BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260629T132501Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Madrid:20270527T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Madrid:20270528T170000
SUMMARY:REPARATORY PRACTICES Coexistence\, Knowledge and Justice in Contexts of Persistent Harm
UID:20260704T211006Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm
TZID:Europe/Madrid
LOCATION:Albasanz 26-28\, Madrid\, Spain\, 28037
DESCRIPTION:<p>9th FISOPOL SYMPOSIUM</p>\n<p><strong>REPARATORY PRACTICES</strong></p>\n<p><strong>Coexistence\, Knowledge and Justice in Contexts of Persisten Harm</strong></p>\n<p>Organised by: Social and Political Philosophy Research Group (FISOPOL)\, Institute of</p>\n<p>Philosophy (IFS-CSIC)\, Centre for Human and Social Sciences (CCHS)\, Spanish National</p>\n<p>Research Council (CSIC)</p>\n<p>Convenors: Luis Guerra Miranda (IFS) &ndash\; &Aacute\;lvaro Morcillo Laiz (IFS)</p>\n<p><strong>INTRODUCTION</strong></p>\n<p>How should reparation be understood in contexts in which harm can no longer be delimited as an exceptional event or stabilised as a concluded past\, but instead persistently shapes the conditions of planetary coexistence? Although institutional frameworks of justice have historically articulated reparation through the categories of compensation\, restitution and recognition\, these approaches presuppose that harm can be delimited\, that responsibility can be assigned within relatively stable frameworks\, and that justice operates as a response directed towards resolution. Such assumptions are becoming increasingly untenable under present critical conditions: the global ecological crisis\, forced displacement\, armed conflicts and structural inequalities give rise to forms of harm that persist over time\, resist resolution and continually reconfigure the conditions under which social and political life unfolds.</p>\n<p>This situation reveals an inherent limitation in prevailing models of justice. Legal and institutional frameworks of reparation are designed to address quantifiable losses\, assign responsibility and provide compensation. Yet they struggle to account for the relational\, affective and collective dimensions of harm\, which evade quantification and shape lived experience over the long term. What remains insufficiently theorised is not only the scope of harm\, but also the processes through which societies seek to confront\, transform or endure it. What kinds of knowledge emerge from these reparatory processes\, and to what extent do they shape modes and means of coexistence and justice\, including from a more-than-human perspective?</p>\n<p>We invite proposals addressing the relationship between reparatory practices\, justice and the generation of knowledge in contemporary contexts marked by the persistence of harm. Contributions may adopt a range of theoretical\, empirical or methodological approaches\, including social and political philosophy\, science and technology studies\, art\, design\, situated research\, institutional analysis and collective practices\, provided that they contribute to the conceptual elaboration of these questions.</p>\n<p>Proposals addressing the following themes are particularly welcome\, although this list is not exhaustive:</p>\n<p>1. Persistent harm\, temporality and reparability. Forms of harm that endure\, accumulate or change over time\, together with the limits and possibilities of their reparation.</p>\n<p>2. Reparation\, justice and responsibility. Relations between reparatory practices\, conceptions of justice\, the attribution of responsibility and the recognition of harm.</p>\n<p>3. Reparatory practices and the production of knowledge. Modes of knowledge\, interpretation and learning that emerge from situated\, collective and experimental reparatory practices.</p>\n<p>4. Institutions\, public policy and infrastructures. Legal and institutional frameworks\, public policies\, forms of governance and infrastructures involved in defining and managing harm.</p>\n<p>5. Memory\, exile and the reconstitution of common life. Practices of memory\, experiences of exile and displacement\, and collective processes for rebuilding bonds and forms of coexistence.</p>\n<p>6. Artistic practices\, design and technological infrastructures. Artistic interventions\, design practices and technological devices that elaborate\, render perceptible or reconfigure the experience of persistent harm.</p>\n<p><strong>SUBMISSION GUIDELINES</strong></p>\n<p><strong></strong>1. Title of the paper</p>\n<p>2. Abstract (minimum 200 and maximum 300 words)\, together with a selected bibliography</p>\n<p>3. Keywords (3-5)</p>\n<p>4. Short biographical note (maximum 100 words)</p>\n<p>Proposals should be sent to <strong>fisopol@gmail.com</strong> by 10 November 2026.</p>\n<p><strong>SYMPOSIUM FORMAT</strong></p>\n<p>The symposium will take place over two days\, with sessions combining individual 20-minute presentations\, panel discussions and spaces for collective exchange.</p>\n<p><strong>LANGUAGES</strong>: Spanish and English</p>\n<p><strong>SUBMISSION DEADLINE:&nbsp\;</strong>10 November 2026</p>\n<p><strong>NOTIFICATION OF ACCEPTANCE:&nbsp\;</strong>15 December 2026. * Selected participants will be required to pay a small registration fee in order to confirm their participation in the symposium.</p>\n<p><strong>KEYNOTE SPEAKERS</strong></p>\n<p>Dr Cristina S&aacute\;nchez\, Autonomous University of Madrid\, Spain\, and Dr Juliana Gonz&aacute\;lez Villamizar\, Justus-Liebig-Universit&auml\;t Gie&szlig\;en\, Germany.</p>\n<p><strong>SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE - FISOPOL</strong></p>\n<p>Dr Mar&iacute\;a Caterina La Barbera\, Dr Francisco Colom\, Dr Juan Carlos Velasco\, Dr C&eacute\;sar Rendueles\, Dr &Aacute\;lvaro Morcillo\, Dr Javier Gil\, Dr Jos&eacute\; Antonio Zamora\, Dr Luis Guerra Miranda.</p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
