Online attendance: \;if you want to join the talk online please email Yuri Cath at y.cath@latrobe.edu.au to ask for the zoom link.
Abstract:
Suppose a listener---let&rsquo\;s call him Jack---is an avid music fan\, and regularly seeks out recommendations as to new music to listen to. On the basis of a recommendation of some kind\, Jack encounters a piece of music\, M. M is deemed highly valuable by fans of the genre to which it belongs. But M is outside Jack&rsquo\;s comfort zone: it doesn&rsquo\;t immediately appeal to him. What are the chances that Jack's encounter with M will lead to a change in his musical taste? \; In this talk\, I argue that the answer to this question depends in part on the mode of recommendation by means of which Jack has encountered M.Specifically\, I will consider the following two modes of recommendation:
I will argue that the chances are higher in Case 1 (compared to Case 2) that Jack's encounter with M will lead to a change in his musical taste. This is because Jack has a greater chance of eventually having an aesthetic experience of M in Case 1 than he is in Case 2. The different likelihoods here\, I will claim\, owe in large part to the intersubjective features that Case 1 has\, but Case 2 lacks. \; Now\, people today tend to rely far more on Spotify's recommender system to seek out musical recommendations than they do on radio DJs. It is therefore plausible that the average music listener has fewer real chances of having her musical tastes changed today than she used to (or would have done) in the heyday of specialist radio shows. In the final part of the talk\, I will explore whether this is in fact a bad thing\, and if so\, why. \; \;
ORGANIZER;CN=Yuri Cath: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR