In Conversation: Exploring the Philosophy of Money and Finance &ndash\; Series III
\nA series of interviews with contributors to The Philosophy of Money and Finance (Hardcover\, OUP 2024\; Paperback\, fall 2025)
\nSchedule
\n"Truth in Financial Accounting"
Author: Christopher J. Cowton (Emeritus\, University of Huddersfield)
Interviewer: Lisa Warenski (CUNY Graduate Center)
Date and Time: 15 January 2026\, 18:00 CET
"Green Central Banking" \;
Authors: Peter Dietsch (University of Victoria)\; Clé\;ment Fontan (University of Louvain)
Interviewer: Jens van't Klooster
Date and Time: 25 March 2026\, 18:00 CET
"On the Wrongfulness of Bank Contributions to Financial Crises"
Author: \;Richard Endö\;rfer (University of Gothenburg)
Interviewer: Kobi Finestone (Univeresity of San Diego)
Date and Time: 01 June 2026\, 18:00 CET
"Bitcoins Left and Right: A Normative Assessment of a Digital Currency"
Authors: Lars Lindblom and Joakim Sandberg
Interviewer: Violet Victoria
Date and Time: October (TBA) 2026\, 18:00 CET
We're delighted to invite you to the research seminar of the Department of Theoretical Philosophy at the University of Bucharest. These are organized in partnership with CELFIS\, the Center for Logic\, Philosophy and History of Science at UB. Here are talks scheduled so far:
\nFall 2025:
\nOctober 28\, 5pm: Alexandru Dragomir &\; Andrei Mărăşoiu (University of Bucharest\, \;f2f)\, "The Inconstant Moral Expert: the case of LLMs"
\nNovember 25\, 4pm: Nicholas Rimell (Chinese University of Hong Kong\, hybrid via Zoom)\, "A Metaphysics of Despair"
\nNovember 28\, 2pm: Micah Thomas Pimaro\, Jr. (University of Calabar\, \;f2f)\, "Placide Tempels&rsquo\;s Metaphysics: A challenge or a trap for African philosophy?"
\nDecember 2\, 3pm: Nora Grigore (Romanian Academy\, Institute of Philosophy and Psychology\, f2f)\, "Worthiness and Expediency: a Distinction without a Difference?"
\nDecember 19\, 2pm: Alin Olteanu (Shanghai International Studies University\, ICUB\, \;f2f)\, "Iconic Imagination in Modeling: A Semiotic Approach to Scientific Inquiry"
\nJanuary 16\, 2pm: Marco Facchin (University of Antwerp\, hybrid via Zoom)\, \;"Is mental content an illusion?" \;
\nJanuary 22\, 12pm: Sandra Brâ\;nzaru (University of Bucharest\, CELFIS\, FPSE\, \;f2f)\, "Conceptualising Empathy"
\nFebruary 10\, 4pm: Marian Călborean (OPTI Software &\; University of Bucharest\, f2f)\, "The minimal ontology of time" \;
\nSpring 2026:
\nMarch 27\, 2pm: Erik Myin (University of Antwerp\, \;hybrid \;via Zoom)\, &ldquo\;Of a Different Mind&rdquo\;
\nMarch 30: \;Mariona Eiren Miyata-Sturm (University of Oxford\, f2f)\, &ldquo\;The metacognitive account of aesthetics in science&rdquo\;
\nApril 3: \;René\; \;van Woudenberg (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam\, \;hybrid \;via Zoom)\, "Are LLMs Authors?"
\nMay 11\, 12pm: Gheorge Ştefanov (U. Bucharest\, f2f)\; "Ce nu pot vedea neuroștiințele? &mdash\; \;Gramatica \;libertății: Wittgenstein\, Anscombe și critica determinismului tare"
\nMay 13\, 3pm: Andrei Moldovan (U. Salamanca\, f2f)\, \;&ldquo\;Between Independence and Guidance: A Dilemma for Intellectual Autonomy&rdquo\;
\nMay 19\, 10am: Daian Bica (Heinrich Heine University\, \;hybrid \;via Zoom)\, \;''How to Tame &lsquo\;Abundance&rsquo\;? Roman Frigg&rsquo\;s User Manual''
\nJune 5\, 2pm: Paula Tomi (National University of Science and Technology 'Politehnica' Bucharest\, \;f2f)\, &ldquo\;LLMs and truth pluralism&rdquo\;
\nJune 15\, 6.45pm: Ioan Muntean (UT Rio Grande Valley\, UI Urbana\, \;f2f)\, "Reflective equilibrium and scientific progress"
\nPrevious events \;in the series are available at: \;
\n2021-22: \;https://philevents.org/event/show/93365 \;
\n2022-23: \;https://philevents.org/event/show/105249 \;
\nhttps://filosofie.unibuc.ro/category/seminar-cercetare-dft/ \;
\nhttps://icub.unibuc.ro/2022/06/14/workshop-semantic-cognition-and-truth/ \;
\nFor those of you who would like to join some of the meetings but have overlapping commitments\, we will do our best to record the meetings whenever everyone in attendance consents to it\, and to then upload the recordings on the Department's YouTube channel. Previous talks are available here:
\nhttps://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOgUq3dN8CXI4L6DhZT1f_Q
ORGANIZER;CN="Andrei Mărăşoiu": METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260218T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20261209T170000 SUMMARY:Reconstructing Carnap Webinar Series 2026 UID:20260823T230125Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:I am excited to share that the \;Reconstructing Carnap Webinar Series \;will resume in \;February 2026! Please find the official flyer attached. All talks will take place from \;4:30 PM to 6:30 PM CET \;(10:30 AM&ndash\;12:30 PM EST).
The webinar can be accessed via the following link: https://meet.google.com/uaq-jqpf-mwr
Schedule of speakers:
The series is organized in collaboration with \;Carnap in Context IV \;(Ö\;AW\, FWF Grant PAT7905424) and \;Rudolf Carnap Digital \;(MCMP\, LMU Munich). \;
ORGANIZER;CN=Caterina Del Sordo;CN=Luca Oliva;CN=Silvano Zipoli Caiani: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260317T170000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20261117T170000 SUMMARY:Wittgenstein's Lecture on Ethics: Online Lecture Series UID:20260823T230126Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:&Eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;-&phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &sigma\;&kappa\;έ&psi\;&eta\;\, ό&pi\;&omega\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&delta\;ύ&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&chi\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&mu\;ό &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Alpha\;&lambda\;έ&xi\;&eta\; &Kappa\;&alpha\;&rho\;&pi\;&omicron\;ύ&zeta\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;\, &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &alpha\;&pi\;&omicron\;&tau\;&epsilon\;&lambda\;&epsilon\;ί &alpha\;&pi\;&lambda\;ώ&sigmaf\; &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &nu\;έ&alpha\; &theta\;&epsilon\;&omega\;&rho\;&eta\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &pi\;&rho\;ό&tau\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&eta\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &rho\;&iota\;&zeta\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&tau\;ό&pi\;&iota\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; ί&delta\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &nu\;&omicron\;ή&mu\;&alpha\;&tau\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\;&sigmaf\;\, &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &kappa\;ί&nu\;&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\; &alpha\;&pi\;ό &tau\;&eta\; &phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &sigma\;ύ&sigma\;&tau\;&eta\;&mu\;&alpha\; &pi\;&rho\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &tau\;&eta\; &phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&chi\;&tau\;ή &epsilon\;&mu\;&pi\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&rho\;ί&alpha\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\;\, ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &eta\; &sigma\;&kappa\;έ&psi\;&eta\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &pi\;&epsilon\;&rho\;&iota\;&omicron\;&rho\;ί&zeta\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&eta\; &lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;ά&sigma\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&eta\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;ώ&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&epsilon\; &tau\;&rho\;ό&pi\;&omicron\; ύ&pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&xi\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&mu\;&mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&omicron\;&chi\;ή&sigmaf\; &sigma\;&tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &pi\;&rho\;&alpha\;&gamma\;&mu\;&alpha\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;. &Sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &pi\;&upsilon\;&rho\;ή&nu\;&alpha\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ή&sigmaf\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &pi\;&rho\;&omicron\;&omicron\;&pi\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή&sigmaf\; &beta\;&rho\;ί&sigma\;&kappa\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &eta\; έ&nu\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&alpha\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &Alpha\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&chi\;&tau\;ή&sigmaf\; &Omicron\;&lambda\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\;\, &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\; &delta\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&alpha\;&mu\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;&eta\;-&kappa\;&lambda\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&sigma\;&tau\;ή&sigmaf\; &epsilon\;&nu\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\; &mu\;έ&sigma\;&alpha\; &sigma\;&tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &omicron\;&pi\;&omicron\;ί&alpha\; &omicron\; ά&nu\;&theta\;&rho\;&omega\;&pi\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &omicron\; &kappa\;ό&sigma\;&mu\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;-&sigma\;&upsilon\;&gamma\;&kappa\;&rho\;&omicron\;&tau\;&omicron\;ύ&nu\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &chi\;&omega\;&rho\;ί&sigmaf\; &nu\;&alpha\; &tau\;&alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ί&zeta\;&omicron\;&nu\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\;\, &sigma\;&upsilon\;&gamma\;&kappa\;&rho\;&omicron\;&tau\;ώ&nu\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ό &pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &omicron\; &Kappa\;&alpha\;&rho\;&pi\;&omicron\;ύ&zeta\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &omicron\;&nu\;&omicron\;&mu\;ά&zeta\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &Mu\;&eta\;-&Tau\;&alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &Tau\;&alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;\, &delta\;&eta\;&lambda\;&alpha\;&delta\;ή &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &sigma\;&chi\;έ&sigma\;&eta\; ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &tau\;&omicron\; έ&nu\;&alpha\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &alpha\;&pi\;&omicron\;&rho\;&rho\;&omicron\;&phi\;ά &tau\;&omicron\; ά&lambda\;&lambda\;&omicron\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &omicron\;ύ&tau\;&epsilon\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&alpha\;&mu\;έ&nu\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &alpha\;&pi\;&omicron\;&lambda\;ύ&tau\;&omega\;&sigmaf\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&chi\;&omega\;&rho\;&iota\;&sigma\;&mu\;έ&nu\;&omicron\;\, &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &epsilon\;&nu\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &sigma\;&epsilon\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&rho\;&kappa\;ή &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&mu\;ό&rho\;&phi\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\; &mu\;έ&sigma\;&alpha\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &chi\;&rho\;ό&nu\;&omicron\;. &Eta\; &pi\;&rho\;&alpha\;&gamma\;&mu\;&alpha\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;\, &sigma\;&epsilon\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ή &tau\;&eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;-&phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &sigma\;ύ&lambda\;&lambda\;&eta\;&psi\;&eta\;\, &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&alpha\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &omicron\;&upsilon\;&sigma\;ί&alpha\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&delta\;&iota\;&kappa\;&alpha\;&sigma\;ί&alpha\; &Sigma\;&chi\;&epsilon\;&sigma\;&iota\;&alpha\;&kappa\;ή&sigmaf\; &Sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;-&Gamma\;έ&nu\;&epsilon\;&sigma\;&eta\;&sigmaf\;\, έ&nu\;&alpha\; &pi\;&lambda\;έ&gamma\;&mu\;&alpha\; &zeta\;&omega\;&nu\;&tau\;&alpha\;&nu\;ώ&nu\; &sigma\;&chi\;έ&sigma\;&epsilon\;&omega\;&nu\; ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &kappa\;ά&theta\;&epsilon\; &mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;ή ύ&pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&xi\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&delta\;ύ&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;έ&sigma\;&alpha\; &alpha\;&pi\;ό &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;&eta\;&lambda\;&epsilon\;&pi\;ί&delta\;&rho\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&eta\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &alpha\;&mu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&beta\;&alpha\;ί&alpha\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&gamma\;&kappa\;&rho\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\;\, &gamma\;&epsilon\;&gamma\;&omicron\;&nu\;ό&sigmaf\; &pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\;ί&zeta\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;&epsilon\; &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &eta\;&rho\;&alpha\;&kappa\;&lambda\;&epsilon\;ί&tau\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&alpha\; &epsilon\;&nu\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &tau\;&omega\;&nu\; &alpha\;&nu\;&tau\;&iota\;&theta\;έ&tau\;&omega\;&nu\;\, &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &epsilon\;&kappa\;&pi\;ό&rho\;&epsilon\;&upsilon\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Epsilon\;&nu\;ό&sigmaf\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &Pi\;&lambda\;&omega\;&tau\;ί&nu\;&omicron\;\, &tau\;&eta\; &mu\;&omicron\;&nu\;&iota\;&sigma\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &omicron\;&nu\;&tau\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;ί&alpha\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Sigma\;&pi\;&iota\;&nu\;ό&zeta\;&alpha\;\, &tau\;&eta\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&lambda\;&epsilon\;&kappa\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &kappa\;ί&nu\;&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Chi\;έ&gamma\;&kappa\;&epsilon\;&lambda\;\, &tau\;&eta\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;-&alpha\;&nu\;ή&kappa\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&nu\; &alpha\;&nu\;&theta\;&rho\;ώ&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &Epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &Chi\;ά&iota\;&nu\;&tau\;&epsilon\;&gamma\;&kappa\;&epsilon\;&rho\;\, &tau\;&eta\; «\;&sigma\;ά&rho\;&kappa\;&alpha\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &kappa\;ό&sigma\;&mu\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;»\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; Merleau-Ponty &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&delta\;&iota\;&kappa\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&iota\;&alpha\;&kappa\;ή &omicron\;&nu\;&tau\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;ί&alpha\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; Whitehead.
\n&Sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\; &kappa\;έ&nu\;&tau\;&rho\;&omicron\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ή&sigmaf\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &sigma\;&kappa\;έ&psi\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&pi\;&tau\;ύ&sigma\;&sigma\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &eta\; &Omicron\;&nu\;&tau\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;ί&alpha\; &Mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&mu\;ό&rho\;&phi\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\;&sigmaf\;\, &sigma\;ύ&mu\;&phi\;&omega\;&nu\;&alpha\; &mu\;&epsilon\; &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &omicron\;&pi\;&omicron\;ί&alpha\; &tau\;&omicron\; &Epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&delta\;&omicron\;&mu\;έ&nu\;&omicron\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &gamma\;&epsilon\;&nu\;&nu\;ά&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&chi\;&eta\;&mu\;&alpha\;&tau\;ί&zeta\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&rho\;&kappa\;ώ&sigmaf\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &epsilon\;&delta\;ώ &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&delta\;ύ&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &eta\; &Pi\;&omicron\;&iota\;&eta\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Kappa\;ό&sigma\;&mu\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &Kappa\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&mu\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &Pi\;&omicron\;ί&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\;\, &delta\;&eta\;&lambda\;&alpha\;&delta\;ή &omega\;&sigmaf\; &eta\; ί&delta\;&iota\;&alpha\; &eta\; &delta\;&eta\;&mu\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &pi\;&rho\;ά&xi\;&eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\; &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &omicron\;&pi\;&omicron\;ί&alpha\; &eta\; &pi\;&rho\;&alpha\;&gamma\;&mu\;&alpha\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;&omicron\;&pi\;&omicron\;&iota\;&epsilon\;ί&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;&omicron\;-&epsilon\;&kappa\;&delta\;&eta\;&lambda\;ώ&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\;. &Eta\; &pi\;&omicron\;&iota\;&eta\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ή &pi\;&eta\;&gamma\;ά&zeta\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &alpha\;&pi\;ό &tau\;&eta\; &delta\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&alpha\;&mu\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &sigma\;&chi\;έ&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &Alpha\;&beta\;ύ&sigma\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;\, &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Mu\;&eta\;&delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\;ό&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Pi\;&alpha\;&nu\;&tau\;ό&sigmaf\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&theta\;ώ&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Chi\;ά&omicron\;&upsilon\;&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &Tau\;ά&xi\;&eta\;&sigmaf\;\, ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &tau\;&omicron\; &Mu\;&eta\;&delta\;έ&nu\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &sigma\;&eta\;&mu\;&alpha\;ί&nu\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &alpha\;&nu\;&upsilon\;&pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&xi\;ί&alpha\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &delta\;&eta\;&mu\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &delta\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&alpha\;&tau\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;\, έ&nu\;&alpha\; &pi\;&rho\;&omicron\;-&omicron\;&nu\;&tau\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό &beta\;ά&theta\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&pi\;ό &tau\;&omicron\; &omicron\;&pi\;&omicron\;ί&omicron\; &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&delta\;ύ&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&omicron\; &Pi\;ά&nu\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&epsilon\;&chi\;ή&sigmaf\; &phi\;&alpha\;&nu\;έ&rho\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\;\, &epsilon\;&nu\;ώ &tau\;&omicron\; &Chi\;ά&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &alpha\;&pi\;&lambda\;ή &alpha\;&tau\;&alpha\;&xi\;ί&alpha\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &pi\;&epsilon\;&delta\;ί&omicron\; &Delta\;&eta\;&mu\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή&sigmaf\; &Alpha\;&beta\;&epsilon\;&beta\;&alpha\;&iota\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\;\, &eta\; &alpha\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&chi\;&tau\;ή &mu\;ή&tau\;&rho\;&alpha\; &tau\;&omega\;&nu\; &mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;ώ&nu\;\, &alpha\;&pi\;ό &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &omicron\;&pi\;&omicron\;ί&alpha\; &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&delta\;ύ&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &eta\; &Tau\;ά&xi\;&eta\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &pi\;&rho\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omega\;&rho\;&iota\;&nu\;ή &mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;&omicron\;&pi\;&omicron\;ί&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\;\, &gamma\;&iota\;&alpha\; &nu\;&alpha\; &epsilon\;&pi\;&iota\;&sigma\;&tau\;&rho\;έ&psi\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &pi\;ά&lambda\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\; &Chi\;ά&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &mu\;έ&sigma\;&alpha\; &sigma\;&epsilon\; έ&nu\;&alpha\;&nu\; &rho\;&upsilon\;&theta\;&mu\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;&omicron\;-&upsilon\;&pi\;&epsilon\;&rho\;&beta\;&alpha\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό &kappa\;ύ&kappa\;&lambda\;&omicron\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&mu\;ό&rho\;&phi\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\;&sigmaf\;\, &gamma\;&epsilon\;&gamma\;&omicron\;&nu\;ό&sigmaf\; &pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&alpha\;&nu\;&tau\;ά &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &eta\;&rho\;&alpha\;&kappa\;&lambda\;&epsilon\;ί&tau\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&alpha\; &alpha\;&rho\;&mu\;&omicron\;&nu\;ί&alpha\; &tau\;&omega\;&nu\; &alpha\;&nu\;&tau\;&iota\;&theta\;έ&tau\;&omega\;&nu\;\, &tau\;&omicron\; &delta\;&eta\;&mu\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό &chi\;ά&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Nu\;ί&tau\;&sigma\;&epsilon\;\, &tau\;&eta\; &zeta\;&omega\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &omicron\;&rho\;&mu\;ή &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Mu\;&pi\;&epsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;&kappa\;&sigma\;ό&nu\;\, &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &pi\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&lambda\;&alpha\;&pi\;&lambda\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Nu\;&tau\;&epsilon\;&lambda\;έ&zeta\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\; &sigma\;ύ&gamma\;&chi\;&rho\;&omicron\;&nu\;&eta\; &epsilon\;&pi\;&iota\;&sigma\;&tau\;&eta\;&mu\;&omicron\;&nu\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &kappa\;&alpha\;&tau\;&alpha\;&nu\;ό&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;&omicron\;-&omicron\;&rho\;&gamma\;ά&nu\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &Pi\;&rho\;ί&gamma\;&kappa\;&omicron\;&zeta\;&iota\;&nu\;.
\n&Mu\;έ&sigma\;&alpha\; &sigma\;&epsilon\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ή &tau\;&eta\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&delta\;&iota\;&kappa\;&alpha\;&sigma\;ί&alpha\;\, &omicron\; &Kappa\;ό&sigma\;&mu\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;&eta\;&chi\;&alpha\;&nu\;&iota\;&sigma\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό &sigma\;ύ&sigma\;&tau\;&eta\;&mu\;&alpha\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;&omicron\;-&pi\;&omicron\;&iota\;&eta\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &delta\;&eta\;&mu\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;ί&alpha\;\, &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &zeta\;&omega\;&nu\;&tau\;&alpha\;&nu\;ή &rho\;&omicron\;ή ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &tau\;&omicron\; ά&mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;&omicron\; &gamma\;ί&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;ή &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &eta\; &mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;ή &epsilon\;&pi\;&iota\;&sigma\;&tau\;&rho\;έ&phi\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\; ά&mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;&omicron\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; έ&tau\;&sigma\;&iota\; &eta\; ύ&pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&xi\;&eta\; &epsilon\;&mu\;&phi\;&alpha\;&nu\;ί&zeta\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &gamma\;&epsilon\;&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή\, &sigma\;&chi\;&epsilon\;&sigma\;&iota\;&alpha\;&kappa\;ή &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &pi\;&omicron\;&iota\;&eta\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή. &Eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;-&phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &sigma\;&tau\;ά&sigma\;&eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&tau\;&omicron\;&pi\;ί&zeta\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &tau\;&omicron\; &kappa\;έ&nu\;&tau\;&rho\;&omicron\; &alpha\;&pi\;ό &tau\;&eta\; &gamma\;&nu\;ώ&sigma\;&eta\; &pi\;&rho\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &tau\;&eta\; &Beta\;&iota\;&omega\;&mu\;&alpha\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &Sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\;\, ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &eta\; &alpha\;&lambda\;ή&theta\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&alpha\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &alpha\;&pi\;&lambda\;ώ&sigmaf\; &epsilon\;&nu\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &epsilon\;&mu\;&pi\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&rho\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&mu\;&mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&omicron\;&chi\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή\, &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&tau\;ά&sigma\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&eta\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\;&iota\;&sigma\;&mu\;&omicron\;ύ &mu\;&epsilon\; &tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &rho\;&upsilon\;&theta\;&mu\;ό &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &kappa\;ό&sigma\;&mu\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &epsilon\;&delta\;ώ &epsilon\;&mu\;&phi\;&alpha\;&nu\;ί&zeta\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &eta\; &Upsilon\;&pi\;έ&rho\;&beta\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &Gamma\;&lambda\;ώ&sigma\;&sigma\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&theta\;ώ&sigmaf\; &eta\; &alpha\;&lambda\;ή&theta\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&alpha\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &mu\;&pi\;&omicron\;&rho\;&epsilon\;ί &nu\;&alpha\; &pi\;&epsilon\;&rho\;&iota\;&omicron\;&rho\;&iota\;&sigma\;&tau\;&epsilon\;ί &sigma\;&epsilon\; &omicron\;&rho\;&iota\;&sigma\;&mu\;&omicron\;ύ&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &delta\;ό&gamma\;&mu\;&alpha\;&tau\;&alpha\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &beta\;&iota\;ώ&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; ά&mu\;&epsilon\;&sigma\;&eta\; &pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&sigma\;ί&alpha\;\, ό&pi\;&omega\;&sigmaf\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&phi\;&alpha\;ί&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &Sigma\;&omega\;&kappa\;&rho\;ά&tau\;&eta\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\; &phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &tau\;&rho\;ό&pi\;&omicron\; &zeta\;&omega\;ή&sigmaf\;\, &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&sigmaf\; &Sigma\;&tau\;&omega\;&iota\;&kappa\;&omicron\;ύ&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &tau\;έ&chi\;&nu\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &beta\;ί&omicron\;&upsilon\;\, &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &Zeta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\; &mu\;&eta\;-&epsilon\;&nu\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &epsilon\;&pi\;ί&gamma\;&nu\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\;\, &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; Wittgenstein &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&alpha\; ό&rho\;&iota\;&alpha\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &gamma\;&lambda\;ώ&sigma\;&sigma\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; Heidegger ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &eta\; &sigma\;&kappa\;έ&psi\;&eta\; &pi\;&lambda\;&eta\;&sigma\;&iota\;ά&zeta\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\; &sigma\;&iota\;&omega\;&pi\;ή &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\;. &Eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;-&phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\;\, &epsilon\;&pi\;&omicron\;&mu\;έ&nu\;&omega\;&sigmaf\;\, &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&gamma\;&kappa\;&rho\;&omicron\;&tau\;&epsilon\;ί &kappa\;&lambda\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&sigma\;&tau\;ό &sigma\;ύ&sigma\;&tau\;&eta\;&mu\;&alpha\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά έ&nu\;&alpha\;&nu\; &Alpha\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&chi\;&tau\;ό &Omicron\;&rho\;ί&zeta\;&omicron\;&nu\;&tau\;&alpha\;\, &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&rho\;&kappa\;ή &kappa\;ί&nu\;&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\; &pi\;&rho\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &tau\;&omicron\; Ά&pi\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&rho\;&omicron\; ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &eta\; &epsilon\;&nu\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &omicron\;&mu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&omicron\;&mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;ί&alpha\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &Kappa\;&alpha\;&theta\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &Epsilon\;&nu\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;/&Pi\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&lambda\;&alpha\;&pi\;&lambda\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;\, &delta\;&eta\;&lambda\;&alpha\;&delta\;ή &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &epsilon\;&nu\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &epsilon\;&kappa\;&delta\;&eta\;&lambda\;ώ&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;έ&sigma\;&alpha\; &alpha\;&pi\;ό &tau\;&eta\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&phi\;&omicron\;&rho\;&omicron\;&pi\;&omicron\;ί&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &pi\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&lambda\;&alpha\;&pi\;&lambda\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;\, &gamma\;&epsilon\;&gamma\;&omicron\;&nu\;ό&sigmaf\; &pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&delta\;έ&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;&epsilon\; &tau\;&eta\; &sigma\;ύ&mu\;&pi\;&tau\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&omega\;&nu\; &alpha\;&nu\;&tau\;&iota\;&theta\;έ&tau\;&omega\;&nu\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &Nu\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό&lambda\;&alpha\;&omicron\; &Kappa\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&zeta\;&alpha\;&nu\;ό\, &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &epsilon\;&xi\;&epsilon\;&lambda\;&iota\;&kappa\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &epsilon\;&nu\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; Teilhard de \;Chardin\, &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &pi\;&omicron\;&lambda\;ύ&pi\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&kappa\;&eta\; &sigma\;&kappa\;έ&psi\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; Morin\, &tau\;&eta\; &delta\;&eta\;&mu\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &phi\;&alpha\;&nu\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&iota\;&alpha\;&kappa\;ή &theta\;έ&sigma\;&mu\;&iota\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; Castoriadis &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\; &phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &pi\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&lambda\;&alpha\;&pi\;&lambda\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; Deleuze.
\n&Sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\; &beta\;&alpha\;&theta\;ύ&tau\;&epsilon\;&rho\;&omicron\; &epsilon\;&pi\;ί&pi\;&epsilon\;&delta\;&omicron\;\, &eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;-&phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\; &omicron\;&delta\;&eta\;&gamma\;&epsilon\;ί &sigma\;&tau\;&eta\; &Sigma\;&iota\;&omega\;&pi\;&eta\;&lambda\;ή &Epsilon\;&pi\;ί&gamma\;&nu\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\;\, ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &eta\; &gamma\;&nu\;ώ&sigma\;&eta\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &pi\;&lambda\;έ&omicron\;&nu\; &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&lambda\;&upsilon\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&chi\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&sigma\;ί&alpha\; &mu\;έ&sigma\;&alpha\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\; &Mu\;&upsilon\;&sigma\;&tau\;ή&rho\;&iota\;&omicron\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &epsilon\;&delta\;ώ &eta\; &phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&tau\;&rho\;έ&pi\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&epsilon\; &sigma\;&tau\;ά&sigma\;&eta\; &delta\;έ&omicron\;&upsilon\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&pi\;έ&nu\;&alpha\;&nu\;&tau\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\; ά&rho\;&rho\;&eta\;&tau\;&omicron\;\, ό&pi\;&omega\;&sigmaf\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; Pascal &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&sigmaf\; &lambda\;ό&gamma\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&sigmaf\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&rho\;&delta\;&iota\;ά&sigmaf\;\, &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; Meister Eckhart &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &epsilon\;&sigma\;&omega\;&tau\;&epsilon\;&rho\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &sigma\;&iota\;&omega\;&pi\;ή\, &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; Levinas &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&omicron\; ά&pi\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&rho\;&omicron\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; Ά&lambda\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; Blanchot &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&omicron\; ό&rho\;&iota\;&omicron\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &gamma\;&lambda\;ώ&sigma\;&sigma\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\;. Έ&tau\;&sigma\;&iota\;\, &eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;-&phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &sigma\;&kappa\;έ&psi\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Kappa\;&alpha\;&rho\;&pi\;&omicron\;ύ&zeta\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&delta\;ύ&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &omicron\;&nu\;&tau\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;ί&alpha\; &delta\;&eta\;&mu\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή&sigmaf\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&mu\;ό&rho\;&phi\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ό&chi\;&rho\;&omicron\;&nu\;&alpha\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &upsilon\;&pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&xi\;&iota\;&alpha\;&kappa\;ό&sigmaf\; &tau\;&rho\;ό&pi\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &zeta\;&omega\;ή&sigmaf\;\, ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &eta\; &pi\;&rho\;&alpha\;&gamma\;&mu\;&alpha\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &alpha\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&chi\;&tau\;ή\, &sigma\;&chi\;&epsilon\;&sigma\;&iota\;&alpha\;&kappa\;ή &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &pi\;&omicron\;&iota\;&eta\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή\, &eta\; &gamma\;&nu\;ώ&sigma\;&eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;ώ&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&epsilon\; &sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\;\, &eta\; &epsilon\;&nu\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &phi\;&alpha\;&nu\;&epsilon\;&rho\;ώ&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &pi\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&lambda\;&alpha\;&pi\;&lambda\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &omicron\; ά&nu\;&theta\;&rho\;&omega\;&pi\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&lambda\;&epsilon\;ί&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &nu\;&alpha\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;έ&chi\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&delta\;&eta\;&tau\;ά &sigma\;&tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &kappa\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&mu\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&delta\;&iota\;&kappa\;&alpha\;&sigma\;ί&alpha\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &delta\;&eta\;&mu\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;ί&alpha\;&sigmaf\;\, &beta\;&iota\;ώ&nu\;&omicron\;&nu\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\; &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &Alpha\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&chi\;&tau\;ή &Omicron\;&lambda\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&delta\;&iota\;ά&kappa\;&omicron\;&pi\;&eta\; &kappa\;ί&nu\;&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;έ&sigma\;&alpha\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\; ά&pi\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&rho\;&omicron\; &mu\;&upsilon\;&sigma\;&tau\;ή&rho\;&iota\;&omicron\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; ύ&pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&xi\;&eta\;&sigmaf\;.
ORGANIZER;CN=Abhijith Jose: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260429T210000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20261126T170000 SUMMARY:Séminaire Arendt 2026 UID:20260823T230128Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:Le Ré\;seau Arendtien Francophone\, cré\;é\; en 2024\, vise à\; favoriser une synergie entre celles et ceux qui\, des amateurs aux chercheuses\, fré\;quentent la pensé\;e de Hannah Arendt. Dans cette optique\, nous cherchons à\; mettre en place un rendez-vous ré\;gulier pour en discuter les diffé\;rents interpré\;tations et aspects.
\nDu fait de l&rsquo\;é\;tendue de la francophonie\, ces sé\;minaires auront lieu en ligne. Leur principe sera le suivant : les participant-e-s auront tous et toutes pré\;alablement lu un article ou un chapitre ré\;cent\, lequel sera pré\;senté\; trè\;s rapidement par souci de prioriser les é\;changes (10 minutes) par son autrice ou auteur. À\; partir de celui-ci\, un-e membre du ré\;seau ouvrira (5 min) à\; un dé\;bat plus large afin de discuter\, outre l&rsquo\;article\, les diffé\;rents interpré\;tations et aspects de l&rsquo\;&oelig\;uvre d&rsquo\;Arendt (1h30).
\nProgramme 2026\nEn 2026\, nous proposons quatre sé\;ances ordinaires du sé\;minaire et une sé\;ance spé\;ciale : «\; Arendt et la science é\;conomique »\;\, «\; Arendt et le travail »\;\, «\; Liberté\;\, volonté\;\, politique »\;\, «\; Arendt et la violence »\;\, «\; Philosophie\, é\;ducation et politique »\;.
\nLe sé\;minaire est ouvert à\; toutes et tous sans inscription pré\;alable \; n&rsquo\;hé\;sitez pas à\; venir y assister et y participer. Les articles et textes discuté\;s sont disponibles sur le site du RAF. N&rsquo\;hé\;sitez pas non plus à\; nous contacter pour toute demande d&rsquo\;information complé\;mentaire.
\nLe RAF ?\nLe Ré\;seau Arendtien Francophone (RAF) se veut un espace divers et pluriel\, rassemblant une communauté\; de doctorant-e-s\, enseignant-e-s\, chercheurs/ses\, intellectuel-le-s et toute personne inté\;ressé\;e ou engagé\;e dans l'é\;tude et la diffusion de la pensé\;e d'Hannah Arendt en France et le monde francophone. À\; travers cette plateforme\, nous souhaitons favoriser les é\;changes intellectuels\, offrir une visibilité\; accrue aux travaux de recherche et cré\;er des liens solides entre francophones s'inté\;ressant à\; et puisant dans l'&oelig\;uvre de cette autrice majeure du XXe siè\;cle.
\nOutre l&rsquo\;organisation de ce sé\;minaire et d'é\;vè\;nements acadé\;miques lié\;s à\; la pensé\;e d'Arendt\, le ré\;seau actualise continuellement un site web qui met à\; disposition : une bibliographie des textes de langue franç\;aise consacré\;s à\; Arendt ou la mobilisant\, un annuaire des membres du ré\;seau\, un agenda des activité\;s francophones qui lui sont dé\;dié\;es et une lettre d'information mensuelle.
\nN'hé\;sitez pas à\; rejoindre le ré\;seau ou à\; nous contacter pour rejoindre l&rsquo\;é\;quipe d&rsquo\;animation !
\n ORGANIZER;CN="Rémi Zanni": METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260528T163000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260924T170000 SUMMARY:Inner Speech Colloquium UID:20260823T230129Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:We are happy to announce another season of the online Inner Speech colloquium starting next month\, with a new list of speakers: \;
\n- May 28th - Gary Lupyan (University of Wisconsin-Madison)
\n- June 25th - \;Kasia Jaszczolt (University of Cambridge)
\n- July 16th - \;Romain Bourdoncle (Collè\;ge de France) &\; Axel Baptista (Institut Jean Nicod)
\n- August 20th - Aleksandr Fadeev (University of Leuven)
\n- September 24th - Keith Frankish (University of Sheffield) \;
\nTimes are all 16:30 CEST
\nMore info about the first talk coming soon. We hope to see many of you there next month! For more information or to subscribe to the mailing list\, contact: jonida.kodra@uni-osnabrueck.de
\nBest regards\,
\nJonida Kodra\, Daniel Mü\;ller and Mathijs Geurts (University of Osnabrü\;ck and \;University of Salzburg)
ORGANIZER;CN=Jonida Kodra;CN=Mathijs Geurts;CN="Daniel Lennart Müller": METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260825T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260828T170000 SUMMARY:Online Course Ethics of AI UID:20260823T230130Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:Online Course on THE ETHICS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
\n\;Four days. Four major debates. Four internationally renowned invited professors.
\nArtificial Intelligence is already transforming how we work\, learn\, create\, govern societies\, practise medicine\, and understand what it means to be human. But who benefits from this transformation&mdash\;and what might be lost along the way?
\nThis intensive four-session online course examines some of the most urgent ethical\, social\, scientific\, and political questions raised by AI. Each session combines an accessible lecture with a live debate featuring a leading international figure:
\n \;Daron Acemoglu &mdash\; MIT economist and 2024 Nobel Laureate
Democracy\, Work and Artificial Intelligence (25 August 2026)
\;Brian Greene &mdash\; Columbia University physicist\, bestselling author and co-founder of the World Science Festival
Knowledge\, Science\, Education and Artificial Intelligence (26 August 2026)
\;Roman V. Yampolskiy &mdash\; University of Louisville computer scientist and leading AI-safety researcher
Medicine\, Bias and Existential Risk of Artificial Intelligence (27 August 2026)
\;Fernando Ribeiro &mdash\; vocalist of Moonspell\, writer and poet
Arts\, Music and Artificial Intelligence (28 August 2026)
\;25&ndash\;28 August 2026
\;16:00&ndash\;18:00 New York | 13:00&ndash\;15:00 Los Angeles | 21:00&ndash\;23:00 Lisbon
\;Live online via Zoom
\;Designed for a general audience &mdash\; no previous technical or philosophical training is required.
\nAcross four evenings\, the course will address questions that increasingly shape our collective future:
\n&bull\; Can AI strengthen democracy&mdash\;or concentrate power?
&bull\; Will automation liberate workers&mdash\;or deepen inequality?
&bull\; Can AI genuinely produce knowledge and creativity?
&bull\; How should education respond to generative AI?
&bull\; Can medical AI improve human life without reproducing discrimination?
&bull\; Could advanced AI become uncontrollable?
&bull\; What happens to artists\, authorship and originality in an automated culture?
This is not simply a course about new technology. It is an opportunity to examine the political\, ethical and human choices that will determine how AI is developed&mdash\;and whose interests it will ultimately serve.
\n \;Registration and information:
aiethicscourse@gmail.com
\n\n \;\nPlaces are limited. Register and join four evenings of serious\, accessible and internationally informed debate about the future of Artificial Intelligence.
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20260827T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20260830T170000 SUMMARY:EAJS2026\, the 18th International Conference of the European Association for Japanese Studies ヨーロッパ日本研究協会 (EAJS) UID:20260823T230131Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:Europe/Warsaw LOCATION:Poznań\, Poland DESCRIPTION:https://nomadit.co.uk/conference/eajs2026/paper/101689
\nhttps://research.berkeley.edu/surf-fellows/jiaqian-zhu/
\n ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260827T130000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260827T160000 SUMMARY:The Examined Algorithm: Strategies for Navigating AI in the Classroom | APA Live UID:20260823T230132Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:Have you been thinking about how to deal with AI in your philosophy classes this fall? In an effort to support philosophers as they respond to emergent problems\, the APA and the AAPT have organized a free\, two-afternoon\, interactive Zoom forum for philosophy teachers to share and develop strategies for addressing student AI usage. Participants will meet virtually in groups to discuss AI in introductory and general education philosophy courses\, AI in student writing\, AI in online philosophy courses\, and AI in formal logic. \;Because these AI discussions will be philosophy-specific\, we believe they will be particularly productive.
\nEach of the four 90-minute sessions will have a moderator\, who will give a brief presentation before opening the floor\, and a scribe\, who will take notes for later distribution to participants who are registered for any of the four sessions. The format will aspire to the AAPT-style\, active-learning sessions of The Teaching Hub. The sessions will be discussions\, not lectures. The focus will be on crowdsourcing the successful ways in which philosophers have responded to AI in their courses.
\nYou can register for any or all of the four 90-minute discussions: \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \;
\nThursday\, August 27
\nAI in Online Courses
1:00&ndash\;2:30 p.m. Eastern / 10:00&ndash\;11:30 a.m. Pacific
AI in Introductory &\; General Education Philosophy Courses
3:00&ndash\;4:30 p.m. Eastern / 12:00&ndash\;1:30 p.m. Pacific
Friday\, August 28
\nAI in Student Writing
1:00&ndash\;2:30 p.m. Eastern / 10:00&ndash\;11:30 a.m. Pacific
AI in Formal Logic Courses
3:00&ndash\;4:30 p.m. Eastern / 12:00&ndash\;1:30 p.m. Pacific
The Examined Algorithm is open only to APA and AAPT members. You can register as a member of either organization. To register as an AAPT member\, please use this link: \;https://forms.gle/JK3Zw1WdziRYouGp7.
\nIf you register as an AAPT member\, but your membership is out of date\, we will be in touch to ask you to renew\, or you can renew your membership here: \;https://www.pdcnet.org/aapt/American-Association-of-Philosophy-Teachers-(AAPT). \;
\nAPA Members who are not AAPT members may register here:https://www.apaonline.org/events/EventDetails.aspx?id=2079238. \; \; \; \; \; \;
\nRegistration will be available until 9 a.m. Eastern time / 6 a.m. Pacific time on the day of the event. Access information will be provided to registrants by email from the APA at least one hour prior to the start of the event. If you do not receive the Zoom access information by one hour before the event begins\, please contactinfo@apaonline.org.
\nA few notes:
\n1. Participants will be expected to keep their cameras on\, unless ADA accommodations are needed. We will all happily weather occasional interruptions from kids\, aging parents\, and non-human companions.
\n2. These sessions will not be recorded&mdash\;participants must attend live at the times listed. \;
\n3. If you are interested in being a scribe or moderator for one of the sessions (which still allows you to fully participate) please contact us as soon as you are able.
\n4. Please forward this information to colleagues who are not (yet) APA or AAPT members\, but who might find this philosophy-specific AI event interesting and useful.
\nWe hope to see you in a couple weeks!
\nAlexandra Bradner\, \;co-organizer
\nAAPT Executive Director and Chair of the APA Committee on Virtual Programming (alexandrabradner@gmail.com)
\nAndrew Mills\, co-organizer
\nChair of the AAPT Conference Programming Committee (andrewpmills@gmail.com)
ORGANIZER;CN=Alexandra Bradner;CN=Andrew Mills: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260827T130000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260828T170000 SUMMARY:Freedom and Authenticity - 8th International Interdisciplinary Conference UID:20260823T230133Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:Conference online (via Zoom)
\nCFP:
\nSince the postmodern movements such as Pop and hyperrealist art or literary genres ̶ New Journalism and creative non-fiction questioned the status of the real and the imitated\, the concept of authenticity has called for a constant reevaluation. Walter Benjamin&rsquo\;s 1935 assumption that &ldquo\;the presence of the original is the prerequisite to the concept of authenticity&rdquo\; has been called into question with the corporate and advertising practice continually rebranding the concept of authenticity to suit mass consumers&rsquo\; needs. Why is it then that within the contemporary culture\, with modes of expressions such as irony\, cynicism and sarcasm strongly present\, the notions of authenticity and freedom are still heavily linked with spiritual awakening and happiness? To what extent do authenticity\, individuality and freedom function as mere commercial products and advertising slogans? Have they over time become shallow romantic ideals or do they still hold the substance to be discovered and implemented into one&rsquo\;s line of thinking and living? What makes freedom and authenticity creatively attractive to artists\, thinkers and spiritual teachers? Can authenticity be defined\, measured\, conceptualized in the contemporary context of relativism? What are the main dynamics between freedom and authenticity?
\n\nDuring the conference\, we strive to discuss the contemporary status of authenticity and freedom\, their interrelationship and their association with concepts such as sincerity\, individuality\, vulnerability\, creativity and many others.
\n\nWe invite researchers representing various academic disciplines: art\, film studies\, literature\, theatre studies\, media studies\, anthropology\, psychology\, sociology\, politics\, cognitive studies\, to name a few.
\n\nDifferent forms of presentations are encouraged\, including case studies\, theoretical inquiries\, personal reflections\, problem-oriented arguments\, comparative analyses and creative expressions.
\n\nWe will be happy to hear from experienced scholars and young academics\, doctoral and graduate students\, as well as professionals from various disciplines. We also invite all persons interested in participating in the conference as listeners\, without giving a presentation.
\n\nOur repertoire of suggested topics includes but is not restricted to: \;
\n\nI. \;Sociology\, Anthropology\, History
\n\nGlobal and local authenticity
\nQuest for authenticity in the context of social and historical crisis
\nFreedom and coronavirus pandemic
\nII. Psychology and Psychiatry
\n\n\;Authenticity and self-growth
\n\;Authenticity and emotional armory &ndash\; perfectionism\, numbing\, etc.
\n\;Authenticity and shame
\n\;Authenticity and vulnerability
\n\;Authenticity and self-image
\n\;Authenticity and individuality: self-absorption versus self-confrontation \;
\nIII. \;Literature\, Film\, Theatre\, Visual Arts
\n\n\;Realism\, hyperrealism\, naturalism
\nAuthenticity and intertextuality: concepts such as original artwork\, reproduction\, printed representation\, copy\, etc.
\nGhostwriting
\nAuthenticity and autofiction
\nAuthenticity and creativity
\nAuthenticity and adaptation
\nOnline theatre performances during COVID-19
\nIV. \;Media Studies
\n\nFake news
\nSocial media marketing and authenticity
\nFreedom of speech
\nV. \; \;Philosophy and Worldviews
\n\nFreedom and authenticity as philosophical concepts
\nAuthenticity and ethics
\nAuthenticity and freedom as the highest humanistic values
\nExistential\, postmodern and contemporary view on authenticity
\nPlease submit abstracts (no longer than 300 words) of your proposed 20-minute presentation\, together with a short biographical note by 03 August 2026 \;to: conferencefreedom@gmail.com
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260827T180000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260827T193000 SUMMARY:Federico Carlassara - The Emergence of Psychology as a Human Science of Experience. A Phenomenological Proposal UID:20260823T230134Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:British Society for Phenomenology
\nBSP Research Seminar 2026 \;
\nSession 1: August
\nFederico Carlassara
\nOnline | 27 August | Free
\nThe 2026 season of the BSP Research Seminar runs for five months from August to December\, with one session every month featuring a speaker from the world of phenomenology. \;
\nFederico Carlassara
\nThe Emergence of Psychology as a Human Science of Experience. A Phenomenological Proposal
\nDate and time: Thursday 27 August 2026\, 18:00&ndash\;19:30 UK/Ireland time \;
\nMainstream contemporary psychology usually addresses human experience in an extremely reductionist way. That is\, it reduces the latter to simple and isolated parts\, be it neurons\, neurotransmitters or visible behaviours and quantifiable reactions. And yet\, human experience is an incredibly complex and multifaceted subject-matter that can&rsquo\;t be reduced to its supposed biological correlates or to quantifiable variables. Rather\, it emerges as a complex\, meaningful whole in constant evolution. In this talk\, I suggest that psychology needs a radical inquiry into its nature and its methods if it wants to be a rightful science in its own right. If we don&rsquo\;t develop a solid epistemological foundation of psychology\, the latter is likely to not really grasp its subject-matter according to its nature and risks to fail as a science. Finally\, I will claim that psychology could greatly benefit on a foundational level from Husserl&rsquo\;s late thought: genetic phenomenology. \;
\nFind out more about session 1 - including free online joining instructions - and the remaining sessions of the BSP Research Seminar 2026 at BSP Online.
ORGANIZER;CN=Alessandro Guardascione: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20260828T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20260828T103000 SUMMARY:'Here and There:' Food\, Safety and Community in Contemporary Performance Art 「あちらとこちら」：現代パフォーマンス・アートにおける食、安全、そしてコミュニティ UID:20260823T230135Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:Europe/Warsaw LOCATION:Poznań\, Poland DESCRIPTION:https://coolhunting.com/link-about-it/does-this-soup-taste-ambivalent/
\nhttps://dajf.org.uk/event/the-art-of-soup-a-taste-of-fukushima
\nhttps://ocula.com/magazine/conversations/ei-arakawa-frieze-presentation/
\nhttps://nomadit.co.uk/conference/eajs2026/paper/101689
\nhttps://research.berkeley.edu/surf-fellows/jiaqian-zhu/
\nhttps://nomadit.co.uk/conference/eajs2026/pp/101689
\nPaper short abstract In the wake of the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami\, artists attempt to explore ways to present the motif of &ldquo\;3/11&rdquo\; beyond geographic confinement&mdash\;beyond Japan. Given restricted access to the nuclear zone\, how do artists respond to &ldquo\;3/11&rdquo\; without direct physical proximity to Fukushima? Paper long abstract
\nIn the wake of the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami\, artists attempt to explore ways to present the motif of &ldquo\;3/11&rdquo\; beyond geographic confinement&mdash\;beyond Japan. Given restricted access to the nuclear zone\, how do artists respond to &ldquo\;3/11&rdquo\; without direct physical proximity to Fukushima? How do overseas Japanese artists represent what took place back in their homeland? How do people outside Japan gain the access to experience and respond to &ldquo\;3/11&rdquo\;? To grapple with this representational dilemma of &ldquo\;here and there\,&rdquo\; this paper looks at the performance art of the contemporary Japanese artist Ei Arakawa&mdash\;Does This Soup Taste Ambivalent? (2014). In this conceptual project\, he attempted to mediate a geographic gap between New York (where he works) and Fukushima (where he comes from). He also intended to reach a geographical balance between Fukushima and the international audience by bringing his family to Frieze London. In dialogue with Does This Soup Taste Ambivalent?\, this paper brings comparative examples of Rirkrit Tiravanija&rsquo\;s installation Untitled (Free/Still) (2007) and the socially engaged art piece Conflict Kitchen (2010). This paper attempts to extend the metaphor of a geographic boundary to invisible yet crucial boundaries among people\, and to further spatialize what Nicolas Bourriaud regards as relational aesthetics. Visual representations of &ldquo\;here and there&rdquo\; can thus be thematically translated into a rendering of boundaries between artists and spectators/participants\, between social environment and human beings and between different ethnic groups. Moreover\, this paper examines the instrumental role of food in performance art. With the same incorporation of food\, these works take advantage of the taste to unite people from different backgrounds\, and to provide a corporeal medium to raise concerns for nuclear radiation and safety. The remediation of food\, in art practice and social media\, further produces a micro-social and micro-political narrative to think of food safety\, human safety\, and community conflicts.
\nAbstract in Japanese (if needed): 「あちらとこちら」：現代パフォーマンス・アートにおける食、安全、そしてコミュニティ 要旨では、2011年の東日本大震災と津波のあと、アーティストたちが 「3/11」を日本の外でどう表現するか を考える研究だと説明されています。特に、福島に直接近づけない状況で、アーティストはどう反応するのか、海外にいる日本人アーティストは故郷で起きたことをどう表すのか、日本の外にいる人はどうやってその出来事に触れ、応答するのか、という問いが立てられています。中心事例として扱われるのは、Ei Arakawa の Does This Soup Taste Ambivalent? (2014) です。要旨によれば、この作品は ニューヨークと福島の地理的な隔たりを媒介しようとした企画として読まれています。比較される例として、Rirkrit Tiravanija の Untitled (Free/Still) (2007) と、社会参加型アートの Conflict Kitchen (2010) も挙げられています。福島の出来事を、食べ物を使ったアートで世界の人にどう伝えるかを考える発表です。 そして、食べ物は人をつなぐだけでなく、安全や不安、社会の対立について考えさせる力を持つ、というのがポイントです。
\n\nhttps://www.academia.edu/73785101/Xu_Weis_Melon_and_Vine ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20260831T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20260901T170000 SUMMARY:Algorithmic Randomness and Quantum Mechanics UID:20260823T230136Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:Europe/Warsaw LOCATION:Grodzka 52\, Kraków\, Poland DESCRIPTION:The term &ldquo\;randomness&rdquo\; often appears in the context of Quantum Mechanics. The behaviour of quantum systems is said to be random\, the outcomes of quantum mechanical experiments are said to be random\, certain devices based on quantum processes are said to operate in a random way&hellip\; However\, the concept of randomness is rarely made precise in these contexts. Meanwhile\, in another branch of science &ndash\; computability theory\, also called recursion theory &ndash\; a fully precise concept of randomness has been developed\, termed &ldquo\;algorithmic randomness&rdquo\;. How are these two uses of the term &ldquo\;randomness&rdquo\; related? Is the concept of algorithmic randomness relevant to Quantum Mechanics? The aim of this workshop is to address various facets of this question in an interdisciplinary gathering. The event will take place at the Jagiellonian University in Krakó\;w on August 31st and September 1st\, 2026. The format of the workshop will be hybrid: it is possible to participate either in person or online (but the organizers strongly encourage in-person participation).
\nOur keynote speakers are:
\nIn addition to talks by our invited speakers\, we plan a few contributed talks. We invite submissions concerning any aspect of the relationship between algorithmic randomness and Quantum Mechanics\, including (but not limited to) the following questions and topics:
\nAbstracts of about 500 words should be sent to joanna.luc@uj.edu.pl by 10.07.2026.
\nTo participate without giving a talk (either in person or online)\, please register by sending an e-mail to joanna.luc@uj.edu.pl.
ORGANIZER;CN=Joanna Luc;CN=Tomasz Placek: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=America/Caracas:20260831T200000 DTEND;TZID=America/Caracas:20260831T200000 SUMMARY:VII Simposio Internacional Ilusión\, Autoengaño y Verdad UID:20260823T230137Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:America/Caracas LOCATION:Caracas\, Venezuela DESCRIPTION:With the theme "Illusion\, Self-Deception\, and Truth\," the USB-USAL-USACH Philosophical Research Group continues\, at its VII International Symposium\, the lines of inquiry initiated in previous editions. This time\, the symposium will examine\, from various philosophical disciplines\, the impact of the interactions or indeterminacies established between illusion\, self-deception\, and truth in contemporary philosophy and the world.
\n\nAmong other topics\, the symposium will address illusion and virtuality\, the mechanisms of the perceptual and discursive constitution of our beliefs about the world and subjectivity\, the problem of truth and falsehood\, biased cognition\, and more\, seeking to examine the limits and paradoxes of truth in the face of self-deception and illusion.
\n\nApproaches and Presentation Blocks:
\n\n1. Ontological and Phenomenological Conceptions
\n\n2. Cultural\, Ethical\, and Sociopolitical Conceptions
\n\n3. Epistemological Conceptions
\n\n4. Aesthetic\, Artistic\, and Social Conceptions
ORGANIZER;CN=Miguel Cabrera Machado: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20260901T123000 DTEND;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20260901T140000 SUMMARY:The Friction of Being UID:20260823T230138Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:Australia/Melbourne LOCATION:221 Burwood Highway\, Melbourne\, Australia\, 3125 DESCRIPTION:The Friction of Being
\nNathan Thompson
\n(Nathan Thompson is a curator for the Revivification installation at the Now or Never Festival at Melbourne Town Hall opening from 21&ndash\;29 August. You can find out more about the installation at: https://nowornever.melbourne.vic.gov.au/event/revivification)
\nAbstract: \;We are standing at the edge of a new computational paradigm\, moving beyond frictionless algorithms toward the profound possibilities of in vitro intelligence. While traditional systems confront an indifferent universe through abstracted probabilities\, living organoids process information through the physical friction of biological existence. By integrating corporeality\, cellular adaptation\, and the inescapable horizon of mortality\, biological computing possesses a genuine\, physical stake in its own survival. Meaning is not a metric to be extracted from static data or imposed narratives\; it is an active state\, forged by living matter persisting in a reality that inherently offers no ultimate purpose.
\nThe artwork Revivification utilizes these living organoids as a localized site of revolt against disembodied metrics. By situating biological agency within the cultural sphere\, the work exposes the fundamental tension between our human demand for structural coherence and the chaotic reality of being. Creativity is thus framed not as a pursuit of calculated perfection\, but as a lucid\, persistent engagement with our own finitude. Through the friction of the body\, the embrace of purposeless play\, and the conscious acceptance of mortality\, we generate authentic value&mdash\;asserting exactly what it requires to be alive.
\nBio: \;Working with Dissipative Systems\, both electromechanical and biochemical\, Nathan John Thompson is fundamentally interested in the possibilities of man/machine interaction\, sentience\, agency and the relationships arising from the intimate connections developed when we allow these new techno-objects/entities into our lives. He manipulates life to question and problematise humanity's position in the contemporary environment.
\nZoom Link: \;https://deakin.zoom.us/j/88371953009?pwd=X7lBvbtjeLw3vURBRUmRMSuXi1UpgA.1
\nMeeting ID: \;883 7195 3009 \;// Password: \;15042783
\nThis meeting is at 12:30pm Australian Eastern Standard Time (AEST) 1 September 2026 [02:30am UTC 1 September 2026]
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=America/Sao_Paulo:20260831T234500 DTEND;TZID=America/Sao_Paulo:20260831T234500 SUMMARY:Kant Colloquium UFABC — Prefaces and Introductions UID:20260823T230139Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:America/Sao_Paulo LOCATION:University Avenue\, s/n\, Anchieta / Avenida da Universidade\, s/n\, Bairro Anchieta\, São Bernardo do Campo\, Brazil\, 09606-045 DESCRIPTION:Call for Abstracts
\nKant Colloquium UFABC &mdash\; Prefaces and Introductions
\nWe invite all interested scholars to submit abstracts for the Kant Colloquium UFABC\, whose theme for this edition is Prefaces and Introductions. This edition welcomes novel and varied approaches that examine how these inaugural texts not only introduce\, but also generate tensions within\, expand upon\, and\, in certain cases\, displace the very trajectory of Kantian thought.
\nAbstracts must be between 200 and 500 words.
\nThe submission deadline is 31 August 2026.
\nDates: 10&ndash\;11 December 2026.
\nVenue: Universidade Federal do ABC\, Sã\;o Bernardo do Campo campus\, Bloco Zeta\, Room 212.
Format: Hybrid event.
Truth\, Democracy\, and Misinformation | AAPAE Workshop 17 Nov 2026
\nWhat are the ethical dimensions of misinformation and its implications for democracy\, public trust\, governance\, and social cohesion across diverse sectors and industries?
\nIn an era shaped by accelerating technological change\, social fragmentation\, political polarisation\, and growing distrust in institutions\, questions surrounding truth\, misinformation\, and democratic legitimacy have become some of the defining ethical challenges of our time. From artificial intelligence and algorithmic influence to climate communication\, public health\, energy transitions\, media ecosystems\, and governance\, misinformation (unknowingly shared untruths) and disinformation (deliberate lies) increasingly shape how societies understand reality\, negotiate difference\, and make collective decisions.
\nThe AAPAE is a meeting point for practitioners from various fields together with academics with specialist expertise. We welcome submissions from not only academics but also \; practitioners\, policymakers\, industry leaders\, activists\, educators\, artists\, and community organisations to critically examine these questions. \;
\nThe workshop seeks to explore not only the harms associated with misinformation\, disinformation\, and epistemic manipulation\, but also the broader ethical questions surrounding truth\, knowledge\, communication\, responsibility\, and democratic participation in increasingly complex and contested social environments. A public panel discussing misinformation and ethics will precede the workshop.
\nWe welcome interdisciplinary contributions from philosophy\, ethics\, law\, political science\, media and communication\, environmental humanities\, psychology\, sociology\, education\, science and technology studies\, Indigenous studies\, governance\, business\, and related fields
\nPossible themes include:
\n● \; \; \; \; \; \; \; AI\, algorithms\, and social media\, including questions regarding digital ethics\, censorship\, and platform responsibility
\n● \; \; \; \; \; \; \; Democracy\, governance\, and institutional trust\, including questions of political polarisation\, democratic resilience\, education\, civic responsibility\, and legitimacy
\n● \; \; \; \; \; \; \; Misinformation and conspiracy in critical domains\, including climate\, public health\, science and energy
\n● \; \; \; \; \; \; \; The contested roles and responsibilities of gatekeepers\, guardians\, experts and knowledge brokers\, including journalists\, professionals and scholars
\n● \; \; \; \; \; \; \; Ethics of persuasion\, influence\, epistemic justice\, and public discourse
\n● \; \; \; \; \; \; \; Indigenous knowledges\, storytelling\, and truth-telling
\nAt a time when misinformation can undermine democratic processes\, social trust\, and collective action\, this workshop aims to foster thoughtful dialogue about how ethical frameworks\, institutions\, and communities might respond constructively to the challenges of our rapidly changing informational landscapes.
\nWe invite papers\, panels\, roundtables\, workshops\, creative practice contributions\, and interdisciplinary conversations that engage critically and constructively with these urgent issues.
\nWorkshop proceedings and contributors will be invited to publish in our series: Research in Ethical Issues in Organizations (REIO).
\nSubmission: Abstracts (500 words) should be submitted to Dr Hugh Breakey (h.breakey@griffith.edu.au) and Dr Jacqueline Boaks (jacqueline.boaks@curtin.edu.au) \;by 1 September 2026.
ORGANIZER;CN=Larelle Bossi;CN=Hugh Breakey;CN=Jacqueline Boaks: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260901T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260901T090000 SUMMARY:17th INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE – WORLD PHILOSOPHY DAY UID:20260823T230141Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:Europe/London LOCATION:Fakulteti Filozofik\, Priština\, Kosovo\, 10000 DESCRIPTION:Confirmed keynote/distinguished speakers:
\nPhilip Kitcher &ndash\; John Dewey Professor of Philosophy\, Emeritus\, Columbia University
Bjø\;rn Torgrim Ramberg &ndash\; \; \;Professor at Department of Philosophy\, Classics\, History of Art and Ideas (IFIKK)\, University of Oslo
Lee Braver &ndash\; Professor at Department of Philosophy\, University of South Florida
Magnus Schlette &ndash\; Professor at Heidelberg University
Sarin Marchetti &ndash\; Dipartimento di Filosofia Department of Philosophy\, The Sapienza University of Rome \;
Honorary lecture:
\nAstrit Salihu &ndash\; Professor at Department of Philosophy\, University of Pristina
\nOrganized by: Department of Philosophy @ University of Pristina\; Kosovo Philosophical Association\; European Pragmatism Association\; Fé\;dé\;ration Internationale des Socié\;té\;s de Philosophie
\nCall for Papers
\nModernity is characterized by the discovery of the &lsquo\;New Continent&rsquo\;\, which in the philosophical discourse of different periods has not been conceived merely as a geographical expansion\, but as a potential space for the development of a new mode of practical and contemplative thinking. Alexis de Tocqueville evaluated the American Revolution in contrast to the French one\, interpreting it as a more authentic expression of democracy\, while Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel argued that the future of philosophical and historical development would shift toward the New Continent. Similarly\, Jean Baudrillard conceptualized America as a form of transatlantic utopia of late modernity.
\nHowever\, these interpretations do not reduce America to a passive space of European projections\, nor do they define it as an entity devoid of self-reflection. On the contrary\, American philosophy\, drawing upon the European intellectual heritage&mdash\;its crè\;me de la crè\;me&mdash\;articulates a distinct and authentic tradition of philosophical thought. This tradition begins with the transcendentalism of Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau\, where Emerson may be read as a proto-pragmatic figure\, and then develops toward the consolidation of classical pragmatism. It culminates in the work of Charles Sanders Peirce\, William James\, and John Dewey\, who reconfigure the map of Western philosophy through a post-metaphysical paradigm of thought.
\nWithin this framework\, elements such as radical empiricism\, eco-ethics\, pluralism\, Hegelian Darwinism\, and ethical democracy contribute to shaping what is known as American philosophy\, articulated under the conceptual framework of pragmatism. In this paradigm\, freedom\, pluralism\, and democracy are not treated as fortuitous categories\, but as constitutive conditions of philosophical practice itself. In this sense\, pragmatism marks a shift from the primacy of theory to practice\, from practice to theoretical reformulation\, and from a theory of truth to a theory about truth (Rorty).
\nAfter the Second World War\, American philosophy became dominated by the Anglo-Saxon tradition of analytic philosophy\, which marginalized classical pragmatism. It was not until the 1970s that this tradition re-emerged in the form of neo-pragmatism or linguistic pragmatism. The key figures of this reconfiguration are Richard Rorty and Hilary Putnam\, later supported by Richard Bernstein with a more political orientation\, and Robert Brandom within a more epistemological and inferentialist line.
\nIn addition to pragmatism as the central tradition of American philosophy\, eco-ethics developed in parallel in the post-war years through Aldo Leopold\, which can be situated within the broader framework of bioethics as articulated by Van Rensselaer Potter. At the same time\, the philosophy of technology initially developed from European premises with Martin Heidegger and Jacques Ellul\, and was further elaborated through the Society for Philosophy and Technology\, established in the United States. One of the key directions within this approach is post-phenomenology\, representing one of the most significant approaches of the empirical turn in the study of technology.
\nAnother central dimension is the philosophy of law and political theory\, where John Rawls and Ronald Dworkin represent two paradigmatic figures of contemporary normative thought. Likewise\, the tradition of philosophy of art and literary criticism developed\, with Harold Bloom\, Arthur Danto\, and George Dickie reformulating debates on the canon\, the artworld\, and the &ldquo\;end of art.&rdquo\;
\nIn general\, pragmatism has functioned as a space of dialogue and plural-perspectivism. As William James emphasizes\, it can be understood as a &ldquo\;house with many rooms\,&rdquo\; where different philosophical traditions coexist in continuous dialogue. In this sense\, American philosophy appears as an open and unfinished reflective process\, articulated through dialogue with various traditions such as phenomenology\, analytic philosophy\, structuralism/post-structuralism\, the Frankfurt School\, and hermeneutics. This methodological and pluralistic openness makes pragmatism one of the most enduring and inclusive traditions of contemporary philosophy. In this sense\, American philosophy cannot be reduced to a single doctrine\, but should be understood as a shared horizon where freedom\, pluralism\, and endless dialogue are respected.
\nMain Topics of the Conference
\nGuidelines and General Information about the Confernce
\nIMPORTANT DATES:
\nAbstract submission deadline: September 1
\nNotification of acceptance: September 10
\nConference dates: November 19-20 \; 2026
\nThe conference will be held in hybrid format: both in-person and online participation will be possible.
ORGANIZER;CN=Labinot Kelmendi: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260901T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260903T170000 SUMMARY:Fourth Austrian Summer School in Phenomenology UID:20260823T230142Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:The Austrian Society for Phenomenology launches its fouth international summer school. Our objective is to promote the research of young scholars (bachelor\, master\, and doctoral students) that sheds new phenomenological light on current debates in epistemology\, metaethics\, and metaphysics. The descriptive analysis of lived experience\, the eidetic study of the various modes of intentionality\, and the epistemic role and normative dimensions ascribed to experience constitute the cornerstones of phenomenological research. In particular\, Husserl&rsquo\;s conceptions of originary givenness\, evaluative experience\, and eidetic intuition are among the various seminal contributions we find in the phenomenological tradition. Currently\, promising research is done that utilizes such conceptions in order to develop phenomenological perspectives on experiential justification\, the debate between epistemic internalism and externalism\, the theory of value\, (moral) emotions\, moral epistemology\, issues surrounding metaphysical realism and anti-realism\, as well as the epistemology and metaphysics of essence\, modality\, and metaphysical dependence relations. We would like to encourage students to develop phenomenological insights and teachings systematically and in view of contemporary debates in philosophy. Our ambition is to promote such phenomenological research by providing a platform to connect with\, discuss with\, and receive feedback from peers and experts. Each conference day is devoted to one of the subtopics of the event.
\nThe conference will be an \;online event. \;If you wish to participate in the summer school but not to give a talk\, please provide a short statement of motivation (not more than 150 words) and specify your name\, affiliation\, and research interests.
\nCall for Papers
\nIf you wish to participate in the summer school and give a talk\, please apply with an (extended) abstract of the paper you wish to present. Submissions should not exceed 500 words\, must be written in English (conference language)\, and should be prepared for blind review.
\nThe submission deadline is July 15\, 2026.
\nPlease send your applications/submissions and general inquiries to: laurentia[dot]adam[at]uni-graz[dot]at
\nWomen and members of other traditionally underrepresented groups are especially encouraged to apply.
\nPreliminary schedule
\nSeptember 1
\nPhenomenological Approaches to Metaethics
\nNicolas de Warren (Penn State University): TBA
\n3 student presentations commented on by Sonja Rinofner-Kreidl (University of Graz)
\nSeptember 2
\nPhenomenological Approaches to Epistemology
\nMirja Hartimo (University of Helsinki): TBA
\n3 student presentations commented on by Philipp Berghofer (University of Graz)
\nSeptember 3
\nPhenomenological Approaches to Metaphysics
\nKit Fine (New York University): TBA
\n3 student presentations commented on by Michael Wallner (University of Graz)
ORGANIZER;CN=Philipp Berghofer;CN=Sonja Rinofner-Kreidl;CN=Michael Wallner: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260901T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20261215T170000 SUMMARY:Inquiry Network WIP Talks UID:20260823T230143Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:The Inquiry Network WIP Talks feature presentations of work in progress related to inquiry\, broadly understood. For example\, presentations might discuss (but are not limited to): the epistemology of inquiry\, the metaphysics of inquiry\, ethical norms of inquiry\, historical perspectives on inquiry\, or the structure of scientific inquiry.
We aim to foster the sharing of ideas in an inclusive\, welcoming and low-pressure environment. Papers that are already accepted for publication will not be accepted. We aim to be sensitive to the needs of early-career scholars.
The group meets biweekly on Zoom during each of the Fall and Spring semesters. Meeting times are determined shortly before the beginning of each semester with the goal of finding a time that works for as many members as possible. Special consideration is given to finding a meeting time that works for presenters of accepted papers.
Applications are open for Foundations and Frontiers of Analytical Sociology\, a doctoral-level course hosted by Institute for Analytical Sociology\, Linkö\;ping University. The course is organized around an international lecture series featuring many of the scholars who have shaped analytical sociology and continue to define its contemporary development.
\nConfirmed speakers include:
\nPeter Bearman\, Delia Baldassarri\, Elizabeth Bruch\, Damon Centola\, Diego Gambetta\, Peter Hedströ\;m\, Gianluca Manzo\, Michael Macy\, Arnout van de Rijt\, Duncan Watts\, and Petri Ylikoski.
\nThe course explores central questions concerning social mechanisms\, explanation\, social interaction\, networks\, diffusion\, collective action\, computational social science\, and the relationship between theory and empirical research. Particular attention is devoted to the role of mechanism-based explanations in the social sciences and to philosophical questions concerning explanation\, causation\, and social scientific inquiry.
\nThe lecture series is accompanied by readings and highly participatory seminars in which participants critically discuss the lectures\, the assigned literature\, and connections to their own research. The course culminates in an individual paper in which participants develop an independent analysis of a research question using the theories\, concepts\, and explanatory models discussed throughout the course. Participants are encouraged to connect this assignment directly to their doctoral projects.
\nThe course is open to doctoral students and researchers from sociology\, philosophy\, political science\, economics\, computational social science\, and related disciplines.
\nFor more information\, contact the course organizer and seminar leader \;Josef Ginnerskov at josef.ginnerskov(at)liu.se
\nSyllabus:
https://forskarstudier.liu.se/en/kurs/7FIEI26/2026V/1624499#syllabus
Registration:
https://forms.cloud.microsoft/e/eFsbLUXnfk
Season 4 of the "value of consciousness" zoom series starts Tuesday. The first talk by \;Rony Hirshhorn\, Nicoolò\; Negro\, and Liad Mudrik on "The Perceived Role \;Of \;Consciousness \;In Moral Status Attributions"\; more info below. Everybody's welcome. \;
\n
************
When: Tuesday\, Sept. 1st\, 11am in Houston/19.00 in Tel Aviv
Where: \;https://riceuniversity.zoom.us/j/95097231463?pwd=MJPessWBzOphk7kDax5u6D2NpiB6In.1
\nWho: \;Rony Hirshhorn\, Nicoolò\; Negro\, and Liad Mudrik
\nWhat: \;"The Perceived Role \;Of \;Consciousness \;In Moral Status Attributions" \;
\nAbstract. \;Determining which entities deserve moral consideration is crucial to policy debates about animal welfare and artificial intelligence regulation. A common assumption is that consciousness is a key criterion for moral status\, often considered to be necessary or sufficient for it. However\, it is unclear whether public attitudes share this assumption. In a large\, preregistered study (N=1493)\, we tested the perceived relationship between consciousness and moral status by triangulating direct questions\, moral dilemmas\, and attribution questions across diverse entities. Although consciousness was strongly associated with moral status\, it was neither perceived as necessary nor sufficient: participants attributed moral status without consciousness\, and denied moral status despite its presence. Moreover\, respondents clustered into distinct decision profiles\, which were predicted by their individual backgrounds. Therefore\, moral decisions did not depend solely on the properties of the target entity\, but also on those of the person making the judgment. These results have implications for how ethical and policy decisions are framed.
\nSchedule for the rest of the year: \;
\nOct. 6: Juliette Vazard\, "Daydreaming your Future"
\nNov. 10: Jacopo Pallagrosi\, &ldquo\;Introspective Acquaintance and Cognitive Achievement&rdquo\;
\nDec. 1: Marybel Menzies\, &ldquo\;Phenomenal Perfection&rdquo\; \;
\nJan. 5 Andreas Mogensen\, &ldquo\;Might it not matter whether software can be sentient?" \;
\nFeb. 2 Julien Bugnon and Martine Nida-Rü\;melin\, &ldquo\;Conscious Beings as Centers \;of \;Value&rdquo\;
\nMar. 2 Tricia Magalotti\, &ldquo\;The \;Value \;of \;Emotional Experience&rdquo\;
\nApr. 6 Luke Roelofs\, &ldquo\;Pluribus and the ethics \;of \;hiveminds&rdquo\;
\nMay 4 Robbie Kubala\, &ldquo\;Consciousness \;Aesthetics without Aesthetic Properties&rdquo\;
ORGANIZER;CN=Uriah Kriegel: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=America/Santiago:20260902T090000 DTEND;TZID=America/Santiago:20260903T170000 SUMMARY: X Congreso Internacional de Doctorandos en Filosofía. UID:20260823T230146Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:America/Santiago LOCATION:Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Campus San Joaquín - Avda. Libertador Bernardo O’Higgins 340\, Santiago\, Macul\, Región Metropolitana\, Macul\, Chile DESCRIPTION:X Congreso Internacional de Doctorandos en Filosofí\;a
\nPrograma de Doctorado en Filosofí\;a
Facultad de Filosofí\;a
Pontificia Universidad Cató\;lica
2-3 de septiembre de 2026
Los estudiantes de doctorado del Instituto de Filosofí\;a de la Pontificia Universidad Cató\;lica invitan a sus compañ\;eras/os de programas similares al X Congreso Internacional de Doctorandos en Filosofí\;a.
\nEl evento se realizará\; los dí\;as 2 y 3 de septiembre de 2026 en la Facultad de Filosofí\;a de la Pontificia Universidad Cató\;lica de Chile\, en formato presencial\, pero\, con la posibilidad de participació\;n virtual para ponentes que se encuentren fuera de Chile. La lengua oficial del congreso es el españ\;ol\, pero tambié\;n se aceptará\;n ponencias en inglé\;s.
\nEl tema del congreso es abierto y esperamos hospedar un evento diverso. El ú\;nico requisito para participar es estar inscrito en un programa de Doctorado en Filosofí\;a\, o en alguna otra disciplina afí\;n de ciencias sociales o humanidades. La siguiente es una lista de las lí\;neas temá\;ticas posibles que el congreso espera albergar:
\n1. Filosofí\;a Antigua
2. Filosofí\;a Medieval y Filosofí\;a de la Religió\;n
3. Filosofí\;a Moderna
4. Esté\;tica y Filosofí\;a del Arte
5. É\;tica y Filosofí\;a Polí\;tica
6. Fenomenologí\;a y Hermené\;utica
7. Filosofí\;a de la Mente\, Filosofí\;a del Lenguaje y Ciencias Cognitivas
8. Filosofí\;a de la Ciencia\, Teorí\;a del Conocimiento y Epistemologí\;a
9. Filosofí\;a de la Tecnologí\;a\, Filosofí\;a de la Té\;cnica
10. Estudios de gé\;nero y filosofí\;a escrita por mujeres
11. Metafí\;sica
12. Ló\;gica e historia y filosofí\;a de la ló\;gica
13. Problemas Filosó\;ficos Contemporá\;neos
14. Filosofí\;a post-continental
15. Filosofí\;a social y teorí\;a crí\;tica
16. Pensamiento latinoamericano y filosofí\;a en Chile
A partir de las ponencias seleccionadas\, el comité\; organizador articulará\; las mesas de diá\;logo segú\;n las lí\;neas temá\;ticas que se presenten\, considerando tambié\;n la posibilidad de conformar mesas con temá\;ticas heterogé\;neas.
\nQuienes esté\;n interesados en participar del congreso deberá\;n llenar\, a má\;s tardar el mié\;rcoles 12 de agosto de 2026 (23.59 hrs.\, hora de Chile continental)\, un formulario de Google (link disponible abajo)\, incluyendo un resumen de la ponencia (entre 400 y 500 palabras) y un resumen de los datos acadé\;micos (en unas 50 palabras) como archivos adjuntos (Word o PDF).
\nLos documentos deberá\;n utilizar tipografí\;a Times New Roman o similar\, tamañ\;o 12\, interlineado simple y el documento con el resumen deberá\; incluir la siguiente informació\;n:
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \;Tí\;tulo de la ponencia
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \;Lí\;nea temá\;tica a la que pertenece (entre las 16 arriba enumeradas)
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \;Resumen de la ponencia (entre 400 y 500 palabras)
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \;Al menos tres de las referencias bibliográ\;ficas má\;s importantes a discutir
\n
Se solicita encarecidamente incluir todos estos í\;tems en el documento adjunto al formulario de Google. Los resú\;menes será\;n evaluados por equipos de doctorandos de la PUC con afinidad temá\;tica. Los principales criterios por considerar para la evaluació\;n de la propuesta será\;n la pertinencia temá\;tica\, claridad de la tesis presentada\, coherencia global del argumento y relevancia de la bibliografí\;a sugerida.
Las ponencias seleccionadas y el cronograma del congreso será\;n anunciados el lunes 17 de agosto de 2026\, a travé\;s de un correo electró\;nico enviado al expositor. Los expositores dispondrá\;n de 20 minutos de exposició\;n. Huelga decir que esta exposició\;n deberá\; ser sincró\;nica\, es decir\, la exposició\;n no puede consistir en la reproducció\;n de una ponencia ya grabada. Al finalizar las exposiciones\, existirá\; un espacio para preguntas y comentarios de má\;ximo 30 minutos adicionales. Con el propó\;sito de respetar los tiempos establecidos por el congreso se recomienda a los/las expositores/as diseñ\;ar su presentació\;n con textos de apoyo y/o diapositivas de no má\;s de 8 pá\;ginas. Asimismo\, se recomienda verificar con anterioridad la duració\;n de la exposició\;n.
\nPara consultas relativas a la organizació\;n del congreso\, por favor escribir a:congresodoctoradofilosofiauc@gmail.com
\nLink del formulario de Google: https://forms.gle/V1Q398EdB7Ndv7Bh9
ORGANIZER;CN="Congreso Doctorado Filosofía U. C.": METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260904T050000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260904T050000 SUMMARY:Emotion and Society Lab's Works-In-Progress Series (2026-27) UID:20260823T230147Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:Another year of the Emotion and Society Lab'sWorks In Progress series is around the corner. It begins on the first Tuesday of October 2026 from 11-12pm Pacific. It&rsquo\;s a virtual nine-month philosophy series with no meetings in January\, August\, and September.
\nWe have some workshop slots available and would love for you to discuss your work on emotions\, moods\, attitudes\, etc.
\nThis year we are taking both read-ahead papers AND 30 minute Works-In-Progress Talks (with powerpoint/Keynote\, etc.)
\nIf you want your work workshopped this year\, please email an abstract to emotionandsocietylab@gmail.com.
\nWrite &ldquo\;WIP Abstract&rdquo\; as the subject and indicate if it will be the Full Paper or a Presentation in the email.
\nThough we can&rsquo\;t accept every abstract\, we hope you will submit yours for consideration.
\nGraduate Students\, Post-docs\, and Faculty are welcome to submit.
\nFor the sake of building community\, those who are accepted are expected to participate in other sessions other than their own in the semester they present.
\nIf you have any questions\, please email the above address.
\nDeadline: September 4\, 2026 by 5pm Pacific.
ORGANIZER;CN=Myisha Cherry;CN=Rachel Fredericks: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260905T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260906T170000 SUMMARY:The Seven Cs UID:20260823T230148Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:We are proud to announce the very first meeting of the &ldquo\;Sailing the The Seven Cs&rdquo\; Conference!
The Seven Cs:
Chaff: Philosophy of the Body\, Medicine\, and Biology.
\nChuff: Philosophy of Emotions &\; Political Rage.
\nChud: Political Philosophy.
\nChad: Philosophy of Gender &\; Sexuality.
\nChopped: Philosophy of Fashion and Food.
\nChess: Philosophy of Games &\; Mathematics
\nChocolate: Philosophy of Economics &\; Global Exploitation
We are currently accepting abstracts on any of the above topics\, and while not preferred\, we also accept talks relating to Cartography\, broadly construed. Submissions must not exceed 1000 words\, and can be emailed to alec@philosophyforthedemos.com. Deadline of 08/15.
This is a real and light-hearted but philosophically rich conference. Website is currently under-construction.
SEMINAR DESCRIPTION
\nThe Spirit\, then?
\nYes and no&mdash\;no and yes.
\nNot Spirit as substance\, nor Spirit as subject. Not even\, perhaps\, Spirit as such. Let us attend instead to what the word leaves behind in its wake: spiritus\, &ldquo\;breath.&rdquo\; A trace of air\, an opening\, a passage.
\nNothing more. Yet\, perhaps\, nothing less.
\nHence the proposal of a minimal pneumatology.
\nBut what does it mean to breathe? What does it mean to leave room&mdash\;for ourselves\, for others\, for things themselves&mdash\;to breathe? And what kind of question is this\, once it has been separated from the familiar vocabularies of self-help\, self-optimization\, or popular psychology?
\nIf a minimal pneumatology is neither a theology nor&mdash\;at least in the Hegelian sense&mdash\;a phenomenology\, it cannot simply become a psychology by default. Shall we turn\, then\, toward hermeticism? I feel here too we would be choosing perhaps the wrong door. For behind it we often find a room crowded with damasks and pleated velvets\, where Spirit\, overburdened by symbols and correspondences\, survives only as a captive creature\, adorned and enchained at once.
\nLet us begin elsewhere.
\nBreathing as a minimal gesture&mdash\;or rather as a constellation of minimal gestures: to open\, to make space\, to give time\, to set aside\, to choose\, to move beyond\, to challenge\, to hollow out\, to celebrate&hellip\; Gestures so slight that they often escape notice\, and yet it may be through them that Spirit passes.
\nA pragmatics of Spirit\, then?
\nFine. Yet I would prefer to speak of an aesthetics.
\nFor what is at stake here is\, before all else\, a restoration of perception to its primary dignity. Not perception as mastery\, nor as the reduction of things to what can be identified and possessed\, but perception as hospitality: a way of receiving what appears without exhausting it.
\nAccordingly\, throughout this session we will linger with a series of images and related materials. Together we shall attempt to discover&mdash\;with attentiveness\, patience\, sensitivity\, and generosity\, not least towards one another&mdash\;the ways in which Spirit\, rather than being summoned through prescribed practices\, and rather than becoming the object of our conceptual constructions\, quietly makes its way through the penumbra of what we see and do not see.
\nEmerging in its simplicity\, it appears uncannily before us\, reminding us that it had been there all along: near yet elusive\, intimate yet withdrawn\, concealed within what we habitually overlook or\, conversely\, feel compelled to overinterpret. It inhabits neither the obvious nor the occult\, but the interval between them&mdash\;the delicate space where attention hesitates and meaning has not yet closed upon itself.
\nThis session is therefore intended for all those drawn to the adventures of art and aesthetics across the centuries\; to philosophy and mythology\; to poetry and poetics\; to symbolism\, surrealism\, and the life of images\; and\, more generally\, to those strange and beautiful encounters in which imagination comes into contact with what is too readily called ineffable\, though it may be asking for something else entirely: not to be named\, mastered\, or decoded\, but simply sheltered in its fragility.
\nThe Spirit\, then?
\nIndeed.
\nMore than what you see. Less than you might interpret. Yet more than you could ever imagine.
\nCONTENTS
\nTIME
\nSunday\, September 6\, 2026
10:00&ndash\;13:00 Eastern US Time &bull\; 16:00&ndash\;19:00 Central European Time.
FACILITATOR
Carlos A. Segovia (PhD) is an independent British-born\, Spanish philosopher and writer\, working on contemporary philosophy at the crossroads of the philosophy of mythology and the philosophy of art\; and author of fifteen books.
\nAmong his publications\,
He has been associate professor of philosophy and religious studies at St Louis University Missouri (Madrid Campus)\, visiting professor at the University of Aarhus and the Free University of Brussels\, and guest lecturer at the European Research Council\, the Collè\;ge International de Philosophie\, the É\;cole Normale Supé\;rieure\, University College London\, Bauhaus-Universitä\;t Weimar\, the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart in Milan\, the European University at St Petersburg\, Waseda University in Tokyo\, Ryukoku University in Kyoto\, and the University of Lilongwe.
\nConvinced\, though\, that higher education within mainstream academia is undergoing a form of intellectual exhaustion&mdash\;brought about by academic standardization\, epistemological bureaucratization\, and the compartmentalization\, ideologization\, and commodification of knowledge\, alongside the cultivation of middlebrow mediocrity and the reduction of learning to a consumer experience&mdash\;he has turned to other scholarly venues in which thinking may still be pursued for what it truly is: a way of confronting the unknown&mdash\;the as-yet unthought but thinkable&mdash\;with renewed awe and in the spirit of an art rather than a science.
\nHe collaborates regularly with Incite Seminars\, where he has facilitated courses like &ldquo\;
He is currently based in Berlin with his life partner\, Sofya Shaikut\, a performance artist and butō dancer\, with whom he is also engaged in ongoing joint work.
\nINCITE SEMINARS
We are a mix of rogue scholars\, disgruntled academics\, disenchanted buddhists\, enchantment-hungry anarchists\, radical therapists\, and general weirdos looking to create autonomous and accessible forms of &ldquo\;higher education.&rdquo\;
We offer online seminars and reading groups to incite personal exploration and inspire community action. Incite Seminars offers an educational experience. We do so by gathering an engaged group of participants for a dynamic exchange of ideas\, led by skilled facilitators. All of our facilitators have a deep relationship to a subject or topic through intensive study or practice.
Incite Seminars is a 100% member-supported learning community. We depend on member contributions to continue holding space for radical study and practice groups\, putting on rigorous seminars and courses\, and providing our facilitators and organizers with fair compensation. If you are unable to pay the full amount for a session or membership at this time\, we invite you to join us at reduced or no cost with our Solidarity option.
More info &\; registration:
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Tokyo:20260907T090000 DTEND;TZID=Asia/Tokyo:20260908T170000 SUMMARY:2026 Youth Symposium: Youth Agency and Activism in an Age of Precarity UID:20260823T230150Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:Asia/Tokyo LOCATION:3-8-1 Komaba\, Meguro\, Japan\, 1538902 DESCRIPTION:The Symposium invites scholars\, researchers\, students\, practitioners\, and young professionals to explore the diverse roles of youth in contemporary society\, politics\, law\, technology\, culture\, and global governance. Through interdisciplinary dialogue\, the Symposium aims to create a space for critical reflection on youth as citizens\, political agents\, legal subjects\, cultural actors\, and contributors to social transformation.
\n\nWe welcome submissions from a wide range of disciplinary and methodological perspectives.
\n\nThemes of the Symposium
\nThemes of the Symposium include\, but are not limited to:
\n\nYouth\, Citizenship\, and Participation
\nDemocracy\, Authoritarianism\, and Resistance
\nDiaspora\, Migration\, and Transnational Politics
\nJuvenile Jurisdiction\, AI\, and Technology
\nYouth Identity\, Culture\, and Society
\nYouth&rsquo\;s Role in Governance and Global Change
\nSpecial Topics
\nPhilosophical Perspectives on Youth and Society
\n&ldquo\;Youth Are Political Agents! Except They Are &lsquo\;Too Young&rsquo\;.&rdquo\; Age\, Behaviour\, and the Psychological Development of Youth
\nCivically Engaged Research
\nWe welcome three types of submissions:
\n\nIndividual Submissions: Abstract
\nIndividual Submissions: Essay
\nPanel Proposal
\nFor More Information
\nPlease refer to the following pages for further details:
\n\nConcept Note: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JKRF4Iy9QexGcv__mE7zIZFk8grFvD4D/view?usp=drive_link
\nSymposium Homepage: https://eaysa.org/2026-youth-symposium-concept-note/
\nSubmission Guidelines: https://eaysa.org/youth-symposium-2026-submission-guidelines/
\nFAQ: https://eaysa.org/youth-symposium-2026-frequently-asked-questions/
\nContact Details
\nIf you have any questions about the Symposium\, please stay tuned to this website for updates or contact us at:
\n\nyouthsym.ircy.info@gmail.com
\n\nWe look forward to receiving your submissions and to welcoming diverse contributions to the 2026 Youth Symposium.
ORGANIZER;CN=Helix Lo: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260907T160000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260907T180000 SUMMARY:Inference and Object UID:20260823T230151Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:We are pleased to announce our monthly \;online \;talk series on "Inferences &\; Capacities."
Our next speaker is:
Ulf Hlobil \;(Concordia University)
Inference and Object
Sep 7: \;11am (Buenos Aires)\, 10am (New York)\, 4pm (Berlin).
\nAbstract: \;I present an account of names and predicates in terms of assertoric sentences and their inferential roles. The account can be translated into an account of objects and properties in terms of worldly propositions (which are things that are made true or false by states) and the alethic modal relations among them. The account exploits symmetries of modal structures. In a slogan: properties are what is common among symmetric points in modal space\; objects are what differs among symmetric points in modal space.
\nHow to participate: \;Please\, send an email to Alfredo Vernazzani at: \;
\nalfredo-vernazzani AT protonmail.com
\n_______
\nThe series brings together work on inferential capacities\, rationality\, normativity\, and cognition &mdash\; across both human and non-human animals &mdash\; with the aim of fostering discussion on the nature and limits of the cognitive sphere. \;
\n2026 line-up: \;
April 27: \;Angelica Kaufmann \;(University of Milan): "Mind Blanking as Mental Imagery." \;
\nMay 18: \;Federico Burdman \;(Universidad Alberto Hurtado) "Constrained choices: addiction\, attention\, and reasons-responsiveness." \;
\nJune 22: \;Susanna Schellenberg \;(Rutgers): "Reflection and Self-Governance in Human and Machine Intelligence" \; \;
\nJuly 20: \;Cameron Buckner \;(University of Florida): "Chains-of-Thought\, Inner Speech\, and Artificial Epistemic Agency."
\nSeptember 7: \;Ulf Hlobil \;(Concordia University): "Inference and Object"
\nOctober 19: \;Eva Schmidt \;(TU Dortmund): TBA \;
\nNovember 16: \;Hans-Johann Glock \;(University of Zü\;rich): "Is Ascribing Inferences to Brains or Non-human Animals a Fallacy?" \;
\nDecember 14: \;Emma Borg \;(SAS\, University of London): "Twitches\, Fidgets\, Habits\, Skills: The Scope of Common-Sense Psychology." \;
Each talk lasts c. 40 minutes followed by 40 minutes open Q&\;A. \;
\nThe series is co-organized by:
\nMariela Aguilera \;(University of Có\;rdoba)
\nMatí\;as Osta-Vé\;lez \;(Universidad de la Repú\;blica)
\nAlfredo Vernazzani \;(TU Dortmund\; University of Pittsburgh).
\nVisit our website: \;
ORGANIZER;CN=Alfredo Vernazzani;CN=Mariela Aguilera;CN="Matías Osta": METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20260908T103000 DTEND;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20260908T170000 SUMMARY:A Century of Foucault - Deakin University Graduate Symposium UID:20260823T230152Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:Australia/Melbourne LOCATION:Tower 2 level 12/727 Collins St\, Melbourne\, Australia\, 3008 DESCRIPTION:This year marks the centenary of the birth of Historian/Philosopher Michel Foucault (1926 &ndash\; 1984) and the 50th anniversary of the French publication of Histoire de la sexualité\;: La volonté\; de savoir. A giant of French poststructuralist thought\, Foucault can be seen as the progenitor of contemporary queer theory and the field of biopolitics. Foucault remains a stalwart of the humanities and his influence extends far beyond the bounds of traditional philosophical discourse to areas such as sociology\, criminology\, and politics.
\nAt Deakin Downtown on September 8\, 2026 at 10:30 AM (AEST) this event will bring together current Australian graduate students to reflect on the legacy and continued influence of Foucault's work.
\nAll are welcome\, we hope you will join us for this exciting and thought provoking day!
\nThis is a hybrid event supported by zoom. Zoom attendance does not require an RSVP with eventbrite.
\nZoom link: \;https://deakin.zoom.us/j/82961833454?pwd=7vKvwKZFKdOhZbHnjJxmTGjte5WKrt.1
\nMeeting ID: 829 6183 3454 // \;Password: 07841049
\n*Lunch catering will be provided for in person attendance\, please be sure to RSVP on the eventbrite page
\n**We also would like to thank the incredible generosity of the Australasian Society for Continental Philosophy (ASCP) and Deakin University's Philosophy and Religious Studies research group (PHIRES) for their support and funding for the event.
\nFor any queries please email \;lauren.p@deakin.edu.au
ORGANIZER;CN=Lauren Pedersen-Hor;CN=Jasper Lear;CN=Beau Kent: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20260908T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20260908T170000 SUMMARY:Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Linguistic Justice UID:20260823T230153Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:Europe/Rome LOCATION:Cagliari\, Italy DESCRIPTION:The 6th European Experimental Philosophy Conference will take place at the University of Cagliari from September 8th to 11th\, 2026. It will consist of the Linguistic Justice Society Satellite Workshop &ldquo\;Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Linguistic Justice&rdquo\; on September 8th\, followed by the main Conference on September 9th&ndash\;11th.
\nThe event is generously supported by Gian Pietro Storari Funds\, Dipartimento di Pedagogia\, Psicologia\, Filosofia\, Università\; degli Studi di Cagliari\, Fondazione di Sardegna\, Esperantic Studies Foundation\, Regione Autonoma Sardegna. The programme of the entire event is available on the conference website:
\nhttps://sites.unica.it/6euroxphi/
\nThe event will be open also to non-presenters. The Satellite Workshop on Linguistic Justice can be attended either online or in person\, while the main Conference can be attended only in person. No registration fee is required for either event.
\nIf you plan to attend the Satellite Workshop and/or the main Conference as a non-presenter\, please send us an email by July 31st to:
\n6EuroXPhi@gmail.com
\nIn the email\, please specify whether you plan to attend the Satellite Workshop\, the main Conference\, or both. If you plan to attend the Satellite Workshop\, please also let us know whether you will attend online or in person. \;
ORGANIZER;CN=Filippo Contesi;CN=Yael Peled: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260908T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260909T170000 SUMMARY:Bodies in Digital Transition: Mapping a topology of digital bodies UID:20260823T230154Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:Europe/London LOCATION:Strand Building\, Strand\, London\, United Kingdom\, WC2R 2LS DESCRIPTION:Machines glow\, pulse\, perform and think through metal\, light\, code\, and living matter. The second Bodies in Digital Transition (BDT) edition traverses the materiality of the mechanical body itself: what embodied gestures and rhythms animate its operations? What moves beneath its surface? What kind of being emerges in the loops of its code? From the lures of the aesthetic surface to the recursive depths of its algorithmic core\, this year BTD aims to dissect the machine&rsquo\;s anatomy across several strata that form a speculative topology of the machinic body\; a descent through appearance\, mechanism\, and ontology toward the thresholds where technology ceases to represent and begins to be. In mapping out the systems of embodiment inhabited by digital beings\, we also open up inquiry into how human agents author\, come into contact with\, and transform machine bodies. There is neither &ldquo\;the technology itself&rdquo\; nor &ldquo\;the aesthetics itself&rdquo\; but rather a method of design in which the two are mutually implicated. To resist interior&ndash\;exterior divides open inquiries of how human agents encounter and transform machinic bodies through the intra-active practice of design.
\nDigital bodies condition human expression and are conditioned by cultural inflections at each strata. The plural and distributed materialities of digital systems span beyond physical objects\, but encompass code\, electromagnetic waves\, and sensory outputs in complex and multiple communicating layers. How does the agency act as this morphing web?
\nFollowing a post-human stance\, neither digital nor human cognition is assumed to be contained within an algorithmic nucleus. Instead\, it is conceived as emerging through relations across each stratum\, whose analytical isolation is not intended to fix ontologies\, but to map a topology of multiple\, non-linear processes through which agencies coalesce.
\nTo move beyond the limits of this configuration and to encourage crossing of boundaries\, we invite trans-disciplinary experimental and highly speculative inquiry and action into the machinic as event\, intra-action\, and formation of being.
ORGANIZER;CN=DiSCo (Digital Studies Collective): METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260908T160000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260908T170000 SUMMARY:Book Launch: Expressive Action: A Philosophical Exploration by Christopher Bennett UID:20260823T230155Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:Join us at https://meet.google.com/muk-tofn-ftj
\nBennett's \;Expressive Action: A Philosophical Theory is the first volume in the new Oxford University Press book series on positive moral philosophy. Cheshire Calhoun will provide a brief introduction to positive moral philosophy followed by Chris Bennett's precis of his book. We'll then have an open discussion.
ORGANIZER;CN=Jules Holroyd: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20260909T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20260910T170000 SUMMARY:ICSD 2026 : 14th International Conference on Sustainable Development\, 09 - 10 September Rome\, Italy UID:20260823T230156Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:Europe/Rome LOCATION:Pontifical Gregorian University of Rome \, Roma\, Italy DESCRIPTION:European Center of Sustainable Development in collaboration with Canadian Institute of Technology will organize the 14th ICSD 2026 International Conference on Sustainable Development\, with particular focus on Environmental\, Economic and Socio-Cultural Sustainability.
The Conference theme : Creating a unified foundation for the Sustainable Development: Research\, Practice and Education.
The 14th ICSD 2026 will be an excellent opportunity to share your ideas and research findings relevant to the Sustainability Science\, through the European network of academics.
Papers will be published in Open Access EJSD Journal (Web of Science) and Proceedings.
This ambition will proceed in a multidisciplinary way across the various fields and perspectives\, through which we can address the fundamental and related questions of Sustainable Development.
Conference Venue
We are pleased to welcome you to ICSD 2025\, held in the very heart of historic Rome.
The venue\, Roma Eventi\, located within the premises of the Pontifical Gregorian University\, at Piazza della Pilotta 4\, Rome\, Italy\, lies just steps from the iconic Trevi Fountain\, and within walking distance of the Spanish Steps\, Piazza Venezia\, the Pantheon\, the Roman Forum\, Piazza Navona\, and the Colosseum.
It is a setting of enduring inspiration \; where timeless cultural heritage meets academic thought \; an ideal place for global dialogue on sustainable development.
Read more: https://ecsdev.org/conference/14th-icsd-2026
Workshop &ldquo\;The Good Life: Well-being and Meaningfulness&rdquo\;
\nMost people want their lives to go well. They also want their lives to be meaningful. While well-being and meaningfulness have both received extensive attention in the philosophical literature\, the relationship between them remains underexplored. This workshop will explore the concepts of well-being\, meaningfulness\, and their relationship\, discussing questions such as: Is a meaningful life always high in well-being\, and vice versa? Does the nature of meaningfulness depend on the nature of well-being? And does a good life require both well-being and meaningfulness?
\nSpeakers:
\nAntti Kauppinen\, University of Helsinki
\nMatthew Hammerton\, Singapore Management University
\nCharlotte Unruh\, University of Southampton
\nMichael Hauskeller\, University of Liverpool
\nWillem van der Deijl-Kloeg\, Tilburg University
\nRegistration: The workshop is free to attend\, but spaces are limited and registration is required. To register\, please email the organiser\, stating whether you wish to attend in person or online.
\nWe gratefully acknowledge funding from the Leverhulme Trust (SRG2425\\251003).
ORGANIZER;CN=Charlotte Franziska Unruh: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20260911T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20260913T170000 SUMMARY:A Novel "Third Way:" Synthesizing Autonomy and New Mechanism UID:20260823T230158Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:Europe/Berlin LOCATION:Oslo\, Norway DESCRIPTION:&ldquo\;. . . [A} great deal of the conceptual history of biology may be read as a struggle between two philosophical positions: reductionism and holism&rdquo\; (Piggliuci 2014). This enduring tension has fueled deep disagreement about the nature and study of life. In twentieth-century biology\, the organicist tradition sought to resolve this tension by seeking a &ldquo\;third-way&rdquo\; that rejects the reductionist assumption that life can be analyzed exhaustively in physico-chemical terms while\, at the same time\, rejecting dubious appeals to immaterial vital forces to explain the behavior of whole living systems.
\nIn contemporary philosophy of biology\, a prominent manifestation of the holist tradition is the Theory of Biological Autonomy (TBA) which explains the causal structure of a whole living organism in terms of constraints and energetic processes. A prominent manifestation of the reductionist tradition\, on the other hand\, is New Mechanism (NM) which\, traditionally\, analyzes the causal structure of biological mechanisms in terms of entities\, activities\, and organization.
\nRecently\, however\, a number of philosophers have been developing an updated New Mechanist analysis of biological mechanisms that construes them as consisting of constraints and energetic processes . As philosophers have pointed out\, this conceptual overlap between the ToBA and NM offers opportunities for theoretical synthesis and\, more ambitiously\, the possibility of establishing a novel &ldquo\;third way&rdquo\; to resolve the conflicting holist and reductionist tendencies running through the history of biology.
\nThe goal of this workshop is to bring together an interdisciplinary group of philosophers\, biologists\, and historians to foster dialogue across theoretical traditions to develop the ToBA-NM synthesis and critically assess it from historical and social scientific perspectives on the wider interacting histories of reductionism and holism in biology.
\nThus\, while the proposed synthesis of ToBA and NM will thematize discussion\, the workshop hopes to encourage wider interdisciplinary reflection on historical and contemporary theoretical and empirical practice in the life sciences. We aim to: 1) Clarify the conceptual and methodological relationship between ToBA and the updated NM framework. 2) consider a) their theoretical and historical relationship to other forms of reductionism and holism and b) evaluate the prospects for the synthesis of TBA and NM succeeding as a &ldquo\;third way&rdquo\; by the lights of the wider organicist tradition. 3) Draw upon insights derived from recent inter-disciplinary efforts between philosophers in the autonomy tradition and various scientists seeking to apply the theory of autonomy in empirical investigation of biological systems at different levels of organization (e.g. ecosystems\, eusocial insects\, organismal\, neuro\, biophysical\, physico-chemical). 4) Reflect on the broader implications of the proposed synthesis for ongoing debates about explanation and organization in the life sciences.
\nA small amount of money will be available to off-set student travel costs.
\nWe aim for the workshop to be a "works in progress" event\, giving early career scholars and scientists the opportunity to share their developing ideas in small informal "break out" groups to get feedback. We ask potential attendees to submit a short 500-750 word abstract to Andrew Bollhagen (aabollhagen@ucdavis.edu) and Sebastian Sander Oest (s.s.oest@ifikk.uio.no). \;
ORGANIZER;CN=Andrew Bollhagen;CN=Sebastian Sander Oest: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Dublin:20260911T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Dublin:20260911T090000 SUMMARY:TransCare 2nd Edition UID:20260823T230159Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:Europe/Dublin LOCATION:Cork\, Ireland DESCRIPTION:Healthcare education and research continue to grapple with the limits of inherited epistemologies: frameworks that have long marginalised\, pathologised\, or erased trans\, gender-diverse\, and intersex lives. Scholarship on \;epistemic injustice \;(Hall 2017\; Wesp et al. 2019) and \;situated knowledges \;(Haraway 1988) shows how these exclusions are embedded in the very processes through which knowledge is produced and legitimised. Insights from gender/sex pluralism (Monro 2005\; 2019\; Preciado 2013) further highlight how institutional systems struggle to \;accommodate the complexity of lived identities \;within and beyond binary frameworks. Transformative inclusion within healthcare settings therefore requires more than updated curricula or revised clinical guidelines: it calls for new methodological imagination (see e.g. Pendleton &\; Pezaro 2025).
\nThis year&rsquo\;s TransCare conference invites \;scholars\, practitioners\, educators\, and community researchers \;to explore how \;creative\, interdisciplinary\, and humanities‑driven methodologies \;can reshape the production of knowledge in healthcare. Building on the 2024 edition&rsquo\;s focus on educational tools\, TransCare turns its attention to the research practices that make such tools possible. We ask how \;arts‑based\, participatory\, speculative\, and community‑led approaches \;can open pedagogical and methodological pathways that affirm gender diversity\, challenge normative assumptions\, and cultivate critical and trans‑affirming pedagogies and research.
\nTo do so\, we aim to foreground methodology not as a technical procedure but as a site where \;knowledge\, care\, and power intersect. Approaches that centre \;lived experience\, relationality\, and reflexivity \;can unsettle dominant epistemic frames and generate new possibilities for teaching and practice. Attending to the \;affective and embodied dimensions of research \;and care (Malatino 2020\; 2022) further highlights the need for methodologies that recognise and value ways of knowing and dealing with trans and intersex communities\, particularly in challenging social and political settings.
\nThe 2026 edition continues TransCare&rsquo\;s commitment to interdisciplinary exchange by emphasising methodology as a site of care\, ethics\, and transformation (Puig de la Bellacasa 2017). \;We welcome contributions that rethink how education and research are designed\, conducted\, interpreted\, and taught\, and that imagine new infrastructures for trans\, gender-diverse\, and intersex&ndash\;inclusive healthcare education.
\n\;
\nScope of Contributions
\nWe welcome contributions from across disciplines\, sectors\, and methodological traditions. Submissions may address\, but are \;not limited \;to\, the following areas:
\nWe particularly encourage submissions that experiment with form\, challenge disciplinary boundaries\, or propose new infrastructures for trans\, gender‑diverse\, and intersex&ndash\;inclusive healthcare research and education. However\, please do not be intimidated: \;all approaches and levels of experimentation are welcome.
\n\;
\nPublication Opportunity
\nWe are also collecting expressions of interest for a \;collected volume on creative\, interdisciplinary\, and humanities‑driven methodologies for trans\, gender‑diverse\, and intersex&ndash\;inclusive healthcare research and education.
\nIf you wish to be considered for inclusion in this edited collection\, \;please indicate this when submitting your abstract by ticking the box in the form. \;
List of References
\nHall\, K. Q. (2017). Queer epistemology and epistemic injustice. In I. J. Kidd\, J. Medina\, &\; G. Pohlhaus Jr. (Eds.)\, \;The Routledge handbook of epistemic injustice \;(pp. 158&ndash\;166). Routledge.
\nHaraway\, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. \;Feminist Studies\, 14(3)\, 575&ndash\;599.
\nMalatino\, H. (2020). \;Trans care. University of Minnesota Press.
Malatino\, H. (2022). \;Side affects: On being trans and feeling bad. University of Minnesota Press.
Monro\, S. (2005). \;Gender politics: Activism\, citizenship and sexual diversity. Pluto Press.
\nMonro\, S. (2019). Non-binary and genderqueer: An overview of the field. \;International Journal of Transgenderism\, 20(2&ndash\;3)\, 126&ndash\;131.
\nPendleton\, J.\, &\; Pezaro\, S. (2025). From midwife to lead perinatal practitioner: A utopian vision. \;Birth\, 52(3)\, 511&ndash\;516.
\nPreciado\, B. P. (2013). \;Testo Junkie: Sex\, drugs\, and biopolitics in the pharmacopornographic era. The Feminist Press.
\nPuig de la Bellacasa\, M. (2017). \;Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. University of Minnesota Press.
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n ORGANIZER;CN=Valeria Venditti: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Dublin:20260911T100000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Dublin:20260912T170000 SUMMARY:TransCare 2nd Edition UID:20260823T230200Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:Europe/Dublin LOCATION:Cork\, Ireland DESCRIPTION:Creative Practices for Trans\, Gender‑Diverse and Intersex Inclusive Healthcare Research and Education 11&ndash\;12 September 2026 | University College Cork
\nTransCare began in 2024 with funding from Research Ireland&rsquo\;s New Foundations scheme to discuss the needs and concerns of intersex\, trans and gender‑diverse people in health settings and envision gender‑affirmative education for healthcare professionals. \;The first edition was hosted in collaboration with \;Society for Women In Philosophy Ireland \;and marked the launch of PATHI\, the \;Professional Association for Trans Health Ireland\, which works to advance trans‑affirming\, evidence‑based healthcare and support practitioners across the island.
\nThanks to the \;Health Research Board&rsquo\;s CES Scheme 2025\, TransCare returns in 2026 with a renewed focus on creative and interdisciplinary methodologies for trans\, gender‑diverse\, and intersex&ndash\;inclusive healthcare research and education.
\nThe conference is organised by Dr Valeria Venditti (they/them\; she/her)\, College Lecturer in Healthcare at the School of Nursing and Midwifery\, University College Cork. The 2026 scientific committee includes people with lived experience\, Dr Valeria Venditti (College Lecturer in Healthcare Ethics)\, Mx Ryan \;Biskupović-Goulding \;(College Lecturer in Mental Health Nursing\, SONM\, UCC)\, and Dr Meg Ryan (Assistant Professor in Psychology and Director of the MSc in Global Mental Health\, Trinity College Dublin)
\nThe CFP is open!
ORGANIZER;CN=Valeria Venditti: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260911T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260912T170000 SUMMARY:Foundations in Science and Religion: Boundaries of Theory & Practice UID:20260823T230201Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:Dates TBC\; CFP open
\nThe "Foundations" Conference is The Forum's dedicated space for early‑career researchers exploring the rich\, complex intersections between scientific inquiry and religious thought. This event provides an intellectually supportive environment where emerging scholars can develop foundational skills\, exchange ideas\, and engage critically with the theoretical and practical dimensions of the field. This conference explores the dynamic and sometimes contested borders between scientific understanding and religious interpretation\, asking how these two influential domains shape&mdash\; and are shaped by&mdash\; one another in contemporary thought and practice.
\nAs scientific knowledge expands and religious traditions continue to evolve\, questions emerge about where boundaries should be drawn\, how they shift\, and what happens when they overlap. This conference examines these issues through interdisciplinary lenses\, bringing together voices from theology\, philosophy\, history\, the natural and social sciences\, and professional practice. By focusing on the boundaries of theory and practice\, this event aims not only to map the current landscape of science and religion studies but also to empower the next generation of scholars to shape its future.
\nApproximate running times BST (tbc):
\nDay 1: 10am-4pm
\nDay 2: 10am-4pm
ORGANIZER;CN=Finley Lawson: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260911T230000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260911T230000 SUMMARY:Understanding Current Approaches to the Theory and Philosophy of History UID:20260823T230202Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:&ldquo\;Theory and philosophy of history&rdquo\; is a contested label for a loosely connected set of research agendas about history (in the sense of our more or less systematic ways of studying the human past). It has been said that theorists tend to focus on history as a cultural product &ndash\; one among many other ways in which people in the present relate to the past\, both theirs and of others &ndash\;\, while philosophers tend to focus on the epistemology of what historians (actually or should) do\; or that theorists tend to be closer to &ldquo\;continental&rdquo\; philosophy\, social theory\, and literary theory\, while philosophers tend to be closer mainstream &ldquo\;analytic&rdquo\; philosophy. However\, these distinctions themselves are also quite contested. In fact\, there is little agreement on what &ldquo\;theory of history&rdquo\; and &ldquo\;philosophy of history&rdquo\; individually are\, how they differ\, and how they relate to one another.
\nDespite these problems with definitions\, researchers who share an interest in the theoretical problems that our relations to the human past entail have managed to gather around certain journals\, conferences\, and networks\, suggesting that some sort of connection may be found. Thus\, the argument appeared that &ldquo\;theory and philosophy of history&rdquo\; is more like an interdisciplinary space where scholars from different fields can discuss a common set of objects from their respective perspectives. However\, the details of what perspectives are those and what methodological or conceptual commitments they carry remain unknown. It is also not entirely clear what exactly the connecting thread is that makes such interdisciplinary dialogue possible.
\nThis virtual workshop aims to discuss the methodological challenges and metaphilosophical commitments of different approaches to the theory and philosophy of history as currently (and broadly) envisioned. As such\, we invite proposals for papers that clarify what these approaches consider to be the field&rsquo\;s proper objects\, aims\, and methods\, as well as the basic presuppositions that make such considerations possible. Accordingly\, proposals may deal with questions that include\, among others\, the following:
\nInvited speakers: Herman Paul (Leiden University)\; Marí\;a Iné\;s La Greca (National University of Tres de Febrero/CONICET)\; Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen (University of Oulu).
\nSubmission guidelines: Please submit an abstract (maximum 500 words) and a short biographical note by 11 September 2026. Acceptance letters will be sent by 25 September 2026.
\nSubmissions and inquiries should be sent to Joã\;o Ohara\, ohara@usp.br.
\nWorkshop format: 3 days (27-29 October 2026)\, with 2 sessions each (keynotes in the morning\, papers in the afternoon\, in Brasí\;lia Time\, UTC&minus\;03:00)
\nPresentations will be 15 minutes long\, followed by more time for discussion/Q&\;A.
\nThis workshop is supported by a grant from the Sã\;o Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) &ndash\; process 25/09351-8.
ORGANIZER;CN="João Ohara": METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260914T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260914T170000 SUMMARY:The Philosophy of Diagnosis UID:20260823T230203Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:Workshop: The Philosophy of Diagnosis
\nSeptember 14\, 2026 9a-5p (EDT = UTC-4)
\nVirtual (on Zoom)
\nHosted by the University of Pittsburgh
\nDiagnosis is central to the practice of medicine\, yet it raises questions that medicine alone cannot answer. What is a diagnosis? What and who is it for? How do we deal with uncertainty about diagnosis and responsibility for it? As artificial intelligence reshapes how diagnoses are reached and what clinical reasoning is\, these questions have become increasingly urgent. This virtual workshop brings together philosophers\, clinicians\, and researchers to examine diagnosis in a series of talks\, starting with core questions about what diagnosis is and should be and what technological developments mean for its future.
\nRegister to attend for free on Zoom:
\nhttps://pitt.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_w5szPTBcQXSoJI3sDVIHBw#/registration
\nKeynotes
\n&ldquo\;Why Every Diagnosis Needs a Critic: Argument\, Objection\, and Clinical Reasoning&rdquo\;
Gurpreet Dhaliwal\, University of California\, San Francisco School of Medicine
Title TBD
Lisa Sanders\, Yale School of Medicine and NYT Columnist (&ldquo\;Diagnosis&rdquo\;)
Invited Speakers
\n&ldquo\;Diagnosis\, Risk\, and Responsibility in the Age of AI&rdquo\;
Daniele Chiffi\, Politecnico di Milano
&ldquo\;What is diagnosis and what is it for?&rdquo\;
Jonathan Fuller\, University of Pittsburgh
&ldquo\;Putting a Name to It: Diagnosis in Contemporary Society&rdquo\;
Annemarie Jutel\, Victoria University of Wellington
&ldquo\;Diagnosis without Disorder&rdquo\;
Hane Maung\, Lancaster University
&ldquo\;The Clinical Reasoning Ourobouros: Cognitive Psychology\, Cybernetics\, Artificial Intelligence\, and the Future of the Clinical Mind&rdquo\;
Adam Rodman\, Harvard University
&ldquo\;From Bytes to Bed: Diagnostic reasoning in the time of AI&rdquo\;
Laura Zwaan\, Institute of Medical Education Research Rotterdam\, Erasmus MC
For any questions about the week&rsquo\;s events\, email the organizing team at:PMR2026@pitt.edu.
\nThis workshop is hosted by the Department of History and Philosophy of Science\, Center for Philosophy of Science\, and Institute for Bioethics at the University of Pittsburgh.
\nOrganizers
\nJonathan Fuller and Sloane Wesloh (University of Pittsburgh\, Department of History and Philosophy of Science)
ORGANIZER;CN=Sloane Wesloh;CN=Jonathan Fuller: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260914T100000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260915T170000 SUMMARY:New Directions in Law-Based Explanations in the Sciences UID:20260823T230204Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:Europe/London LOCATION:Lakatos Building\, London\, United Kingdom DESCRIPTION:When we look at current research across the natural and social sciences dealing with explanations of phenomena in their respective fields\, the word &lsquo\;explanation&rsquo\; is often modified with an adjective: causal\, non-causal\, mechanistic\, nomological/law-based\, topological\, mathematical\, and narrative are some of the non-mutually-exclusive modifiers that one may encounter. It is generally accepted that fields such as physics rely more on laws for their explanatory practices than disciplines such as cell biology\, which are\, for the most part\, concerned with mechanistic explanations\, for example. In the philosophy of science\, particularly since the advent of the New Mechanism literature in the 1990s\, barring some exceptions\, there has been relatively little sustained work on the pragmatic side of law-based explanations as opposed to other explanatory modalities\, and the interest that law-based explanations have garnered has mostly focused on the metaphysics of laws. This workshop aims to bring the philosophy of law-based explanations\, with particular attention to their pragmatic dimensions\, back into focus. Moreover\, while being historically informed\, the hope is to discuss new directions within this strand of the philosophy of explanation. Some questions for consideration could include (in no particular order):
\nConfirmed Speakers:
\nCall for Abstracts
\n13th International Philosophy of Medicine Roundtable Conference
\nSeptember 14-18\, 2026
\nVirtual
\nHosted by the University of Pittsburgh \;
\nConference Dates
\nSeptember 14: Pre-conference workshop on the philosophy of diagnosis
\nSeptember 14: Keynote talks \;
\nSeptember 15-18: Selected Talks
\nVenue
\nThe 13th International Philosophy of Medicine Roundtable will be held online\, hosted by the University of Pittsburgh Department of History and Philosophy of Science.
\nKeynote speakers
\nLisa Sanders (Yale School of Medicine)
\nGurpreet Dhaliwal (University of California\, San Francisco School of Medicine) \;
\nCall for Abstracts: Main Conference Program
\nWe welcome philosophical talks on all aspects of health and medicine\, broadly construed. \;
\nPlease submit a 500-word abstract tohttps://forms.gle/fenNHJ982oNzKW42Aby March 15\, 2026. Abstracts will undergo blinded review by the scientific committee. Accepted papers will be allocated a 30 min speaking slot (including Q&\;A). \;
\nAn individual may be listed as an author on more than one abstract. However\, they may only submit one abstract on which they are listed as a presenter (and may only present once in the main program).
\nSpecial issue
\nPresenters at the Roundtable will be invited to submit a paper version of their talk to a special section of the journal Philosophy of Medicine (https://philmed.pitt.edu). Details will be provided to presenters.
\nImportant dates
\nSubmission deadline: March 15\, 2026
\nNotification of acceptance: by the end of April 2026
\nConference dates: September 14-18\, 2026
\nContacts
\nQuestions regarding submissions or the Roundtable conference generally should be directed to pmr2026@pitt.edu.
\nLocal Organizers
\nJonathan Fuller\, Raphael Scholl\, Laura Matthews\, Sloane Wesloh\, Rose Gatfield-Jeffries (University of Pittsburgh\, Department of History and Philosophy of Science) \;
\nScientific Committee
\nAtocha Aliseda\, Rachel Ankeny\, Robyn Bluhm\, Giovanni Boniolo\, Kirstin Borgerson (Chair)\, Raffalla Campaner\, Jonathan Fuller\, Elselijn Kingma\, Maë\;l Lemoine\, Benjamin Smart (Secretary)
ORGANIZER;CN=Sloane Wesloh;CN=Rose Gatfield-Jeffries;CN=Laura Matthews;CN=Raphael Scholl;CN=Jonathan Fuller: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260915T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260915T090000 SUMMARY:JIS Symposium 2026: The Future of Democracy: Renewing Ordered Liberty UID:20260823T230206Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:CALL FOR PAPERS JIS SYMPOSIUM 2026 THE FUTURE OF DEMOCRACY: RENEWING ORDERED LIBERTY PASADENA\, CALIFORNIA\, USA\, 17 October 2026 (Online: Zoom) HOSTED BY OMEGA GRADUATE SCHOOL Suggested Themes: By its 250th anniversary\, American democracy is at a crossroads. The American experiment in self-government faces a triple challenge. In The Fragility of Order\, George Weigel recounts America&rsquo\;s major twentieth-century challenges whose successes have come into question. Weigel argues that order is a &ldquo\;fragile thing\,&rdquo\; and needs continual renewal\, specially in a postmodern cultural context unsure about the truth of anything. Order rapidly unraveled in the United States on three levels: moral\, cultural\, and political. Skepticism and relativism of the moral order found expression in nihilism and subjectivism in both popular and high culture\, which translated also into increased partisanship in the political order. The question arises how to restore the American Founders&rsquo\; ideal of a government that invoked &ldquo\;the Laws of Nature and of Nature&rsquo\;s God&rdquo\; that set up a constitutional framework with checks and balances to circumscribe the exercise of political power\, and secure &ldquo\;life\, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.&rdquo\; If this &ldquo\;One nation under God\, with liberty and justice for all&rdquo\; is to endure\, then its Judeo-Christian cultural roots need to be rediscovered to nurture individuals\, families\, and communities\, reaffirming America&rsquo\;s promise of equality of opportunity\, in contrast to quasi-Marxist &ldquo\;equity&rdquo\; as leveling egalitarianism or &ldquo\;equal outcomes\,&rdquo\; a democratic temptation that Alexis de Tocqueville warned against in his Democracy in America. The neo-Freudian obsession with sex and its perversions needs to yield to the imago Dei vision of human dignity (Gen 1:27)\; the un-American emphasis on race and gender in education and public policy (affirmative action/DEI) replaced by merit as the best criterion for gauging individual effort\; while politics need the leaven of respect for all. In brief\, can America find its soul and redeem the American Dream? JIS Symposium 2026 endeavors to bring together scholars from a wide range of disciplines and denominations for an exciting international conference which takes both scholarship and faith seriously. Keynote: Dawn Lewis Sutherland (Liberty University): "Democracy After Datafication: Personhood and the Renewal of Ordered Liberty." JIS Symposium 2026: The Future of Democracy: Renewing Ordered Liberty (Online via Zoom) is co-sponsored by IIR-ICSA-JIS. All conference participants must pre-register. Abstracts (250 words) due: September 15\, 2026: c/o Dr. O. Gruenwald\, JIS Editor\, 1065 Pine Bluff Dr.\, Pasadena\, CA 91107\, USA\, per e-mail (no attachments) to: info@jis3.org. Include: Paper Title\, First &\; Last Name\, department\, institution\, mailing address\, telephone &\; e-mail. Fully-developed papers will be considered for publication in the refereed Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies XXXIX 2027. Website: https://www.jis3.org/symposium2026.
ORGANIZER;CN=Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies;CN=Oskar Gruenwald: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260915T120000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260915T130000 SUMMARY:David Wallace - A Gravitomagnetic Bootstrap: localizing rotational and conformal structure in Newtonian gravity as a path to general relativity UID:20260823T230207Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:America/New_York LOCATION:University of Pittsburgh\, Pittsburgh\, United States\, 15260 DESCRIPTION:The Center for Philosophy of Science at the University of Pittsburgh invites you to join us for our Lunch Time Talk. Attend in person at 1117 Cathedral of Learning or visit our live stream on YouTube at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrRp47ZMXD7NXO3a9Gyh2sg.
\n\nLTT: David Wallace
\n\nTuesday\, September 15th @ 12:00 pm - 1:30 pm EST
\n\nTitle: A Gravitomagnetic Bootstrap: localizing rotational and conformal structure in Newtonian gravity as a path to general relativity
\n\nAbstract:
\nHistorically Newtonian gravity was understood in terms of long-range forces imposed on an absolute spacetime background\, we now know it can be better understood as a localization of inertial structure - or at least of that part which distinguishes inertial motion from rectilinear acceleration. That perspective suggests a natural generalization: what if we also localize other aspects of inertial structure\, like rotation and scale\, and make them depend on matter dynamically? The resultant theory is uniquely determined up to an overall constant with the dimensions of velocity. It fails to be Galilean covariant\; investigating this failure allows one to 'bootstrap' up to (local) Lorentz covariance in a manner closely analogous to the bootstrap from magnetostatics to Maxwell's theory and special relativity. The resultant theory is equivalent to the first post-Newtonian approximation to general relativity.
\nThis talk will also be available live streamed on:
\nZoom at \;
\nYouTube at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrRp47ZMXD7NXO3a9Gyh2sg.
ORGANIZER;CN=Edouard Machery: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260916T100000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260917T170000 SUMMARY:Radical Scepticism\, Intellectual Courage\, and Conspiracy Theory UID:20260823T230208Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:Europe/London LOCATION:Avenue Campus\, Southampton\, United Kingdom DESCRIPTION:This two-day conference\, hosted by the Ethics of Doubt project\, aims to bring together leading scholars from around the world to discuss radical scepticsm\, the virtue of intellectual courage\, and their relationship to conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorising.
\nFor more information about the conference and the project more generally\, please visit our website: \;https://www.ethicsofdoubt.org/
ORGANIZER;CN=Taylor Matthews;CN="Genia Schönbaumsfeld": METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260916T160000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260916T173000 SUMMARY:Jeremy Butterfield's The Multiverse: Book launch UID:20260823T230209Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:Jeremy Butterfield&rsquo\;s The Multiverse \;is an introduction to the idea that our universe is just one of many universes. He presents and assesses three versions of the idea of the multiverse: one from philosophy and two from physics. He explores: the ideas of logically possible worlds\, the branches of the quantum state (in the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics)\, and the bubbles of inflationary cosmology. For each idea\, he selects one philosophical question to explore in depth. They are\, respectively: what is a possible world\, what is chance\, and what is explanation?
\nOn Sep 16 2026\, 18.00 CEST\, we'll host a virtual book launch in which Jeremy Butterfield will present his book in conversation with Al Wilson (Leeds) and Richard Dawid (Stockholm). The event will be chaired by Helen Beebee (Leeds) and David Teira (Madrid)\, from BSPS Open\, the diamond open access collection publishing the book in partnership with Calgary UP. \;
\nThe book can be freely downloaded here: \;
\nhttps://ucalgary.scholaris.ca/items/fd41bdc8-3ef9-4225-9aa5-32fe70f8fece
\nOr you can buy a printed copy: https://press.ucalgary.ca/books/9781773856964/
ORGANIZER;CN=David Teira: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260917T090000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260919T170000 SUMMARY:The Inaugural International Society for Moral Psychology Conference UID:20260823T230210Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:America/New_York LOCATION:616 Thurston Avenue\, Ithaca\, United States\, 14853 DESCRIPTION:We welcome submissions from various disciplines including but not limited to philosophy\, psychology\, linguistics\, neuroscience\, cognitive science\, medicine\, religion\, and law. Submissions will be refereed for quality and relevance to ISMP\, which aims to promote broader impacts of and participation in moral psychology around the world. We are especially interested in submissions of research on cross-cultural moral psychology and reports on cross-cultural moral psychology research collaborations.
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260918T133000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260918T163000 SUMMARY:Book Symposium: The New Modern Medicine UID:20260823T230211Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:America/New_York LOCATION: University of Pittsburgh\, 4200 Fifth Avenue\, Pittsburgh\, United States\, 15260 DESCRIPTION:Book Symposium: The New Modern Medicine
\nSeptember 18 @ 1:30 pm - 4:00 pm EDT \;
\nIn The New Modern Medicine: Disease\, Evidence\, and Epidemiological Medicine (OUP\, 2025)\, Jonathan Fuller examines contemporary scientific medicine and its distinctive philosophical problems\, particularly problems brought about by the integration of modern epidemiology into medicine. In this book symposium\, Christopher Phillips and Benjamin Chin-Yee will respond to the book from philosophical\, historical\, and clinical perspectives. The audience will then be invited into the conversation.
\nThe New Modern Medicine is available to download open access:
\nhttps://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-new-modern-medicine-9780190066147?cc=us&\;lang=en&\;#
\nJonathan Fuller MD PhD
\nAssociate Professor\, Department of History and Philosophy of Science
\nUniversity of Pittsburgh
\n\nProfessor and Department Head\, Department of History
\nCarnegie Mellon University
\nBenjamin Chin-Yee MD DPhil
\nAssistant Professor\, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
\nAssistant Professor\, Department of Philosophy
\nWestern University
\nSchedule:
\n1:30&ndash\;1:35 Introduction by Center Director
\n1:35&ndash\;1:50 Introduction to the book by Jonathan Fuller
\n1:50&ndash\;2:20 Response by Christopher Phillips
\n2:20&ndash\;2:50 Response by Benjamin Chin-Yee
\n2:50&ndash\;3:00 Break
\n3:00&ndash\;3:15 Reply by Jonathan Fuller
\n3:15&ndash\;4:00 Q&\;A
\nLocated in the Center for Philosophy of Science\, 1117 Cathedral of Learning
\n ORGANIZER;CN=Edouard Machery: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260823T230016Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20260920T230000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20260920T230000 SUMMARY:"Ricœur\, Dead or Alive?" Fonds Ricœur Monthly Seminar (ENS\, Paris) UID:20260823T230212Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-jbhxv TZID:Europe/Paris LOCATION:École Normale Supérieure\, 45 rue d'Ulm\, Paris\, France\, 75005 DESCRIPTION:Presentation of the Seminar
\nThe seminar "Actualité\;s de Ric&oelig\;ur" ("Ric&oelig\;ur Studies Today") aims to offer a space for discussion and development for early-career research on Ric&oelig\;ur. Hosted at the É\;cole Normale Supé\;rieure for the 2026&ndash\;2027 academic year\, it welcomes proposals from doctoral students\, postdoctoral researchers\, and early-career scholars who wish to explore\, extend\, or put to the test the resources of Paul Ric&oelig\;ur's philosophy.
\nThe first edition of this seminar is entitled "Ric&oelig\;ur\, Dead or Alive?" &mdash\; a deliberately ambiguous formulation\, one that invites us to question both the internal vitality of his &oelig\;uvre and its capacity to nourish the philosophical\, ethical\, and political debates of today.
\nIs Ric&oelig\;ur's hermeneutic phenomenology not defined\, in essence\, by its defense of &mdash\; and\, as it were\, its "vow" (v&oelig\;u) in favor of &mdash\; life\, the living\, and the lively? But is he still a living interlocutor\, or has his thought sedimented into heritage?
\nThe seminar will follow this format: two speakers per two-hour session\, with 30 minutes of presentation and 30 minutes of discussion for each speaker.
\nFor paper proposals\, we welcome submissions engaging with three thematic axes.
\nAxis I. Life as Resistance &ndash\; Language\, Time\, and Action
\nHow does life affirm\, narrate\, and configure itself in the face of what negates it? Ric&oelig\;ur's hermeneutic phenomenology is traversed by a fundamental tension between the power to act and the multiple forms of its hindrance. Confronted with evil\, forgetting\, or indeed death\, Ric&oelig\;ur explores the diverse forms of resistance at work within life &mdash\; metaphors\, narratives\, memories\, history. These resistances\, as actions\, possess an intrinsic logic and continue to create the meaning of life.
\nSuggested Lines of Approach
\n1. Language as resistance: How does the "living metaphor" (The Rule of Metaphor\, 1975) constitute a form of resistance to the "entropy of language\," which freezes meaning? In what sense is semantic innovation a vital act\, a "revival"?
\n2. Narrative as resistance: In Time and Narrative (1983&ndash\;1985)\, emplotment is presented as a provisional victory over temporal discordance. How are we to think this victory in the face of the radicality of Heideggerian "being-towards-death"?
\n3. Memory as resistance: Memory\, History\, Forgetting (2000) distinguishes between forgetting kept in reserve and forgetting through effacement. In what way does this distinction commit us to an ethics of memory as a form of fidelity to life?
\nAxis II. A Life of One's Own &ndash\; Selfhood\, Vulnerability\, Ethicity
\nHow might vulnerability\, far from being a limit of subjectivity\, be its very condition of ethical possibility? Ric&oelig\;ur's hermeneutics of the self is built upon the recognition of a constitutive fragility: narrative identity is always exposed to rupture\, to suffering\, to undergoing the action of the other &mdash\; the other inscribing at the very heart of the self. This axis proposes to deepen reflection on the relation between the self and the other\, and to explore the modes by which a "good life" may be accomplished\, starting from the concrete ordeals of vulnerability: trauma\, the quest for mutual recognition\, and the precariousness of existence.
\nSuggested Lines of Approach
\n4. The ordeal of narrative identity: Oneself as Another (1990) articulates idem-identity and ipse-identity around the self-constancy under trial. What becomes of this articulation when the trial is that of identity's collapse &mdash\; serious illness\, exile\, trauma? Ric&oelig\;ur's hermeneutics of narrative identity also resonates with debates on the performativity of identity and with gender studies (Butler).
\n5. The reciprocity of recognition: In The Course of Recognition (2004)\, Ric&oelig\;ur moves from self-recognition to mutual recognition. How might this course enter into dialogue with contemporary theories of vulnerability (Weil\, Levinas) or of care?
\n6. The ethical life: The "ethical aim" defined in the "ethical studies" (Oneself as Another\, Studies 5-7) seeks to realize a "good life." Does this notion remain operative in the face of situations of thwarted life\, precarity\, or desubjectivation?
\nAxis III. Ric&oelig\;ur&rsquo\;s Survival &ndash\; Present Legacies
\nRic&oelig\;ur maintained a singular relationship with his own era\, marked as much by fruitful resonances as by sharp conflicts. This axis seeks to interrogate the philosophical actuality of these past debates: what extensions\, what corrections\, and what ruptures does Ric&oelig\;urian thought call for today? Proposals will place Ric&oelig\;ur's texts in critical dialogue with contemporary problematics\, without confining themselves to historical reconstruction.
\nSuggested Lines of Approach
\n7. Radical alterity in phenomenology: Ric&oelig\;ur engaged in a twofold critical dialogue with Derridean deconstruction and Levinasian ethics &mdash\; two distinct contestations of the autonomy of the self\, the one through the play of language\, the other through the ethical injunction of the face. How do these confrontations\, taken together\, illuminate the limits and the resources of the hermeneutics of the self in the face of the contemporary challenges of hospitality\, communication\, and responsibility?
\n8. Philosophical anthropology: Is the human being\, understood as the "capable human being" (From Text to Action\, 1986)\, in a position to accommodate new forms of agency &mdash\; collective\, distributed\, digital &mdash\; or do its anthropological presuppositions constrain it? In this regard\, Ric&oelig\;urian philosophy could enter into fruitful dialogue with the theories of Stiegler (tertiary retention) and Arendt (collective action).
\n9. Justice today: How might Ric&oelig\;ur's reflections on justice\, collective memory\, and forgiveness (Memory\, History\, Forgetting\, Epilogue) be articulated with the contemporary stakes of memory conflicts\, politics of reconciliation\, or postcolonial reparations? Ric&oelig\;ur's philosophy is bound up with figures such as Halbwachs\, Derrida\, and Honneth. His reflection on memory and forgiveness continues to shed lasting light on the practices of transitional justice.
\nSubmission Guidelines
\nTo submit a proposal or for any inquiries\, please write to us at the following address: seminaire.actualites.ricoeur@gmail.com. Proposals are welcome from doctoral students\, postdoctoral researchers\, and early-career scholars of any discipline (philosophy\, literary studies\, theology\, social sciences\, law)\, provided that they are grounded in Ric&oelig\;ur's texts and in contemporary debates for which Ric&oelig\;urian theory could be fruitfully mobilized. Comparative and transdisciplinary proposals are welcome. We will accept proposals in French and in English.
\nOrganizing Committee
\nTristan Barberousse (ENS)
\nKexin Hu (ENS)
\nMartina Lodi (Lumsa-ICP)
\nQiyu Chen (Montpellier III)
\n\nPractical Information
\nSubmissions: seminaire.actualites.ricoeur@gmail.com
\nSubmission deadline: 20 September 2026
\nVenue: É\;cole Normale Supé\;rieure\, 45 rue d'Ulm\, Paris (75005)
\nFrequency: monthly (2026&ndash\;2027 academic year)\, normally on the last Tuesday of each month\, beginning however on Tuesday 6 October.
\nSchedule: 6 October\; 27 October\; 24 November\; 15 December (due to the holiday break)\; 26 January\; 23 February\; 30 March\; 27 April.
\nPaper proposals must follow these guidelines:
\nAn anonymized abstract of 400 to 600 words in Word format\, specifying the title of the paper\, the chosen axis\, and the thesis defended\, accompanied by an indicative bibliography.
\nA brief bio-bibliographical note (name\, affiliation\, current position\, thesis supervisor where applicable) should be included in the body of the email. To facilitate the archiving and processing of your submission\, we kindly ask you to format the subject line of your email as follows: [Seminar Application] Surname &ndash\; Title of the Paper. Formatting guidelines for the (anonymous) abstract: Times New Roman or Arial\, 12-point font\, 1.5 line spacing.
\nWe wish for the papers to be delivered in person\, in order to facilitate the discussions that lie at the heart of the seminar spirit of this initiative. A link will nevertheless be available for those who wish to follow the event remotely\, where applicable.
\nThe seminar has no dedicated budget for the reimbursement of travel and accommodation expenses\, and in-person participation is at the speakers' own expense. We therefore encourage them to explore\, as a first step\, the funding available from their research unit\, doctoral school\, or home institution.
\nSelected speakers will be invited to submit a preparatory text (25\,000 characters maximum)\, to be circulated to participants one week before the session\, and sent to the contact address (seminaire.actualites.ricoeur@gmail.com).
ORGANIZER;CN=Barberousse Tristan;CN=Hu Kexin;CN=Lodi Martina;CN=Chen Qiyu: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR