / Université\; Grenoble Alpes\, France
Episodic Simulation: A Case Report of Theory-Ladenness in Cognitive Neuroscience
\n17:30 &ndash\; 18:00
Ilir Isufi \;(online) &mdash\; University of Cincinnati\, United States of America
What to Make of Replication Failures in Linguistic Relativity Research?
18:00 &ndash\; 19:00 (Keynote speaker)
Ingo Brigandt \;(online) &mdash\; Department of Philosophy\, University of Alberta\, Edmonton\, Canada
Representing and Explaining Cognitive Diversity
Day 3 (online only)
\n09:00 &ndash\; 09:30
Alexandra-Ioana Dim \;(online) &mdash\; University of Bucharest\, Faculty of Philosophy\, Romania
Are ToM Tests Language-Biased and Anthropomorphized? ToM and LLMs
09:30 &ndash\; 10:00
Ari Belenkiy \;(online) &mdash\; Independent researcher
The Role of Algebraic Topology in Our Intuition of Numbers
10:00 &ndash\; 10:45
Daniela Nica \;(in person) &mdash\; University of Bucharest\, Faculty of Philosophy\, Romania
Benign Concept&ndash\;Evidence Loops: Psychological Constructionism and Cognitive Ontology
\n11:00 &ndash\; 11:30
Sorin Moisescu \;(online) &mdash\; Faculty of Philosophy\, University of Bucharest \;
Self-Knowledge and Second-Order Knowledge by the Lens of Sensation
\n12:00 &ndash\; 12:30
Gina Săndulescu \;(online) &mdash\; University of Bucharest\, Department of Philosophy\, Romania
Measuring Noise Sensitivity. Psychometric Limitations and the Micro-Phenomenological Perspective
Register below:
ORGANIZER;CN=Daniela Nica;CN=Sandra-Catalina Branzaru: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Bucharest:20260531T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Bucharest:20260601T170000 SUMMARY:Conceptualising the Self UID:20260614T124442Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:Europe/Bucharest LOCATION:Splaiul Independentei nr. 204\, Bucharest\, Romania DESCRIPTION:New approaches and advances in philosophy\, psychology\, neuroscience\, and rising interest and development in alternative views regarding the concept of self\, gave rise to novel discussions and debates about what constitutes the self\, or even if there is such a &ldquo\;thing&rdquo\; as a self. Therefore\, Conceptualising the Self aims to bring together researchers working in fields such as (but not limited to): philosophy\, cognitive science\, psychology\, neuroscience\, sociology\, anthropology\, in order further our understanding and promote interdisciplinary dialogue concerning novel developments that have implications for how the self is conceived.
\nWe encourage contributions addressing the following questions:
\nIf you want to attend the event may register at the ubphilosophymasters@gmail.com (or by RSVP here on PhilEvents) on or before the 31st of May in order to receive the Zoom connection details if you want to attend online.
\nThe conference will take place on May 31st and July 1st in Bucharest\, Romania. It will have a mixed format\, in that speakers may choose whether they present online only or face to face at the event's location (if so\, their session will enjoy a live audience\, but it will also be streamed to remote participants).
ORGANIZER;CN=Daniel Cristian Stancu;CN=Sandra-Catalina Branzaru: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20260601T103000 DTEND;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20260601T120000 SUMMARY:Talking to Myself: AI and Diachronicity UID:20260614T124443Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:Australia/Melbourne LOCATION:Deakin Downtown\, Melbourne\, Australia\, 3008 DESCRIPTION:Title: Talking to Myself: AI and Diachronicity
\nAbstract: In 2023 artist/scientist Michelle Huang fed selections from her childhood diaries to GPT-3\, creating a chatbot version of her younger self with whom she had an extensive conversation. In this talk\, I reflect on Huang&rsquo\;s experiment as a jumping off point for thinking about diachronic self-experience. I identify two distinct goals Huang describes for this conversation\, determining what her younger self would think of how her life turned out and furthering her &ldquo\;inner child&rdquo\; work\, and argue that these goals presuppose very different views of our sense of self-in-time. Both views are widespread in philosophy and in everyday thought. I consider what the fact that both seem so well-entrenched suggests for our diachronic nature\, sketching a view according to which our characteristic sense of self-in-time derives from our ongoing negotiation of these two different forms of self-understanding. Although these conclusions do not rest directly on use of technology in Huang&rsquo\;s conversation\, the role played by AI makes the conclusions I draw easier to see and adds some new wrinkles.
\nBio: Marya Schechtman is Chair and Professor of Philosophy at the University of Illinois Chicago\, where she is also an affiliate of the Laboratory of Integrative Neuroscience. She is the author of The Constitution of Selves (Cornell\, 1996)\, Staying Alive: Personal Identity and the Unity of a Life (Oxford\, 2014)\, and The Self\, A Very Short Introduction (Oxford\, 2024) as well as numerous articles on personal identity and the self. \;
\nZoom Link: \;https://deakin.zoom.us/j/87022307848?pwd=qE9pRvjtQab9iWii0MyDewMFlAh8xd.1
\nMeeting ID: 870 2230 7848 // \;Password: 14757978
\nThis meeting is at 10:30am Australian Eastern Standard Time (AEST) 1 June 2026 [12am GMT 1 June 2026]
ORGANIZER;CN=Patrick Stokes: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20260601T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20260601T090000 SUMMARY:Artifices: technology\, thought\, art UID:20260614T124444Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:Europe/Warsaw LOCATION:EJSMONDA 2\, Gdynia\, Poland DESCRIPTION:artifices -- 6th Ereignis Conference -- sets out to examine artificial intelligence as alterity\, desiring-machine\, and symbolic force that reorganizes human subjectivity\, labour\, and planetary life. Drawing on philosophies from Levinas and Sartre to Lacan\, Deleuze and Guattari\, we question the natural/artificial binary and ask whether thinking machines represent radical ethical encounter or algorithmic reduction of the Other.
\nKey questions include: \;
\nThe 6th interdisciplinary Ereignis conference will take place on August 8 and 9\, 2026 at Hotel Nadmorski in Gdynia\, Poland\, with a hybrid option for those unable to attend in person. Registration will be required.
\nDeadline for proposals: 1 June 2026.
\nFor more information and to submit your proposal: https://conference.ereignis.no/
ORGANIZER;CN=Torgeir Fjeld: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260601T143000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260601T160000 SUMMARY:Expressive Classifiers in Mandarin Chinese UID:20260614T124445Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:The Slurring Terms Across Languages (STAL) network (https://sites.google.com/view/stalnetwork/home)\, an international and interdisciplinary network whose primary aim is to promote work on slurs\, pejoratives\, expressives and evaluative terms from less studied languages\, invites you to the ninth and last talk of the 2025-2026 academic year. The invited speaker is Mingya Liu \;(Humboldt University of Berlin) who will give a talk entitled \;"Expressive Classifiers in Mandarin Chinese" \;(see the abstract below). The event will take place online on Monday\, JUNE 1\, 14:30-16:00 Central European Summer Time (CEST)\, and is part of the of STAL network seminar series (program here: https://sites.google.com/view/stalnetwork/seminar). If you want to participate\, please write to stalnetwork@gmail.com for the Zoom link.
\nAll welcome!
\nABSTRACT:
\nIn this talk\, I will present two case studies of expressive language in Mandarin Chinese\, both of which involve classifiers. In one case\, classifiers such as "wei" and "zun" express honorification towards the token or kind denotation of the head noun. In the other case\, expressive vocatives in Mandarin Chinese\, contain the second person pronoun and the generic classifier "ge" and they express antihonorifiation towards the addressee. I will present a uniform multidimensional account of both phenomena\, where the difference lies in whether the semantic composition relies on a type-shift operation or not.
ORGANIZER;CN=Isidora Stojanovic;CN=Dan Zeman: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260601T150000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260601T163000 SUMMARY:AI and the gaps on the bright side of responsibility UID:20260614T124446Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:Call for Participation
AP in V4 Lecture Series &mdash\; Analytic Philosophy in Visegrad Countries
Title: AI and the gaps on the bright side of responsibility
Speaker: Daniela Vacek (Slovak Academy of Sciences)
Date and time: 1st of June 2026\, 15:00&ndash\;16:30 CET (3:00&ndash\;4:30 p.m. CET)
Format: Online lecture \;
Organised by: Matej Bel University in Banská\; Bystrica (Slovakia)\, University of Ostrava (Czech Republic)\, and University of Warsaw (Poland)\, with the support of the Visegrad Fund.
Project website: https://ff.osu.eu/ap-in-v4/
Lecture series page: https://ff.osu.eu/ap-in-v4/lectures/
If you are interested in joining\, please contact: zuzana.rybarikova@osu.cz
Abstract:
I will present a view of gaps in praiseworthiness (known as AI achievement gaps).
This view accepts that such gaps are a genuine concern but also shows that they can be
filled. This activity of &ldquo\;filling a gap&rdquo\;\, however\, requires stretching certain concepts (such as
collective\, vicarious\, or proxy responsibility) beyond their standard boundaries. Doing so\, this
approach allows for ascribing responsibility for the good (or even neutral) outcomes of AI
systems to human stakeholders.
