Confirmed \;speakers:
\nChristopher Bartel (Appalachian State University)
\nAlexandre Declos (University of Neuchâ\;tel)
\nNele \;van de Mosselaer (Tilburg University)
\nNathan Wildman (Tilburg University)
\n
Workshop description: \;Whether games qualify as artworks remains a matter of debate. It is\, however\, uncontroversial that games can possess aesthetic value and exhibit aesthetic properties. But what is distinctive about the aesthetic appeal of games\, and how should we theorize it?
Several influential answers have been proposed. Some argue that the distinctive aesthetics of games lies in their interactivity (Tavinor 2009\; Lopes 2010) or in the sculpted agencies they afford (Nguyen 2020). Christopher Bartel has recently argued that the aesthetics of videogames depends not only on their formal features\, but also on players&rsquo\; attitudes\, distinguishing several aesthetically relevant modes of play (goal-seeking\, narrative\, or &ldquo\;dollhouse&rdquo\; play). Frank Lantz (2024)\, by contrast\, maintains that games exhibit a sui generis form of beauty grounded in their systemic features. It remains an open question how these approaches can be reconciled\, and \;where they fundamentally diverge.
This workshop aims to engage with these debates and to explore the aesthetics of games more broadly. Bringing together philosophers of art and game scholars\, the workshop will examine how games challenge inherited categories of aesthetic theory\, and how aesthetic theory can\, in turn\, illuminate the nature of game-playing.
We welcome contributions addressing the intersection of aesthetics and game studies. \;Possible topics include (but are not limited to):
Submission details
\nPlease submit proposals by email to: N.W.Wildman@tilburguniversity.edu> and alexandre.declos@unine.ch>
Submissions should consist of a PDF prepared for blind review\, containing an abstract of 300 words (references excluded). Please make sure to put "Aesthetics of games submission" in the subject.
Deadline for submission: April 15\, 2026
Please note that participants are expected to cover their own transport and accomodation costs\; however\, lunches and a workshop dinner will be covered.
Making kin is first and foremost a gesture rather than a concept. Donna Haraway \; presents it as a gesture that reacts to a world organized by rigid separations: nature and \; culture\, feminine and masculine\, human and machine\, organism and technique. To \; make kin is to learn how to live together under the epistemological horizontality of \; habitable bodies in damaged landscapes\, accepting interdependence as an ontological \; and political condition. It is not a matter of restoring a lost nature\, nor of celebrating \; technology as a promise of salvation\, but of weaving possible relations within wounded \; worlds. This proposal emerges from the recognition of the most recent narcissistic \; wound in the human imaginary: technology.
\nAfter Copernicus\, Darwin and Freud&mdash\;who \; unsettled anthropocentric pride by demonstrating that the Earth is not the center of the \; universe\, that human beings are not isolated divine creations but part of animal \; evolution\, and that we do not exercise full control over our own mind\, being also \; governed by the unconscious&mdash\;technoscience\, particularly the digital and artificial \; intelligence\, once again displaces the human from the center by challenging its cognitive\, \; ontological\, and moral exceptionalism. For Donna Haraway\, this wound should neither \; be denied nor healed\, but inhabited through a profound reconfiguration of how agency\, \; responsibility\, kinship\, space\, and time are conceived in a shared and fragmented world \; composed of human and non-human cultural entities. Making kin therefore entails \; rethinking and reinhabiting bodies\, beginning by questioning which bodies are \; recognized and how they appear. Bodies that are sites of passage\, traversed by regimes \; of gender\, race\, class\, and species\; bodies exposed to toxicities\, extraction\, and \; infrastructures\; bodies amplified\, monitored\, and reconfigured by technologies. Bodies \; that are also habitats of resistance\, care\, and the invention of new ways of dwelling. The \; pressing question is not only how to survive\, nor even how to live\, but how to render \; bodies habitable. In this sense\, this congress seeks to bring together philosophical and \; interdisciplinary reflections that explore the unexpected alliances between ecology\, \; technology and feminism\, interrogating the conditions of possibility for habitable bodies \; within contemporary ecological techniques. In doing so\, it aims to contribute to \; imagining futures in which making kin is not merely a concept\, but an urgent ethical and \; political praxis.
\nThis way\, researchers are invited to submit presentation proposals within the \; three main strands of the congress&mdash\;feminism\, ecology and technology&mdash\;placing them in \; dialogue through perspectives such as ecofeminism\, transhumanism\, new materialisms\, \; the ethics of care\, decolonial thought\, among others. Theoretical\, critical\, or situated \; approaches from philosophy and related fields are welcome\, exploring\, among other \; possibilities:
\n➢ Contemporary transformations of the categories of subject\, agency and community \; in light of posthumanism\, new materialisms\, and relational metaphysics\;
\n➢ Practices of care\, hospitality and kinship as ethical and political questions\, analyzed \; from the perspectives of care ethics\, applied ethics\, bioethics and contemporary \; political philosophy\;
\n➢ The reconfiguration of the body as a site of experience\, agency and vulnerability\, \; considering dialogues between phenomenology\, philosophy of embodiment\, gender \; studies and philosophy of technology\;
\n➢ Interdependencies between humans\, non-humans and technologies and their \; epistemological implications\, addressed through the lens of philosophy of science\, \; feminist epistemology and technoscience studies\;
\n➢ Questions of justice\, responsibility and vulnerability in wounded ecologies\, \; examined from the optic of political philosophy\, critical theory\, postcolonial theory \; and environmental ethics\;
\n➢ Critiques of traditional hierarchies (nature/culture\, human/non-human\, \; masculine/feminine) and the exploration of alternative models of kinship and \; coexistence\, drawing on metaphysics\, ontology\, social philosophy and posthuman \; theories\;
\n➢ Reflections on technology\, artificial intelligence\, biotechnology and digitalities as \; forces that displace the subject\, transform agency and redefine modes of inhabiting\, \; from the perspectives of philosophy of technology\, critical cybernetics and AI \; studies\;
\n➢ The construction of shared worlds\, kinships and interdependencies through visual \; and performing arts and cinema\, considered in light of philosophy of art\, relational \; aesthetics\, and philosophy of film\;
\n➢ The role of language\, narrative and symbolic representation in mediating bodies\, \; technologies and ecologies\, investigated through philosophy of language\, narrative \; theory\, critical semiotics\, and philosophy of communication.
\nProposals must be submitted in English\, Portuguese\, Spanish\, French\, or \; Italian to makingkin@outlook.pt by April 21\, 2026. They should include an abstract \; (up to 300 words) and a brief biographical note (up to 150 words). Presentations should \; not exceed 20 minutes. The results will be announced on 7 May 2026. This International Congress is organized within the framework of PRAXIS &ndash\; Center for \; Philosophy\, Politics and Culture\, University of Beira Interior (Covilhã\;\, Portugal).
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153352Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260702T120000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260703T170000 SUMMARY:Postcolonialism\, Postcommunism and Postmodernism - 8th International Interdisciplinary Conference UID:20260611T105630Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:Conference online (via Zoom)
\nCFP:
\nIn our postmodern world there are a lot of questions that should be re-considered and re-defined. What does it mean to fight against colonialism and racism in the world of migration crisis and xenophobic attitudes towards minorities? What does it mean to be a postcommunist country in the face of the common nostalgia for order and rules? How is it possible to have a national identity being aware of the relative character of every national feature?
We want to examine the notions of postcolonialism\, postcommunism and postmodernism as thoroughly as possible\, from many perspectives and in variable aspects: in politics\, society\, psychology\, culture\, and many more. We also want to devote considerable attention to how these phenomena are represented in artistic practices: in literature\, film\, theatre or visual arts.
We invite researchers representing various academic disciplines: history\, politics\, psychology\, sociology\, anthropology\, philosophy\, economics\, law\, literary criticism\, theatre studies\, film studies\, fine arts\, memory studies\, migration studies\, consciousness studies\, dream studies\, gender studies\, postcolonial studies\, medical sciences\, psychiatry\, psychoanalysis\, cognitive sciences and others.
Different forms of presentations are encouraged\, including case studies\, theoretical investigations\, problem-oriented arguments\, and comparative analyses.
We will be happy to hear from both experienced scholars and young academics at the start of their careers\, as well as doctoral students and undergraduate students. We also invite all persons interested in participating in the conference as listeners\, without giving a presentation.
We hope that due to its interdisciplinary nature\, the conference will bring many interesting observations on and discussions about postcolonialism\, postcommunism and postmodernism.
Our repertoire of suggested topics includes but is not restricted to
I. Postcolonialism
\;
postcolonial politics
\npostcolonial philosophy
\npostcolonial societies
\nhistory of (post)colonialism
\npostcolonialism and orientalism
\npostcolonialisim and Islampophobia
\npostcolonialism and anti-Semitism
\npostcolonialism and terrorism
\npostcolonialism and racism
\npostcolonialism and political correctness
\npostcolonialism and cosmopolitism
\npostcolonilism and religion
\n
II. Postcommunism
\;
postcommunism and democracy
\npostcommunism and liberalism
\npostcommunism and capitalism
\nnostalgia for communism
\ncommunism and conformism
\npostcommunism and revolution
\npostcommunist countries in the European Union
\npostcommunist generations
\n
III. Postmodernism
modernism and postmodernism
\npostmodern philosophy
\npostmodern psychology
\npostmodern identity
\npostmodern lifestyle
\npostmodernism and nationalism
\npostmodernism and human rights
\npostmodernism and authority
\nIV. Literature and the Arts
\;
postcolonialism\, postcommunism and postmodernism in literature
\npostcolonialism\, postcommunism and postmodernism in film
\npostcolonialism\, postcommunism and postmodernism in theatre
\npostcolonialism\, postcommunism and postmodernism in fine arts
\npostcolonial narratives
\npostcommunist memoirs
\npostmodern conventions
\nPlease submit abstracts (no longer than 300 words) of your proposed 20-minute presentations\, together with a short biographical note\, by 15 June2026 to:inconferenceoffice@gmail.com \; \;
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153352Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260801T234500 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260801T234500 SUMMARY:CFP for a Special Issue of Angelaki: Khôra UID:20260611T105631Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:Call for papers for a Special Issue of Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities
\nKhô\;ra
\n(preliminary title)
\nEditors: Nicholas Birns and Marina Christodoulou
\nFor a pdf of the full Call see: \;https://www.academia.edu/164922361/CFP_for_a_Special_Issue_of_Angelaki_Khô\;ra
\nThis special issue (33.5) invites contributions that revisit the concept of khô\;ra\, introduced in Plato&rsquo\;s Timaeus as a &ldquo\;third kind&rdquo\; beyond being and becoming\, a matrix\, a receptacle\, and reinterpreted in contemporary philosophy\, most notably by Derrida. Situated between presence and absence\, intelligibility and materiality\, khô\;ra resists stable categorization while remaining indispensable for thinking space\, inscription\, and receptivity. We seek papers that engage khô\;ra across disciplines\, exploring its implications for spatial theory\, media\, politics\, ecology\, and aesthetics\, as well as its limits and possible reconfigurations today.
\nContributors are encouraged to explore the following subjects\, as already apparent in the presentation/argumentaire of the edited volume\, however these are not exclusive (an indicative non-exhaustive bibliography that might give some directions is included in the end): \;
\nPlatonic interpretations\, as well as pre-platonic and later antique \; (i.e. Neoplatonist \, e.g. Plotinus) references and interpretations
\nPotential later uses and mentions of the term\, e.g. in Byzantine\, Roman\, and Medieval texts
\nModern and Contemporary uses\, mentions\, studies\, interpretations of the term: e.g. Spinoza\, Leibniz\, Schelling&rsquo\;s commentary on the Timaeus\, Bergson\, Heidegger\, Phenomenology (Husserl\, Richir\, etc.)\, Whitehead\, Derrida\, Deleuze\, Feminism (Grosz\, Irigaray\, Kristeva\, etc.)\, \; John Sallis\, Aesthetics (e.g. in Arts\, Performance and Architecture).
\nAccounts from Charles Taylor\, \; John Caputo\, Richard Kearney\, other post-secular thinkers. \;
\nNon-western equivalent terms/concepts/ideas\, or usages and interpretations\, in Hindu or Buddhist philosophy or elsewhere\, as for example in Nishida Kitarō\, or in Indigenous cultures.
\nKhô\;ra and digital space / AI
\nKhô\;ra in architecture or urban studies
\nKhô\;ra and/in feminist philosophy\, especially as applied to the limits and fault lines of gender. \;
\nKhô\;ra and decolonial spatial theory
\nKhô\;ra in literature or visual art\, especially accounts of place or materiality in literature. \;
\nKhô\;ra and affect / embodiment
\nKhô\;ra and environmental thought\, especially in terms of the idea of the ground. \;
\nAnimal Studies
\nObject oriented ontology
\nKhô\;ra and psychology/subjectivity \;
\nChapters shall be 5000-8500 (max) words\, inclusive of bibliography and notes.
\nContributions can include the following: original essays\, interviews\, and &ldquo\;review articles&rdquo\; (Angelaki does not accept standard book reviews though). Translations to English will be taken into account\, as long as the responsibility for producing work of publishable quality in the English language lies with the author.
\nThe Special Issue will also be published as a monograph-type book by Routledgein theAngelaki: New Work in the Theoretical Humanities - book series.
\nPlease submit a title and an abstract/brief-outline proposals of between 300-800 words. Additionally\, please include an up-to-date curriculum vitae (CV). The deadline for submissions is 01 August\, 2026. Please send your materials to Nicholas Birns (nb2003@nyu.edu) and Marina Christodoulou (marina.n.christodoulou@gmail.com)\, who can also address any inquiries you may have. \;
\nThe timeline is below:
\n01 August\, 2026 &ndash\; Abstracts/brief outlines due from CFP
\nSeptember 15\, 2026 &ndash\; Notification of Preliminary Acceptance of Proposals or Rejection
\nSeptember 15\, 2027 &ndash\; Completed Manuscripts Due\, Editorial Reviews Start \;
\nJanuary 15\, 2028 &ndash\; Editorial Reviews Completed
\nMarch 01\, 2028 &ndash\; Revisions Completed\, Final Manuscript Submission\, Final Approval of Manuscripts
\nMay 15\, 2028 &ndash\; Delivery of material to Angelaki. Beginning of Production Process (Copy Edits and Proofs)
\nSeptember 2028 &ndash\; Special Issue Publication Online
\n2029 &ndash\; Republication in the Routledge Book Series
\nAngelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities
\nAngelaki homepage
\nAngelaki facebook
\nAngelaki Humanities - book series
\nAngelaki: New Work in the Theoretical Humanities - book series
\nFor a pdf of the full Call see: \;https://www.academia.edu/164922361/CFP_for_a_Special_Issue_of_Angelaki_Khô\;ra
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153352Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260820T140000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260821T170000 SUMMARY:Food and Memory - 5th International Interdisciplinary Conference UID:20260611T105632Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:Conference online
\nABOUT THE CONFERENCE: \;
\nResearchers have long confirmed the importance of studying food-related issues in the past and in the today's world. During our interdisciplinary conference\, we are going to concentrate on the relationships between food and memory. In what sense &ndash\; and in what circumstances &ndash\; can food be regarded as an identity-forming factor? What role does it play in shaping our individual and collective memories? How can food studies deepen our knowledge on the social and cultural aspects of our lives? Why are food memories so often related to important experiences of individuals and societies?
\n\; \; \; \; \; \; We would like to discuss these and many other questions from a broad perspective\, referring to the anthropological\, psychological\, sociological\, historical\, and \; aesthetic research on food and memory. That is why we invite researchers representing various academic fields: anthropology\, history\, psychology\, psychoanalysis\, psychiatry\, sociology\, political studies\, philosophy\, economics\, law\, memory studies\, consciousness studies\, literary studies\, theatre studies\, film studies\, migration studies\, gender studies\, postcolonial studies\, medical sciences\, and cognitive sciences\, to name a few.
\n\; \; \; \; \; \; Different forms of presentations are encouraged\, including case studies\, theoretical inquiries\, personal reflections\, problem-oriented arguments\, and comparative analyses.
\n\; \; \; \; \; \; We will be happy to hear from both experienced scholars and young academics at the beginning of their careers\, as well as doctoral and graduate students. We also invite all persons interested in participating in the conference as listeners\, without giving a presentation.
\nOur repertoire of suggested topics includes but is not restricted to:
\nIndividual experiences:
\nFood memories
\nFood and sensory memory
\nSmell\, taste and remembrance
\nIndividual food preferences
\nFood and identity
\nVeganism and ethical memory
\n&ldquo\;You are what you eat&rdquo\;
\nFood and emotions
\nFood and affect
\nFood and abjection
\nFood and sickness
\nFood and eating disorders
\nFood and aging
\nFood and mental health
\nFood and the materiality of memory
\nFood and nostalgia
\nFood and trauma
\nFood and ecstasy
\nFood as epiphany
\nFood in dreams
\n\; \; \;2. Interpersonal experiences:
\nFood and love
\nFood and sex
\nFood and caregiving
\nFood and poisoning
\nFood as a tool of communication
\nFood and intergenerational memory
\nFood and queer identities
\nRecipes as memory practices
\n\; \;3. Collective experiences:
\nFood\, memory and tradition
\nFood habits
\nFood ceremonies and rituals
\nFood taboos
\nFood and religions
\nFood and language
\nFood symbolism
\nFood and cultural/social identity
\nFood and migration crises
\nDiasporic cuisines and belonging
\nFood and displacement
\nFood and war
\nFood scarcity and survival
\nFood and decolonization
\nColonial histories of food
\nCulinary nationalisms
\nMulticultural dimensions of contemporary cuisines
\nFood and fashion
\nFood and social status
\nFood and inequalities
\nFood and genocide
\nFood waste and memory
\nFood and sustainability
\nFood and climate anxiety
\nPandemic food practices
\nFood during COVID-19F
\nFood and capitalism
\n4. Aesthetic experiences:
\nFood and memory in literature\, film\, theatre and visuals arts
\nFood-related literary and cinematic genres
\nCookbooks as autobiographical narratives
\nFood in the media
\nFood aesthetics in popular culture
\nConcepts of good taste
\nFood photography and memory
\nNostalgia marketing and food
\n5. Contemporary challenges and digital cultures:
\nDigital food cultures
\nFood and digital archives
\nFood and social media
\nFood influencers and online identity
\nFood delivery culture
\nArtificial intelligence and food cultures
\nFood and bioethics
\nPlease submit abstracts (no longer than 300 words) of your proposed 20-minute presentations\, together with a short biographical note\, by 25 July 2026 to:conferencememory@gmail.com
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153352Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20260828T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20260828T103000 SUMMARY:'Here and There:' Food\, Safety and Community in Contemporary Performance Art 「あちらとこちら」：現代パフォーマンス・アートにおける食、安全、そしてコミュニティ UID:20260611T105633Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Warsaw LOCATION:Poznań\, Poland DESCRIPTION:https://coolhunting.com/link-about-it/does-this-soup-taste-ambivalent/
\nhttps://dajf.org.uk/event/the-art-of-soup-a-taste-of-fukushima
\nhttps://ocula.com/magazine/conversations/ei-arakawa-frieze-presentation/
\nhttps://nomadit.co.uk/conference/eajs2026/paper/101689
\nhttps://research.berkeley.edu/surf-fellows/jiaqian-zhu/
\nhttps://nomadit.co.uk/conference/eajs2026/pp/101689
\nPaper short abstract In the wake of the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami\, artists attempt to explore ways to present the motif of &ldquo\;3/11&rdquo\; beyond geographic confinement&mdash\;beyond Japan. Given restricted access to the nuclear zone\, how do artists respond to &ldquo\;3/11&rdquo\; without direct physical proximity to Fukushima? Paper long abstract
\nIn the wake of the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami\, artists attempt to explore ways to present the motif of &ldquo\;3/11&rdquo\; beyond geographic confinement&mdash\;beyond Japan. Given restricted access to the nuclear zone\, how do artists respond to &ldquo\;3/11&rdquo\; without direct physical proximity to Fukushima? How do overseas Japanese artists represent what took place back in their homeland? How do people outside Japan gain the access to experience and respond to &ldquo\;3/11&rdquo\;? To grapple with this representational dilemma of &ldquo\;here and there\,&rdquo\; this paper looks at the performance art of the contemporary Japanese artist Ei Arakawa&mdash\;Does This Soup Taste Ambivalent? (2014). In this conceptual project\, he attempted to mediate a geographic gap between New York (where he works) and Fukushima (where he comes from). He also intended to reach a geographical balance between Fukushima and the international audience by bringing his family to Frieze London. In dialogue with Does This Soup Taste Ambivalent?\, this paper brings comparative examples of Rirkrit Tiravanija&rsquo\;s installation Untitled (Free/Still) (2007) and the socially engaged art piece Conflict Kitchen (2010). This paper attempts to extend the metaphor of a geographic boundary to invisible yet crucial boundaries among people\, and to further spatialize what Nicolas Bourriaud regards as relational aesthetics. Visual representations of &ldquo\;here and there&rdquo\; can thus be thematically translated into a rendering of boundaries between artists and spectators/participants\, between social environment and human beings and between different ethnic groups. Moreover\, this paper examines the instrumental role of food in performance art. With the same incorporation of food\, these works take advantage of the taste to unite people from different backgrounds\, and to provide a corporeal medium to raise concerns for nuclear radiation and safety. The remediation of food\, in art practice and social media\, further produces a micro-social and micro-political narrative to think of food safety\, human safety\, and community conflicts.
\nAbstract in Japanese (if needed): 「あちらとこちら」：現代パフォーマンス・アートにおける食、安全、そしてコミュニティ 要旨では、2011年の東日本大震災と津波のあと、アーティストたちが 「3/11」を日本の外でどう表現するか を考える研究だと説明されています。特に、福島に直接近づけない状況で、アーティストはどう反応するのか、海外にいる日本人アーティストは故郷で起きたことをどう表すのか、日本の外にいる人はどうやってその出来事に触れ、応答するのか、という問いが立てられています。中心事例として扱われるのは、Ei Arakawa の Does This Soup Taste Ambivalent? (2014) です。要旨によれば、この作品は ニューヨークと福島の地理的な隔たりを媒介しようとした企画として読まれています。比較される例として、Rirkrit Tiravanija の Untitled (Free/Still) (2007) と、社会参加型アートの Conflict Kitchen (2010) も挙げられています。福島の出来事を、食べ物を使ったアートで世界の人にどう伝えるかを考える発表です。 そして、食べ物は人をつなぐだけでなく、安全や不安、社会の対立について考えさせる力を持つ、というのがポイントです。
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153352Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260911T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260911T090000 SUMMARY:Special Issue of the Journal of Philosophy in Schools: Aesthetic Education UID:20260611T105634Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:The Journal of Philosophy in Schools (JPS) is seeking articles for inclusion in a special issue entitled Aesthetic Education and Philosophy in Schools.
\nAesthetic education is often treated as a concern of the arts curriculum alone &mdash\; a matter of what happens in the music room\, the drama studio\, or the visual arts classroom. Yet the claim that education has an aesthetic dimension is older and broader than this narrower usage suggests. From Schiller's argument that beauty is the condition under which the human being becomes whole\, to Dewey's insistence that aesthetic experience is not a separate domain but the consummatory quality of any experience undergone with attention\, to Maxine Greene's reminder that imagination is the passport to the "as if\," the tradition has long held that the aesthetic is implicated wherever learners are asked to perceive carefully\, feel responsively\, and judge with discernment.
\nThis raises questions that sit close to the heart of philosophy in schools. What is the relationship between aesthetic experience and the formation of judgment? Can the school\, which often prioritizes reasoning and dialogue\, also be understood as a site of aesthetic formation &mdash\; a place where attention\, receptivity\, and imaginative response are cultivated alongside argument? If so\, how might practitioners understand what they are already doing\, and what further possibilities might open up? Finally\, how might these questions be addressed using philosophical pedagogies?
\nThis special issue invites contributions that examine the intersection of aesthetic education and philosophy with school-aged children\, across and beyond the arts curriculum. We welcome submissions from various philosophical traditions\, as well as historical recoveries of figures whose work remains generative for contemporary practice. We particularly welcome scholars who approach aesthetics in a crossdisciplinary way &ndash\; calling upon figures from various traditions to formulate their philosophical argument. \;
\nPapers could address the following questions or pursue additional lines of inquiry:
\nThe Facilitator as Artist: How might the role of the teacher or facilitator in a philosophical inquiry be understood as an aesthetic practice or performance?
\nEmbodiment &\; Environment (Place &\; Play): What is the relationship between aesthetic experience\, physical play\, and embodied cognition in philosophical inquiry? How do the physical classroom environment\, outdoor settings\, or digital spaces influence the aesthetic dimension of philosophical inquiry with children?
\nThe Role of Attention\, Perception\, and/or Imagination: What role does aesthetic attention\, perception\, or imagination play in philosophical inquiry with children\, and how might this be cultivated? How can the school be a place for aesthetic philosophical practice\, and what would such a reframing change in pedagogical terms?
\nEducative Aesthetic Experience: What distinguishes an aesthetic experience that is genuinely educative from one that is merely pleasant\, passive\, or even distracting within the context of philosophical inquiry? How can aesthetics be engaged without instrumentalizing works of art?
\nEducating the Aesthetic Dimension: What does it mean to educate the aesthetic dimension of a young person's experience or cultivate aesthetic sensibility\, and how does this differ from\, or complement\, the cultivation of critical reasoning?
\nCreative Thinking and Aesthetics: How does "creative thinking" function within philosophical inquiry with children\, and what is its relationship to critical and caring thinking? How might an aesthetic perspective illuminate the distinctiveness of creative thinking and its compatibility with critical reasoning in philosophical dialogue?
\nAesthetics and Flourishing: In what ways do aesthetic experiences in the philosophy classroom foster a sense of meaning\, connection\, and student growth? What specific qualities\, structures\, or pedagogical conditions must an aesthetic experience possess to facilitate philosophical learning and student growth? How does engaging the aesthetic dimension within philosophical inquiry contribute to student well-being\, eudaimonia\, and the holistic flourishing of the child?
\nTheoretically-Grounded Aesthetic Intuition: What theoretical resources are needed to make sense of practitioner intuitions that the best philosophy classrooms have an aesthetic quality that exceeds their argumentative content?
\nEmpirical Research and Implications: How do aesthetic considerations bear on ethical\, civic\, and epistemic education\, and what are the implications for classroom practice? How might empirical research illuminate the presence and significance of aesthetic experience in classroom philosophical dialogue? \;
\nDiverse Aesthetic Traditions: What can non-Western aesthetic traditions or Indigenous perspectives on beauty and experience bring to philosophy in schools? What aesthetic injustices have occurred because of the emphasis on beauty and other Western aesthetic traditions? What barriers to entry are generated by the perceived &ldquo\;gatekeeping&rdquo\; of Western concepts of aesthetics? \;
\nWe invite extended abstracts (500-700 words) to be considered for inclusion in this special issue. Please include a brief bio indicating any relevant affiliations.
\nProcedures and Timelines
\nYour extended abstract and proposed title\, along with your name\, affiliation\, and bios\, should be submitted via email to the guest editors: Rebecca Taylor (rt2904@tc.columbia.edu) and Michael Quinn (m.quinn2@research.gla.ac.uk).
\nAbstracts due: Friday\, September 11\, 2026. Authors will be notified by early October 2026 as to whether their submission has been accepted.
\nFull papers (4000-6000 words)will be due February 1\, 2027\, for double-blind peer review. \;
\nAuthor Guidelines can be found here:https://jps.bham.ac.uk/about/submissions/
\nJPS is a peer-reviewed\, open-access online journal dedicated to research in philosophy with school-aged children. This special issue will be published in the June/July or \; November/December 2027.
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153352Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Belgrade:20260917T070000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Belgrade:20260917T070000 SUMMARY:Virtues\, Education and Wellbeing UID:20260611T105635Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Belgrade LOCATION:Sveucilisna avenija 4\, Rijeka\, Croatia DESCRIPTION:The aim of the conference is to bring together scholars working in ethics\, moral psychology\, epistemology\, political philosophy\, philosophy of art\, philosophy of education\, philosophy of wellbeing\, Aristotle&rsquo\;s philosophy\, educational science and other domains of the humanities\, with the aims of exploring our current educational practices and the way they advance development of our virtues\, our moral and epistemic characters\, and provide the necessary foundation for our individual and social wellbeing. \; \;
\nIn particular\, the conference places special emphasis on the role of virtues\, emotions\, and character formation in education\, as well as on their contribution to human flourishing. We are interested in philosophical accounts that explore how educational practices shape not only cognitive capacities but also moral and emotional dispositions\, and how these\, in turn\, support individual and collective wellbeing. This includes questions about the cultivation of intellectual and moral virtues\, the role of art in learning and moral development\, and the extent to which education can and should aim at fostering flourishing lives. We are also interested in exploring the role of arts within education\, and their capacity to contribute to the refinement of our moral characters\, development of moral virtues (or vices) and overall capacity to achieve and maintain wellbeing and social stability.
\nTopics include\, but are not limited to:
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; Virtue and character education: aims\, methods\, and limits
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; Moral and intellectual virtues in educational contexts
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; The role of emotions in moral development and learning
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; Education and human flourishing: philosophical perspectives
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; Habituation\, practical wisdom\, and the formation of character
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; The place of Aristotle&rsquo\;s ethics in contemporary philosophy of education
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; Epistemic virtues and intellectual character formation
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; The role of exemplars\, role models\, and narratives in education
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; Emotional education: empathy\, compassion\, and emotional regulation
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; The risks of moral education: indoctrination\, paternalism\, and autonomy
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; Virtues and civic education: friendship\, trust\, and social cohesion
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; The role of art in education
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; Questions of art censorship in schools: dangerous and harmful art\, cancel culture
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; Virtue aesthetics
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; Aesthetics as moral propaedeutic
\nThe conference will take place at the University of Rijeka\, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences\, September 17th and 18th 2026.
\nKey notes: Kristjan Kristjansson and Maria Silvia Vaccarezza \;
\n
We invite submissions for 30 minute presentations\, followed by 15 minutes of Q&\;A. If you are interested in presenting your work\, please send the title and the abstract of max. 300 words by June 20th 2026 to virtue.education.rijeka@gmail.com. \;Notification of acceptance will be sent out by July 1stth. There is no conference fee.
The aim of the conference is to bring together scholars working in ethics\, moral psychology\, epistemology\, political philosophy\, philosophy of art\, philosophy of education\, philosophy of wellbeing\, Aristotle&rsquo\;s philosophy\, educational science and other domains of the humanities\, with the aims of exploring our current educational practices and the way they advance development of our virtues\, our moral and epistemic characters\, and provide the necessary foundation for our individual and social wellbeing. \; \;
\nIn particular\, the conference places special emphasis on the role of virtues\, emotions\, and character formation in education\, as well as on their contribution to human flourishing. We are interested in philosophical accounts that explore how educational practices shape not only cognitive capacities but also moral and emotional dispositions\, and how these\, in turn\, support individual and collective wellbeing. This includes questions about the cultivation of intellectual and moral virtues\, the role of art in learning and moral development\, and the extent to which education can and should aim at fostering flourishing lives. We are also interested in exploring the role of arts within education\, and their capacity to contribute to the refinement of our moral characters\, development of moral virtues (or vices) and overall capacity to achieve and maintain wellbeing and social stability.
\nTopics include\, but are not limited to:
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; Virtue and character education: aims\, methods\, and limits
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; Moral and intellectual virtues in educational contexts
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; The role of emotions in moral development and learning
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; Education and human flourishing: philosophical perspectives
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; Habituation\, practical wisdom\, and the formation of character
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; The place of Aristotle&rsquo\;s ethics in contemporary philosophy of education
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; Epistemic virtues and intellectual character formation
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; The role of exemplars\, role models\, and narratives in education
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; Emotional education: empathy\, compassion\, and emotional regulation
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; The risks of moral education: indoctrination\, paternalism\, and autonomy
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; Virtues and civic education: friendship\, trust\, and social cohesion
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; The role of art in education
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; Questions of art censorship in schools: dangerous and harmful art\, cancel culture
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; Virtue aesthetics
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; Aesthetics as moral propaedeutic
\nThe conference will take place at the University of Rijeka\, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences\, September 17th and 18th 2026.
\nWe invite submissions for 30 minute presentations\, followed by 15 minutes of Q&\;A. If you are interested in presenting your work\, please send the title and the abstract of max. 300 words by June 20th 2026 to virtue.education.rijeka@gmail.com. \;Notification of acceptance will be sent out by July 1stth. There is no conference fee.
ORGANIZER;CN="Iris Vidmar Jovanović";CN="Monika Jovanović";CN="Ana Gavran Miloš": METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153352Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20260924T170000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20260926T170000 SUMMARY:Ischia & Naples Festival of Philosophy: Freedom UID:20260611T105637Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Rome LOCATION:Ischia\, Italy DESCRIPTION:12th Edition: Freedom
\n1&ndash\;27 September 2026
Ischia &\; Naples Festival of Philosophy
Conference: 24-26 September 2026
\nKeynote in English by Simona Forti (Scuola Normale Superiore)
\nExtended Submission Deadline: 1 May 2026
\n\;
\nThe Festival
\nFor over a decade\, the IN-Philosophy Festival has transformed the island of Ischia into a living laboratory of thought\, a crossroads where philosophy\, science\, art\, and community converge. Founded and directed by philosopher Raffaele Mirelli\, the Festival has become an international point of reference for its ability to combine academic rigor with strong public engagement\, restoring philosophy to its original public and dialogical vocation.
\n\nOver the course of its eleven previous editions\, the island has hosted philosophers\, scientists\, writers\, artists\, psychologists\, theologians\, and intellectuals such as Vito Mancuso\, Erri De Luca\, Amalia Ercoli Finzi\, Vittorino Andreoli\, Umberto Galimberti\, Massimo Cacciari\, Aldo Cazzullo\, and many other scholars from Italian and international universities. Each year\, hundreds of participants&mdash\;academics\, students\, and citizens&mdash\;turn the island into a shared space of reflection\, where philosophy is experienced in the open air\, facing the sea.
\n\nPromoted by InSophia APS\, in collaboration with the \;Department of Cultural Heritage Sciences of the University of Salerno (DISPAC)\, the \;University of Toronto Mississauga (Department of Visual Studies)\, the \;Italian Philosophical Society\, \;HETA &ndash\; Center for Psychological Treatment and Distress\, \;Dora News &ndash\; Psychology and Beyond\, the \;&ldquo\;A. Canova&rdquo\; High School of Treviso\, the \;&ldquo\;G. Buchner&rdquo\; High School of Ischia\, \;Filosofia in Movimento\, \;Gazzetta Filosofica\, the \;La Mortella Gardens of Ischia\, the \;Friends of Gabriele Mattera\, \;under the High Patronage of the European Parliament\, and with the patronage of the \;Campania Region\, \;FISP (International Federation of Philosophical Societies)\, the \;&ldquo\;G. Sadoul&rdquo\; Cultural Circle\, and the \;PIDA International Architecture Award.
\n\nAfter exploring themes such as Time\, Universes\, Artificial Identities\, and Happiness\, the 2026 edition addresses \;Freedom as a radical shared question: \;&ldquo\;Can we be free together?&rdquo\;
The IN-Philosophy Festival takes place in some of the most evocative locations on the island of Ischia&mdash\;spaces where nature\, art\, and knowledge intertwine\, and where philosophy encounters beauty and life.
\nThe La Mortella Gardens host the opening evening of the Festival\, featuring a classical music concert and the inaugural keynote\, in a dialogue of sound\, words\, and landscape that marks each edition with harmony between art and thought.
\n\nThe Aragonese Castle\, finally\, becomes the evening stage for major public encounters\, where philosophy\, science\, and art engage in dialogue by the sea\, illuminated by the symbolic power of the site.
\nEach space of the Festival is part of a single experience: thinking together\, on an island that transforms knowledge into encounter and reflection into life.
\n\;
\nThe Theme
\nEvery authentic freedom is both a political act and an ethical gesture. Political\, because it concerns the construction of shared spaces and the possibility of speech\; ethical\, because it requires responsibility toward others. Freedom\, if not grounded in justice\, becomes tyranny\; if not rooted ethics\, it exploits. In an age of polarization\, control\, and surveillance\, freedom may also return as a practice of presence: an attempt to remain in the world with awareness\, to act without dominating\, to oppose without destroying\, to make use without abuse. Politics and ethics thus rediscover their common root: encounter\, and the recognition of the other as a condition of one&rsquo\;s own existence.
\n\nTo be free today thus also means to face complexity without renouncing depth\; to safeguard distance as a space for thought\; to recognize that freedom is not a solitary right\, but a shared practice. We live in an age of &ldquo\;diffusions&rdquo\;&mdash\;biological\, cultural\, technological&mdash\;in which everything spreads\, yet little endures. So perhaps freedom also demands that we learn yet again how to dwell: to rediscover the value of limits\, silence\, and relation. Freedom is not a possession\, but a shared movement\, a fragile balance between the right to say &ldquo\;I&rdquo\; and the ability to remain &ldquo\;we.&rdquo\; Perhaps it is here that the deepest meaning of being human today is at stake: in the impossible yet necessary convergence between personal and collective freedom\, between the individual who affirms themselves and the community that joins and enjoins them. Freedom is not a good to be safeguarded\, but a way of practicing collectivity that must be renewed every day.
It is not born in the silence of the self\, but in the shared breath of the community.
\n\nPerhaps the most genuine question remains the same: \;can we be free together?
\n\nThematic Sessions (Guidelines for Contributions)
\nProposals may address the theme of freedom from an interdisciplinary\, theoretical\, or applied perspective. The following sessions outline the main areas of inquiry of the Festival and are open to contributions from philosophers\, scientists\, artists\, psychologists\, sociologists\, historians\, economists\, theologians\, legal scholars\, and researchers in contemporary culture.
\nAim of the Thematic Sessions
\n\nThe IN-Philosophy Festival invites scholars\, researchers\, and professionals from different fields of knowledge to contribute original reflections on the theme of \;Freedom\, in its multiple theoretical\, practical\, and symbolic
\narticulations.
\n\nThe aim is to foster dialogue among disciplines and perspectives which\, although differing in method and language\, share a common need to question freedom as a human\, social\, and epistemic experience.
\nThe proposed thematic sessions are not intended as rigid limits\, but as horizons of inspiration through which each author may orient their contribution. Sessions will take place in Ischia from \;24 to 26 September.
\n\n\;
\n\;
\nI. Origins and Figures of Freedom
\nPrometheus\, Ulysses\, and the Origins of the Free Act
Myth as the root of human freedom: disobedience\, journey\, and knowledge.
&rarr\; Ancient philosophy\, comparative mythology\, classical literature.
Law and the Soul
Between Socrates and Augustine: inner freedom and moral responsibility.
&rarr\; Moral philosophy\, theology\, law.
The Word that Liberates
Literature as an act of emancipation: from Dante to Primo Levi.
&rarr\; Literature\, linguistics\, philosophy of language.
\;
\nII. Polis and Power
\nPolitical Freedom and Fragile Democracy
From Arendt&rsquo\;s thought to polarized societies.
&rarr\; Political philosophy\, social sciences\, communication studies.
Economy and Freedom
Market\, labor\, inequality: the ethics of money.
&rarr\; Civil economy\, philosophy of work\, sociology.
Architecture of Freedom
Space as right and symbol: open cities\, borders\, and squares.
&rarr\; Architecture\, urban studies\, public aesthetics.
\;
\nIII. Body\, Care\, and Freedom
\nThe Liberated Body
Identity\, gender\, and desire as practices of emancipation.
&rarr\; Psychology\, gender studies\, neuroscience.
Freedom in Fragility
Autonomy and care\, health and dignity: the freedom of vulnerable bodies.
&rarr\; Bioethics\, philosophy of medicine\, clinical psychology.
Art as Disobedience
From painting to theatre\, creation as a political gesture.
&rarr\; Visual arts\, aesthetics\, art history.
\;
\nIV. Digital Freedom and New Horizons
\nDigital Humanism
Restoring meaning to the infosphere: consciousness\, AI\, and freedom of thought.
&rarr\; Philosophy of technology\, computer science\, AI ethics.
Surveillance and Autonomy
Data\, algorithms\, and new forms of control.
&rarr\; Cyberlaw\, digital sociology\, political philosophy.
Educating for Presence
Freedom and education in the connected society.
&rarr\; Pedagogy\, learning psychology\, media education.
\;
\nV. Freedom and the World
\nAn Ecology of Freedom
Inhabiting without dominating: freedom as a measure of the Earth.
&rarr\; Philosophical ecology\, anthropology\, environmental sciences.
The Island and Elsewhere
Freedom as belonging and departure: insular thought.
&rarr\; Geophilosophy\, Mediterranean anthropology\, philosophy of landscape.
To Migrate\, to Host\, to Remain
The right to move and the duty to welcome.
&rarr\; International law\, geopolitics\, ethics of hospitality.
\;
\n\;
\n\;
\n\;
\nVI. Freedom and Imagination
\nCinema and the Freedom of Vision
From neorealism to digital worlds: images that liberate or imprison?
&rarr\; Film studies\, media studies\, visual aesthetics.
Literature and the Memory of the Self
Writing in order not to disappear: freedom\, censorship\, and testimony.
&rarr\; World literature\, philosophy of narration\, psychoanalysis.
Faith\, Science\, and the Future
Between determinism and grace: freedom as responsibility toward the world to come.
&rarr\; Theology\, philosophy of science\, future ethics.
How to Submit Proposals
\nLanguages: \;Italian\, English
\nPaper proposals (minimum 3\,000 and maximum 4\,500 characters\, including spaces\; Times New Roman\, font size 12\, single spacing)\, accompanied by a bibliography and a CV\, as well as a brief autobiographical note (please specify current institutional affiliation or\, if not currently in an academic position\, the institution where the most recent course of study or research was completed)\, must be submitted by \;1 May 2026\, 11:59 p.m.\, to:
Please send the short biography in a separate file (maximum 1\,000 characters\, including spaces).
Files must be submitted in *.doc or *.odt format\, not *.pdf (Times New Roman\, font size 12\, single spacing).
Failure to comply with the formal guidelines will result in exclusion.
Each paper will have \;20 minutes\, followed by \;10 minutes of discussion.
Papers may be presented in Italian or English. Panel proposals are also welcome.
\;
\nPanels
\nEach panel must consist of \;3 or 4 papers \;on a common theme. The panel coordinator\, who may also be one of the speakers\, is responsible for introducing and moderating the discussion. Panel proposals must include the abstracts of each paper (maximum 3\,000 characters each) and a general introduction of no more than 3\,000 characters.
\n\;
\nPublication
\nAs in previous years\, a selection of contributions will be published in the official proceedings of the Festival.
\nA registration fee will be required for speakers. Accommodation options on the island during the Festival week will also be provided.
\n\;
\nSelection
\nThe ability to communicate research knowledge to a broad audience is a key criterion for selection. Proposals will be evaluated by the Scientific Committee.
\n\nFor further information\, please contact the Festival&rsquo\;s organizational secretariat or scientific direction at:
\ninfo@inphilosophyfestival.it
\ndirezione@inphilosophyfestival.it
\n\nThe Festival website also provides full information on proposal submission\, including the \;Summer School of Humanities \;and the \;Young Thinkers Festival.
\n
Facebook: \;inphilosophyfestival
Instagram: \;@inphilosophyfestival
The Department of Philosophy at Florida Atlantic University invite submissions for the fifth annual AFK in Florida: The Philosophy of Video Games Conference.
\nThis interdisciplinary conference brings together philosophers\, artists\, and educators to explore the ethical\, aesthetic\, metaphysical\, social\, and political dimensions of games and play. We welcome papers that approach video games as philosophically rich texts and experiences\, as well as work that examines the broader philosophical implications of interactive media and ludic culture. \;
\nAlthough the primary focus is on video games\, we also encourage submissions on related domains of play&mdash\;board games\, puzzles\, amusement and theme parks\, and other forms of play&mdash\;inasmuch as they raise meaningful philosophical questions. Preference will be given to papers that engage directly with video games. \;Also\, please note this conference will be entirely in person and there is no funding available to assist witih conference travels. \;
\nTopics may include\, but are not limited to:
\nPlease submit an anonymized abstract of 500&ndash\;750 words.
\nA separate cover sheet should include your name\, paper title\, institutional affiliation\, and email address.
\nThe conference will also include poster sessions. Submissions will be considered for both full presentations and poster presentations. Authors should indicate in their submission:
\nSend submissions as a single document (Word or PDF) to: nbaima@fau.edu
\nAt a glance:
\n* Inaugural two-day philosophy of AI and technology conference in Ingolstadt\, Germany. \;
\n* Call for Abstracts \;
\n* Essay Prize
\nOverview of FrankenstAIn Conference:
\nIn Mary Shelley&rsquo\;s Frankenstein novel\, the protagonist\, Victor Frankenstein\, creates an artificial agent that ends up escaping the control of its creator. The analogy with AI is clear. And the novel can therefore be read as a cautionary tale about the rapid and unpredictable consequences of creating agents that we do not properly understand and that do not align with our values. \;
\nThe novel thus raises a host of questions that are today relevant for the philosophy and ethics of artificial intelligence\, as well as the responsible use of technology more generally. Shelley sets her novel in Ingolstadt. And Victor Frankenstein would have studied at buildings recently renovated and now used by KU Eichstä\;tt-Ingolstadt. These include the 15th-century Hohe Schule (High School) and the 18th-century Old Anatomy building in which the conference will take place. The aim of the conference is to bring together academics from various disciplines working in the philosophy of AI and technology. The event is set against the backdrop of Shelley&rsquo\;s novel. And participants will have the opportunity to participate in a &lsquo\;city walk&rsquo\; and a visit to the Medical History Museum where they will learn more about the historical and technological context in which the novel is set. The conference marks the first in an annual conference-series on the topic. \;
\nCall for Abstracts (250-500 words):
\nWe welcome submissions on the philosophy of AI and the responsible development\, deployment\, and use of technologies. The idea is to use Shelley&rsquo\;s novel as a source of inspiration to explore new and important areas of AI research\, or to offer different perspectives on current ones. Talks need not explicitly engage with the novel (though this is of course very welcome) as long as they tackle themes\, questions\, and formats that are to some extent relevant to the novel. \;
\nIn addition\, we welcome submissions that contextualise these debates within a broader cultural and historical framework\, as well as work on topics in the philosophy of fiction/film/sci-fi and philosophical aesthetics. We hope that the conference will allow for an historically-informed philosophical exploration of the future of AI through the images and ideas that determine our relationship to the things we create &ndash\; especially when they develop a dynamic of their own and seem to escape our control.
\nWe are open to submissions from a range of different disciplines and perspectives. The only necessary criterion being that papers must be philosophically informed. Potential areas of interest include\, but are not limited to: \;
\nWhat does it mean to create things or beings whose capabilities and effects are fundamentally unpredictable?
\nWhat do we owe &ndash\; if anything &ndash\; to the artificial agents that we create? \;
\nHow can ethical responsibility be conceived under conditions of radical uncertainty?
\nTo what extent is AI a modern &lsquo\;creature&rsquo\; in Shelley's sense?
\nWhat continuities exist between myth (Prometheus)\, literature (Shelley)\, and modern technological development? \;
\nHow can literature/sci-fi/film (etc.) help with the investigation of AI and the philosophy of technology?
\nWhich metaphors and narratives promote understanding of current developments in the field of AI\, and which are misleading?
\nWhat new insights &ndash\; if any &ndash\; does Frankenstein bring to the &lsquo\;value alignment problem&rsquo\;?
\nHow should we define sentience\, awareness\, and similar in artificial intelligence\, or should we not define them in such systems at all?
\nWhat is technological progress?
\n*Abstracts should be submitted as a PDF attachment in English to: frankenstAIn-conference@ku.de
\n*Please anonymise abstracts by removing any identifying information about the author(s)
\n*Please include your full name and affiliation (if applicable) in the body of the email
\n*Deadline for submission is May 1st (2026)\, 23:59 (CET)
\n*Applicants will be notified by May 15th
\n*Applicants who wish to be considered for the essay prize\, please indicate that when submitting the abstract\; for more info on the essay prize see below
\n*Further information can be found on the website: https://www.ku.de/en/frankenstein/events/conference \;
\nEssay Prize (3000 words)
\nWe also welcome submissions for the associated FrankenstAIn Essay Prize. The prize is sponsored by the &ldquo\;Fö\;rderverein Georgianum&rdquo\;.
\nThe prize is aimed at early career researchers &ndash\; master&rsquo\;s students\, doctoral students\, and postdocs (no more than four years after PhD defence) &ndash\; with a strong research interest in:
\nPhilosophy (ethics\, philosophy of technology\, epistemology\, political philosophy\, aesthetics)
\nHistory of philosophy and history of ideas
\nScience and technology studies (STS)
\nHistory of science
\nComputer science\, AI research\, human-computer interaction\, mathematics
\nBehavioural sciences focused on human relation to technologies \;
\nPhilosophical aesthetics\, including philosophy of fiction\, film\, and sci-fi
\nA cash prize of &euro\;1\,000 will be awarded to the author of the essay that combines philosophical depth\, clarity of argument\, originality\, and relevance to current philosophy of AI debates in an interesting and novel way. Reflections on other cultural-historical themes\, as well as connections to Mary Shelley's novel will also be well-received. The essays will be evaluated by an interdisciplinary jury consisting of\, among others\, the keynote speakers invited to the conference. The winner will also have the opportunity to partake in a panel discussion dedicated to their essay.
\n*Applicants who wish to be considered for the essay prize please indicate this in the body of the email when submitting your abstract
\n*If your abstract is accepted\, you will then be invited to submit an essay
\n*Deadline for submission of the essay is September 4th (2026)\, 23:59 (CET)
\n*Applicants will be notified by September 25th (2026)
\n*Further information can be found on the website: https://www.ku.de/en/frankenstein/events/conference \;
\nQuestions &\; Further Queries
\nQuestions and further queries should be directed to: frankenstAIn-conference@ku.de
\n*Participation is free of charge
\n*Unfortunately we are unable to cover travel and accommodation costs as standard. However\, we might be able to provide assistance in special circumstances. If you think this applies to you\, then please write to us: frankenstAIn-conference@ku.de
ORGANIZER;CN=Norbert Paulo: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153352Z DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20270226T090000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20270227T170000 SUMMARY:AFK in Florida: The 5th Annual Philosophy of Video Games Conference UID:20260611T105640Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:America/New_York LOCATION:Boca Raton\, United States DESCRIPTION:The Department of Philosophy at Florida Atlantic University invite submissions for the fifth annual AFK in Florida: The Philosophy of Video Games Conference.
\nThis interdisciplinary conference brings together philosophers\, artists\, and educators to explore the ethical\, aesthetic\, metaphysical\, social\, and political dimensions of games and play. We welcome papers that approach video games as philosophically rich texts and experiences\, as well as work that examines the broader philosophical implications of interactive media and ludic culture. \;
\nAlthough the primary focus is on video games\, we also encourage submissions on related domains of play--board games\, puzzles\, amusement and theme parks\, and other forms of play&mdash\; and issues related to technology--virtual reality\, social media\, robots--inasmuch as they raise meaningful philosophical questions. Preference will be given to papers that engage directly with video games. \;Also\, please note this conference will be entirely in person. \;
\nTopics may include\, but are not limited to:
\nFor questions\, random thoughts\, cat pictures\, and fun conversation\, contact Nicholas Baima\, nbaima@fau.edu
ORGANIZER;CN=Nicholas Baima;CN=Sarah Malanowski: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153352Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Bucharest:20251028T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Bucharest:20260930T170000 SUMMARY:DFT-CELFIS research seminar\, University of Bucharest UID:20260611T105641Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Bucharest LOCATION:Splaiul Independenţei nr. 204\, Bucharest\, Romania\, 060024 DESCRIPTION:We're delighted to invite you to the research seminar of the Department of Theoretical Philosophy at the University of Bucharest. These are organized in partnership with CELFIS\, the Center for Logic\, Philosophy and History of Science at UB. Here are talks scheduled so far:
\nFall 2025:
\nOctober 28\, 5pm: Alexandru Dragomir &\; Andrei Mărăşoiu (University of Bucharest\, \;f2f)\, "The Inconstant Moral Expert: the case of LLMs"
\nNovember 25\, 4pm: Nicholas Rimell (Chinese University of Hong Kong\, hybrid via Zoom)\, "A Metaphysics of Despair"
\nNovember 28\, 2pm: Micah Thomas Pimaro\, Jr. (University of Calabar\, \;f2f)\, "Placide Tempels&rsquo\;s Metaphysics: A challenge or a trap for African philosophy?"
\nDecember 2\, 3pm: Nora Grigore (Romanian Academy\, Institute of Philosophy and Psychology\, f2f)\, "Worthiness and Expediency: a Distinction without a Difference?"
\nDecember 19\, 2pm: Alin Olteanu (Shanghai International Studies University\, ICUB\, \;f2f)\, "Iconic Imagination in Modeling: A Semiotic Approach to Scientific Inquiry"
\nJanuary 16\, 2pm: Marco Facchin (University of Antwerp\, hybrid via Zoom)\, \;"Is mental content an illusion?" \;
\nJanuary 22\, 12pm: Sandra Brâ\;nzaru (University of Bucharest\, CELFIS\, FPSE\, \;f2f)\, "Conceptualising Empathy"
\nFebruary 10\, 4pm: Marian Călborean (OPTI Software &\; University of Bucharest\, f2f)\, "The minimal ontology of time" \;
\nSpring 2026:
\nMarch 27\, 2pm: Erik Myin (University of Antwerp\, \;hybrid \;via Zoom)\, &ldquo\;Of a Different Mind&rdquo\;
\nMarch 30: \;Mariona Eiren Miyata-Sturm (University of Oxford\, f2f)\, &ldquo\;The metacognitive account of aesthetics in science&rdquo\;
\nApril 3: \;René\; \;van Woudenberg (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam\, \;hybrid \;via Zoom)\, "Are LLMs Authors?"
\nMay 11\, 12pm: Gheorge Ştefanov (U. Bucharest\, f2f)\; "Ce nu pot vedea neuroștiințele? &mdash\; \;Gramatica \;libertății: Wittgenstein\, Anscombe și critica determinismului tare"
\nMay 13\, 3pm: Andrei Moldovan (U. Salamanca\, f2f)\, \;&ldquo\;Between Independence and Guidance: A Dilemma for Intellectual Autonomy&rdquo\;
\nMay 19\, 10am: Daian Bica (Heinrich Heine University\, \;hybrid \;via Zoom)\, \;''How to Tame &lsquo\;Abundance&rsquo\;? Roman Frigg&rsquo\;s User Manual''
\nJune 5\, 2pm: Paula Tomi (National University of Science and Technology 'Politehnica' Bucharest\, \;f2f)\, &ldquo\;LLMs and truth pluralism&rdquo\;
\nJune: Alexandru Nicolae (University of Bucharest\, Faculty of Letters\; Romanian Academy\, Institute of Linguistics\, \;f2f)
\nJune: Cătălin Teoharie (University of Bucharest\, CELFIS\, \;f2f)
\nJune: Ioan Muntean (UT Rio Grande Valley\, UI Urbana\, \;f2f)
\nJuly: Mihai Rusu (Babeş Bolyai University\, ICUB\, hybrid)
\nJuly: Constantin Stoenescu (University of Bucharest\, CELFIS\, \;f2f)\, "Revisiting 'The Normative Structure of Science' \;
\nSeptember: Oana Şerban (University of Bucharest\, CCIIF\, \;f2f)
\nPrevious events \;in the series are available at: \;
\n2021-22: \;https://philevents.org/event/show/93365 \;
\n2022-23: \;https://philevents.org/event/show/105249 \;
\nhttps://filosofie.unibuc.ro/category/seminar-cercetare-dft/ \;
\nhttps://icub.unibuc.ro/2022/06/14/workshop-semantic-cognition-and-truth/ \;
\nFor those of you who would like to join some of the meetings but have overlapping commitments\, we will do our best to record the meetings whenever everyone in attendance consents to it\, and to then upload the recordings on the Department's YouTube channel. Previous talks are available here:
\nhttps://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOgUq3dN8CXI4L6DhZT1f_Q
ORGANIZER;CN="Andrei Mărăşoiu": METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153352Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20260608T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20260610T170000 SUMMARY:Stanley Cavell at 100. An International Centennial Conference - Rome Conference UID:20260611T105642Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Rome LOCATION:Via Carlo Fea 2\, Roma\, Italy DESCRIPTION:Department of Philosophy
\nSapienza Università\; di Roma
\n\;
\nStanley Cavell at 100
\nAn International Centennial Conference
\nParis | Rome | Boston
\n- Rome Conference -
\nEthics\, Politics\, Forms of Life
\n8-10 June 2026
\nOrganized by Piergiorgio Donatelli
\n\;
\nVenue
\nVilla Mirafiori
\nVia Carlo Fea 2\, Rome
\n\;
\nProgram
\n8 JUNE
\nROOM 5
\n09:00&ndash\;9:30: Welcome and Opening remarks
\nOpening Lecture | Chair: Paola Marrati
\n9:30&ndash\;10:30 Veena Das \;(Johns Hopkins): Opening lecture Objects Beyond Catalogues: Yet Another Take on the Outer and the Inner
\n10:30&ndash\;10:45: Break
\nROOM 5
\nPlenary Panel 1 | Chair: Jeroen Gerrits
\n10:45&ndash\;11:25 É\;lise Domenach (É\;cole Nationale Supé\;rieure Louis-Lumiè\;re\, IUF): Projecting Cavell: skepticism and ecocinema
\n11:25&ndash\;12:05 Nancy Yousef \;(Yale): Must we mean what we write? or\, can ethics and aesthetics be one?
\n12:05&ndash\;12:45 Michael Campbell \;(Kyoto University): The critical sensibility and the senses of criticism
\n12:45&ndash\;14:15: Lunch break
\nROOM 5
\nKeynote Lecture 1 | Chair: Juliet Floyd
\n14:15&ndash\;15:05: Alice Crary \;(New School &ndash\; ISJPS Paris 1): Pro-democratic defiance
\n15:05&ndash\;15:20: Break
\nParallel Sessions A
\n\;
\nROOM 5 | Chair: Alessio Vaccari
\n15:20&ndash\;16:20
\nRico Gutschmidt \;(Universitä\;t Konstanz): Cavell\, skepticism\, and the epistemic transformation of groundlessness
\nChester Leung \;(University of Southampton): Self-knowledge\, selfhood\, and the truth of scepticism
\nFrancesco Gandellini \;(The Hebrew University of Jerusalem): The truth on the truth of scepticism
\n16:20&ndash\;16:50 Discussion
\nROOM 1 | Chair: Miranda Boldrini
\n15:20&ndash\;16:20
\nSimon van der Weele \;(University of Humanistic Studies Utrecht): Moral status\, profound intellectual disability\, and skepticism: from moral status to acknowledgment
\nUri Brun \;(Oxford): Beyond the implementation problem: \;a Cavellian perspective on conceptual engineering
\nFrancesco Zucchini \;(Sapienza): Normativity without rules: Stanley Cavell on language and ethics
\n16:20&ndash\;16:50 Discussion
\nROOM 12 | Chair: Clara Han
\n15:20&ndash\;16:20 \;
\nReza Hosseini \;(Rosebank International\, South Africa): Stanley Cavell on what used to be called the state of one&rsquo\;s soul
\nAmir Sotoudeh \;(Sapienza): From Private Sensation to Shared Intelligibility: The Moral Life of Reason and the Perfectionist Imagination in Pain
\nLucilla Guidi \;(UniPegaso - Universitä\;t Potsdam): Cavell on soul-blindness: seeing and failing to see others
\n16:20&ndash\;16:50 Discussion
\n16:50&ndash\;17:05: Break
\nROOM 5
\nKeynote Lecture 2 | Chair: \;Sandra Laugier
\n17:05&ndash\;17:55: Roberto De Gaetano \;(Sapienza): The art of acknowledgement
\n9 JUNE
\nROOM 5
\nKeynote Lecture 3 | Chair: Alice Crary
\n09:15&ndash\;10:05: Victor Krebs \;(Pontificia Universidad Cató\;lica del Perú\;): Neither progress nor decline. Cavell&rsquo\;s pertinence to the anthropocene
\n10:05&ndash\;10:20: Break
\nROOM 5
\nPlenary Panel 2 | Chair: Daniele Lorenzini
\n10:20&ndash\;11:00 Clara Han \;(Johns Hopkins): &ldquo\;From me it is born&rdquo\;: the singularity of a life and a politics of the ordinary
\n11:00&ndash\;11:40 Alessio Vaccari \;(Sapienza): Reading Nietzsche&rsquo\;s ethical thought through Cavell&rsquo\;s moral perfectionism
\n11:40&ndash\;12:20 Lotte Buch Segal Undoing a form of life: How knowledge of Palestine became pale
\n\;
\n12:20&ndash\;13:35: Lunch break
\nParallel Sessions B
\n\;
\nROOM 5 \;| Chair: Piergiorgio Donatelli
\n13:35&ndash\;14:35
\nGustavo Gó\;mez Pé\;rez \;(Pontificia Universidad Javeriana): The tragic sense of responsibility: Cavell\, affective injustice\, and the acknowledgment of pain in Colombia&rsquo\;s conflict
\nLuigi Corrias \;(Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam): Acknowledgement after dehumanization: Cavell and the politics of reconciliation
\nArnaud Petit \;(Oxford): A perfectionist play of voices
\n14:35&ndash\;15:05 Discussion
\nROOM 12 \;| Chair: Lucilla Guidi
\n13:35&ndash\;14:35
\nCamila Lobo \;(Universidade Nova de Lisboa): Cavell&rsquo\;s politics of means: moral perfectionism and prefigurative practice in times of crisis
\nWade Roberts \;(Juniata College): Aversive thinking in dark times: confronting the contemporary crises of democracy
\nMiranda Boldrini (Nantes Université\;): Cavell\, anthropology\, and ordinary ethics
\n\;14:35&ndash\;15:05 Discussion
\n15:05&ndash\;15:20: Break
\n\;Parallel Sessions C
\n\;
\nROOM 5 \;| Chair: Victor Krebs \;
\n15:20&ndash\;16:20
\nGilad Nir \;(Universitä\;t Potsdam): Modernism\, skepticism and theatricality
\nBojin Zhu \;(Universitä\;t Wien): Separateness and the limits of public language
\nKristen De Man \;(University of Chicago): &ldquo\;All my words are someone else&rsquo\;s&rdquo\;: Stanley Cavell on the individual and the community
\n16:20&ndash\;16:50 Discussion
\nROOM 1 | Chair Luca Tenneriello
\n15:20&ndash\;16:00
\nJonas Friedli \;(New School): Overconfidence in convention: on passion\, expression and irreducibility in Derrida&rsquo\;s and Cavell&rsquo\;s second encounter with Austin
\nJuliette Courtillé\; \;(Sorbonne University): Ways of doing philosophy: the Cavellian legacy of Hilary Putnam
\nLuca Antonio Donato (Sapienza): Acknowledgment after AI: Enabling Avoidance
\n16:00&ndash\;16:30 Discussion
\n\;
\nROOM 12 | Chair: É\;lise Domenach
\n15:20&ndash\;16:20
\nMoran Godess Riccitelli \;(Bar-Ilan University &ndash\; Universitä\;t Potsdam): The aesthetic ground of Cavell&rsquo\;s moral perfectionism
\nSaliha Shah (Women&rsquo\;s College Srinagar): \;The Ontology of Onwardness: Thinking of Cavell and Iqbal
\nLuka Chilvers \;(University College London): Cavell and Midgley on games and (ordinary) life
\n16:20&ndash\;16:50 Discussion
\n16:50&ndash\;17:05: Break
\n\;
\nROOM 5
\nKeynote Lecture 4 | Chair: Paul Standish
\n17:05&ndash\;17:55: Paola Marrati \;(Johns Hopkins): Cavell and Baldwin: knowledge of the self and knowledge of reality
\n10 JUNE
\nParallel Sessions D
\n\;
\nROOM 5 | Chair: Nancy Yousef
\n9:30&ndash\;10:30
\nKevin Spencer \;(Wenzhou-Kean University): Debasing Emersonian perfectionism: l'acte gratuit as genre
\nLè\;a Boman \;(Paris 1 Panthé\;on-Sorbonne): From events to moments: the ethics of ordinary time in Cavell and Emerson
\nLuke Ciancarelli \;(Harvard) and Austin Wang (Johns Hopkins): On the source of the perfectionist demand &ldquo\;Be true to yourself&rdquo\;
\n10:30&ndash\;11:00 Discussion
\nROOM 1 \;| Chair: Michael Campbell
\n9:30&ndash\;10:30
\nAnton Hug \;(Paris 1 Panthé\;on-Sorbonne): Conflictual gender disagreements
\nFrancesca Scapinello \;(Universidade de Lisboa): Cavell and anarchy
\nLuca Tenneriello \;(Sapienza): &ldquo\;Not a competing theory of the moral life&rdquo\;: Cavell vs Rawls
\n10.30-11.00: Discussion
\n\;
\nROOM 12 \;| Chair: Lotte Buch Segal
\n9:30&ndash\;10:10
\nEdward Guetti \;(American University\, Washington\, DC): With and against abandonment: the Emersonian perfectionist and Homo Sacer
\nJustin Burdick \;(University of South Florida): Attuning to the Over-Soul: Emerson&rsquo\;s metaphysical posture and Cavellian moral perfectionism
\n10:10-10:40: Discussion
\n11:00&ndash\;11:15: Break
\nROOM 5
\nKeynote Lecture 5 | \;Chair: Naoko Saito
\n11:15&ndash\;12:05: Paul Standish \;(University College London): In the craftsman&rsquo\;s garden
\nConclusions
\n12:05&ndash\;12:35: Piergiorgio Donatelli\, Sandra Laugier\, Juliet Floyd
\nROOMS
\nRoom 5 (Aula V): ground floor
\nRoom 12 (Aula XII): outside
\nRoom 1 (Aula I): outside
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153352Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20260608T143000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20260610T170000 SUMMARY:The Emotional Aspects of Resistance and Solidarity Conference UID:20260611T105643Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Rome LOCATION:Bologna\, Italy DESCRIPTION:TEARS CONFERENCE\, 8-10 June 2026
\nPhilosophy Department\, University of Bologna
\nOrganizers: Laurencia Sá\;enz Benavides &\; Pia Campeggiani
\nI am happy to announce the conference entitled &ldquo\;The Emotional Aspects of Resistance and Solidarity&rdquo\;. This conference aims to bring in post-graduate students\, early career academics and established scholars whose work on the socio-political aspects of narrative practices\, affects and emotions can offer illuminating perspectives on some of the issues addressed by the \;TEARS project\, such as:
\nThe conference will take place on the 8th-10th June 2026\, at the Philosophy Department of the University of Bologna\, Via Azzo Gardino 23\, Sala Rossa (June 8th &\; 9th)\; Via Zamboni 38\, Sala Apollo (June 10th). \;
\nThis conference is supported by the European Union&rsquo\;s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant Agreement n°\;1011105929 Project TEARS
\nIf you wish to attend this event\, please register here: \;https://forms.gle/CQvzuoV7YSiautBs5 \;
\nFor any inquiries\, please email \; \;maria.saenzbenavides@unibo.it \;or \;laurenciasaenz@gmail.com \;
\nConference Programme:
\nKeynote Speakers: Maria Pia Lara (UAM) &\; Mariana Ortega (Penn State University)
\nDay 1. Monday June 8th. \;
\nVenue: Sala Rossa\, Via Azzo Gardino 23. \;
\n14: 30 Welcome
\n15:00-16:00 &ldquo\;From outlaw emotions to moral injury: Rethinking the affective disruptions of norms&rdquo\; Ditte Munch-Jurisic (Copenhagen) \;
\n16:00-17:00 &ldquo\;Feelings and Epistemic Resistance&rdquo\; Caleb Ward (Hamburg)
\n17:00 Keynote address: Maria Pia Lara (UAM)
\n19:30 Social Dinner
\nDay 2 Tuesday June 9th. \;
\nVenue: Sala Rossa\, Via Azzo Gardino 23
\n8:00-9:00 \; &ldquo\;The emancipatory power of narrative practices&rdquo\; Laurencia Saenz Benavides (Bologna)
\n9:00-10:00 &ldquo\;Pedagogical perspectives on loneliness narratives in extremist and emancipatory movements&rdquo\; Ruth Rebecca Tietjen (Tilburg) \;
\nBreak
\n10:15-11:15 \;&ldquo\;The Unfinished &lsquo\;We&rsquo\;: Longing for Belonging\, Loneliness\, and the Affective Fault Lines of Political Communities&rdquo\; Marie Wuth (Erlangen-Nü\;rnberg).
\n11:15-12:15: TBC Tris Hedges (Copenhagen)
\n12:30-14:30 Lunch
\n14:30-15:30 &ldquo\;Mass Masochism&rdquo\; Serena Gregorio (Justus-Liebig-University Giessen). \;
\n15:30-16:30 &ldquo\;&lsquo\;Something new must be created at all costs&rsquo\;. Affects of Societal Transformation&rdquo\; Henrike Kohpeiß\; (Lü\;neburg)
\nBreak
\n17:00 Keynote lecture: Mariana Ortega (Penn State University)
\n19:30 \;Dinner \;
\nDay 3. Wednesday June 10th. \;
\nVenue: Sala Apollo\, 38 Via Zamboni \;
\n9:00-11:00 Concluding remarks
\nEnd of the conference
\n ORGANIZER;CN="Laurencia Sáenz Benavides": METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153352Z DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260608T090000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260612T170000 SUMMARY:ISTP 2026 Conference: Theorizing in Dark Times – Art\, Narrative\, Politics UID:20260611T105644Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:America/New_York LOCATION:200 Willoughby Ave \, New York\, United States\, 11205 DESCRIPTION:STP 2026 Conference &ndash\; &ldquo\;Theorizing in Dark Times &ndash\; Art\, Narrative\, Politics&rdquo\;
\nJune 8 &ndash\; June 12\, 2026
\nPratt Institute\, Brooklyn\, NY\, USA
\nwww.pratt.edu/ISTP-2026
\nCALL FOR CONTRIBUTIONS
\nThe International Society for Theoretical Psychology (ISTP\, www.istpsychology.org) will host its 2026 conference at Pratt Institute&rsquo\;s Brooklyn\, New York Campus\, which is located on Lenapehoking\, the traditional and unceded homeland of the Lenape people\, past\, present\, and future.
\nThe conference theme &ldquo\;Theorizing in Dark Times &ndash\; Art\, Narrative\, Politics&rdquo\; invites scholars\, artists\, and practitioners to critically reflect on the ways in which theory operates not only as an intellectual tool but as a form of political engagement.
\nAt the heart of the conference lies the question: What is the role of theory in dark times? Theoretical psychology has long sought to understand the human condition\, yet in moments of global crisis\, theory itself becomes a site of political resistance. The conference will examine how theory functions as a political force\, shaping narratives of power\, ideology\, and agency. It will address the political implications of psychological theory\, asking how psychological concepts\, often regarded as neutral or apolitical\, become entangled with broader social and political dynamics.
\nThe conference will also provide the room to explore how the arts\, through their ability to create alternative narratives and question existing power structures\, play a pivotal role in advancing theoretical inquiry in times of crisis. Art\, in this context\, is not merely reflective\; it is transformative\, offering new ways to theorize human experience and political realities.
\nWe warmly invite scholars from theoretical psychology and neighboring disciplines&mdash\;philosophy\, sociology\, anthropology\, literature\, the arts\, and beyond&mdash\;to submit their contributions and join us at Pratt Institute in Brooklyn\, New York\, from June 8 to June 12\, 2026. Whether through theoretical reflection\, conceptual analyses\, or creative interventions\, we seek diverse perspectives that critically engage with the conference theme. Contributions beyond the conference theme are also welcome. Submit here: www.pratt.edu/ISTP-2026. The deadline is December 10\, 2025.
\n&mdash\;&mdash\;&mdash\;&mdash\;&mdash\;&mdash\;
\nThe Conference Registration Opens September 2025
\nRegistration Fees: Regular $630/ISTP Member $570/Reduced $310
\nPratt Institute provides affordable accommodations: Single: $135 first night\, $65 each additional night/Full conference stay $510/ Double accommodation: $125 first night\, $55 each additional night/Full conference stay $400 per person.
\nWebsite: www.pratt.edu/ISTP-2026
\nContact: istp-2026@pratt.edu
ORGANIZER;CN=Martin Dege: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153352Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260609T163000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260609T180000 SUMMARY:Talk 11: Beneficent Communication as Power. Talk 12: Women’s Digital Voices and the Reconfiguration of Public Debate. UID:20260611T105645Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:Register here: https://indico.uni-paderborn.de/event/156/
\n09.06.2026\, 4.30-6pm (Paris time)
\nMarianne Najm Abou-Jaoude - Beneficent Communication as Power
\nThis presentation proposes a three-level framework&mdash\;safe\, responsible and beneficent&mdash\;to analyse and foster constructive forms of women&rsquo\;s agency in contemporary digital media ecologies. &ldquo\;Safe&rdquo\; designates not engaging in practices and structures that include violence\, exploitation and manipulation online and offline. &ldquo\;Responsible&rdquo\; refers to doing no harm\, ensuring fairness and structural justice. &ldquo\;Beneficent&rdquo\; goes further\, namely actively promote the flourishing of others\, create conditions for dialogue and build the common good\, and is presented as the key to reimagining women&rsquo\;s power in and through media. \;Drawing on case studies of women communicators in religious\, civic and grassroots community contexts\, this research examines digital practices through the three cumulative levels of positive ethics in communication to illuminate how such engagements challenge exclusionary structures in theology and philosophy. \; \;A few case studies examples would be first\, women moderating encrypted messaging groups that coordinate neighborhood mutual aid and emotional support while establishing clear norms of safety and verification. A second examines women leaders in faith-based digital communities who use livestreams and social media to host spaces of shared discernment\, interreligious encounter and reconciliation. A third considers women running community radio and podcast collectives that platform the voices of migrant\, indigenous or otherwise marginalised women\, combining journalistic rigour with participatory storytelling. \;
\nAbout the Speaker: \;Marianne Najm Abou Jaoude is a telecom engineer finishing her doctoral research at Sophia University Institute near Florence in Italy. Her thesis concerns ethics of AI and the responsibility of everyone in building a safe and peaceful future. She developed a framework about a digital oath that includes beneficence in communication and systems design\, and the role of technology such as generative AI in peacebuilding and depolarization. Her work examines progressive ethical levels and the concept of collaborative positive ethics to foster human-centric innovation and inclusive digital communication
\n\n\nRoula Azar Douglas &ndash\; Women&rsquo\;s Digital Voices and the Reconfiguration of Public Debate
\n\nIn the contemporary digital landscape\, social media platforms\, blogs\, and online communities have emerged as significant spaces where women articulate political\, philosophical\, religious\, or secular positions. Far from being peripheral\, these digital arenas are vital sites for rethinking legitimacy\, influence\, and participation in public discourse. This paper examines how women &mdash\; from secular thinkers and educators to feminist digital activists\, as well as Christian pastors in Europe and Muslim scholars in the Arab world &mdash\; use digital media to challenge traditional frameworks\, reinterpret doctrines or social norms\, and create alternative spaces for reflection\, critique\, and debate. Through selected case studies\, the paper analyzes strategies these women employ to reach diverse audiences: the mobilization of storytelling and personal narrative\, the use of pedagogical tools\, and the deliberate cultivation of online communities that function as safe spaces for questioning and dissent. It also considers aesthetic and rhetorical choices &mdash\; such as visual branding and accessible language &mdash\; that enhance the effectiveness of their digital presence. Particular attention is devoted to how these actors navigate visibility in environments where religious\, cultural\, or political expectations can restrict women&rsquo\;s public expression. This includes facing harassment\, censorship\, or community backlash\, while leveraging alliances\, digital solidarity networks\, and transnational audiences to amplify their voices. The study highlights how digital platforms enable women to bypass traditional gatekeepers and establish new forms of authority rooted in experience\, authenticity\, and community engagement. Ultimately\, it sheds light on how online spaces are reshaping women&rsquo\;s participation in intellectual and spiritual debates\, highlighting both persistent obstacles and emerging opportunities for more inclusive\, plural\, and transformative dialogue.
\n\nAbout the Speaker: Roula Azar Douglas is a Lebanese-Canadian researcher\, journalist\, writer\, and academic interested in the role of media in shaping social realities. She is the founder and president of the Union de la presse francophone &ndash\; Liban (UPF Liban)\, a mentor with the Global Thinkers Forum in London\, and serves on the editorial board of the Middle East edition of the scientific journal Hermè\;s. Douglas coordinates the National Observatory of Women in Research (CNRS-L) and contributes to a research project on gender equality with the Diane Chair at USJ and the French Institute for Research and Development (IRD). She also oversees a weekly page on universities\, research\, and youth for L&rsquo\;Orient-Le Jour and is the author of Le jour où\; le soleil ne s&rsquo\;est pas levé\; (2018) and Chez nous\, c&rsquo\;é\;tait le silence (2007)
\n\n\;
\n ORGANIZER;CN=Marguerite El Asmar Bou Aoun;CN=Jil Muller;CN=Daniel Fischer;CN=Katia Raya Rami: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153352Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Budapest:20260610T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Budapest:20260611T170000 SUMMARY:Chosen Nation(s): Historical and Cultural Interpretations of Exceptionalism UID:20260611T105646Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Budapest LOCATION:Ludovika tér 2.\, Budapest\, Hungary\, 1083 DESCRIPTION:The Ludovika University of Public Service (NKE) and the Jewish Theological Seminary &ndash\; University of Jewish Studies (OR-ZSE) are pleased to announce a joint academic conference on \;&ldquo\;Chosen Nation(s): Historical and Cultural Interpretations of Exceptionalism&rdquo\;\, to be held in Budapest\, Hungary.
\nKeynote speaker: \;DR. CHRISTINA LITTLEFIELD\, Associate Professor of Communication and Religion at Pepperdine University\, author of "Chosen Nations: Pursuit of the Kingdom of God and its Influence on Democratic Values in Late-Nineteenth Century Britain and the United States" (Fortress Press\, 2013)\, and \;"Christian America and the Kingdom of God" (University of Illinois Press\, 2025\, with \;Richard T. Hughes).
\nThe aim of this interdisciplinary conference is to present the elements of various religious\, group\, national\, and imperial identities that refer to chosenness\, historical vocation\, and uniqueness in world history. This includes everything from the religious formulation of the chosen people\, through the sense of civilizational mission\, to the martyrdom concepts of individual groups and nations. We are particularly interested in examining how claims of chosenness function as instruments of legitimacy\, exclusion\, and moral hierarchy\, and how they are contested\, transformed\, or inverted in different historical and cultural contexts.
\n\;
\nConference Themes
\nWe invite proposals for papers that engage with the following topics\, among others:
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; the concept of the chosen people in Jewish religious tradition and in modern Jewish secular thought
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; the concept of chosenness in Christian and Muslim religious understanding
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; secularized chosenness and political theology
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; victimhood\, sacrifice\, and negative exceptionalism
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; the Christian empire as the embodiment of universalism
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; the civilizing mission of modern empires
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; the religious foundations of the American republics
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; the Russian World and Eurasianism
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; American exceptionalism and Manifest Destiny
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; the German Sonderweg and tragedy
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; the vanguards of Communism and liberal democracy in the 20th century
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; aesthetics of chosenness
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; canon formation and cultural chosenness
\nThere is no conference participation fee\, and accommodation is provided for speakers.
\nKey Details
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; Date: \;10-11 June 2026
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; Location: \;Nemzeti Kö\;zszolgá\;lati Egyetem\, Orszá\;gos Rabbiké\;pző &ndash\; Zsidó\; Egyetem\, Budapest\, Hungary
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; Language: \;English
\n\;
\nSubmission Guidelines
\nWe welcome abstracts of no more than 300 words\, accompanied by a brief biography (100 words)\, including current institutional affiliation. Individual presentations will be 20 minutes\, followed by discussion. Proposals for individual papers and thematic panels are both encouraged.
\nSubmissions should be sent to \;chosennations2026@gmail.com by \;1 May 2025. Notification of acceptance will be sent on a rolling basis\, at the latest by \;10 May 2025.
\n\;
\nPublication Opportunities
\nSelected papers from the conference may be considered for publication in a peer-reviewed volume.
\nContact
\nFor further information\, please contact \;chosennations2026@gmail.com.
\nWe look forward to your contributions and to welcoming you to a stimulating dialogue on chosenness and exceptionalism in religion\, history\, and culture.
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153352Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260610T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260612T170000 SUMMARY:Fiction and Lies: the ASIFF/SIRFF Fourth International Congress UID:20260611T105647Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/London LOCATION:Edinburgh\, United Kingdom DESCRIPTION:This three-day international conference aims to explore the relationship between fiction and lies from a range of disciplinary and interdisciplinary perspectives\, including philosophy\, literary history and theory\, narratology\, film and media studies\, psychology and cognitive science. \;
\nThe keynote speakers are Eileen John (Philosophy\, Warwick) and Pierre Bayard (Literature\, Université\; Paris 8 - Saint-Denis). The full programme is available on the conference web page: https://fictionstudies.org/?p=index&\;art_ID=420.
\nRegistration is £\;50 for staff\, £\;15 for students\, except for those at Scottish universities. This includes lunch on all three days.
\nFunding from the Scots Philosophical Association means that staff (including emeritus) and students from Scottish universities attending the conference can have their fees waived. Please email fictionlies2026@gmail.com from your institutional address to request a password before registering. We encourage you to join the ASIFF/SIRFF for other benefits.
\nAll other delegates must be members of ASIFF/SIRFF. If you are not yet a member\, please go to https://fictionstudies.org/?index&\;art_ID=333 and follow the instructions. Membership status will be checked against registration.
\nThere will also be an optional conference dinner. Please go to the conference web page for more information: https://fictionstudies.org/?p=index&\;art_ID=420.
ORGANIZER;CN=Stacie Friend: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153352Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20260610T180000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20260611T170000 SUMMARY:SHOULD HUMANITY END? Apocalypse and the World to Come UID:20260611T105648Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Berlin LOCATION: Universitätsplatz 1\, Heidelberg\, Germany\, 69117 DESCRIPTION:Ecological\, technological\, and political transformations are intensifying apocalyptic images and narratives. However\, the most pressing question of our present is not how we can avert the end of humanity\, as such an outlook is doubly misleading. It is doubtful whether we would ever be capable of doing so\, or whether sufficient time remains\, but more fundamentally\, it reflects an ideological distortion that obscures a more decisive problem: Should humanity end? Rather than being captivated by ever-new scenarios of impending doom\, it is far more urgent to ask: How exactly will humanity come to an end? And as if that were not enough\, we must consider that the humanity that might be wiped out\, and whose extinction we fear\, perhaps does not even exist yet. Will it ever come to exist? If it does not\, what exactly are we trying to preserve? And after all\, can we really coherently argue for the prevention of extinction if humans are constantly excluded from humanity in the first place? This means the question &ldquo\;should humanity end?&rdquo\; cannot be separated from the question &ldquo\;whose humanity?&rdquo\; and whether the concept is worth preserving at all or needs to be broken open entirely.
\n&ldquo\;Should Humanity End? Apocalypse and the World to Come&rdquo\; is a philosophical event hosted by the Kä\;te Hamburger Centre for Apocalyptic and Post-Apocalyptic Studies (CAPAS) at the Heidelberg University in collaboration with the Kunstakademie Dü\;sseldorf. The evening brings together three thinkers &ndash\; current and former CAPAS fellows &ndash\; to discuss both their research and their individual positions on the guiding question: &ldquo\;Should humanity end? And if so\, how?&rdquo\;
\nWith: Gabi Balcarce (University of Buenos Aires\, CAPAS Fellow)\, Goran Vrane&scaron\;ević (University of Ljubljana\, CAPAS Fellow)\, and Marcus Quent (Kunstakademie Dü\;sseldorf\; CAPAS Alumnus).
\nInfo: \;https://www.capas.uni-heidelberg.de/en/outreach/outreach-events/should-humanity-end-apocalypse-and-the-world-to-come
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153352Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20260611T070000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20260611T070000 SUMMARY:Styles of Appearing. Aesthetics and Phenomenology UID:20260611T105649Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Zurich LOCATION:Avenue de l'Europe 20\, Fribourg\, Switzerland\, 1700 DESCRIPTION:In January 1907\, the founder of phenomenology\, \; Edmund Husserl\, wrote a letter to the Viennese Modernist playwright and poet Hugo von Hofmannsthal\, suggesting that the phenomenologist&rsquo\;s and the artist&rsquo\;s methods are closely connected. Husserl&rsquo\;s suggestion remains provocative to this day\, as its full implications are yet to be fully grasped. Undeniably\, for more than a century now\, the tradition of phenomenology has cleared a path for philosophy that departs from argument-centric approaches in favor of firsthand corporeal experiences rooted in the lifeworld. This also entailed suspending or &ldquo\;bracketing&rdquo\; the question of whether our metaphysical\, ethical\, or aesthetic beliefs are justified\, focusing instead on the way things appear to us: phenomenology sets aside the &ldquo\;what&rdquo\; (the mind-independent nature of things) to home in on the &ldquo\;how&rdquo\;&mdash\;the mode in which things are given in our experience.
\nIf this is a valid characterization of the phenomenological method\, it aligns it closely with the discipline of aesthetics\, as founded by A.G. Baumgarten in the 18th century. Aesthetics too\, one might argue\, predominantly leaves aside the nature of what is being depicted or expressed to focus on the &ldquo\;how&rdquo\;: on how things are presented to us by artworks or other aesthetic objects and\, correspondingly\, on what it is like to sense them in aesthetic experience. Gü\;nter Figal even went as far as to claim that aesthetics could never be anything but phenomenological. Be that as it may: uncontestably\, what phenomenology and aesthetics have in common is a shared interest in the &ldquo\;style&rdquo\; of appearing.
\nAlthough Husserl himself hinted at this proximity in his letter to von Hofmannsthal\, his own writings on art and literature are remarkably sparse. While Husserl never wrote a formal work on aesthetics\, Jacques Derrida
\nmaintained that his thinking yields a &ldquo\;latent aesthetics.&rdquo\; This claim seems applicable to the phenomenological movement as a whole: while attempts to develop a systematic phenomenological aesthetics are surprisingly rare&mdash\;with Roman Ingarden and \; Mikel Dufrenne as the exceptions that prove the rule &mdash\;the aesthetic dimension however takes center stage in the work of numerous other authors\, from Eugen Fink\, Jean-Paul Sartre and Maurice Merleau-Ponty through Erwin Straus\, Henri Maldiney\, and Bernhard Waldenfels. What happens\, then\, when we look at phenomenology through an aesthetic lens? And in turn\, what is the outcome of practicing aesthetics as a kind of phenomenology?
\nThe ninth iteration of the Aesthetics &\; Critique workshop will address the complex and layered relationship between aesthetics and phenomenology. Topics for discussion include:
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; What does it mean to ground aesthetics in phenomenological analysis rather than other approaches? Conversely\, could an aesthesiological approach&mdash\;as required by aesthetic objects and situations&mdash\;offer a refinement to phenomenology as a method?
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; What is the relationship between sensible experience and artistic experience\, and how does a phenomenology of art relate to the phenomenological analysis of sensible experience in general?
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; Can the concept of style help describe different modes of appearing (and of reacting to it)?
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; How is sense-making inextricably connected to corporeal sensing?
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \;What possibilities does the artist&rsquo\;s encounter with the world offer the phenomenologist&mdash\;perhaps a heightened sensitivity to the nuances of lived experience?
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \;How can aesthetic as well as aesthesiological categories help reconceptualizing the multisensorial mediascapes of our contemporary condition?
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; How can experimental aesthetic practices become test sites\, both individually and collectively\, for transformative embodied experiences?
\n\nConveners: Emmanuel Alloa\, Alessandro De Cesaris\, Masoud Olia
\n\;
\nInvited Speakers
\n\nCharles Bobant (Paris)
\nMauro Carbone (Lyon)
\nMaud Hagelstein (Liè\;ge)
\nAdnen Jdey (Louvain)
\nHarri Mä\;cklin (Helsinki)
\nMarcia Sá\; Schuback Cavalcante (Stockholm)
\nAlessandra Scotti (Torino)
\n\nHow to participate
\n\nParticipants are invited to send a proposal (max 400 words) and a CV to Alessandro De Cesaris (alessandro.decesaris@unifr.ch) by April 30th. Notifications of acceptance will be sent by May 5th.
\n\n\nTravel\, accommodation and meal costs will be covered for all speakers. \;
ORGANIZER;CN=Alessandro De Cesaris;CN=Emmanuel Alloa: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153352Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20260611T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20260612T170000 SUMMARY:Styles of Appearing. Aesthetics and Phenomenology UID:20260611T105650Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Zurich LOCATION:Avenue de l'Europe 20\, Fribourg\, Switzerland\, 1700 DESCRIPTION:In January 1907\, the founder of phenomenology\, \; Edmund Husserl\, wrote a letter to the Viennese Modernist playwright and poet Hugo von Hofmannsthal\, suggesting that the phenomenologist&rsquo\;s and the artist&rsquo\;s methods are closely connected. Husserl&rsquo\;s suggestion remains provocative to this day\, as its full implications are yet to be fully grasped. Undeniably\, for more than a century now\, the tradition of phenomenology has cleared a path for philosophy that departs from argument-centric approaches in favor of firsthand corporeal experiences rooted in the lifeworld. This also entailed suspending or &ldquo\;bracketing&rdquo\; the question of whether our metaphysical\, ethical\, or aesthetic beliefs are justified\, focusing instead on the way things appear to us: phenomenology sets aside the &ldquo\;what&rdquo\; (the mind-independent nature of things) to home in on the &ldquo\;how&rdquo\;&mdash\;the mode in which things are given in our experience.
\nIf this is a valid characterization of the phenomenological method\, it aligns it closely with the discipline of aesthetics\, as founded by A.G. Baumgarten in the 18th century. Aesthetics too\, one might argue\, predominantly leaves aside the nature of what is being depicted or expressed to focus on the &ldquo\;how&rdquo\;: on how things are presented to us by artworks or other aesthetic objects and\, correspondingly\, on what it is like to sense them in aesthetic experience. Gü\;nter Figal even went as far as to claim that aesthetics could never be anything but phenomenological. Be that as it may: uncontestably\, what phenomenology and aesthetics have in common is a shared interest in the &ldquo\;style&rdquo\; of appearing.
\nAlthough Husserl himself hinted at this proximity in his letter to von Hofmannsthal\, his own writings on art and literature are remarkably sparse. While Husserl never wrote a formal work on aesthetics\, Jacques Derrida
\nmaintained that his thinking yields a &ldquo\;latent aesthetics.&rdquo\; This claim seems applicable to the phenomenological movement as a whole: while attempts to develop a systematic phenomenological aesthetics are surprisingly rare&mdash\;with Roman Ingarden and \; Mikel Dufrenne as the exceptions that prove the rule &mdash\;the aesthetic dimension however takes center stage in the work of numerous other authors\, from Eugen Fink\, Jean-Paul Sartre and Maurice Merleau-Ponty through Erwin Straus\, Henri Maldiney\, and Bernhard Waldenfels. What happens\, then\, when we look at phenomenology through an aesthetic lens? And in turn\, what is the outcome of practicing aesthetics as a kind of phenomenology?
\nThe ninth iteration of the Aesthetics &\; Critique workshop will address the complex and layered relationship between aesthetics and phenomenology. Topics for discussion include:
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; What does it mean to ground aesthetics in phenomenological analysis rather than other approaches? Conversely\, could an aesthesiological approach&mdash\;as required by aesthetic objects and situations&mdash\;offer a refinement to phenomenology as a method?
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; What is the relationship between sensible experience and artistic experience\, and how does a phenomenology of art relate to the phenomenological analysis of sensible experience in general?
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; Can the concept of style help describe different modes of appearing (and of reacting to it)?
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; How is sense-making inextricably connected to corporeal sensing?
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \;What possibilities does the artist&rsquo\;s encounter with the world offer the phenomenologist&mdash\;perhaps a heightened sensitivity to the nuances of lived experience?
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \;How can aesthetic as well as aesthesiological categories help reconceptualizing the multisensorial mediascapes of our contemporary condition?
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; How can experimental aesthetic practices become test sites\, both individually and collectively\, for transformative embodied experiences?
ORGANIZER;CN=Emmanuel Alloa;CN=Alessandro De Cesaris: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153353Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20260612T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20260614T170000 SUMMARY:Swedish Congress of Philosophy (Filosofidagarna) 2026 UID:20260611T105651Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Berlin LOCATION:Campus Albano\, Stockholm\, Sweden DESCRIPTION:The Swedish Congress of Philosophy (&rdquo\;Filosofidagarna&rdquo\;) is a biennial philosophy conference that circulates between universities in Sweden. The 2026 conference is organised by the Department of Philosophy at Stockholm University\, between June 12 and June 14.
\nKeynote Speakers
\nSections and Invited Speakers
\nSubmission and registration information\, along with further details will be available on the conference website in due course. \;
ORGANIZER;CN=James Nguyen;CN="Gunnar Björnsson";CN=Katharina Berndt;CN=Miira Tuominen: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153353Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260612T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260612T170000 SUMMARY:Fragility and the Aesthetics of Sensitivity UID:20260611T105652Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/London LOCATION:55-59 Penrhyn Rd\, Kingston upon Thames\, London\, United Kingdom\, KT1 2EE DESCRIPTION:Under the dual themes of fragility and sensitivity\, and in light of contemporary systemic crises\, the symposium aims to examine changing disciplinary conditions in the production of knowledge and the practice of research at the intersection of science\, politics\, and aesthetics
\n\nThe symposium will feature keynote presentations by Brigitte Hart and Andrew Goffey. Brigitte Hart is a sound artist whose recent work explores the sonic textures of found objects along the Thames\, examining the relationships between ecosystems\, soundscape\, and society. Andrew Goffey is Associate Professor of Critical Theory and Cultural Studies at the University of Nottingham. His work has extensively engaged with questions of transdisciplinarity and the thought of Fé\;lix Guattari.
\n\nThe programme also includes four research papers and an open discussion between Anca-Maria Pop\, a PhD student in Philosophy\, and Julia Schauerman\, an electroacoustic composer\, improviser\, and community artist whose current research explores acousmatic storytelling as a collaborative creative practice for engaging complex contemporary issues.
\n\nThis is a hybrid event. Full programme details and registration information are available below with a link for online participation. \;
\n\nPlease note: The venue for the symposium has changed from Clattern Lecture Theatre to JG0002.
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153353Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260612T170000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260612T183000 SUMMARY:When is an official source not a reliable source? An analysis of mainstream misinformation and credibility UID:20260611T105653Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:I would like to draw your attention to the following online philosophy seminar series\, hosting by the Center for International Philosophy at Beijing Normal University at Zhuhai this semester.
\nOn June 12th\, 5pm China Standard Time\, Fred Matthews (Bristol) will be presenting a talk titled "When is an official source not a reliable source? An analysis of mainstream misinformation and credibility"
\nAttendance is free.
\nPlease register for the event by sending an email to:
\nm.dentith@bnu.edu.cn
\nfor the Zoom link and password.
\nAbstract: When researching conspiracy theories and misinformation\, much emphasis is placed upon the status of &lsquo\;official sources&rsquo\;. Conspiracy theories are sometimes defined in terms of their opposition to the narratives put forward by official sources\, and the condemnation of conspiracy theories often occurs alongside the belief that we should place our trust in official sources of information. It will be the contention of this paper that we need a better understanding of &lsquo\;official sources&rsquo\;\, and that some official sources are capable of promoting a potentially dangerous form of &lsquo\;mainstream misinformation&rsquo\; if not assessed critically.
\nI shall argue that official sources of information are indeed crucial and often deserve our trust\, but that we also need a clearer sense of what counts as a trustworthy official source\, and what the hierarchy should be in different domains of enquiry. I shall begin with what I believe is the widely accepted view that not all official sources are created equal. Regardless of our political views\, most people probably treat government bodies which have a possible agenda with greater scepticism than independent scientific institutions and so on. I will then analyse some prominent examples of official sources and how much trust we should place in them\, highlighting the flaws with each of them. It will become clear that whether we should place our trust in these sources depends greatly on the context\, and the sort of claim being assessed. Furthermore\, I will suggest that there is a worrying tendency for us to be subject to the &lsquo\;halo effect of expertise&rsquo\;\, which can lead to clear cases of misinformation being promoted by mainstream\, generally reliable sources. This has a tendency to slip under the radar. There also appears to be a &lsquo\;halo effect of class&rsquo\;\, in which ideas that would seemingly be dismissed as disreputable conspiracy theorizing by &lsquo\;outsiders&rsquo\; nonetheless manage to attain a status of respectability when put forward by famous\, privileged\, or influential figures.
\nI shall finally present a path for moving forward\, arguing that all official and influential sources\, no matter how trustworthy they may appear to be\, must be subjected to appropriate intellectual scrutiny. This means that their claims should often\, although importantly not always\, be assessed carefully and scrutinized for possible sources of bias. This applies even (or especially) when we are dealing with very reputable figures or institutions. In this way\, we can develop a safety buffer against mainstream sources of misinformation while simultaneously keeping non-mainstream misinformation at bay.
\nBio: Fred Matthews is a Teaching Assistant and recent PhD graduate at the University of Bristol. His main areas of research are in political philosophy and environmental ethics. He also has an interest in social epistemology and the philosophy of conspiracy theories. His most recent articles include &lsquo\;Liberalism and Individual Freedom in the Climate Crisis&rsquo\; (Environmental Ethics\, forthcoming) and &lsquo\;On the Censorship of Conspiracy Theories&rsquo\; (Social Epistemology\, 2025). Before his PhD at Bristol\, he completed an MPhil in Political Theory at the University of Oxford\, and a BA in Philosophy at the University of East Anglia.
\nThe meeting time is the 12th of June\, 5pm China Standard Time [9am GMT\, June 12th]
\nMeeting time in other timezones:
\n- 10am\, British Standard Time
\n- 11am Central European Standard Time
\n- 2am\, Pacific Daylight Time
\n- 9pm\, New Zealand Standard Time
ORGANIZER;CN=M R. X. Dentith: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153353Z DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260615T000000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260615T000000 SUMMARY:2026 Southern Aesthetics Workshop UID:20260611T105654Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:America/New_York LOCATION:University of South Carolina\, Columbia\, United States DESCRIPTION:The Southern Division of the American Society for Aesthetics is pleased to announce a two-day\, pre-read workshop at the University of South Carolina in Columbia\, SC\, October 9-10\, 2026. Each paper will have two commentators. The program will include a performance and keynote by a local artist.
\nWork in any area of aesthetics or the philosophy of art is welcome. We especially encourage submissions that explore issues of special concern in the South\, broadly construed\, and issues pertaining particularly to the southeastern region\, such as local food and food culture\, poetry\, music\, or sites of conflict. Scholars are welcome to submit no matter where they live or work\, and members of traditionally underrepresented groups in philosophy are especially encouraged to apply.
\nThe deadline for papers of no more than 3500 words (including footnotes\, excluding references) is June 15\, 2026. Decisions will be made by late July. Submissions should be prepared for anonymous review and sent to SouthernAestheticsWorkshop@gmail.com. Submissions will be reviewed by members of the SAW conference committee. Those who presented papers at the 2025 Southern Aesthetics Workshop are not eligible to submit papers to the upcoming event. Papers presented at the ASA Annual Meeting are not eligible for presentation at SAW. All presentations and commentaries must be in-person.
\nAll persons on the program other than the invited keynote&mdash\;including presenters\, commentators\, and chairs&mdash\;must have active ASA membership before the conference program is announced. Registration will be $30\; $15 for students. The workshop will be open to anyone registered. Presenters with no other access to travel funds may be considered for Irene H. Chayes Travel grants from the American Society for Aesthetics. To apply for travel funding\, please note in your submission email that you wish to be considered and include an estimate of your travel costs.
\nQueries can be sent to SouthernAestheticsWorkshop@gmail.com.
ORGANIZER;CN=Angela Sun;CN=Michael Dickson;CN=Kyle Kirby;CN=Jeremy Killian;CN=Zachary Weinstein;CN=Tyler Olsson;CN=Guy Rohrbaugh: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153353Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20260617T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20260619T170000 SUMMARY:MBR026_ROME - MODEL-BASED REASONING: EPISTEMOLOGY\, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\, COGNITIVE SCIENCE UID:20260611T105655Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Rome LOCATION:Via carlo fea 2\, Roma\, Italy\, 00161 DESCRIPTION:Proceedings will be published by Springer
Series "SAPERE" \;http://www.springer.com/series/10087
Selected technical papers will be published in special issues of the
Logic Journal of the IGPL
*************************************************************
\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \;MODEL-BASED REASONING
\; \;EPISTEMOLOGY\, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\, COGNITIVE SCIENCE
\; \; \; MBR026_ROME (Tenth International MBR Conference)
\; \; \;Chairs: Selene Arfini\, Emiliano Ippoliti\, Lorenzo Magnani
\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \;June 17-19\, 2026 - Rome\, Italy
\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \;Venue:
\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \;Department of Philosophy
\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \;Sapienza University of Rome
\; \; \; \; \; \; \; Villa Mirafiori - Via Carlo Fea 2\,
\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; 00161 Roma
\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \;Rooms: II\, VI\, X
**************************************************************
KEY DATES
Deadline for extended abstract submissions: February 1\, 2026
Notification of acceptance: February 20\, 2026
Early registration deadline (discounted rate): March 10\, 2026
Late registration deadline: before April 15\, 2026
Conference dates: June 17-19\, 2026
Final paper submission deadline: September 30\, 2026
CONGRESS WEBSITE: \;https://mbr026.com/
MBR COMMUNITY WEBSITE
http://www-9.unipv.it/webphilos_lab/wordpress/index.php/research/mbr-community/ \; INVITED SPEAKERS
Sorin Bangu - University of Bergen
Marta Bertolaso - University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome
Axel Gelfert - Technische Universitä\;t\, Berlin
James Ladyman - University of Bristol
Lorenzo Magnani - University of Pavia
Patricia Palacios - University of Salzburg
Demetris Portides - University of Cyprus
Viola Schiaffonati - Politecnico di Milano
SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE: \;https://mbr026.com/scientific-committee/
********************************************************************************
Organization:
- Department of Philosophy\, Sapienza University of Rome
- Department of Humanities\, Philosophy Section\, University of Pavia
Under the patronage of the Italian Society of Logic and Philosophy of
Science (SILFS)
PROGRAM
The conference will investigate the logical\, epistemological\, and
cognitive dimensions of modeling practices across science\, technology
(with particular attention to AI)\, and cognitive science. This includes
both logical and computational approaches to modeling. We welcome
submissions that analyze model-based reasoning from a variety of
perspectives: philosophical\, logical\, epistemological\, historical\,
sociological\, psychological\, or computational. Additionally\, the
conference will address how model-based reasoning contributes to the
development and enhancement of human cognitive abilities\, whether
mental\, embodied\, hybrid\, or tool-assisted.
The conference will only be in person.
SUBMISSION OF EXTENDED ABSTRACTS AND SYMPOSIA PROPOSALS
Presentation Proposals
To participate in the conference\, authors must submit a 1000-1500 word
extended abstract by February 1\, 2026 in .pdf format.
A 300-word summary for the conference booklet and website must also be
included.
Authors should submit the abstracts using this form:
https://forms.gle/2RiHxv2ezPS91Ku88
Symposia Proposals
Proposals for symposia\, typically involving 3-4-5 participants\, should
be submitted as a 2-page .pdf document by by February 1\, \;2026 at this
link: \;https://forms.gle/2RiHxv2ezPS91Ku88
All extended abstracts will undergo peer review. The final structure of
the conference will be determined following the review process.
Following the conference\, authors of accepted proposals may submit a
complete manuscript for the proceedings.
PROCEEDINGS
Submitted papers must be original\, unpublished\, and written in English.
Manuscripts should be prepared using either LaTeX (with a preference for
BibTeX for references) or Microsoft Word\, and should not exceed 20 pages
in length.
Accepted papers will be published in the Springer SAPERE series
(https://www.springer.com/series/10087).
In addition\, a selection of technical papers will be considered\, pending
further peer review\, for inclusion in one or two special issues of The
Logic Journal of IGPL (OUP)\, which have previously hosted contributions
from past MBR conferences (MBR98\, MBR01\, MBR04\, MBR06_CHINA\,
MBR09_BRAZIL\, MBR015_ITALY\, MBR018_SPAIN\, MBR023_ROME).
The final deadline for submission is September 30th\, 2026. Please send
the files to Matteo Costa\, \;matteo.costa@uniroma1.it
RELEVANT RESEARCH AREAS
We welcome contributions addressing topics such as:
- General theoretical and cognitive issues in model-based reasoning
- Models as fictions\, distortions\, credible worlds
- Creative reasoning
- Models and games of make-believe
- Ontology of models
- Affordances\, artifacts\, and model-based reasoning
- Brain\, neuroscience\, and model-based reasoning
- Abduction
- Logical analyses related to model-based reasoning
- Inferences\, interaction and duality in logic and language
- Visual\, spatial\, imagistic modeling and reasoning
- Simulative modeling
- Surrogative reasoning
- The role of diagrammatic reasoning
- Computational models of visual and simulative reasoning
- Causal and counterfactual reasoning in model construction
- Visual analogy
- Thought experiments
- Manipulative reasoning
- Distributed model-based reasoning
- Distributed cognition\, embodiment\, and model-based reasoning
- Models of rationality and inference patterns in decision making
- Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery and conceptual change
- Model-based reasoning and ethics
- Model-based reasoning and finance
- Model-based reasoning and economics
- Model-based reasoning and history of philosophy
- Model-based reasoning and semiotics
- Model-based reasoning in scientific explanation
- Model-based medical diagnosis
- Model-based reasoning in engineering and robotics
- Model-based reasoning and technological artifacts
- Model-based reasoning and knowledge management
- Model-based reasoning and information technology
- Model-based reasoning and AI
- Model-based reasoning and learning
- Model-based reasoning and language
- The role of models in scientific and technological thinking
FEES AND REGISTRATION
The registration fee covers participation in all MBR conference sessions
and includes access to the social dinner.
Early Registration (before March 10\, 2026):
* Standard: euro 250
* PhD students and independent researchers: euro 150
* Bachelor's and Master's degree students: euro 60
Late Registration (after March 10\, 2026):
* Standard: euro 300
* PhD students and independent researchers: euro 200
* Bachelor's and Master's degree students: euro 75
Additional Options:
* One-day attendance: euro 100
* Social dinner only: euro 45
Cancellation Policy:
Cancellations must be submitted in writing. An administrative fee of 75
euros will be applied to cancellations made before May 22\, 2026. No
refunds will be issued for cancellations received after that date.
Payment Methods:
Payments can be made via credit card or bank transfer upon registration
through the official conference website.
Every participant must complete the form at this link to register for
the conference: \;https://forms.gle/xfqxA396WqBdk1iQ6
CHAIRS
- Selene Arfini
Department of Humanities - Philosophy Section\, University of Pavia
Piazza Botta 6\, 27100 Pavia\, ITALY
Email: \;selene.arfini@unipv.it
- Emiliano Ippoliti
Department of Philosophy\, Sapienza University of Rome
Via Carlo Fea 2\, 00161 Rome\, ITALY
Email: \;emiliano.ippoliti@uniroma1.it
- Lorenzo Magnani
Director\, Computational Philosophy Laboratory
http://www-9.unipv.it/webphilos_lab/wordpress/
Department of Humanities - Philosophy Section\, University of Pavia
Piazza Botta 6\, 27100 Pavia\, ITALY
Email: \;lmagnani@unipv.it
LOCAL ORGANIZATION
Matteo Costa \;matteo.costa@uniroma1.it
Emiliano Ippoliti \;emiliano.ippoliti@uniroma1.it
HOW TO GET TO Villa Mirafiori (Department of Philosophy\, Sapienza
University of Rome)
\; From Fiumicino Airport (Leonardo da Vinci):
Take the Leonardo Express train to Roma Termini (about 35 minutes). Once
at Termini Station\, follow the directions above to reach Villa Mirafiori
via bus 90.
\; From Termini Station:
Head to Piazza dei Cinquecento and board bus number 90 in the direction
of "Labia." Ride for four stops and get off at "Nomentana/XXI Aprile."
The journey takes approximately 15 minutes.
PREVIOUS MBR CONFERENCES
The conference continues the themes and scholarly traditions established
by the previous nine editions of the MBR (Model-Based Reasoning)
conference series:
* Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery (MBR'98)\, Pavia\, Italy
* Model-Based Reasoning: Scientific Discovery\, Technological Innovation\,
and Values (MBR'01)\, Pavia Italy
* Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Engineering: Abduction\,
Visualization\, and Simulation (MBR'04)\, Pavia\, Italy
* Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Medicine (MBR06_CHINA)\,
Guangzhou\, P. R. China
* Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology: Abduction\, Logic\, and
Computational Discovery (MBR09_BRAZIL)\, Campinas\, Brazil
* Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology: Theoretical and
Cognitive Issues (MBR12_ITALY)\, Sestri Levante\, Italy
* Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology: Models and Inferences
Logical\, Epistemological\, and Cognitive Issues (MBR15_ITALY)\, Sestri
Levante\, Italy
* Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology: Inferential Models
for Logic\, Language\, Cognition\, and Computation (MBR018_SPAIN)\, Seville\,
Spain
* Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology: Inferences &\; Models
in Science\, Logic\, Language\, and Technology (MBR023_ROME)\, Rome\, Italy
The proceedings from these conferences have been published in the
following volumes:
- L. Magnani\, N. J. Nersessian\, and P. Thagard (eds.) (1999)\,
Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery\, Kluwer Academic/Plenum
Publishers\, New York. \;http://www.wkap.nl/prod/b/0-306-46292-3 \;(Chinese
edition\, translated and edited by Q. Yu and T. Wang\, China Science and
Technology Press\, Beijing\, 2000).
- L. Magnani and N. J. Nersessian (eds.) (2002)\, Model-Based Reasoning.
Science\, Technology\, Values\, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers\, New
York. \;http://www.wkap.nl/prod/b/0-306-47244-9
- L. Magnani\, N. J. Nersessian\, and C. Pizzi (eds.) (2002)\, Logical and
Computational Aspects of Model-Based Reasoning\, Kluwer Academic\,
Dordrecht. \;http://www.wkap.nl/prod/b/1-4020-0791-4
- P. Li\, X. Chen\, Z. Zhang\, and H. Zhang (eds.)(2004)\, Science\,
Cognition\, and Consciousness\, JiangXi People's Press\, Nanchang\, China.
- L. Magnani and Li. Ping (eds.) (2006)\, Philosophical Investigations
from a Perspective of Cognition\, Guangdong People's Publishing House\,
Guangzhou\, (published in Chinese).
- L. Magnani (2006) (ed.)\, Model-Based Reasoning in Science and
Engineering. Cognitive Science\, Epistemology\, Logic\, College
Publications\, London.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Model-Based-Reasoning-Science-Engineering/dp/1904987230
- L. Magnani and P. Li (eds.) (2007)\, Model-Based Reasoning in Science\,
Technology\, and Medicine\, Series "Studies in Computational
Intelligence"\, Vol. 64\, Springer\, Berlin/New York.
http://www.springer.com/engineering/book/978-3-540-71985-4
- L. Magnani\, W. Carnielli\, C. Pizzi (eds.) (2010) Model-Based Reasoning
in Science and Technology Abduction\, Logic\, and Computational Discovery\,
Series "Studies in Computational Intelligence"\, Vol. 314\, Springer\,
Heidelberg/Berlin. \;http://www.springer.com/us/book/9783642152221
- L. Magnani (ed.) (2014) Model-Based Reasoning in Science and
Technology. Theoretical and Cognitive Issues\, Series "Sapere"\, Vol. 8\,
Springer\, Heidelberg/Berlin. \;http://www.springer.com/us/book/9783642374272
- L. Magnani and C. Casadio (eds.) (2016)\, Model-Based Reasoning in
Science and Technology. Logical\, Epistemological\, and Cognitive Issues\,
Springer\, Switzerland\, Series "Sapere"
http://www.springer.com/us/book/9783319389820
- A. Nepomuceno\, L. Magnani\, F. Salguero\, C. Bar s and M. Fontaine
(eds.) (2019)\, Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology -
Inferential Models for Logic\, Language\, Cognition and Computation\,
Springer\, Cham\, Switzerland.
- E. Ippoliti\, S. Arfini\, L. Magnani (eds) (2024). Model-Based
Reasoning\, Abductive Cognition\, Creativity. Springer\, Cham.
A selection of papers from previous MBR conferences has appeared in
esteemed international journals\, including Philosophia\, Foundations of
Science\, and the Logic Journal of the IGPL.
Recent handbooks reflecting the research developed within the MBR
community include:
- L. Magnani\, T. Bertolotti (eds.) (2017) Springer Handbook of
Model-Based Science\, Springer\, Switzerland
http://www.springer.com/us/book/9783319305257
L. Magnani (ed.) (2022) \; Handbook of abductive cognition \, Springer\,
Switzerland
(https://link.springer.com/referencework/10.1007/978-3-030-68436-5). \; \;
This events tries to be a presential space\, but we could study the possibility of online participations in case it is really difficult and the proposal fits in the cfp. In case of not being able to attend in person it is necessary to specify it in the email where you are sending the proposal where you are sending it.
\nFrom the National University of Distance Education\, the Complutense University of Madrid\, and the Universidad Autó\;noma Metropolitana&ndash\;Iztapalapa\, we invite researchers to submit proposals that explore and analyze our political present from a Deleuzo‑Guattarian perspective that understands the centrality of capitalism as an axiomatics and immanent system.
\nWe are now accepting abstracts that follow (but are not limited to) the following thematic lines:
\nDialogues between macro\, micro and mesopolitics: thinking a minor politics
Democracy\, institutions and community
State and war: borders and imperial regimes
The affective turn in politics
Capitalist axiomatics\, social organization and libidinal economy
Militant clinic: antipsychiatry and schizoanalysis
Feminisms of difference\, xenofeminisms and post‑humanist feminisms
Anticoloniality\, postcoloniality and decoloniality
Corporealities and dissident desires
Violence\, extractivism and climate catastrophe
Proposal submission:
An anonymized abstract should be sent to the organizing email address (desteticas@gmail.com)\, summarizing the proposal in 250 to 300 words. The title\, thematic lines\, five keywords\, and an essential bibliography must be included. In addition\, a second document should be attached to the email stating the author&rsquo\;s name\, institutional affiliation\, a brief biography\, contact email\, and the title of the proposal.
Deadline:
April 27\, 2026 will be the deadline for submitting papers.
Conference dates:
&ldquo\;Political Deterritorializations&rdquo\; will take place on June 17\, 18\, and 19\, 2026 at the Complutense University of Madrid (UCM) and the National University of Distance Education (UNED).
Organizers:
Luis Jaime Estrada (UAM‑I &ndash\; UCM)\, Myriam Rodrí\;guez del Real (UNED)\, Ana Gorostizu (UC3M).
Scientific committee:
Germá\;n Cano (UCM)\, Francisco José\; Martí\;nez (UNED)\, Amanda Nú\;ñ\;ez (UNED)\, Nicolá\;s Ried (Universidad Diego Portales&ndash\;Chile)\, Juan Evaristo Valls Boix (UCM)\, Sayak Valencia (COLEF&ndash\;Mexico).
In 2026\, the Institute of Philosophical Studies (IEF) inaugurates the International Colloquium of Post-graduate Studies in Philosophy. Although specifically designed for young researchers (master&rsquo\;s students\, PhD candidates and postdocs)\, this event aims at building a forum for sharing and discussing ideas among researchers in diverse career stages. This first edition will count on renowned guests in four structural &ndash\; although not exclusive &ndash\; thematic areas (education\, aesthetics\, ethics and politics).
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153353Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20260618T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20260619T170000 SUMMARY:Migration\, Adaptation and Memory - 9th International Interdisciplinary Conference UID:20260611T105658Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Warsaw LOCATION:Gdańsk\, Poland DESCRIPTION:In person (in Gdansk\, Poland) and online (via Zoom)
CFP:
How do we remember and represent our migration experiences? Who is involved in these processes? How does history remember these events? What helps migrants and societies to adapt? The significance of these and related questions have made their way into our daily lives\, from the refugee crisis to policy decisions\, individual psychotherapy to (re)building identities\, communities\, and memories.
During the conference\, we are going to turn our attention to processes that are integral to human experience: migration\, adaptation\, and memory. We are interested in all aspects of migration and adaptation\, in their individual and collective dimensions\, in the past and in the present-day world. We would like to examine the role of memory\, the processes of migrating and adapting to various dynamic life circumstances\, across time\, space\, culture\, language\, and discipline.
Therefore\, we strive to represent and discuss the crossroads of migration\, adaptation\, and memory in their multiple representations: psychological\, social\, historical\, cultural\, philosophical\, religious\, neurological\, organizational\, methodological\, economic\, political\, and many others. We will also devote considerable attention to how these phenomena appear and transform in artistic practices: literature\, film\, theatre\, and visual arts. This is why we invite researchers representing various academic disciplines: anthropology\, history\, psychiatry\, psychology\, psychoanalysis\, sociology\, politics\, philosophy\, economics\, law\, literary studies\, theatre studies\, film studies\, design\, project management\, memory studies\, migration studies\, consciousness studies\, dream studies\, gender studies\, postcolonial studies\, medical sciences\, cognitive sciences\, and urban studies\, to name a few.
Different forms of presentations are encouraged\, including case studies\, theoretical inquiries\, personal reflections\, problem-oriented arguments\, comparative analyses\, and creative expressions.
We will be happy to hear from experienced scholars and young academics\, doctoral and graduate students\, as well as professionals from various disciplines. We also invite all persons interested in participating in the conference as listeners\, without giving a presentation.
Our repertoire of suggested topics includes but is not limited to:
I. Arts
-Literature\, poetry\, film\, theatre\, etc. as adaptive mediums
-Adaptation through artistic creation and destruction
-Artistic imagination and adaptation
-Migration as represented in arts
-Art created during migration
-Creative expression through memories
II. History
-Adaptation across history
-Memory processes in writing history
-Documenting history and memories in migration
III. Political Sciences and Law
-Policies related to migration and adaptation
-Human rights and migration
-Bureaucracy in relation to migration policies
-Judiciary systems
-Political agendas\, memory and migration
-Objective vs. subjective memory in politics
-International politics and adaptation
IV. Psychology and Psychiatry
-Mental health and adaptation
-Abnormal behaviors and adaptation
-(Mal)adaptive memory processes
-Social and transcultural psychiatry
-Perception/cognition/attention
-Personality
-Psychoanalysis
V. Medical sciences
-Genetics/epigenetics in adaptation processes
-Neurobiology and biochemistry of adaptation and memory
-Evolutionary approaches to memory\, adaptation and migration
-Chronic diseases\, memory\, and adaptation
VI. Humanitarian work\, Governments and NGOs
-Roles and responsibilities
-Management of temporary and transitory spaces
-Project management and evaluation
-Best practices
-Welcome contexts
VII. Philosophy and Worldviews (Eastern\, Western\, Indigenous...)
-Epistemology and metaphysics
-Existential and postmodern adaptation
-Ethics in migratory context
-Philosophy of memory
VIII. Sociology and Anthropology
-Cultural determinants and adaptation
-Race/ethnic identity and adaptation
-Religion\, adaptation and migratory experiences
-Gender\, adaptation and migratory experiences
-Social networks and adaptation
-Language of adaptation\, memory and migration
-Family relations and adaptation
-Urban planning and adaptation
-Diaspora and community development
IX. Economics
-Adaptation and job security
-Private sponsorship and adaptation
Please submit abstracts (no longer than 300 words) of your proposed 20-minute presentations\, together with a short biographical note to: migrationconferenceoffice@gmail.com or
onsite presenters - by 10 April 2026
online presenters - by 30 April 2026
The conference language is English.
Our conference email: migrationconferenceoffice@gmail.com
For all details please visit our website.
This workshop aims to foster an interdisciplinary collective discussion about the evolution of public opinion studies in arena shaped by social media\, emotional engagement\, and polarization. In addition to reflecting on the extent to which media and new communication platforms contribute to the creation&mdash\;and perpetuation&mdash\;of a polarized society\, we would like to promote dialogue on how we\, as scholars\, can redefine the role of communication in this context. Our goal is to explore together how we could rebuild this fragmented landscape\, addressing issues in public opinion research and exploring new ways of enhancing civic engagement. This reflection seems timely in the current context of international conflicts and crises that threaten democracy and often appear to undermine rational dialogue.
The starting point of this workshop is to return to the fundamentals of public opinion dynamics. Understanding how opinions are formed\, expressed\, and transformed requires revisiting the basic mechanisms that shape collective judgment in contemporary societies. For this purpose\, it is essential to challenge some of the entrenched cliché\;s that too often underlie general explanations of current phenomena. Are we\, as researchers\, engaging with social issues in a sufficiently critical and nuanced manner? Can we expand the scope of our enquiry and seek the causes of this lack of engagement?
Moreover\, we must ask whether the drive toward simplification&mdash\;amplified by digital communication&mdash\;has become one of the main obstacles to meaningful public discourse. \;
This raises several key questions: Is public opinion today more simplistic than ever? Does the public arena still serve as a genuine space for democratic debate\, or has it come to be dominated by emotional narratives and polarization? And if so\, how can we regenerate the public sphere so that meaningful dialogue is possible?
The distinction between what is considered true and what is dismissed as fake news comes to the forefront. Public opinion can increasingly be understood as a social construction that no longer necessarily refers to reality itself. Instead\, it is shaped by mediated representations\, emotions\, and collective perceptions that circulate within the public sphere. As a result\, the boundaries among information\, perception\, and belief become progressively blurred. How\, then\, can public opinion remain genuinely informed in an environment shaped by echo chambers and algorithmic reinforcement? What is the role of traditional media in this context? How is Artificial Intelligence shaping debates and content?
In sum\, in a context where freedom of expression is often curtailed\, and public participation is facing growing disruptions\, this workshop seeks to discuss the conditions for a rational and open public sphere. \;
This workshop honors the work of Maxwell McCombs and Esteban Ló\;pez-Escobar\, whose lifelong commitment to the study of agenda-setting and media effects has left an enduring legacy in the field of communication research and its links to democracy. They reminded us that communication carries a social responsibility: to strengthen democratic life and\, ultimately\, to help create the conditions for better and more just societies. Now\, by revisiting the legacy of McCombs and Ló\;pez-Escobar\, our workshop seeks to inspire new directions in the study of public opinion\, while reaffirming the political mission that supports all meaningful communication research.
\n TOPICS FOR PROPOSAL
Possible topics for proposals include\, but are not limited to: &bull\; Media\, old and new\, effects on public opinion. &bull\; Public attitudes. Role of Emotions in Public Opinion. &bull\; Polarization\, extremism\, and information disorders. &bull\; Public perceptions. Controversial issues and social perceptions. &bull\; New media effects. Developments of Agenda-setting in the new media context. Developments of Framing studies. &bull\; New Directions in Electoral Campaigns. &bull\; Effects of polls in democracies. &bull\; AI effects on public opinion. &bull\; Challenges to freedom of expression. &bull\; Civic engagement.
One aim of the workshop is to identify and bring together scholars in communication\, sociology\, and politics concerned about communication research and public opinion studies. \;
ORGANIZER;CN="Mónica Codina": METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153353Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Lisbon:20260618T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Lisbon:20260619T170000 SUMMARY:International Colloquium of Post-graduate Studies in Philosophy UID:20260611T105700Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Lisbon LOCATION:Faculdade de Letras\, Coimbra\, Portugal DESCRIPTION:In 2026\, the Institute of Philosophical Studies (IEF) inaugurates the International Colloquium of Post-graduate Studies in Philosophy. Although specifically designed for young researchers (master&rsquo\;s students\, PhD candidates and postdocs)\, this event aims at building a forum for sharing and discussing ideas among researchers in diverse career stages. This first edition will count on renowned guests in four structural &ndash\; although not exclusive &ndash\; thematic areas (education\, aesthetics\, ethics and politics).
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153353Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20260618T110000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20260619T170000 SUMMARY:Migration\, Adaptation and Memory - 9th International Interdisciplinary Conference UID:20260611T105701Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Warsaw LOCATION:Gdańsk\, Poland DESCRIPTION:Conference: 18-19 June 2026\n-in person (Gdansk\, Poland) and online (via Zoom)\nCFP:\n \;\nHow do we remember and represent our migration experiences? Who is involved in these processes? How does history remember these events? What helps migrants and societies to adapt? The significance of these and related questions have made their way into our daily lives\, from the refugee crisis to policy decisions\, individual psychotherapy to (re)building identities\, communities\, and memories. \;
\nDuring the conference\, we are going to turn our attention to processes that are integral to human experience: migration\, adaptation\, and memory. We are interested in all aspects of migration and adaptation\, in their individual and collective dimensions\, in the past and in the present-day world. We would like to examine the role of memory\, the processes of migrating and adapting to various dynamic life circumstances\, across time\, space\, culture\, language\, and discipline. \;
\nTherefore\, we strive to represent and discuss the crossroads of migration\, adaptation\, and memory in their multiple representations: psychological\, social\, historical\, cultural\, philosophical\, religious\, neurological\, organizational\, methodological\, economic\, political\, and many others. We will also devote considerable attention to how these phenomena appear and transform in artistic practices: literature\, film\, theatre\, and visual arts. This is why we invite researchers representing various academic disciplines: anthropology\, history\, psychiatry\, psychology\, psychoanalysis\, sociology\, politics\, philosophy\, economics\, law\, literary studies\, theatre studies\, film studies\, design\, project management\, memory studies\, migration studies\, consciousness studies\, dream studies\, gender studies\, postcolonial studies\, medical sciences\, cognitive sciences\, and urban studies\, to name a few. \;
\nDifferent forms of presentations are encouraged\, including case studies\, theoretical inquiries\, personal reflections\, problem-oriented arguments\, comparative analyses\, and creative expressions. \;
\nWe will be happy to hear from experienced scholars and young academics\, doctoral and graduate students\, as well as professionals from various disciplines. We also invite all persons interested in participating in the conference as listeners\, without giving a presentation. \;
\nOur repertoire of suggested topics includes but is \;not limited to: \;
\n\n\; \;I. Arts
\nLiterature\, poetry\, film\, theatre\, etc. as adaptive mediums
\nAdaptation through artistic creation and destruction
\nArtistic imagination and adaptation
\nMigration as represented in arts
\nArt created during migration
\nCreative expression through memories \;
\n\; \;II. History
\nAdaptation across history
\nMemory processes in writing history
\nDocumenting history and memories in migration \;
\n\; \;III. Political Sciences and Law
\nPolicies related to migration and adaptation
\nHuman rights and migration
\nBureaucracy in relation to migration policies
\nJudiciary systems
\nPolitical agendas\, memory and migration
\nObjective vs. subjective memory in politics
\nInternational politics and adaptation
\nIV. Psychology and Psychiatry
\nMental health and adaptation
\nAbnormal behaviors and adaptation
\n(Mal)adaptive memory processes
\nSocial and transcultural psychiatry
\nPerception/cognition/attention
\nPersonality
\nPsychoanalysis
\nV. Medical sciences
\nGenetics/epigenetics in adaptation processes
\nNeurobiology and biochemistry of adaptation and memory
\nEvolutionary approaches to memory\, adaptation and migration
\nChronic diseases\, memory\, and adaptation
\nVI. Humanitarian work\, \;Governments and \;NGOs \;
\nRoles and responsibilities
\nManagement of temporary and transitory spaces
\nProject management and evaluation
\nBest practices
\nWelcome contexts \;
\nVII. Philosophy and Worldviews (Eastern\, Western\, Indigenous...)
\n\;Epistemology and metaphysics
\nExistential and postmodern adaptation
\nEthics in migratory context
\nPhilosophy of memory \;
\nVIII. Sociology and Anthropology
\nCultural determinants and adaptation
\nRace/ethnic identity and adaptation
\nReligion\, adaptation and migratory experiences
\nGender\, adaptation and migratory experiences
\nSocial networks and adaptation
\nLanguage of adaptation\, memory and migration
\nFamily relations and adaptation
\nUrban planning and adaptation
\nDiaspora and community development \;
\nIX. Economics
\nAdaptation and job security
\nPrivate sponsorship and adaptation
\nWhere does literacy begin and end? We take Homer&rsquo\;s \;Iliad \;to be the foundation of literary culture\, but such texts stem from an oral tradition. Their stories were embodied and mutable\, each telling carrying only an essence. Reading took off when such yarns were no longer told and solidified into the written word. Writing a &lsquo\;definitive&rsquo\; version brings permanence\, but does the artefact thus become a monolith\, effectively spelling the word&rsquo\;s end? \;
\n
In reading\, words stand apart from their everyday significance. They thus demand compensation. Already in the fourth century\, Augustine found Saint Ambrose reading silently startling. Even as the Saint&rsquo\;s &ldquo\;voice and tongue were at rest\,&rdquo\; his eyes nonetheless &ldquo\;ran over the text&rdquo\; and his &ldquo\;heart searched out the meaning&rdquo\;. The subsequent evolution of writing techniques &mdash\; \;from Gutenberg to HTML &mdash\; \;only fuels their continued abstraction and our interpretative adaptation.
Technology gets the blame today for us no longer reading enough\, not writing well\, \;and\, worst of all\, failing to parse the written word. Yet already in the nineteenth century\, Nietzsche bemoaned mass literacy as ironically causing the decline of &lsquo\;authentic&rsquo\; literacy. Mass entertainment and AI read-write tools make authenticity a premium\, while the Chinese state is investing in the promotion of reading as a geopolitical tactic. Are reading and writing\, therefore\, a battleground of both our tastes and resources?
Perhaps these questions are the haunting of language itself\, with literacy its inescapable instrumentalisation. \;Out of Print \;will examine the ostensible crisis of reading in our age in literary\, philosophical\, historical\, and sociological forms.
With contributions from Edmund King (Open)\, Alison Brady (UCL)\, Kit Wilson\, Daniel Hadas (Kings)\, and aesthetic interruptions\, Out of Print will examine the ostensible crisis of reading in our age in literary\, philosophical\, historical\, and sociological forms.
Symposium programme
For writer \;Kit Wilson\, the problem of literacy is not its decline\, but rather a hyper-literate state. The written word has become a bulwark against experience\, with the reading of social media posts or Substack essays is at best a distraction. Wilson&rsquo\;s work explores the confusion of the &lsquo\;map&rsquo\; with the &lsquo\;territory&rsquo\; that occludes access to an understanding of things outside of language itself. When we treat language as extrinsic to experience in this manner\, do we end up reducing our ability to understand what language describes to machine language?
Alison Brady \;challenges concerns about digitalisation as a threat to literacy. Arguments in favour of &ldquo\;slow reading&rdquo\;\, for example\, overlook that reading and writing have always been technological. As the phenomenologist and provocateur\, Vilem Flusser\, discussed in \;Does Writing Have a Future?\, writing technologies\, \;from chisels to smart pens\, have always been central to literacy practices\, conditioning what is possible in the first place.
Edmund King \;is interested in anxieties around the decline of reading and literacy\, and the outsized fantasies of the power of reading they produce. As humanists feel increasingly under threat in the institutions\, they attribute to reading (particularly the reading of fiction) miraculous and healing powers. In an age where daily reading time is plummeting\, we cling to the promises of &lsquo\;bibliotherapy\,&rsquo\; that books are good as a health supplement to be consumed. In the process\, the \;content \;of such books and the practice\, aesthetics\, and tradition of reading goes by the by.
Scholar \;Daniel Hadas \;will explore Homer&rsquo\;s transition from spoken to written text\, as the pivotal moment in ancient Greco-Roman literacy. He will historicise writing and literacy&rsquo\;s role in the Ancient world.
The Department of Philosophy\, Faculty of Arts\, Masaryk University in Brno\, Czech Republic\, invites submissions for a conference on the metaphysical and epistemological foundations of social identities\, organised within the research project Identity Politics: Metaphysics and Epistemology.
\nConference Theme
\nIn recent decades\, political and social debates have increasingly focused on identity-based groups defined by characteristics such as race\, gender\, sexual orientation\, disability\, class\, religion\, or age. These developments have generated extensive discussion in political philosophy and social theory. However\, many of the metaphysical and epistemological assumptions underlying identity politics remain insufficiently examined.
\nThis conference aims to investigate the nature\, constitution\, and epistemic role of social identities. In particular\, we seek to explore the mechanisms through which identities emerge as robust social and political entities\, and the ways in which identity-related features&mdash\;such as lived experience\, self-identification\, social recognition\, and shared narratives&mdash\;contribute to their formation and persistence. \;
\nAnother central aim is to examine whether different identities (for example\, race\, gender\, sexual orientation\, or class) are constituted through similar or distinct metaphysical and epistemic mechanisms. Comparative approaches that analyse similarities and differences across identities are especially welcome. \;
\nThe conference will also address the epistemological aspects of social identities\, including questions concerning situated knowledge\, epistemic authority\, intersectionality\, and conflicts among different socially situated perspectives.
\nTopics
\nPossible topics include\, but are not limited to:
\nMetaphysics of Social and Political Identities
\nEpistemology of Social Identity
\nSubmissions from metaphysics\, epistemology\, social philosophy\, feminist philosophy\, philosophy of race\, and related areas are welcome.
\nKeynote speaker: Kristina Rolin (Tampere University)
\nSubmission Guidelines
\nPlease submit an anonymous abstract of 400&ndash\;500 words.
\nThe submission should be attached to the email in .pdf format and prepared for blind review. Please include the following information separately in the body of the email: your name(s)\, affiliation(s)\, contact information\, the title of your talk.
\nImportant Dates
\nConference Details
\nSubmission
\nPlease send submissions to: belohrad@phil.muni.cz
\nContact
\nFor inquiries\, please contact: Radim Bělohrad\, Ph.D. (belohrad@phil.muni.cz)
\nOrganizing committee
\nRadim Bělohrad\, Ph.D. \;
\nZdeňka Jastrzembská\;\, Ph.D. \;
\nMarek Picha\, Ph.D.
\nDagmar Pichová\;\, Ph.D.
ORGANIZER;CN=Radim Belohrad: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153353Z DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20260622T090000 DTEND;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20260626T170000 SUMMARY:Melbourne Critical Theory Winter School - Structure and Action: Psychoanalytic Theory Now UID:20260611T105704Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Australia/Melbourne LOCATION:Old Arts\, University of Melbourne\, Melbourne\, Australia\, 3010 DESCRIPTION:The CRAM Critical Theory Winter School is an annual event that takes up a pressing topic confronting contemporary critical theory and philosophy. The 2026 Winter School\, taught by Sigi Jö\;ttkandt and Justin Clemens\, will interrogate the conditions of action within the structures of our contemporary situation.
\nThe relation of &lsquo\;Structure and action&rsquo\; is the most enduring of psychoanalytic preoccupations. Under what conditions\, asked Jacques Lacan\, do actions &ldquo\;give the lie&rdquo\; to the structures upon which they operate? How has such action been misrecognised in the past\, and to what extent must it remain so for the sake of the present? Whether thought in terms of continuity or break\, revelation or generation\, the psychoanalytic theory of how actions succeed existing structures and precede new ones presses urgent ethical\, epistemological\, and political questions. To pose the question of &lsquo\;psychoanalytic theory now\,&rsquo\; then\, necessitates a rigorous rearticulation of contemporary structures \;and \;the actions &ndash\; latent\, virtual\, as yet unnamed &ndash\; that would be capable of transforming them. For psychoanalysis\, the relation between structure and action is lived\, by the subject\, as the difference between repetition and transformation.
\nOur two instructors leading the 2026 CRAM Winter School are globally recognised for their scholarly and pedagogical responses to these questions. Sigi Jö\;ttkandt (UNSW) and Justin Clemens (University of Melbourne) will lead participants in a full week of immersive collaborative study and intensive discussion. Attendees will be offered a substantial programme of masterclasses\, reading groups\, public lectures\, and screenings designed to further the critical inquiry into the very structures and actions our instructors have spent their careers articulating.
\nWe especially encourage graduate students and early-career researchers to apply.
\nStructure:
Each participant will attend five 3-hour reading groups (reading packs will be supplied)\, two 2-hour masterclasses\, and two 1.5-hour public lectures throughout the week. In addition to this core program\, several optional activities will be scheduled.
Fees:
$120 student/unwaged
$180 waged
$300 waged with institutional support
Participants are responsible for independently organising their travel and accommodation.
\nHow to apply:
Please prepare a short statement giving detail of your current/previous education and the describing the relevance of the Winter School theme to your current research interests. Submit via the link at our webpage by 20 May. \;
Places are strictly limited. Successful applicants will be notified by 22 May.
Bursaries:
We are able to offer several travel bursaries of up to $500 to graduate students and scholars unable to access institutional funds travelling from overseas\, interstate\, or regional Victoria. Bursary recipients will also have their participation fee waived. Please indicate in your application whether you wish to be considered for a bursary.
Instructors:
Professor Justin Clemens works at the intersection of literary studies\, psychoanalysis and contemporary European philosophy. He has written extensively on figures such as Sigmund Freud\, Jacques Lacan\, Alain Badiou\, and Giorgio Agamben\, as well as on themes of technology\, slavery\, torture\, and love. Among his scholarly publications are \;Barron Field in New South Wales \;(2023)\, co-authored with Thomas H. Ford\, \;What is Education? \;(2017)\, edited with A.J. Bartlett\, and \;Psychoanalysis is an Antiphilosophy \;(2013). In addition to his scholarly research\, he also publishes poetry and criticism.
Professor Sigi Jö\;ttkandt specialises in 19th and 20th century British and American literature\, Lacanian psychoanalysis\, and continental philosophy. She is the author of several books\, including most recently \;The Nabokov Effect: Reading in the Endgame\, and has published widely on such topics as Henry James\, Jacques Lacan\, Alain Badiou\, love\, aesthetics\, feminism\, and environmental philosophy. She is a founding Director of Open Humanities Press and edits \;S: Journal of the Circle for Lacanian Ideology Critique.
ORGANIZER;CN=Critical Research Association Melbourne (cram): METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153353Z DTSTART;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20260622T100000 DTEND;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20260624T170000 SUMMARY:Queer Aɸ 2026 UID:20260611T105705Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:America/Los_Angeles LOCATION:Santa Cruz\, United States DESCRIPTION:Queer Aɸ Conference
\nhttps://queeranalyticphilosophy.weebly.com/
\nKeynote: Rowan Bell (University of Guelph) \;
\nPublic Events:
\nLuna Beller-Tadiar (NYU Steinhardt)
\nJulia Serano
\nOrganizers: Lauren Lyons\, Erin Beeghly\, Joshua Kramer.
\nLocal Contacts: Lauren Lyons\, Nico Orlandi and Sara Bernstein \;
\nWe invite all queers to submit to the second-annual Queer Aɸ (Queer Analytic Philosophy) Conference\, hosted by UC Santa Cruz\, June 22-24\, 2026. The aim of the conference is to foreground philosophical work in the analytic tradition (very broadly conceived) that is informed by queer experience\, community\, and theorizing\, as well as to build community among queer scholars in philosophy and beyond. In addition to talks\, the conference will include a poster session\, a workshop on LGBTQIA+ activism\, two public events\, a party (of course)\, and other glam surprises. The conference will conveniently take place at the University of California\, Santa Cruz during the week leading up to San Francisco Pride.
\nThere are several ways to apply and participate: by giving a talk\, by presenting at our QWIP (queer work-in-progress poster sessions)\, or by serving as a commentator (senior faculty are especially encouraged to participate in this role). QWIP is geared toward early stage work\, public-facing projects\, and cross-disciplinary work\, and it is open to upper-level undergraduates. We are also seeking submissions for session chairs. The goal is to bring as many queer philosophers as possible together for a few days of community-building and queer philosophizing. Applicants to last year&rsquo\;s event are encouraged to apply again. \;
\nWe are happy to announce a Graduate Student Prize in Queer Analytic Philosophy\, which features a $1000 award. Those applying for the paper prize should submit a full paper in addition to an abstract. The prize recipient will give a talk at the conference. \;
\nWe have some funding available to support the travel costs of participants\; priority will be given to those who lack research funds and are in precarious employment situations. \;
\nWe are also committed to making this event accessible for all. For questions about accommodations\, please contact our Accessibility Coordinator\, Erin Beeghly\, at erin.beeghly@utah.edu.
\nThis event is generously funded by an APA Diversity and Inclusiveness Grant. \;
\nTopics for papers and work-in-progress may include\, but are not limited to:
\nImagination and desire from a queer perspective
\nIdeology\, propaganda\, and queer/anti-queer activism
\nStandpoint epistemology and cishet ignorance
\nSelf-knowledge of gender and sexuality
\nDiscriminatory language and hate speech
\nResistant queer linguistic practices
\nIdentity labels and representation of queer identities
\nVarieties of essentialism about LGBTQ+ identities
\nQueer solidarity and forms of political organizing
\nGender reform and abolitionism
\nMetaphysics of sex\, gender\, and sexuality
\nQueer critiques of science (including\, but not limited to\, mathematical\, physical\, biological\, and mind sciences)
\nQueer aesthetics and the aesthetics of queer art
\nPhilosophical aspects of historical queer thought and queer approaches to the history of philosophy (ancient\, medieval\, and modern)
\nQueer topics\, experience and approaches to the philosophy of emotions and reactive attitudes
\nQueer topics\, experience and \; approaches to the philosophy of love\, sex\, and relationships
\nBioethics and the treatment of queer bodies
\nWe look forward to seeing you in Santa Cruz for three days of philosophy\, community\, and celebration leading into Pride! \;
\nQuestions? lmlyons@ucsc.edu
\nnorlandi@ucsc.edu \;
\nAccessibility coordinator: erin.beeghly@utah.edu \;
\n\nTo apply\, please fill in this form: \;
\n\nhttps://docs.google.com/forms/d/1RqUIjseKwcCLgtJKKrhvFGE1BClh8fqZ3eTooCEvnwM/viewform?edit_requested=true \; \;
\n\nIf you are interested in presenting a paper or poster\, please submit an abstract of around 750 words (a maximum of 1\,000 but no less than 500 words)\, prepared for anonymous review and suitable for a 45-minute presentation (followed by discussion) to a philosophically-informed audience that may include non-philosophers. If your abstract is not selected\, you have the option to be considered for the QWIP or one of the commentator or chair slots without submitting further material.
\n\nYou also have the option to apply to be a commentator or chair specifically. The application form asks for a short (1-paragraph) explanation of why you would like to be considered.
\n\nIf you would like to apply for the paper prize\, you should submit a full\, anonymized paper in addition to your abstract. The link to upload your paper is in the form. \;
\n\nDeadline for submissions: April 15\, 2026.
\n\nWe will inform you of our decision by April 30\, 2026. \;
\n\nWe will announce the recipient of the paper prize on May 30\, 2026.
ORGANIZER;CN=Lauren Lyons;CN=Erin Beeghly;CN=Joshua Kramer;CN=Scout Etterson: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153353Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Dublin:20260623T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Dublin:20260624T170000 SUMMARY:Prejudice in Hume and His Contemporaries UID:20260611T105706Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Dublin LOCATION:Newman Building\, Dublin\, Ireland DESCRIPTION:Prejudice in Hume and His Contemporaries University College Dublin\, 23-24 June 2026
Confirmed speakers:
\nAmy Schmitter (University of Alberta)
\nJacqueline Taylor (University of San Francisco)
\nRoss Carroll (Dublin City University)
\nElena Gordon (University College Dublin)
\nDescription: The early modern concept of prejudice is currently receiving renewed attention along two dimensions. First\, rising interest in early modern social and non-ideal epistemology has turned to theories of prejudice for explanations of group irrationality and group ignorance and\, more generally\, for early modern vice epistemologies. Second\, theories of prejudice are interesting for how they intersect with emerging theories of social\, racial\, gender and national identity. Despite the centrality of prejudice to long-established narratives about the Enlightenment and the rise of the &lsquo\;new science&rsquo\;\, these &lsquo\;social&rsquo\; aspects of the concept remain understudied. \;
David Hume's views on prejudice strikingly express these social dimensions. \;His central discussion of prejudice (Treatise 1.3.13) connects it to unreflective generalizations of humans based on perceived group membership. He couples this discussion with sophisticated socio-constructivist accounts of many kinds of social identity\, that are at the same time limited by objectionable sexist and racist beliefs. \;
This conference aims to investigate Hume&rsquo\;s theory of prejudice along the lines indicated above\, but it will also look at his possible inspirations and at his own influence on later authors in the Scottish Enlightenment and beyond. Thus\, spreading outward from Hume\, the conference aims to produce a more comprehensive and sophisticated understanding of the social aspects of prejudice in the broad context in which he was writing.
Program (Irish times):
\nTuesday\, 23 JuneThe event is generously supported by the British Society for the History of Philosophy\, the Mind Association\, \;Taighde É\;ireann - Research Ireland\, and the \;UCD School of Philosophy. \;It is organised as part of the project 'Hume and the Prejudiced Self'\, funded by Taighde É\;ireann - Research Ireland (grant number GOIPD/2025/1772).
ORGANIZER;CN=Ruben Noorloos: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153353Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Vienna:20260624T170000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Vienna:20260626T170000 SUMMARY:Digital Humanism Conference 2026 UID:20260611T105707Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Vienna LOCATION:Austrian Academy of Science\, Dr. Ignaz Seipel-Platz 2\, Vienna\, Austria\, 1010 DESCRIPTION:Orientation in turbulent times
\nThis moment is shaped by competing and intensifying dynamics: on the one hand\, escalating narratives of existential technological risk\, and on the other\, waves of economic speculation and hype around AI\; alongside deepening geopolitical fragmentation\, trade conflicts\, and even open war. In this context\, digital technologies are at the centre of attention\, they have become central infrastructures through which power\, knowledge\, security\, and economic value are organised. This convergence creates both urgency and ambiguity\, demanding new forms of orientation that move beyond critique toward grounded practices of shaping technology in line with democratic and societal values.
\nThis year&rsquo\;s Digital Humanism Conference does not respond with abstraction or diagnosis alone. It turns toward action. It asks not only what is at stake\, but what is already being done\, by whom\, and under which conditions\, what we can do\, what we have to demand from our institutions. It foregrounds practices that seek to reclaim technological development as a matter of public concern and collective responsibility.
\nIn this sense\, Digital Humanism is approached as a practice. It unfolds through design\, through empowerment\, through involvement and education\, and through the everyday decisions that configure technological systems and their social effects. The conference therefore highlights the often invisible work required to align digital technologies with democratic values\, human rights\, inclusion\, diversity\, and environmental responsibility.
\nPositioned within current global power shifts\, the conference engages critically with existing governance frameworks while maintaining a forward-looking perspective. It explores how agency can be regained and redistributed\, how dependencies can be reduced\, and how public institutions can take on a more active role in shaping digital futures.
ORGANIZER;CN=Erich Prem: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153353Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20260626T010000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20260629T170000 SUMMARY:18th Philosophy of Management Annual Conference UID:20260611T105708Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Paris LOCATION:30-32 Rue Henri Barbusse\, 92110 Clichy\, Paris\, France DESCRIPTION:The 18th edition of the Philosophy of Management Annual Conference moves to Paris\, France\, and will be held at the EM Normandie from \;26 \;to 29 \;June 2026. As usual\, each paper will be guaranteed a \;45-minute slot \;for an unhurried presentation and in-depth discussion. \; We are looking forward to receiving your submissions by \;1 February 2026.
\nWe welcome submissions that explore the diverse facets of management in private or public organizations through a philosophical lens. Whether it&rsquo\;s applied ethics\, social\, moral\, and political philosophy\, ontology\, epistemology\, axiology\, or aesthetics\, we encourage scholars to propose novel\, critical\, timely\, and/or controversial arguments. Submissions can also adopt a &lsquo\;meta-&rsquo\; standpoint for raising and answering questions such as: \;What is philosophy of management? \;Is philosophy useful for managers? \;Is management a science or an art? \;Can management be part of the humanities and\, if not\, what else should it be part of?
\nSpecial Tracks
\nTrack 1: Politization of Business - \;This special track invites scholars to critically examine the emergence of Political CSR and the growing politicization of business. We seek contributions that investigate how and why corporations adopt political roles\, when they should or should not adopt such roles\, the forms such involvement takes\, and the consequences for firms\, societies\, and global governance.
\nTrack 2: The Virtues of the Manager: Rethinking MacIntyre's Critique - \;Can managers be understood not as the manipulators of MacIntyre&rsquo\;s early critique\, but as practitioners of virtue whose work sustains common goods? Might management itself be reconceived as a practice requiring virtues such as justice\, constancy\, and practical wisdom?
ORGANIZER;CN=Marian Eabrasu: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153353Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260626T234500 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260626T234500 SUMMARY:Bodies in Digital Transition: Mapping a topology of digital bodies UID:20260611T105709Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/London LOCATION:Strand Building\, Strand\, London\, United Kingdom\, WC2R 2LS DESCRIPTION:Machines glow\, pulse\, perform and think through metal\, light\, code\, and living matter. The second Bodies in Digital Transition (BDT) edition traverses the materiality of the mechanical body itself: what embodied gestures and rhythms animate its operations? What moves beneath its surface? What kind of being emerges in the loops of its code? From the lures of the aesthetic surface to the recursive depths of its algorithmic core\, this year BTD aims to dissect the machine&rsquo\;s anatomy across several strata that form a speculative topology of the machinic body\; a descent through appearance\, mechanism\, and ontology toward the thresholds where technology ceases to represent and begins to be. In mapping out the systems of embodiment inhabited by digital beings\, we also open up inquiry into how human agents author\, come into contact with\, and transform machine bodies. There is neither &ldquo\;the technology itself&rdquo\; nor &ldquo\;the aesthetics itself&rdquo\; but rather a method of design in which the two are mutually implicated. To resist interior&ndash\;exterior divides open inquiries of how human agents encounter and transform machinic bodies through the intra-active practice of design. Digital bodies condition human expression and are conditioned by cultural inflections at each strata. The plural and distributed materialities of digital systems span beyond physical objects\, but encompass code\, electromagnetic waves\, and sensory outputs in complex and multiple communicating layers. How does the agency act as this morphing web? Following a post-human stance\, neither digital nor human cognition is assumed to be contained within an algorithmic nucleus. Instead\, it is conceived as emerging through relations across each stratum\, whose analytical isolation is not intended to fix ontologies\, but to map a topology of multiple\, non-linear processes through which agencies coalesce. To move beyond the limits of this configuration and to encourage crossing of boundaries\, we invite trans-disciplinary experimental and highly speculative inquiry and action into the machinic as event\, intra-action\, and formation of being.
\n \; ORGANIZER;CN=DiSCo (Digital Studies Collective): METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153353Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260630T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260630T090000 SUMMARY:Writing Across Differences UID:20260611T105710Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:"Open Cultural Studies" (https://www.degruyterbrill.com/journal/key/culture/html) invites submissions for a special issue entitled &ldquo\;Writing Across Differences\,&rdquo\; edited by Gero Bauer\, Ingrid Hotz-Davies\, and Marion Mü\;ller (all University of Tü\;bingen\, Germany).
\nDESCRIPTION
\nFor some years now\, we have been witnessing heated debates about who may\, can\, or should write what about whom in a certain way. These debates are primarily fuelled by the question of how the (ascribed) identity of an author or speaker relates to what is being said. Cultural distinctions between people and corresponding group identities (such as race\, class\, gender\, or sexual orientation) have become more and more significant over the course of the past fifty years. Often\, the transgression of boundaries of identity &ndash\; e.g. in the creation of fictional characters and worlds or in the production of knowledge &ndash\; is framed as problematic. At the same time\, the idealisation of discourses designed to establish a marked writing within boundaries carries its own implications and problems.
\nIn all cases\, &lsquo\;writing across&rsquo\; &ndash\; across boundaries but also possibly in the failure of crossings deemed necessary &ndash\; in public discourse\, in the creation of fiction\, or in the production of knowledge has a high potential for scandalisation as the debates about speaking and writing across differences appear to be struggles over cultural hegemony and the distribution of power and resources which are fought out in academia\, in the cultural and literary sector\, in education\, and in the media.
\nWe assume that in late modernity\, the (presumed or displayed) identity of authors and the associated positionality and (relative) power of definition in public perception have gained unprecedented political relevance and that expectations of their texts in terms of authenticity\, experiential knowledge\, and truthfulness are derived from this. These expectations\, as well as the reaction to their disappointment or any scepticism about them\, fuel new rhetorics\, aesthetics\, and text forms which urgently require an interdisciplinary debate\, also in the sense of a self-reflexive analysis of academic writing in the humanities and social sciences.
\nWe invite contributions that take an interdisciplinary look at the dynamics surrounding the crossing of cultural boundaries in literary\, academic\, and journalistic writing as well as their effects and consequences. Contributions should focus on analysing cases of writing across socially and culturally determined identity boundaries and their public negotiation.
\nWe welcome contributions from different perspectives in the humanities and social sciences\, such as literary and cultural studies\, sociology\, anthropology\, media studies\, educational science\, and ethics\, but also from interdisciplinary fields of study that engage with the historically contingent relevance of the question of who speaks in a text\, in which contexts and with what authorisation\, and who produces knowledge about whom.
\nContributions may address\, but are in no way limited to\, the following questions:
\nHOW TO SUBMIT
\nSubmissions \; will be collected by June 30\, 2026 via the online submission system at https://www.editorialmanager.com/culture/
\nChoose &ldquo\;special issue: Writing Across Differences&rdquo\;
\nBeforesubmission\, authors \;should \;carefully read \;the \;Instructions for \;Authors\, \;available \;at https://www.degruyterbrill.com/publication/journal_key/CULTURE/downloadAsset/CULTURE_Instruction%20for%20Authors.pdf
\nAll contributions will undergo critical peer review before being accepted for publication.
\nAs a general rule\, publication costs should be covered by Article Publishing Charges (APC)\; that is\, be defrayed by the authors\, their affiliated institutions\, funders or sponsors. Authors without access to publishing funds are encouraged to discuss potential discounts or fee-waivers with OA Portfolio Manager Magdalena Skoneczna (magdalena.skoneczna@degruyterbrill.com)\, before submitting their manuscript.
\nFurther questions about this thematic issue can be sent to Gero Bauer (gero.bauer@uni-tuebingen.de). In case of technical problems with submission\, please write to Assistant.Managing.Editor@degruyterbrill.com.
\n\;Find us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/OpenCulturalStudies/
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153353Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Belgrade:20260630T230000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Belgrade:20260630T230000 SUMMARY:Historical Narratives and Counternarratives UID:20260611T105711Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Belgrade LOCATION:Belgrade\, Serbia DESCRIPTION:Narration and self-narration represent a fundamental need of human beings as historical and cultural subjects. This fact has been recognised and studied in the field of anthropological\, cultural\, historical\, sociological and even psychological and philosophical research. According to various interpretative perspectives\, personal identity is constructed narratively (Bruner\, Ricoeur et al.)\, and is built at the crossroads between subjective experience and cultural transmission of a population.
\nPersonal identity\, therefore\, is not determined solely by psychological-affective development\, pure experience and knowledge of a more or less general and practical nature. A complex combination of elements nourishes the thoughts\, choices\, interests and behaviours of individuals\, rooted in the cultural values\, beliefs\, memory and history of a population.
\nThis\, explains\, on the one hand\, the civilising and emancipatory function of studies and research in the humanities and historical-social sciences for individuals\, peoples and communities\; on the other hand\, it explains the particular difficulty in achieving full and scientific knowledge of facts\, events and experiences. On the one hand\, the question of the objectivity of truth is dialectically linked both to the question of the representation of knowledge and to the question of the correspondence between statements and actual state of things. On the other hand\, the same issue enters into dialectic with the question of persuasion and knowledge interests.
\nIn particular\, the relationship between truth and persuasion\, between argumentative validity and communicative effectiveness\, is a source of tension and controversy. The matrix is clearly Western and has its roots in ancient thought (one can consider Aristotle&rsquo\;s distinction between rhetoric and dialectic\, or reconsider Socrates and Plato&rsquo\;s lessons or Sophists&rsquo\; perspective\, etc.). This is a critical area where the difference between convincing and persuading\, between knowing and believing\, between demonstrative discourse and discourse aimed at obtaining the consent of an audience generates\, in various ways\, tension and controversy that is as much scientific and cultural as it is political and social. On the one hand\, the multiplication of communication channels\, accessibility to social media\, the strengthening of the so-called &ldquo\;infosphere&rdquo\; and the advent of generative AI\; on the other\, the proliferation of economic and political conflicts of interests behind scientific research\, knowledge and communication &ndash\; all this seems to have further dramatised and complicated the critical issues and problems in question.
\nHowever\, as numerous studies in different disciplinary field have shown\, the issue of persuasion cannot be addressed solely in the contexts of mass communication\, economic interests and political manipulation: no discursive practice is free from presuppositions and more or less conscious exercises and effects of persuasion (Perelman\, Habermas\, Toulmin et al.). The structures of persuasive discourse are transversally present in all linguistic practices\, including specialists&rsquo\; ones\, inspired by criteria of scientific rigour. The scientific-cultural universe cannot therefore be divided into two clearly separate areas: on the one hand\, the area of certain\, experimentally proven truth\, the domain of analytical reason\; on the other\, the area of relative truth\, the domain of the humanities and of a reason conditioned by pragmatic\, historical motivations\, i.e. anchored to a particular Lebensform.
\nThis situation reinforces the need for clarification of the relationship between truth and persuasion in the humanities and historical-social sciences\, and for rigorous analysis and discussion of the possibilities and limitations of persuasive practice\, beliefs\, cultural affiliations\, interests and values reflected in them.
\nThe conference aims to promote an interdisciplinary exchange &ndash\; including a critical discussion of case studies &ndash\; between philosophical and non-philosophical research areas\, with a particular (but not exclusive) focus on the following issues\, which are grouped around the main question &ldquo\;Narration and Renarration of Facts: How and When Is the Truth?&rdquo\;:
\n\n- the relationship between truth and persuasion
\n- the relationship between truth and communication
\n- the relationship between truth and the languages of politics
\n- the relationship between knowledge and representation
\n- the relationship between knowledge and interest
\n- the relationship between knowledge and cultural belonging
\n- the relationship between knowledge and ideology
\n- the relationship between identity and (re-)narration
\n- the relationship between factuality and communicative distortion
\n\nOrganiser: Prof. Milenko Bodin (University of Belgrade)
\n\nSubmissions of a long abstract (of no more than 1000 words) and a CV are due by 30 June 2026.
\nAll applicants must indicate the following details: Name\, presentation title\, institutional affiliation\, and contact information.
\nPlease\, send your abstract and CV to: filcentar@gmail.com
\n\nApplicants will be notified by 15 July 2026.
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153353Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260630T230000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260630T230000 SUMMARY:‘Impossible Architecture’ in: 'Universitas Gedanesis' UID:20260611T105712Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:Jan Grzanka\, editor of the biannual scientific journal &lsquo\;Universitas Gedanensis&rsquo\;\, together with Roman Nieczyporowski\, invite you to contribute to the next issue of the journal entitled &lsquo\;Impossible Architecture&rsquo\;.
\nThe editors of the publication understand impossible architecture as an area of reflection situated at the intersection of idea and matter\, design and imagination\, revealing the boundaries and contradictions of contemporary architecture. The topics covered include both projects that have not been realised for technological\, economic or political reasons\, as well as visions that exist only in the form of drawings\, models\, narratives or virtual environments. Impossibility is treated not only as a structural problem\, but also as a social\, ethical and ecological category\, making architecture a tool for critical reflection on contemporary models of design and habitation.
\nThe editors plan to publish two issues of the journal\, which will then be followed by a book published by the Krakow Society of Authors and Publishers of Scientific Works &lsquo\;Universitas&rsquo\;. For several years now\, a series of publications has been appearing\, based on articles published in the Universitas Gedanensis journal\, supplemented with additional materials\, published under the common title Bibliotheca Culturae Scriptae (Library of Written Culture).
\nEach volume in the series is planned as a separate collective work\, edited by Jan Grzanka and an expert in the field invited to collaborate. Roman Nieczyporowski is the co-editor of the volume &lsquo\;Impossible Architecture&rsquo\;.
\nAll information about the journal (including back issues) and the series is available at: universitasgedanensis.com.pl. The tabs &lsquo\;For authors&rsquo\;\, &lsquo\;Reviewing policy&rsquo\; and &lsquo\;Publication ethics&rsquo\; contain detailed guidelines for publishing articles in Universitas Gedanensis.
\nPlease send any questions and correspondence to the following e-mail addresses:
\njangrzanka@onet.pl
\nEditor-in-chief of Universitas Gedanensis: Dr Jan Grzanka (SANS-Sopot)
\nroman.nieczyporowski@asp.gda.pl
\nCo-editor of the volume: Dr Roman Nieczyporowski (Academy of Fine Arts in Gdańsk)
\n\n\n ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153353Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Madrid:20260701T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Madrid:20260703T170000 SUMMARY:Acquaintance: Kick-Off Workshop of the Acquaintance Network UID:20260611T105713Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Madrid LOCATION:Av. Blasco Ibañez\, 30\, Valencia\, Spain\, 46010 DESCRIPTION:\nKick-Off Workshop of the Acquaintance Network
\nJuly 1-3\, 2026
\nValencia Philosophy Lab
\nUniversity of Valencia\, Department of Philosophy
\nRoom F11
\n(ONLY IN PERSON)
\nThe Acquaintance Network is a newly formed international philosophy research group working on the metaphysics\, epistemology\, value\, and history of acquaintance.
\nAcquaintance is the relation of conscious awareness that we bear to the things we experience most directly. The notion of acquaintance has the potential to explain a wide range of important facts in philosophy of mind\, epistemology\, metaphysics\, aesthetics\, ethics\, and other domains.
\nThe Acquaintance Network aims to support current work on acquaintance and to promote future work on acquaintance. More information about the Acquaintance Network here.
\nThis is the inaugural workshop of the Acquaintance Network. We&rsquo\;ll discuss fundamental issues concerning the nature and epistemology of acquaintance\, both from a contemporary and a historical perspective.
\nProgram
\nWednesday\, July 1
\n10 &ndash\; 11:30 Donovan Wishon\, &ldquo\;How Transparent is Experience?: Reassessing Diaphaneity in Early Analytic Philosophy&rdquo\;
\n Coffee break
\n12 &ndash\; 13:30 Sharon Casu\, &ldquo\;Acquaintance and Mediation&rdquo\;
\n \;Lunch
\n15 &ndash\; 17 \; \; \; \; Roundtable: SEP on Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description (by Ali Hasan). \;Discussants: Emad Atiq\, Sharon Casu\, Sam Coleman\, Matt Duncan\, Anna Giustina\, Ali Hasan\, Michael Markunas\, Jacopo Pallagrosi\, Chris Ranalli\, Donovan Wishon
\nThursday\, July 2
\n10 &ndash\; 11:30 \;Sam Coleman\, &ldquo\;Phenomenal Concepts\, Qualia\, and Acquaintance - Issues Arising&rdquo\;
\n Coffee break
\n12 &ndash\; 13:30 Michael Markunas\, &ldquo\;Acquaintance with Abstract Objects&rdquo\;
\nLunch
\n15:30 &ndash\; 17 Anna Giustina and Jacopo Pallagrosi\, &ldquo\;Knowledge by Acquaintance and the Conceptual Mind&rdquo\;
\nFriday\, July 3
\n12:00 &ndash\; 13:30 Matt Duncan\, &ldquo\;I Think\, Therefore ... Presentism is False&rdquo\;
\nLunch
\n15:30 &ndash\; 17:30 Roundtable: The Normativity of Knowledge by Acquaintance. Discussants: Sharon Casu\, Sam Coleman\, Matt Duncan\, Anna Giustina\, Ali Hasan\, Michael Markunas\, Jacopo Pallagrosi\, Chris Ranalli\, Donovan Wishon
\nOrganization and contact
\nAnna Giustina (anna.giustina@outlook.com)
\nJacopo Pallagrosi
\nMatt Duncan
\nSpecial thanks to Jorge Guardiola for the invaluable logistic support.
\nFunding
\nKnow Yourself: The Importance\, the Nature\, and the Applications of Introspective Self-Knowledge \;(PID2023-151949NA-I00)\, funded by Ministerio de Ciencia\, Innovació\;n y Universidades.
\nThis is a Valencia Philosophy Lab event.
ORGANIZER;CN=Matt Duncan;CN=Anna Giustina;CN=Jacopo Pallagrosi: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153353Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20260703T083000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20260703T170000 SUMMARY:Progress under Pressure UID:20260611T105714Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Zurich LOCATION:Frohburgstrasse 3\, Luzern\, Switzerland DESCRIPTION:The 1st Swiss PPE Conference will take place at the University of Lucerne on 3 July 2026. This student-led event brings together PPE students as well as students specializing in \;one of the three disciplines.
\n'Progress under Pressure' addresses what we perceive as one of the most significant and urgent challenges of our time. Progress is commonly understood as a movement towards an improved state. While there is an ongoing debate about whether humanity is continually striving towards such a state\, we nonetheless continue to use the idea of progress as a normative guideline for designing many assumptions\, models and systems. However\, the many intersecting and growing crises of our time are putting this normative principle of progress under increasing pressure. Ideas\, paradigms and methods from all three PPE fields can help us rethink the meaning of human progress and recalibrate our assumptions\, models and systems accordingly.
\nThe conference will discuss questions such as:
\nWe believe that PPE is not only a programme of study\, but also a way of relating to the world. It is a crossroads where multiple perspectives on various issues are given the opportunity to develop and come together\, enabling us to see the bigger picture. We hope that\, with the help of your work and ideas\, this PPE conference may contribute to this crossroads.
For questions and clarifications\, feel free to contact us via email (ppe-conference@unilu.ch). \;
Schedule
\nDetails will follow. \;
\nWorkshops
\n1. Rethinking progress: What is progress and development and where should it lead? Is humanity continually striving towards progress or not? How should we rethink progress particularly in relation to poverty\, developing countries and non-Western perspectives? \;
\n2. Systems: The intersecting and growing crises of our time increasingly expose the limits of political\, economic\, and ecological systems. In what ways are our institutions and structures (not) able to withstand this systemic stress? And what is needed to reinforce resilient systems? \;
\n3. Work and Meaning: Today&rsquo\;s labour market increasingly causes competition\, burnout and alienation\, while also excluding integral parts of the sphere of work such as care work. Yet\, work can also satisfy essential needs such as recognition\, meaning and self-realization. How\, then\, should progress in the sphere of work be measured?
\nKeynotes
\nLisa Herzog (online)
\nJo Wolff (in person) \;
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153353Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Brussels:20260703T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Brussels:20260708T170000 SUMMARY:Summer School Desire and Decay in Japanese Philosophy UID:20260611T105715Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Brussels LOCATION:Rodestraat 14\, Antwerpen\, Belgium\, 2000 DESCRIPTION:Join us for an engaging five-day summer school at the University of Antwerp\, where you will delve into the significant themes of \;mortality\, desire\, and decay within Japanese ethics and aesthetics. This intensive programme combines philosophical inquiry with insights from literature and contemporary art\, enabling participants to explore how these concepts impact ethical thought and aesthetic expression in both Japanese and Western cultures. \; \;
\nKey themes \;include an introduction to impermanence and decay in Japanese thought\, intersections with process philosophy\, and the cultural implications of kawaii (cuteness) alongside the exploration of Shinto perspectives and contemporary artistic representations. \;Guest lecturers \;will share their expertise\, enhancing discussions through \;interdisciplinary case studies and interactive seminars. \;Confirmed lecturers are Masahiro Morioka\, Thorsten Botz-Bornstein\, Kyoko Kasuya\, Takeshi Morisato\, \; Adam \;Loughnane\, \;Camil Valerio Ristè\;\, Manon Paredis\, Tom Hannes\, \;Franlu Vulliermet\, \;Bart Vandeput\, Christina Stadlbauer\, \; Kristien Hens. By the end of the course\, you will gain an understanding of \;how Japanese philosophical traditions address the complexities of life\, death\, and the human experience.
\n\n ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153353Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20260703T121500 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20260703T170000 SUMMARY:Analytic Aesthetics Workshop UID:20260611T105716Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Berlin LOCATION:Norbert-Wollheim-Platz 1\, Frankfurt am Main\, Germany DESCRIPTION:Analytic Aesthetics Workshop
\nGoethe University Frankfurt
\nFriday 3 July 2026
\nIG-Farben-Haus\, IG 0.254 (UG)
\nProgramme:
\n&bull\; 12:15&ndash\;13:45 Sanna Hirvonen (LanCog\, University of Lisbon): A Degree-Based Solution to the Paradox of Everyday Aesthetics
\n&bull\; 14:15&ndash\;15:45 Felix Brä\;uer (University of Mannheim): Style Appropriation\, Aesthetic Resistance\, and Silencing
\n&bull\; 16:15-17:45 Jochen Briesen (University of Heidelberg): Artworks as Invitations
\nAttendance is free for anyone interested.
\nIf you want to attend the workshop\, please register by e-mail to: Robert Michels (r.michels@em.uni-frankfurt.de)
ORGANIZER;CN=Robert Michels: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260609T153353Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260710T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260710T170000 SUMMARY:Losing Oneself: Self-Alienation in Post-Kantianism and Beyond UID:20260611T105717Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/London LOCATION:32 Russell Square\, London\, United Kingdom\, WC1B 5DN DESCRIPTION:Royal Holloway\, University of London and the London Post-Kantian Seminar host a one-day conference entitled &ldquo\;Losing Oneself: Self-Alienation in Post-Kantianism and Beyond&rdquo\;. The event receives funding from the Mind Association and Royal Holloway.
\nIt is among the most human and yet most dehumanizing experiences to lose oneself&mdash\;to suffer self-alienation. This can be brought on by everyday emotions like shame or guilt about a job done badly or a friend left hanging\; it can be a consequence of inhumane conditions of labour\; it can go along with traumatic or violent events\; and it can be a core experience of those going through persecution\, internment\, and civilizational collapse. Crucially\, even the mere reflection on oneself as human can engender self-alienation. The phenomenon of self-alienation thus has an array of aspects that range from the psychological via the social\, political\, existential\, and metaphysical\, to the aesthetic and literary.
\nIn modern times\, an important philosophical tradition that responds to this vulnerability of human life is post-Kantianism broadly construed: first taking center stage in Fichte\, Hegel\, and Marx\, the problem of self-alienation was further developed by Arendt\, the Frankfurt School\, and then post-Wittgensteinian authors like Cavell\, Diamond\, and Crary. The problem also reaches beyond post-Kantianism and is at the center of current debates in political philosophy\, philosophy of action\, feminism\, \;philosophy of gender\, \;aesthetics\, and the philosophy of epistemic injustice. This conference brings together authors from within and beyond the post-Kantian tradition\, as well as junior and senior researchers.
\nThe event is free and open to all! To register and for any inquiries please contact: jens.pier@rhul.ac.uk.
\nSpeakers and Respondents:
Benedict Blunt (Oxford) \;
Diana Craciun (UCL)
Lizzy Holt (UCL)
Thomas Khurana (Potsdam)
Quill Kukla (Georgetown/Hanover)
Spencer Alexandria Nabors (Georgetown)
Jens Pier (Royal Holloway)
Francey Russell (Barnard/Columbia)
James Ternent (Cambridge)