About the speaker
Daniela Vacek is a philosopher based in Bratislava and a researcher affiliated with the Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences and Comenius University in Bratislava. Her work brings together AI ethics\, responsibility\, aesthetics\, and philosophical logic\, with particular interests in artificial intelligence\, fiction and poetry\, and hyperintensional logic. She also led the international Pavel Tichý\; project\, Pavel Tichý\; on Individuals\, Roles\, and God\, a three-year research project supported by the Ian Ramsey Centre at the University of Oxford and funded by the John Templeton Foundation. Her publication record includes recent and forthcoming work in Analysis\, AI &\; Society\, Ethics and Information Technology\, AI and Ethics\, and Synthese\, as well as earlier papers in venues such as British Journal of Aesthetics\, Logic Journal of the IGPL\, Organon F\, and Filozofia.
\n ORGANIZER;CN=Tadeusz Ciecierski;CN="Zuzana Rybaříková";CN="Miloš Taliga": METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260601T151500 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260601T164500 SUMMARY:Fear of Social Indeterminacy UID:20260614T124447Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:The Collective Ethics Seminar: Online Presentation &ndash\; 1 June 2026 &ndash\; 15.15 &ndash\; 16.45 CEST / 09.15 &ndash\; 10.45 EST
Kevin Richardson - Fear of Social Indeterminacy
On Monday 1 June 2026\, Kevin Richardson (Duke University) will give a presentation in the Collective Ethics Seminar entitled &lsquo\;Fear of Social Indeterminacy&rsquo\;.
Abstract: Social norms and policies are often built around determinate social category classifications. For example\, the black/white\, male/female\, straight/gay binaries are often taken to be absolute classifications. When determinate classification schemes are violated\, there is often widespread social fear and panic. This fear could be described as fear of social indeterminacy\, but it is tricky to determine what such fear could amount to. A person can fear a determinate object or event\, or they can experience uncertainty-induced fear\, but it is unclear what it means for them to fear indeterminacy itself. In this presentation\, I argue that fear of social indeterminacy is often best understood as the fear of metaphysical indeterminacy. If I am correct\, metaphysical indeterminacy can play an explanatory role in the context of ordinary\, object-directed emotions.
The online seminar is open for all to attend. The session starts at 15.15 CEST / 09.15 EST. You can join the session via the following link: https://univienna.zoom.us/j/62736288881?pwd=SndEdTNoNlZtSzJqcmpabm5NaWIyUT09
For more information about the seminar\, please see https://social.univie.ac.at/events/collective-ethics-seminar/. We hope to see you at the seminar!
Kind regards\,
Gunnar Bjö\;rnsson (Stockholm University)\, Kenneth Silver (Trinity College Dublin)\, and Niels de Haan (University of Vienna)
When: Tuesday June 3\, at 11am in Houston and Nashville
\nWhere: \;https://riceuniversity.zoom.us/j/95097231463?pwd=MJPessWBzOphk7kDax5u6D2NpiB6In.1
\nWho: Jon Garthoff
\nWhat: "The Independent Value of Conscious Individuals"
\nAbstract
\nIn this presentation I both explain the value of conscious individuals and motivate the centrality of that value in ethical theory. In so doing I sketch important sections of a more general account of value. This includes clarifying distinctions often not marked with care\, including the distinction between value in general and goodness in particular. I also indicate how this account of value illuminates other important topics\, such as moral obligation and meaningfulness. In all these domains\, the view developed here steers a middle course between deflating the objectivity of the domain and grounding its objectivity in a speculative posit. The presentation thus proposes a ground for ethics that is both objective and mundane. Given the scope of these ambitions they cannot be carried through completely. But I aim to motivate interest in the approach\, one that differs from more familiar Neo-Aristotelian and Neo-Kantian views while synthesizing important insights drawn from those traditions. I aim also to reorient thinking about moral status\, extending this idea beyond morality and advancing our understanding of the value of individuals beyond the decades-old insights of Christine Korsgaard and Tom Regan. Lastly\, I aim to help liberate objective ethical theory from premodern vestiges that identify the foundation of what matters with the highest or most perfect value.
ORGANIZER;CN=Uriah Kriegel: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=Pacific/Auckland:20260603T040000 DTEND;TZID=Pacific/Auckland:20260603T040000 SUMMARY:2026 AAP Conference UID:20260614T124449Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:Pacific/Auckland LOCATION:Knighton Road\, Hamilton\, New Zealand DESCRIPTION:Held annually since 1923\, our 2026 Conference will be hosted by \;The University of Waikato \;- Te Whare Wānanga o Waikato\, Hamilton\, New Zealand.
\n\nThe conference is designed to give professional philosophers and philosophy postgraduate students the opportunity to present and discuss papers in all areas of philosophy. \;
\nThis year's conference is offered fully \;hybrid\, with all sessions streamed.
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260602T163000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260602T180000 SUMMARY:Talk 9: Autonomy Beyond Kant: Butler\, Tronto\, and Interdependence. Talk 10: ntervening Assemblages of Trans-formation/Action: Beatriz Nascimento (1942–1995) UID:20260614T124450Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:Register here: https://indico.uni-paderborn.de/event/156/
\n02.06.2026\, 4.30-6pm (Paris time)
\nJake Nicholas Brooks - Autonomy Beyond Kant: Butler\, Tronto\, and Interdependence
\nThe aim of this contribution is to highlight - from a standpoint of intersectional critique &ndash\; the limitation of the Kantian conception of autonomy\, grounded on a male and autonomous subject\, that has shaped Western philosophical and theological discourses. The contribution will develop along two complementary lines. First\, drawing on Butler&rsquo\;s critique of the State of Nature tradition\, it will show how the subject of modern philosophy has always been conceived as already adult\, male\, and autonomous\, thus masking the condition of dependency inherent to human beings. Butler&rsquo\;s analysis reveals how this framework is produced through exclusions of those identities\, which are shaped by gender oppression and racialization. Butler&rsquo\;s work demonstrates that dependency is not a deviation from the norm\, rather a constitutive feature of human life. Secondly\, relying on Tronto&rsquo\;s care ethic\, the contribution will argue that humanity is better understood as grounded on interdependence\, where care relationships are not only fundamental for democratic societies\, but also for a responsible and adequate care of human beings. Tronto&rsquo\;s analysis highlights how the unequal distribution of care labor - which is historically borne by women or racialized and marginalized groups - is grounded on &ldquo\;passes&rdquo\; given to men\, that exempt them from care responsibilities. Through Tronto&rsquo\;s theory it will become clear that a model of humanity grounded on interdependence and responsibility is necessary for a more equal ethical and political life. Through this two-fold analysis\, this contribution aims at demonstrating the necessity for an ontological shift: it is necessary to overcome the conception of humanity as male-centered\, autonomous and self-made\, to a vision of humanity as interdependent\, needy\, vulnerable\, and relational.
\nAbout the Speaker: Jake Nicholas Brooks is MA graduate with honors in Philosophy at University of Rome &ldquo\;La Sapienza&rdquo\;. His research interests revolve around Political Philosophy\, Feminist Theories\, and Gender Studies. He carried out a thesis on the Habermasian conception of progress. He has published an article in double-blind peer review for Quaderni Leif - ethical and moral journal from the University of of Catania - on Tronto&rsquo\;s ethics&rsquo\;s of care and Simone Weil&rsquo\;s perspective on war. He is currently working on a paper for Etica-Mente\, another journal of University of Catania\, concerning Tronto&rsquo\;s conception of interdependence
\n\;
\nKaimé\; Guerrero Valencia - Intervening Assemblages of Trans-formation/Action: Beatriz Nascimento (1942-1995)
\nThis paper examines the intellectual\, artistic\, and political contributions of Beatriz Nascimento (1942&ndash\;1995)\, a leading figure of Brazil&rsquo\;s Black Movement. It situates her work at the intersection of historiography\, aesthetics\, and political theory\, showing how she developed innovative conceptual and methodological tools to contest colonial structures of knowledge and create new practices of Black autonomy. Through an interdisciplinary analysis of her essays\, poetry\, archival materials\, and the documentary Ô\;rí\; (1989)\, the paper argues that Nascimento\, by mobilizing writing\, film\, and activism as intertwined strategies\, elaborates a distinct theoretical\, methodological\, and ethical approach that redefines Black historiography\, advances the conception of a Black utopia\, and reconfigures the quilombo (maroon societies) as a political and existential category. At the core of Nascimento&rsquo\;s oeuvre is the concept of trans-formaç\;ã\;o/aç\;ã\;o\, a neologism that denotes processes of transformation enacted through language. She theorizes language not as a neutral medium but as a site of material and historical change\, capable of unsettling hegemonic orders and generating new forms of collective subjectivity. The paper demonstrates how she strategically combined academic\, poetic\, and cinematic registers to transform language itself into an instrument of resistance. Nascimento&rsquo\;s work establishes the conditions for new forms of Black historiography in which freedom is articulated not as an abstract universal but as a lived and collective practice. Her oeuvre constitutes an embodied\, aesthetic\, and political historiography of the Black diaspora\, in which the quilombo functions as both archive and horizon of freedom\, and Black utopia materializes through collective practices of memory\, writing\, and resistance.
\nAbout the Speaker: Kaimé\; Guerrero Valencia were born in Quito\, Ecuador\, and has been living in Berlin for ten years. They studied sociology and political science at the Pontificia Universidad Cató\;lica del Ecuador\, followed by a MA degree in interdisciplinary Latin American studies with a gender profile at the Free University of Berlin. They are currently completing their PhD in the Collaborative Research Center Intervening Arts in the Faculty of Humanities at the University of Duisburg-Essen. Their research interests include the intersections between aesthetic\, political and scientific processes in the production of alternative forms of word-making
ORGANIZER;CN=Marguerite El Asmar Bou Aoun;CN=Jil Muller;CN=Daniel Fischer;CN=Katia Raya Rami: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Brussels:20260603T093000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Brussels:20260604T170000 SUMMARY:Institutional Inertia and Transformation UID:20260614T124451Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:Europe/Brussels LOCATION:Cleveringaplaats 1\, Leiden\, Netherlands\, 2311 DESCRIPTION:&lsquo\;Alongside the modern evils\, we are oppressed by a whole series of inherited evils\, arising from the passive survival of&hellip\; anachronistic social and political relations. We suffer not only from the living\, but from the dead.&rsquo\; \;(Marx)
We can criticize institutions\, ideas and practices because they are exploitative\, violent\, oppressive\, racist or unjust. But the problem can also be that they just don&rsquo\;t work anymore. Fossil-fuel based economies\, centuries-old political institutions and constitutions\, or the patriarchal nuclear family might have made sense in the context in which they emerged\, but today\, they have become outdated\, either because they no longer correspond to changed social norms\, or because they no longer successfully exercise the function for which they were once instituted\, or both. As Adorno wrote\, &lsquo\;modes of conduct which were once rational\, but have now become obsolete\, are evoked unchanged by the logic of history.&rsquo\;
There seems to be a kind of inertia inherent in institutions: once they are established\, institutions start to live a life of their own\; they are reproduced without conscious reflection or design and they resist attempts to change them\, even when change is sorely needed. But this inertia is inherent to the way institutions function: institutions provide stability by fixing rules\, laws\, social roles and hierarchies\, protocols\, definitions and patterns of behaviour\, and this is what makes them function effectively. Institutional inertia\, as Sartre suggests\, can also be &lsquo\;enriching&rsquo\;: it opens up new possible courses of action and provides the background stability without which a meaningful understanding of the world would not be possible at all.
This conference brings together scholars working on questions relating to institutions\, institutional persistence and institutional change from a variety of perspectives and disciplines\, in order to address the following questions: how do we distinguish between normal or legitimate institutional reproduction and &lsquo\;irrational&rsquo\; institutional inertia? How can we judge institutions to be obsolete? How do institutions resist change or perpetuate themselves even though they no longer correspond to changing social norms\, or are no longer effective\, or have even become destructive? How can we resist\, escape\, or make use of institutional inertia\, and what are the preconditions for institutional transformation?
\;
We are pleased to invite you to the next session of \;the \;Empirically \;Informed \;Philosophy of Mind online Seminar \;
Who: \;Francesco Ianì\; (Università\; degli studi di Torino)
When: \;Thursday\, June 4th\, 2026 &mdash\; 5 - 6:30 pm (CET)
Where: Online via Zoom:
https://pantheonsorbonne.zoom.us/j/92782580594?pwd=a5p3WfunQQxJICrjJaUenFJFzmllbx.1
What: \;Mental simulation(s) as memory process(es)
The concept of &ldquo\;Mental Simulation&rdquo\; (MS) has been increasingly used in cognitive science since the early 2000s\, supporting a wide range of cognitive activities such as mental imagery\, language comprehension\, and action observation. Although MS is used widely across these domains\, it functions as an umbrella term because different types of mental simulations can vary in their simulation processes (e.g.\, triggered externally or internally) and simulation outcomes (e.g.\, motor resonance or a mental representation) (Stockner et al.\, 2025). In this work\, we propose a theoretical framework suggesting that different types of mental simulation exist\, all of which can be considered as different forms of memory processes. To outline this point\, we review extensive literature indicating that these forms of mental simulation and their underlying neurocognitive mechanisms rely heavily on previous experiences. For example\, expert musicians perform better at auditory imagery tasks (e.g.\, Bishop et al.\, 2013)\, and neural activation during action observation is greater when dancers are familiar with the observed dance (e.g.\, Calvo-Merino et al.\, 2005). Our underlying theoretical assumption is as follows: if a mental simulation and its underlying neurocognitive process are shaped by\, and directly related to\, previous and memorised experience\, then it is a form of memory. These memory processes can have a more explicit (i.e.\, declarative) or implicit (i.e.\, procedural) nature\, depending on the characteristics of the simulation process and its outcome features. Like memory processes\, mental simulations should also be regarded as constructive and generative processes that may involve partial reinstatement but should not be identified with it. Thus\, instead of traditionally conceptualising memory as an imaginative process (i.e.\, imagination-first)\, we propose a memory-first approach.
For any questions\, please contact:
Sacha Behrend &mdash\; sachabehrend1991@gmail.com
Elodie Boissard &mdash\; Elodie.Boissard@univ-paris1.fr
Program
Organizers:
Sacha Behrend &mdash\; Postdoctoral Researcher\, University of Hradec Krá\;lové\; (Czech Republic) / Affiliated Researcher\, Institut d&rsquo\;histoire et de philosophie des sciences et des techniques (IHPST)\, Université\; Paris 1 Panthé\;on-Sorbonne
Elodie Boissard &mdash\; Postdoctoral Researcher\, Bordeaux Neurocampus Department / Institut de Neurosciences Cognitives et Inté\;gratives d&rsquo\;Aquitaine (UMR 5287)\, Université\; de Bordeaux\, CNRS
There will be two in-person gatherings in Summer 2026 to remember and engage with the philosophical work of Andrew Cooper\, who tragically died in November 2025. These two events will take place at the University of Warwick (June 18-19) and at University College London (July 03).
\nThis online event\, on the 5th of June -- from 2.00-5.00pm\, UK time -- will precede those other two in-person events. The online event will be an opportunity -- for people anywhere in the world\, who were interested in Andrew's work -- to informally discuss some of his published writings.
\nThe readings for the event are at the bottom of this page.
\nThe zoom link for this event is here: \;
If you have any questions please feel free to contact the organisers\,
\n* Karen Simecek (k.d.simecek@warwick.ac.uk)
* Robert Simpson (robert.simpson@ucl.ac.uk)
* Curie Virag (curie.virag@warwick.ac.uk)
The aim of this workshop is to bring together people from different fields such as programming languages foundations\, formal verification\, philosophy or artificial intelligence\, around methods of reasoning and applications involving logic. We call for full papers whose main results are not published or submitted elsewhere. \;
\nSuggested topics include\, but are not limited to the following:
\nLogics (classical and non-classical): constructive\, modal\, epistemic\, temporal\, paraconsistent\, description\, substructural\, connexive\, quantum\, algebraic\, multi-valued\, higher-order\, lambda calculi and type theory\, etc.
\nMethods: natural deduction and sequent calculi\, tableaux\, answer set programming\, model checking\, equational reasoning\, automated and interactive theorem proving\, SAT and SMT solving\, etc.
\nApplications: mechanized proofs\, formalized mathematics\, declarative and dependent-type programming\, program synthesis and analysis\, formal methods\, type systems\, formal semantics of languages and systems\, process calculi\, philosophical logic\, philosophy of computing\, AI-related applications\, etc.
\n\nImportant Dates:
\nPaper submission: June 5th\, 2026
\nNotification of acceptance: August 5th\, 2026
\nWorkshop (Hybrid): October 6th\, 7th &\; 8th\, 2026
\nSubmission Guidelines: \; papers written in English\, limited to 12 pages excluding footnotes\, appendices\, and references. Contributions are to be prepared for anonymous review\, that is\, authors' names and institutions must be omitted\, and references to authors' own related work should be in the third person. Papers must use the Easychair Latex Class and be submitted via EasyChair at \; https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=lanmr2026 \;
\n\nThe language of the workshop is English\, at least one of the authors of accepted papers is expected to attend the workshop in order to present their contribution in a 25-minute presentation
ORGANIZER;CN=Favio Ezequiel Miranda-Perea: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=America/Denver:20260605T234500 DTEND;TZID=America/Denver:20260605T234500 SUMMARY:2026 Society for the Study of Ethics and Animals Mini-Conference UID:20260614T124455Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:America/Denver LOCATION:Eaton Hall\, University of Colorado Boulder\, Boulder\, United States DESCRIPTION:The SSEA is excited to announce a one-day mini-conference\, to be held on August 5\, 2026\, immediately prior to the Rocky Mountain Ethics Congress (RoME) at the University of Colorado Boulder.
\nThe mini-conference is intended as a forum for rigorous philosophical work on animal ethics\, broadly conceived. We invite proposals for individual talks and 3-5-person colloquia on any topic in animal ethics.
\nFor individual talks\, please send abstracts of 300-400 words (all included). Include your name and talk title in the body of your email\, and attach an anonymized PDF abstract suitable for blind review. Speakers should prepare talks of 30 minutes.
\nFor colloquium proposals\, please send a PDF with a detailed description (400-500 words\, all included) of the colloquium theme as well as the names of speakers. All speakers must have confirmed their participation by the time the proposal is submitted.
\nThe deadline for abstracts is June 5\, 2026. Decisions will be announced by June 19.
\nThe mini-conference will be held in person at CU Boulder. We will\, however\, consider submissions for remote talks by those who cannot attend in person. If you would only be able to present online\, please indicate this in the main text of your email.
\nAll submissions should be sent to ethicsanimals@gmail.com. Please include the words &ldquo\;2026 conference submission&rdquo\; in the subject line. Please contact Avram Hiller at ahiller@pdx.eduif you have any questions.
\nPlease share this with anyone who might be interested! \;
ORGANIZER;CN=Avram Hiller: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Bucharest:20260606T100000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Bucharest:20260607T170000 SUMMARY:International Interdisciplinary Conference of Psychedelic Studies UID:20260614T124456Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:Europe/Bucharest LOCATION:Splaiul Independențeii\, nr. 204\, Bucharest\, Romania DESCRIPTION:The &ldquo\;International Interdisciplinary Conference of Psychedelic Studies&rdquo\;\, organized by drd. Raluca Bilașco-Rusu and drd. Ștefăniță Manea\, Doctoral School of Philosophy\, Faculty of Philosophy of the University of Bucharest (Department of Theoretical Philosophy)\, brings together students\, professionals and researchers in philosophy of mind\, phenomenology\, neuroscience\, psychiatry and cognitive science to engage in rigorous scholarly dialogue on certain psychedelic substances and their significance for mind\, medicine\, and culture.
\nThe conference offers a genuinely interdisciplinary space &mdash\; one in which phenomenological analysis\, neurophilosophical modelling\, empirical clinical findings\, and questions of ethics and policy are held in productive tension. Presentations will span philosophy of mind\, phenomenology\, psychiatry\, cognitive science\, neuroscience\, and the ethics of psychedelic research.
\nThe event will take place on \;June 6th - 7th\, 2026. Regular presentations will be 20 minutes in length\, followed by 10-minute Q&\;A sessions. Keynote lectures will be 45 minutes followed by a 15-minute discussion period. The conference will adopt a hybrid format: presenters may choose to participate in person or via live stream\, and all sessions will be available to remote attendees.
\nWe encourage BA\, MA and PhD students\, as well as early PhDs\, postdocs and researchers\, to contribute with research abstracts related to the event's topic areas. Abstracts should be written in English and should not exceed 300 words. Abstracts will receive full consideration if submitted before May 20th\, 2026 at \;confpsych2026@gmail.com \;Word or PDF attachments preferred\, with the message titled "abstract submission".
\nAll submissions will undergo a process of blind peer review. (Please write your identifying details in the body of the email\, and leave the attached abstract anonymized.) We intend notifications of acceptance to be sent out on or before June 1st\, 2026. The conference programme will be announced as soon as review is completed. For any questions\, please don't hesitate to email \;confpsych2026@gmail.com.
\nThematic Areas
\nThe conference welcomes contributions across the following domains:
\nPanel Topics &\; Guiding Questions
\nKeynote Speakers
\nKarl Friston ·\; University College London One of the most cited neuroscientists in the world\, Karl Friston is the originator of the free energy principle and active inference framework &mdash\; among the most influential theoretical contributions to contemporary neuroscience and philosophy of mind. His work offers a unified account of perception\, action\, and consciousness grounded in Bayesian brain theory\, and has become central to current debates on the mechanisms underlying psychedelic states\, including the REBUS model developed with Robin Carhart-Harris. \;
\nPeter Sjö\;stedt-Hughes ·\; University of Exeter Dr Peter Sjö\;stedt-Hughes is a Philosopher of Mind and Metaphysics who specializes in the thought of Whitehead\, Spinoza\, Nietzsche\, and Bergson&mdash\;and in fields pertaining to panpsychism\, pantheism\, mental causation\, and altered states of consciousness. He is a lecturer at The University of Exeter where he is a lead on the new MSc in Psychedelics: Mind\, Medicine\, and Culture. Peter is co-director of Europe&rsquo\;s largest psychedelics conference\, Breaking Convention\, and is on the board of breathwork charity Dreamshadow. He is a member of the drugs advisory committee group\, DrugScience\, he is on the advisory board of the Tyringham Institute\, and is on the team of the established UK independent publisher\, Psychedelic Press. Peter is the author of Noumenautics (2015)\, Modes of Sentience (2021)\, co-editor and contributor of Bloomsbury&rsquo\;s Philosophy and Psychedelics (2022)\, the TEDx Talker on &lsquo\;psychedelics and consciousness&rsquo\;. \;
\nDavid Luke ·\; University of Greenwich Associate Professor in Psychology at the University of Greenwich and co-founder of the Breaking Convention conference\, David Luke is one of the foremost researchers on the psychology and phenomenology of anomalous experiences induced by psychedelic substances. His work spans transpersonal psychology\, parapsychology\, and the anthropology of altered states\, with particular attention to DMT\, entity encounters\, and the broader question of what radically non-ordinary experiences reveal about the nature of mind and reality. He is the editor of DMT Entity Encounters and Otherworlds: Psychedelics and Exceptional Human Experience\, and brings to the conference a rare combination of rigorous empirical inquiry and genuine openness to the most challenging implications of psychedelic phenomenology.
\n ORGANIZER;CN="Raluca Bilașco Rusu";CN="Ștefăniță Manea": METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260607T190000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260607T203000 SUMMARY:Phenomenology of Artificial Intelligence UID:20260614T124457Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:Phenomenology of Artificial Intelligence \;
\nBSP Online Course
\nRegistration open now \;
\nThe rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has sparked numerous philosophical debates\, revealing that AI is not merely a sophisticated technological invention but also a profound philosophical problem. From its onset\, AI has been modeled in many ways after assumptions about how human intelligence works. \;
\nPhenomenology\, as a philosophical tradition\, offers unique insights into human cognition\, perception\, and consciousness. By focusing on the lived experience and the embodied nature of intelligence\, phenomenology challenges reductionist views of intelligence and provides a more holistic approach to understanding how artificial systems might (or might not) reflect human intelligence. This course will explore the ways in which phenomenological concepts can illuminate key issues in the philosophy of AI and help us navigate the conceptual and ethical challenges posed by these emerging technologies. \;
\nThis course focuses on four key concepts and their phenomenological treatment as applied to AI: embodiment\, lifeworld\, meaning\, and consciousness. \;
\nBSP Online courses focus on phenomenological thinkers or topics and are taught by experts in the field. The sessions last 1.5 hours and are held once a week online\, over consecutive weeks. This will include a lecture and time for discussion / Q&\;A. Reading materials or any other course materials will be provided in advance. Catch-up recordings are available in case anyone misses any sessions! \;
\nCourse Leader: Veronica Cibotaru (University of Tü\;bingen and the Husserl Archives\, Paris)
\nSessions: 4 sessions over 4 weeks Dates: 7 / 14 / 21 / 28 June &ndash\; weekly &ndash\; Sundays
\nTime: 7:00&ndash\;8:30pm UK time
\nLocation: Online (Teams) \;
\nFind out some more about \;BSP2026OC2: Phenomenology of Artificial Intelligence
ORGANIZER;CN=Alessandro Guardascione: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Brussels:20260608T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Brussels:20260609T170000 SUMMARY:Transgressing Boundaries: Unusual Applications of Formal Logic UID:20260614T124458Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:Europe/Brussels LOCATION:Socrate\, Place Cardinal Mercier \, Louvain-la-Neuve\, Belgium ORGANIZER;CN=Victoria Van Gheem;CN=Peter Verdee;CN=Blandine De Becker: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260608T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260610T170000 SUMMARY:C-test Workshop UID:20260614T124459Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:Recent advances in artificial intelligence\, animal sentience\, and brain organoid research have brought the question of how to detect consciousness to the forefront. Determining whether animals\, machines\, or other systems are conscious has major scientific and practical implications\, influencing ethical decision-making and policy. One promising approach to this challenge is the development of consciousness tests (C-tests)\, empirically grounded methods for detecting consciousness across diverse populations. Importantly\, C-tests are not necessarily grounded in theories of consciousness\, which are still &ldquo\;works in progress&rdquo\; and therefore not sufficiently robust to support secure ascriptions of consciousness. C-tests\, instead\, offer a data-driven methodology for navigating the uncertainty surrounding consciousness attributions and thus promise to be useful and effective even in the context of vast theoretical disagreement in consciousness science. \;
\nBut how do C-tests work? How are they validated? Can they be successfully applied to heterogeneous populations? The goal of this workshop is to survey and critically assess the current state of the art regarding C-tests. While a growing number of proposals have been developed&mdash\;drawing on behavioral\, cognitive\, and neurophysiological indicators&mdash\;there has been relatively little systematic discussion of how these tests relate to one another or what standards they should satisfy. The workshop will therefore bring together researchers from multiple disciplines to examine existing approaches\, discuss desiderata for robust C-tests\, explore novel research programs\, and investigate possible synergies between different methods. At the same time\, we aim to foster critical discussion of key challenges\, including conceptual ambiguities related to construct validity\, risks of anthropocentric bias\, and difficulties in validating C-tests independently of theories of consciousness.
\nThe workshop will cover a broad range of topics reflecting the interdisciplinary nature of C-test research. Contributions will address conceptual\, methodological\, empirical\, and practical issues. Discussions will focus on different target systems\, including non-human animals\, artificial intelligence systems\, and brain organoids. By bringing together perspectives from philosophy\, neuroscience\, psychology\, and AI\, the workshop aims to clarify the emerging landscape of C-tests and stimulate new directions for research.
\nDate: June 8 &ndash\; 10\, 2026
Time: 10:00 &ndash\; 21:30 CET
Location: \; \;BAM&Xi\;\, University of Bamberg &\; Online\, Zoom
This workshop is part of BAM&Xi\;'s AI Consciousness Sprint.
Register here: \;https://www.uni-bamberg.de/en/bamxi/research-activities/ai-consciousness-sprint/c-tests-workshop/#c715047
University of Missouri 2026 Virtual Summer School on the Foundations of the Mind Sciences
\nWe are pleased to announce the University of Missouri 2026 Virtual Summer School on the Foundations of the Mind Sciences\, sponsored by the Florence G. Kline Chair in Philosophy and directed by Gualtiero Piccinini. This program brings together leading researchers to provide advanced training on the state of the art.
\nAccepted participants will attend for free via Zoom.
\nParticipants will pursue their own research project and do some readings before each session. They will engage directly with the speakers and each other through lectures and discussions. Applicants with particularly strong research proposals may be selected to receive feedback on their projects from faculty.
\nWe welcome applications from advanced graduate students\, postdoctoral researchers\, and early-career scholars working on foundational topics in the mind sciences (such as linguistics\, neuroscience\, and psychology). Philosophers are especially welcome to apply\; applicants from other disciplines may be accepted in exceptional cases.
\nDaily Schedule: Sessions will be held during 9:00 AM - 12:00 PM CDT (UTC-5)
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; 9-9:30 Welcome and Introduction
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; 9:30-10:15 Guest Presentation (except for PGS who will join around 9)
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; 10:15-11:30 Discussion/Q&\;A with the Guest Presenter
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; 11:30-12:00 Closing Remarks
\nSpeaker Schedule: (with guest presenters joining the session 9:30-11:30 am CDT (UTC-5)\, except for PGS who will join the session around 9 am):
\nApplication Requirements:
Applicants should submit a curriculum vitae\, a summary of their research project (max 750 words)\, and a statement of how the summer school will benefit them (max one paragraph). Priority will be given to research proposals on topics in the foundations of the mind sciences.
Application Deadline: January 15th\, 2026
Submission Email: lngmnp@missouri.edu
We look forward to your applications!
\nThank you\,
Lauren Graf
Graduate Research Assistant
University of Missouri-Columbia
Lngmnp@missouri.edu
TEARS CONFERENCE\, 8-10 June 2026
\nPhilosophy Department\, University of Bologna
\nOrganizers: Laurencia Sá\;enz Benavides &\; Pia Campeggiani
\nI am happy to announce the conference entitled &ldquo\;The Emotional Aspects of Resistance and Solidarity&rdquo\;. This conference aims to bring in post-graduate students\, early career academics and established scholars whose work on the socio-political aspects of narrative practices\, affects and emotions can offer illuminating perspectives on some of the issues addressed by the \;TEARS project\, such as:
\nThe conference will take place on the 8th-10th June 2026\, at the Philosophy Department of the University of Bologna\, Via Azzo Gardino 23\, Sala Rossa (June 8th &\; 9th)\; Via Zamboni 38\, Sala Apollo (June 10th). \;
\nThis conference is supported by the European Union&rsquo\;s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant Agreement n°\;1011105929 Project TEARS
\nIf you wish to attend this event\, please register here: \;https://forms.gle/CQvzuoV7YSiautBs5 \;
\nFor any inquiries\, please email \; \;maria.saenzbenavides@unibo.it \;or \;laurenciasaenz@gmail.com \;
\nConference Programme:
\nKeynote Speakers: Maria Pia Lara (UAM) &\; Mariana Ortega (Penn State University)
\nDay 1. Monday June 8th. \;
\nVenue: Sala Rossa\, Via Azzo Gardino 23. \;
\n14: 30 Welcome
\n15:00-16:00 &ldquo\;From outlaw emotions to moral injury: Rethinking the affective disruptions of norms&rdquo\; Ditte Munch-Jurisic (Copenhagen) \;
\n16:00-17:00 &ldquo\;Feelings and Epistemic Resistance&rdquo\; Caleb Ward (Hamburg)
\n17:00 Keynote address: Maria Pia Lara (UAM)
\n19:30 Social Dinner
\nDay 2 Tuesday June 9th. \;
\nVenue: Sala Rossa\, Via Azzo Gardino 23
\n8:00-9:00 \; &ldquo\;The emancipatory power of narrative practices&rdquo\; Laurencia Saenz Benavides (Bologna)
\n9:00-10:00 &ldquo\;Pedagogical perspectives on loneliness narratives in extremist and emancipatory movements&rdquo\; Ruth Rebecca Tietjen (Tilburg) \;
\nBreak
\n10:15-11:15 \;&ldquo\;The Unfinished &lsquo\;We&rsquo\;: Longing for Belonging\, Loneliness\, and the Affective Fault Lines of Political Communities&rdquo\; Marie Wuth (Erlangen-Nü\;rnberg).
\n11:15-12:15: TBC Tris Hedges (Copenhagen)
\n12:30-14:30 Lunch
\n14:30-15:30 &ldquo\;Mass Masochism&rdquo\; Serena Gregorio (Justus-Liebig-University Giessen). \;
\n15:30-16:30 &ldquo\;&lsquo\;Something new must be created at all costs&rsquo\;. Affects of Societal Transformation&rdquo\; Henrike Kohpeiß\; (Lü\;neburg)
\nBreak
\n17:00 Keynote lecture: Mariana Ortega (Penn State University)
\n19:30 \;Dinner \;
\nDay 3. Wednesday June 10th. \;
\nVenue: Sala Apollo\, 38 Via Zamboni \;
\n9:00-11:00 Concluding remarks
\nEnd of the conference
\n ORGANIZER;CN="Laurencia Sáenz Benavides": METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260608T151500 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260608T164500 SUMMARY:Taking Intellectual Advantage of Others UID:20260614T124502Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:The Collective Ethics Seminar: Online Presentation &ndash\; 8 June 2026 &ndash\; 15.15 &ndash\; 16.45 CEST / 09.15 &ndash\; 10.45 EST
Cameron Boult - Taking Intellectual Advantage of Others
On Monday 8 June 2026\, Cameron Boult (Brandon University) will give a presentation in the Collective Ethics Seminar entitled &lsquo\;Taking Intellectual Advantage of Others&rsquo\;.
Abstract: \;I develop and defend the concept epistemic assholes. An epistemic asshole is someone who exhibits a distinctive form of epistemic badness characterized not by gross irrationality or hostility to truth\, but by a stable\, entitled disregard for one&rsquo\;s epistemic relations with others. Drawing on Aaron James&rsquo\;s (2012) account of moral assholes\, I examine how people can systematically exploit epistemic cooperation by allowing themselves special advantages&mdash\;such as &ldquo\;freedom from inquiry&rdquo\;\, &ldquo\;doxastic comfort&rdquo\;\, and &ldquo\;freedom to criticize&rdquo\;&mdash\;while remaining insulated from criticism by an entrenched sense of entitlement. The resulting view\, the Relational Approach to Epistemic Assholes (REA)\, explains why epistemic assholes are not epistemically the worst\, yet are nonetheless deeply galling. After motivating the need for this concept\, I show how REA captures both &ldquo\;impure&rdquo\; cases (involving both epistemic and moral assholery) and &ldquo\;pure&rdquo\; epistemic assholes\, whose objectionable conduct is driven by epistemic aims themselves. I further explore connections between epistemic assholes and epistemic vice\, and the causal role that epistemic assholery can play in active ignorance and epistemic exploitation. Through this latter connection\, I argue that epistemic assholes play an insidious causal role in sustaining objectionable social power dynamics. The concept of epistemic assholes provides a valuable lens for understanding and calling out important but often-hidden hazards in our social epistemic environment. \;
The online seminar is open for all to attend. The session starts at 15.15 CEST / 09.15 EST. You can join the session via the following link: https://univienna.zoom.us/j/62736288881?pwd=SndEdTNoNlZtSzJqcmpabm5NaWIyUT09
For more information about the seminar\, please see https://social.univie.ac.at/events/collective-ethics-seminar/. \;We hope to see you at the seminar!
Kind regards\,
Gunnar Bjö\;rnsson (Stockholm University)\, Kenneth Silver (Trinity College Dublin)\, and Niels de Haan (University of Vienna)
The II Workshop on Substructural Logics and its limits will be held on June 9th and June 10th 2026 at the Carl Friedrich von Weizsä\;cker-Centerof the University of Tü\;bingen with the support of the PLEXUS project (Grant Agreement no 101086295\; PI: Prof. Pablo Cobreros) a Marie Sklodowska-Curie action funded by the EU under the Horizon Europe Research and Innovation Programme). The Workshop is organised by Federico Pailos.
\nA substructural logic is one that gives up one of the structural features of classical logic. By this it is meant either some closure property\, like reflex ivity\, transitivity or monotonicity\, or some local or globally valid metain ferential schema. This Workshop has two interrelated general aims: (i) contribute to the de velopment of a conception of logicality that better fits with the recent de velopments in the field of substructural logics\, mainly related to some key applications\, such as the vagueness phenomena and the semantic paradoxes\; (ii) assess the pros and cons of this new conception of logicality with respect to more traditional approaches\, that understood a logic as a set of inferences closed under some key (Tarskian) properties\, such as reflexivity\, transitivity and monotonicity.
\nFor those who wish to join online\, Zoom details will be provided soon.
ORGANIZER;CN=Federico Pailos: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260609T163000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260609T180000 SUMMARY:Talk 11: Beneficent Communication as Power. Talk 12: Women’s Digital Voices and the Reconfiguration of Public Debate. UID:20260614T124504Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:Register here: https://indico.uni-paderborn.de/event/156/
\n09.06.2026\, 4.30-6pm (Paris time)
\nMarianne Najm Abou-Jaoude - Beneficent Communication as Power
\nThis presentation proposes a three-level framework&mdash\;safe\, responsible and beneficent&mdash\;to analyse and foster constructive forms of women&rsquo\;s agency in contemporary digital media ecologies. &ldquo\;Safe&rdquo\; designates not engaging in practices and structures that include violence\, exploitation and manipulation online and offline. &ldquo\;Responsible&rdquo\; refers to doing no harm\, ensuring fairness and structural justice. &ldquo\;Beneficent&rdquo\; goes further\, namely actively promote the flourishing of others\, create conditions for dialogue and build the common good\, and is presented as the key to reimagining women&rsquo\;s power in and through media. \;Drawing on case studies of women communicators in religious\, civic and grassroots community contexts\, this research examines digital practices through the three cumulative levels of positive ethics in communication to illuminate how such engagements challenge exclusionary structures in theology and philosophy. \; \;A few case studies examples would be first\, women moderating encrypted messaging groups that coordinate neighborhood mutual aid and emotional support while establishing clear norms of safety and verification. A second examines women leaders in faith-based digital communities who use livestreams and social media to host spaces of shared discernment\, interreligious encounter and reconciliation. A third considers women running community radio and podcast collectives that platform the voices of migrant\, indigenous or otherwise marginalised women\, combining journalistic rigour with participatory storytelling. \;
\nAbout the Speaker: \;Marianne Najm Abou Jaoude is a telecom engineer finishing her doctoral research at Sophia University Institute near Florence in Italy. Her thesis concerns ethics of AI and the responsibility of everyone in building a safe and peaceful future. She developed a framework about a digital oath that includes beneficence in communication and systems design\, and the role of technology such as generative AI in peacebuilding and depolarization. Her work examines progressive ethical levels and the concept of collaborative positive ethics to foster human-centric innovation and inclusive digital communication
\n\n\nRoula Azar Douglas &ndash\; Women&rsquo\;s Digital Voices and the Reconfiguration of Public Debate
\n\nIn the contemporary digital landscape\, social media platforms\, blogs\, and online communities have emerged as significant spaces where women articulate political\, philosophical\, religious\, or secular positions. Far from being peripheral\, these digital arenas are vital sites for rethinking legitimacy\, influence\, and participation in public discourse. This paper examines how women &mdash\; from secular thinkers and educators to feminist digital activists\, as well as Christian pastors in Europe and Muslim scholars in the Arab world &mdash\; use digital media to challenge traditional frameworks\, reinterpret doctrines or social norms\, and create alternative spaces for reflection\, critique\, and debate. Through selected case studies\, the paper analyzes strategies these women employ to reach diverse audiences: the mobilization of storytelling and personal narrative\, the use of pedagogical tools\, and the deliberate cultivation of online communities that function as safe spaces for questioning and dissent. It also considers aesthetic and rhetorical choices &mdash\; such as visual branding and accessible language &mdash\; that enhance the effectiveness of their digital presence. Particular attention is devoted to how these actors navigate visibility in environments where religious\, cultural\, or political expectations can restrict women&rsquo\;s public expression. This includes facing harassment\, censorship\, or community backlash\, while leveraging alliances\, digital solidarity networks\, and transnational audiences to amplify their voices. The study highlights how digital platforms enable women to bypass traditional gatekeepers and establish new forms of authority rooted in experience\, authenticity\, and community engagement. Ultimately\, it sheds light on how online spaces are reshaping women&rsquo\;s participation in intellectual and spiritual debates\, highlighting both persistent obstacles and emerging opportunities for more inclusive\, plural\, and transformative dialogue.
\n\nAbout the Speaker: Roula Azar Douglas is a Lebanese-Canadian researcher\, journalist\, writer\, and academic interested in the role of media in shaping social realities. She is the founder and president of the Union de la presse francophone &ndash\; Liban (UPF Liban)\, a mentor with the Global Thinkers Forum in London\, and serves on the editorial board of the Middle East edition of the scientific journal Hermè\;s. Douglas coordinates the National Observatory of Women in Research (CNRS-L) and contributes to a research project on gender equality with the Diane Chair at USJ and the French Institute for Research and Development (IRD). She also oversees a weekly page on universities\, research\, and youth for L&rsquo\;Orient-Le Jour and is the author of Le jour où\; le soleil ne s&rsquo\;est pas levé\; (2018) and Chez nous\, c&rsquo\;é\;tait le silence (2007)
\n\n\;
\n ORGANIZER;CN=Marguerite El Asmar Bou Aoun;CN=Jil Muller;CN=Daniel Fischer;CN=Katia Raya Rami: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=America/Sao_Paulo:20260610T090000 DTEND;TZID=America/Sao_Paulo:20260611T170000 SUMMARY:PUCRS Epistemology Conference 2026: On Epistemic Defeat UID:20260614T124505Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:America/Sao_Paulo LOCATION:Porto Alegre\, Brazil DESCRIPTION:Zoom Link: \;https://pucrs.zoom.us/j/93963963528?pwd=qLLSHwptNTYYWORNXXVraHp40V6zGF.1
ORGANIZER;CN="João R. Fett";CN="Vinícius Felipe Posselt": METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260610T090000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260612T170000 SUMMARY:Experiments in Linguistic Meaning 4 UID:20260614T124506Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:America/New_York LOCATION:Philadelphia\, United States\, 19143 DESCRIPTION:Call for Papers: Experiments in Linguistic Meaning (ELM) 4
\nJune 10-12 2026\, \;University of Pennsylvania
\nOrganizers: \;Paloma Jeretič\, Anna Papafragou\, and Florian Schwarz
\nEmail: \;organizers@elm-conference.net
\nWe are excited to announce the fourth Experiments in Linguistic Meaning (ELM) conference to be hosted by the University of Pennsylvania on June 10-12\, 2026. The conference is dedicated to the experimental study of linguistic meaning broadly construed\, with a focus on theoretical issues in semantics and pragmatics\, their interplay with other components of the grammar\, their relation to language processing and acquisition\, as well as their connections to human cognition and computation. We aim to include representation of linguistic\, psychological\, logical\, philosophical\, social\, developmental\, computational\, as well as cross-linguistic and cross-cultural perspectives.
\nInvited speakers:
\nJennifer Culbertson\, University of Edinburgh
\nEllen Lau\, University of Maryland
\nKyle Rawlins\, Johns Hopkins University
\nInvited Online Symposium on Modality in language and cognition:
\nNicolò\; Cesana-Arlotti\, Yale University
WooJin Chung\, Seoul National University
Valentine Hacquard\, University of Maryland
The experimental study of meaning in language draws on a broad spectrum of disciplines\, topics\, and methodologies\, and ELM reflects this diversity in its scope. The biennial ELM conference aims to foster the interdisciplinary study of meaning\, and to provide a home for a community of scholars that might not meet and interact with each other with regularity in other contexts. We encourage researchers from around the world to submit their recent work to ELM 4\, and to attend in order to discuss the latest theories and data in the cognitive science of meaning broadly construed.
\nThe University of Pennsylvania is home to a vibrant interdisciplinary community that studies language and meaning across several departments. ELM acknowledges support from \;mindCORE\, Penn&rsquo\;s hub for the integrative study of \;the mind\; Penn&rsquo\;s \;Department of Linguistics\; and the \;University Research Foundation.
\nFormat: \;After successful hybrid ELM 2 and 3\, we will continue in the same format\, namely:
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \;start out with an \;online-only day \;(with on-site gathering options for in person attendees already there) on \;June 10\, \;
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \;followed by \;two in person \;presentation days (June 11-12) (with \;hybrid \;audience participation option). \;
Note: Desired presentation format (with a commitment to either online or in person) will have to be indicated at time of submission (this applies to consideration for both talks and posters/short presentations)
Abstract Submissions via \;OpenReview\, due December 10\, 2025 (11:59pm EST)
\nThe conference will feature both 20-minute talks and posters/short presentations. Abstracts must be anonymous and written in English. They should use US Letter size paper and 1 inch margins on all four sides. Abstracts must be single-spaced\, and written using Arial 11pt font. Abstracts should be at most 2 pages\, including the main text of the abstract\, figures\, and any supplementary materials and references the authors wish to include. Authors should avoid identifying information in the abstract\, especially when referring to their own prior work. The abstract must be submitted as a single PDF file and must include a title at the top. Abstracts violating these requirements may be rejected without further consideration.
Note: If you do not already have an OpenReview account\, be sure to register and get your account approved/activated well before the deadline\, as this can take a few days.
Timeline:
\nNovember 10\, 2025: \; ELM abstract submissions opens on \;OpenReview
https://openreview.net/group?id=elm-conference.net/ELM/2026/Conference
December 10\, 2025 (11:59pm EST): \; \; \;Abstract submission deadline
Feb 1\, 2026: \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; Acceptance Notifications
ORGANIZER;CN=Paloma Jeretic;CN=Florian Schwarz;CN=Anna Papafragou: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=Africa/Johannesburg:20260611T090000 DTEND;TZID=Africa/Johannesburg:20260612T170000 SUMMARY:Thinking about Philosophical Counselling and Philosophy as a Way of Life from a South African Place UID:20260614T124507Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:Africa/Johannesburg LOCATION:Ryneveld and Andringa Street\, Stellenbosch\, South Africa DESCRIPTION:Philosophical counselling and philosophy as a way of life are experiencing a period of renewed interest\, marked by several significant forthcoming publications and the emergence of new scholarly societies internationally. Within this broader international context\, a growing and sustained conversation has begun to take shape in South Africa\, one that asks what these practices mean when thought from \;a South African place\, and what such situated reflection might contribute to the wider field.
\nThis symposium\, \;Thinking about Philosophical Counselling and Philosophy as a Way of Life from a South African Place\, is a direct response to this conversation. It aims to bring together philosophers\, practitioners\, postgraduate students\, and those with a shared interest in these questions to foster a space for sustained and open dialogue.
\nThe aim of the symposium is to think about philosophical counselling and philosophy as a way of life from within South African contexts.
ORGANIZER;CN=Jaco Louw: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260612T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260612T170000 SUMMARY:Fragility and the Aesthetics of Sensitivity UID:20260614T124508Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:Europe/London LOCATION:55-59 Penrhyn Rd\, Kingston upon Thames\, London\, United Kingdom\, KT1 2EE DESCRIPTION:Call for Contributions: Fragility and the Aesthetics of Sensitivity
\nKeynote Presenters: \;
\nAndrew Goffey (University of Nottingham)
\nBrigitte Hart (Sound artist\, Shortwave Collective)
\nWhen crisis becomes a permanent state rather than an exceptional rupture\, fragility assumes the form of an existential condition visible across social\, ecological\, and political domains. Under such circumstances\, the production of knowledge increasingly shifts toward anticipatory regimes&mdash\;risk modelling\, foresight studies\, and adaptive infrastructures designed to navigate instability. Contemporary problems appear as hybrid entities: complex issues that exceed the grasp of any single discipline and demand collaborative investigation capable of rendering them perceptible and registering fragile relations that cannot be stabilised or fixed.
\nIn this context\, the problem of disciplinarity&mdash\;of relations between disciplines and collaboration across them&mdash\;acquires renewed urgency. Contemporary ecological frameworks in the humanities further intensify this concern by grounding the crossing of boundaries in an existential condition. This expansion of the problematic invites a reconsideration of an older question: what do the prefixes inter-\, trans-\, non-\, or post- differentially signify when applied to disciplinarity? Which form of disciplinarity adequately captures our present condition?
\nWhile the laboratory has served as a central model&mdash\;a metonym for interdisciplinary collaboration\, anchoring the emergent mode of scientific praxis called &ldquo\;research&rdquo\;&mdash\;today research also unfolds across privately funded para-institutions\, hybrid platforms\, and transient project-based networks. However\, collaborations between artists and social theorists with natural scientists remain structurally asymmetrical: artistic practice is often reduced to the visualization of scientific data\, while social theory has long remained under pressure to imitate the methods of the hard sciences. In this context\, the symposium seeks to examine the tangible forms of contemporary cross-disciplinary collaboration and the conceptual frameworks that sustain them.
\nThe symposium approaches this question under the long shadow of post-1968 French philosophy\, whose insistence on the inherent intertwinement of politics and aesthetics continues to shape contemporary thought. As a guiding reference\, we take the framework developed by Bruno Latour\, approached here through the twin themes of \;fragility and the aesthetics of sensitivity. Latour may be seen as the synthetic inheritor of this philosophical trajectory\, insofar as his anthropology of laboratory science leads to a non-disciplinary\, transversal form of social ontology that immanently connects science\, aesthetics\, and politics. His model advances a form of collective pragmatism oriented toward the proposal of new entities for social existence&mdash\;entities defined relationally as fragile networks of attachments. Scientific instruments function as sensitive devices that inscribe and thereby render these entities visible\, thereby making them open to collective concern.
\nThe symposium is thus both a call for dialogue and an invitation to rethink disciplinarity under the increasingly urgent\, deteriorating\, and transitional conditions of the present. We are interested in contemporary artistic and theoretical practices\, particularly those that combine the two and critically reflect on their disciplinary\, institutional\, and methodological conditions. If\, as Fé\;lix Guattari reminds us\, &ldquo\;there is no general pedagogy relative to the constitution of a living transdisciplinarity\,&rdquo\; then where and how might such a transdisciplinarity be practiced today? \;
\nPossible contributions might focus on: \;
\nSubmission Guidelines:
\nAbstract: \;max. 300 words
\nPresentation length: \;20 minutes \;with time reserved for discussion.
\nPlease send an abstract (max. 300 words) and a short biographical note to: \; k2035920@kingston.ac.uk
\nDeadline for submissions: \;26 April 2026
Notification of acceptance: \;10 May 2026
The event is organised as a \;PhD student-led symposium supported by the Techne AHRC Doctoral Training Partnership.
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260612T170000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260612T183000 SUMMARY:When is an official source not a reliable source? An analysis of mainstream misinformation and credibility UID:20260614T124509Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:I would like to draw your attention to the following online philosophy seminar series\, hosting by the Center for International Philosophy at Beijing Normal University at Zhuhai this semester.
\nOn June 12th\, 5pm China Standard Time\, Fred Matthews (Bristol) will be presenting a talk titled "When is an official source not a reliable source? An analysis of mainstream misinformation and credibility"
\nAttendance is free.
\nPlease register for the event by sending an email to:
\nm.dentith@bnu.edu.cn
\nfor the Zoom link and password.
\nAbstract: When researching conspiracy theories and misinformation\, much emphasis is placed upon the status of &lsquo\;official sources&rsquo\;. Conspiracy theories are sometimes defined in terms of their opposition to the narratives put forward by official sources\, and the condemnation of conspiracy theories often occurs alongside the belief that we should place our trust in official sources of information. It will be the contention of this paper that we need a better understanding of &lsquo\;official sources&rsquo\;\, and that some official sources are capable of promoting a potentially dangerous form of &lsquo\;mainstream misinformation&rsquo\; if not assessed critically.
\nI shall argue that official sources of information are indeed crucial and often deserve our trust\, but that we also need a clearer sense of what counts as a trustworthy official source\, and what the hierarchy should be in different domains of enquiry. I shall begin with what I believe is the widely accepted view that not all official sources are created equal. Regardless of our political views\, most people probably treat government bodies which have a possible agenda with greater scepticism than independent scientific institutions and so on. I will then analyse some prominent examples of official sources and how much trust we should place in them\, highlighting the flaws with each of them. It will become clear that whether we should place our trust in these sources depends greatly on the context\, and the sort of claim being assessed. Furthermore\, I will suggest that there is a worrying tendency for us to be subject to the &lsquo\;halo effect of expertise&rsquo\;\, which can lead to clear cases of misinformation being promoted by mainstream\, generally reliable sources. This has a tendency to slip under the radar. There also appears to be a &lsquo\;halo effect of class&rsquo\;\, in which ideas that would seemingly be dismissed as disreputable conspiracy theorizing by &lsquo\;outsiders&rsquo\; nonetheless manage to attain a status of respectability when put forward by famous\, privileged\, or influential figures.
\nI shall finally present a path for moving forward\, arguing that all official and influential sources\, no matter how trustworthy they may appear to be\, must be subjected to appropriate intellectual scrutiny. This means that their claims should often\, although importantly not always\, be assessed carefully and scrutinized for possible sources of bias. This applies even (or especially) when we are dealing with very reputable figures or institutions. In this way\, we can develop a safety buffer against mainstream sources of misinformation while simultaneously keeping non-mainstream misinformation at bay.
\nBio: Fred Matthews is a Teaching Assistant and recent PhD graduate at the University of Bristol. His main areas of research are in political philosophy and environmental ethics. He also has an interest in social epistemology and the philosophy of conspiracy theories. His most recent articles include &lsquo\;Liberalism and Individual Freedom in the Climate Crisis&rsquo\; (Environmental Ethics\, forthcoming) and &lsquo\;On the Censorship of Conspiracy Theories&rsquo\; (Social Epistemology\, 2025). Before his PhD at Bristol\, he completed an MPhil in Political Theory at the University of Oxford\, and a BA in Philosophy at the University of East Anglia.
\nThe meeting time is the 12th of June\, 5pm China Standard Time [9am GMT\, June 12th]
\nMeeting time in other timezones:
\n- 10am\, British Standard Time
\n- 11am Central European Standard Time
\n- 2am\, Pacific Daylight Time
\n- 9pm\, New Zealand Standard Time
ORGANIZER;CN=M R. X. Dentith: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260613T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260613T170000 SUMMARY:4th Annual Conference of The Collective: Women in Legal Philosophy UID:20260614T124510Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:Europe/London LOCATION:Worcester College\, Oxford\, United Kingdom\, OX1 2HB DESCRIPTION:The purpose of this annual conference is to provide an interactive forum for new work by women in legal theory and philosophy of law whose methodology is analytic. \; The conference draws primarily from women in North America\, Europe and the United Kingdom. \; Participants include both students and professionals. \; The event is hybrid and pre-read. \; In-person attendance is by invitation only\, but all are welcome to register to attend virtually using this link:
\n\;https://app.smartsheet.com/b/form/019cbaa8ad1a7a3492d4403f512ab706
\nPapers will be available online two weeks in advance. Links to join will be sent out one week in advance.
ORGANIZER;CN=Michelle Dempsey;CN=Kara Woodbury-Smith: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Dublin:20260614T230000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Dublin:20260614T230000 SUMMARY:International Conference on Christian Phenomena UID:20260614T124511Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:Europe/Dublin LOCATION:Dromoland\, Newmarket on Fergus\, Ireland DESCRIPTION:This conference brings together scholars\, scientists\, missionaries\, and pilgrims to examine contemporary Christian phenomena from multiple disciplinary perspectives. By integrating academic research with documented personal experience\, our event aims to advance the study of Christian artifacts\, texts\, mystics\, and alleged visionaries.
\nThrough the exchange of academic research and lived testimony\, the conference seeks to foster a rigorous and balanced understanding of extraordinary religious experiences in the modern Christian world.
\nThis conference is intended for Individuals wishing to share personal testimony or accounts of extraordinary Christian experience and Academic researchers seeking to present and disseminate their scholarly work on Christian phenomena.
\nThe conference will take place in picturesque Dromoland\, County Clare\, along Ireland&rsquo\;s iconic Wild Atlantic Way. Hybrid presentations are also welcomed. \;
\nConference Themes
\nSubmissions are invited on topics including\, but not limited to:
\n&bull\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; Scientific and historical studies of Christian relics
\n&bull\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; Research on the Medjugorje apparitions
\n&bull\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; Psychological and interdisciplinary studies of visionaries
\n&bull\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; Studies related to The Poem of the Man-God and similar texts
\n&bull\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; The life and work of modern saints (1900&ndash\;present)
\n&bull\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; Mystical Phenomena in Pilgrimage and Missionary Work
ORGANIZER;CN=Damien Mac Namara: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260615T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260615T090000 SUMMARY:JIS Symposium 2026: The Future of Democracy: Renewing Ordered Liberty UID:20260614T124512Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:CALL FOR PAPERS JIS SYMPOSIUM 2026 \nTHE FUTURE OF DEMOCRACY: RENEWING ORDERED LIBERTY\nPASADENA\, CALIFORNIA\, USA\, 17 October 2026 (Online: Zoom) HOSTED BY OMEGA GRADUATE SCHOOL\nSuggested Themes:\nBy its 250th anniversary\, American democracy is at a crossroads. The American experiment in self-government faces a triple challenge: moral\, cultural\, and political. In The Fragility of Order (2018)\, George Weigel recounts America’s major twentieth-century challenges whose successes have come into question. Weigel argues that order is a “fragile thing\,” and needs continual renewal\, especially in a postmodern cultural context unsure about the truth of anything. According to Weigel\, order rapidly unraveled in the United States on three levels: moral\, cultural\, and political. Skepticism and relativism of the moral order found expression in nihilism in both popular and high culture\, which also translated into increased partisanship in the political order. The question arises how to restore the American Founders’ ideal of a government that invoked “the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God\,” with a conception of human nature as a “crooked timber of humanity\,” but redeemable\, that set up a constitutional framework with checks and balances to circumscribe the exercise of political power. If this “One nation under God\, with liberty and justice for all\,” is to endure\, then its Judeo-Christian cultural roots need to be rediscovered to nurture individuals\, families\, and communities\, reaffirming America’s promise of equality of opportunity\, in contrast to quasi-Marxist “equity” as leveling egalitarianism or “equal outcomes\,” a democratic temptation that Alexis de Tocqueville warned against in his Democracy in America. The neo-Freudian obsession with sex and its perversions needs to yield to the imago Dei vision of human dignity (Gen 1:27)\; the un-American emphasis on race and gender in education and public policy (affirmative action/DEI) replaced by merit as the best criterion for gauging individual effort\; while politics need the leaven of respect for all. In brief\, can America find its soul and redeem the American Dream?\nJIS Symposium 2026 endeavors to bring together scholars from a wide range of disciplines and denominations for an exciting international conference which takes both scholarship and faith seriously.\n JIS Symposium 2026: The Future of Democracy: Renewing Ordered Liberty (Online via Zoom) is co-sponsored by IIR-ICSA-JIS. All conference participants must pre-register. Abstracts (250 words) due: June 15\, 2026: c/o Dr. O. Gruenwald\, JIS Editor\, 1065 Pine Bluff Dr.\, Pasadena\, CA 91107\, USA\, per e-mail (no attachments) to: info@jis3.org. Include: Paper Title\, First & Last Name\, faculty or student\, institution\, mailing address\, telephone & e-mail. Fully-developed papers will be considered for publication in the refereed Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies XXXIX 2027. Web: https://www.jis3.org/symposium2026. ORGANIZER;CN=Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies;CN=Oskar Gruenwald: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260529T212550Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20260616T113000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20260617T170000 SUMMARY:Entity Realism Beyond Manipulation UID:20260614T124513Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq TZID:Europe/Zurich LOCATION:Hochschulstrasse 4\, Bern\, Switzerland\, 3012 DESCRIPTION:We are pleased to share the program and registration details for the workshop Entity Realism Beyond Manipulation. Participation (including lunch and refreshments) is free of charge\, but we ask you to register \;by 7 June 2026 \;by sending your name and affiliation to \;mahdi.khalili@unibe.ch. The program is as follows:
\nTuesday\, June 16
11.30 &ndash\; 11.45 \;Welcome Address
11.45 &ndash\; 12.30 \;Katherine Morrow\, University of Oslo \;&mdash\; \;Against Selective Antirealism About Ecological Entities
\n12.30 &ndash\; 14.00 \; Lunch Break
\n14.00 &ndash\; 14.45 \;Kenneth Aizawa\, Rutgers University Newark \;&mdash\; \;Compositional Abduction and Entity Realism
\n14.45 &ndash\; 15.30 \;Mahdi Khalili\, University of Bern \;&mdash\; \;Entity Realism about Black Holes
\n15.30 &ndash\; 16.00 \; \; \; Coffee Break
\n16.00 &ndash\; 16.45 \;Gauvain Leconte-Chevillard\, University of Namur \;&mdash\; \;No Manipulation\, No Entities? The Ontological Commitment of Natural \;Experiments in Astrophysics and Cosmology
\n16.45 &ndash\; 18.00 \;Mauricio Suá\;rez\, Complutense University of Madrid \;&mdash\; \;Deflating Experimental Realism in Astrophysics
\n19.00 &ndash\; 22.00 \; Workshop Dinner \;
\nWednesday\, June 17
\n11.00 &ndash\; 11.45 \; \;Thijs Latten\, Delft University of Technology \;&mdash\; \;An Engineering Perspective on Quantum State Realism: A Case Study in \;Expanding Causal Realism
\n11.45 &ndash\; 12.30 \;Ruey-Lin Chen\, National Chung Cheng University &\; \;Jonathan Hricko\, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University \;&mdash\; \;Real Entities and Real Causal Relationships: The Cases of the Transgenic and \;Gene Knockout/Knock-In Methods
\n12.30 &ndash\; 14.00 \; \; \; Lunch Break
\n14.00 &ndash\; 14.45 \;Matthias Egg\, University of Bern \;&mdash\; \;Effective Entity Realism
\n14.45 &ndash\; 16.00 \;Nora Boyd \;(online)\, Siena University \;&mdash\; \;How to Get in Touch With Distant Reality: The Causal Production of Empirical Data
\n16.00 &ndash\; 16.30 \; \; Coffee Break
\n16.30 &ndash\; 17.15 Panel Discussion
\n17.15 &ndash\; 17.30 \; \; \; Closing Remarks
\n\nThis conference is part of the project Extending the Scope of Causal Realism\, supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation. \;
ORGANIZER;CN=Mahdi Khalili;CN=Matthias Egg;CN=Frederick Britt: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR