In Conversation: Exploring the Philosophy of Money and Finance &ndash\; Series III
\nA series of interviews with contributors to The Philosophy of Money and Finance (Hardcover\, OUP 2024\; Paperback\, fall 2025)
\nSchedule
\n"Bitcoins Left and Right: A Normative Assessment of a Digital Currency"
Authors: Lars Lindblom and Joakim Sandberg
Interviewer: Violet Victoria
Date and Time: October 6\, 2026\, 12 pm EST (18:00 CET)
[Thi is the final interview in the series. Recordings of prior interviews can be found on Phinance.]
ORGANIZER;CN=Lisa Warenski;CN=Emiliano Ippoliti: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260218T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20261209T170000 SUMMARY:Reconstructing Carnap Webinar Series 2026 UID:20261024T121833Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:I am excited to share that the \;Reconstructing Carnap Webinar Series \;will resume in \;February 2026! Please find the official flyer attached. All talks will take place from \;4:30 PM to 6:30 PM CET \;(10:30 AM&ndash\;12:30 PM EST).
The webinar can be accessed via the following link: https://meet.google.com/uaq-jqpf-mwr
Schedule of speakers:
The series is organized in collaboration with \;Carnap in Context IV \;(Ö\;AW\, FWF Grant PAT7905424) and \;Rudolf Carnap Digital \;(MCMP\, LMU Munich). \;
ORGANIZER;CN=Caterina Del Sordo;CN=Luca Oliva;CN=Silvano Zipoli Caiani: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260317T170000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20261117T170000 SUMMARY:Wittgenstein's Lecture on Ethics: Online Lecture Series UID:20261024T121834Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:&Eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;-&phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &sigma\;&kappa\;έ&psi\;&eta\;\, ό&pi\;&omega\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&delta\;ύ&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&chi\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&mu\;ό &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Alpha\;&lambda\;έ&xi\;&eta\; &Kappa\;&alpha\;&rho\;&pi\;&omicron\;ύ&zeta\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;\, &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &alpha\;&pi\;&omicron\;&tau\;&epsilon\;&lambda\;&epsilon\;ί &alpha\;&pi\;&lambda\;ώ&sigmaf\; &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &nu\;έ&alpha\; &theta\;&epsilon\;&omega\;&rho\;&eta\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &pi\;&rho\;ό&tau\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&eta\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &rho\;&iota\;&zeta\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&tau\;ό&pi\;&iota\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; ί&delta\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &nu\;&omicron\;ή&mu\;&alpha\;&tau\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\;&sigmaf\;\, &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &kappa\;ί&nu\;&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\; &alpha\;&pi\;ό &tau\;&eta\; &phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &sigma\;ύ&sigma\;&tau\;&eta\;&mu\;&alpha\; &pi\;&rho\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &tau\;&eta\; &phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&chi\;&tau\;ή &epsilon\;&mu\;&pi\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&rho\;ί&alpha\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\;\, ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &eta\; &sigma\;&kappa\;έ&psi\;&eta\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &pi\;&epsilon\;&rho\;&iota\;&omicron\;&rho\;ί&zeta\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&eta\; &lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;ά&sigma\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&eta\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;ώ&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&epsilon\; &tau\;&rho\;ό&pi\;&omicron\; ύ&pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&xi\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&mu\;&mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&omicron\;&chi\;ή&sigmaf\; &sigma\;&tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &pi\;&rho\;&alpha\;&gamma\;&mu\;&alpha\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;. &Sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &pi\;&upsilon\;&rho\;ή&nu\;&alpha\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ή&sigmaf\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &pi\;&rho\;&omicron\;&omicron\;&pi\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή&sigmaf\; &beta\;&rho\;ί&sigma\;&kappa\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &eta\; έ&nu\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&alpha\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &Alpha\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&chi\;&tau\;ή&sigmaf\; &Omicron\;&lambda\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\;\, &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\; &delta\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&alpha\;&mu\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;&eta\;-&kappa\;&lambda\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&sigma\;&tau\;ή&sigmaf\; &epsilon\;&nu\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\; &mu\;έ&sigma\;&alpha\; &sigma\;&tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &omicron\;&pi\;&omicron\;ί&alpha\; &omicron\; ά&nu\;&theta\;&rho\;&omega\;&pi\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &omicron\; &kappa\;ό&sigma\;&mu\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;-&sigma\;&upsilon\;&gamma\;&kappa\;&rho\;&omicron\;&tau\;&omicron\;ύ&nu\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &chi\;&omega\;&rho\;ί&sigmaf\; &nu\;&alpha\; &tau\;&alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ί&zeta\;&omicron\;&nu\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\;\, &sigma\;&upsilon\;&gamma\;&kappa\;&rho\;&omicron\;&tau\;ώ&nu\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ό &pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &omicron\; &Kappa\;&alpha\;&rho\;&pi\;&omicron\;ύ&zeta\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &omicron\;&nu\;&omicron\;&mu\;ά&zeta\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &Mu\;&eta\;-&Tau\;&alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &Tau\;&alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;\, &delta\;&eta\;&lambda\;&alpha\;&delta\;ή &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &sigma\;&chi\;έ&sigma\;&eta\; ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &tau\;&omicron\; έ&nu\;&alpha\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &alpha\;&pi\;&omicron\;&rho\;&rho\;&omicron\;&phi\;ά &tau\;&omicron\; ά&lambda\;&lambda\;&omicron\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &omicron\;ύ&tau\;&epsilon\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&alpha\;&mu\;έ&nu\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &alpha\;&pi\;&omicron\;&lambda\;ύ&tau\;&omega\;&sigmaf\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&chi\;&omega\;&rho\;&iota\;&sigma\;&mu\;έ&nu\;&omicron\;\, &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &epsilon\;&nu\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &sigma\;&epsilon\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&rho\;&kappa\;ή &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&mu\;ό&rho\;&phi\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\; &mu\;έ&sigma\;&alpha\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &chi\;&rho\;ό&nu\;&omicron\;. &Eta\; &pi\;&rho\;&alpha\;&gamma\;&mu\;&alpha\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;\, &sigma\;&epsilon\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ή &tau\;&eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;-&phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &sigma\;ύ&lambda\;&lambda\;&eta\;&psi\;&eta\;\, &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&alpha\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &omicron\;&upsilon\;&sigma\;ί&alpha\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&delta\;&iota\;&kappa\;&alpha\;&sigma\;ί&alpha\; &Sigma\;&chi\;&epsilon\;&sigma\;&iota\;&alpha\;&kappa\;ή&sigmaf\; &Sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;-&Gamma\;έ&nu\;&epsilon\;&sigma\;&eta\;&sigmaf\;\, έ&nu\;&alpha\; &pi\;&lambda\;έ&gamma\;&mu\;&alpha\; &zeta\;&omega\;&nu\;&tau\;&alpha\;&nu\;ώ&nu\; &sigma\;&chi\;έ&sigma\;&epsilon\;&omega\;&nu\; ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &kappa\;ά&theta\;&epsilon\; &mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;ή ύ&pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&xi\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&delta\;ύ&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;έ&sigma\;&alpha\; &alpha\;&pi\;ό &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;&eta\;&lambda\;&epsilon\;&pi\;ί&delta\;&rho\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&eta\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &alpha\;&mu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&beta\;&alpha\;ί&alpha\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&gamma\;&kappa\;&rho\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\;\, &gamma\;&epsilon\;&gamma\;&omicron\;&nu\;ό&sigmaf\; &pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\;ί&zeta\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;&epsilon\; &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &eta\;&rho\;&alpha\;&kappa\;&lambda\;&epsilon\;ί&tau\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&alpha\; &epsilon\;&nu\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &tau\;&omega\;&nu\; &alpha\;&nu\;&tau\;&iota\;&theta\;έ&tau\;&omega\;&nu\;\, &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &epsilon\;&kappa\;&pi\;ό&rho\;&epsilon\;&upsilon\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Epsilon\;&nu\;ό&sigmaf\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &Pi\;&lambda\;&omega\;&tau\;ί&nu\;&omicron\;\, &tau\;&eta\; &mu\;&omicron\;&nu\;&iota\;&sigma\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &omicron\;&nu\;&tau\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;ί&alpha\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Sigma\;&pi\;&iota\;&nu\;ό&zeta\;&alpha\;\, &tau\;&eta\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&lambda\;&epsilon\;&kappa\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &kappa\;ί&nu\;&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Chi\;έ&gamma\;&kappa\;&epsilon\;&lambda\;\, &tau\;&eta\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;-&alpha\;&nu\;ή&kappa\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&nu\; &alpha\;&nu\;&theta\;&rho\;ώ&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &Epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &Chi\;ά&iota\;&nu\;&tau\;&epsilon\;&gamma\;&kappa\;&epsilon\;&rho\;\, &tau\;&eta\; «\;&sigma\;ά&rho\;&kappa\;&alpha\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &kappa\;ό&sigma\;&mu\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;»\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; Merleau-Ponty &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&delta\;&iota\;&kappa\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&iota\;&alpha\;&kappa\;ή &omicron\;&nu\;&tau\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;ί&alpha\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; Whitehead.
\n&Sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\; &kappa\;έ&nu\;&tau\;&rho\;&omicron\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ή&sigmaf\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &sigma\;&kappa\;έ&psi\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&pi\;&tau\;ύ&sigma\;&sigma\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &eta\; &Omicron\;&nu\;&tau\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;ί&alpha\; &Mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&mu\;ό&rho\;&phi\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\;&sigmaf\;\, &sigma\;ύ&mu\;&phi\;&omega\;&nu\;&alpha\; &mu\;&epsilon\; &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &omicron\;&pi\;&omicron\;ί&alpha\; &tau\;&omicron\; &Epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&delta\;&omicron\;&mu\;έ&nu\;&omicron\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &gamma\;&epsilon\;&nu\;&nu\;ά&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&chi\;&eta\;&mu\;&alpha\;&tau\;ί&zeta\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&rho\;&kappa\;ώ&sigmaf\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &epsilon\;&delta\;ώ &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&delta\;ύ&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &eta\; &Pi\;&omicron\;&iota\;&eta\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Kappa\;ό&sigma\;&mu\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &Kappa\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&mu\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &Pi\;&omicron\;ί&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\;\, &delta\;&eta\;&lambda\;&alpha\;&delta\;ή &omega\;&sigmaf\; &eta\; ί&delta\;&iota\;&alpha\; &eta\; &delta\;&eta\;&mu\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &pi\;&rho\;ά&xi\;&eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\; &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &omicron\;&pi\;&omicron\;ί&alpha\; &eta\; &pi\;&rho\;&alpha\;&gamma\;&mu\;&alpha\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;&omicron\;&pi\;&omicron\;&iota\;&epsilon\;ί&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;&omicron\;-&epsilon\;&kappa\;&delta\;&eta\;&lambda\;ώ&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\;. &Eta\; &pi\;&omicron\;&iota\;&eta\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ή &pi\;&eta\;&gamma\;ά&zeta\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &alpha\;&pi\;ό &tau\;&eta\; &delta\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&alpha\;&mu\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &sigma\;&chi\;έ&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &Alpha\;&beta\;ύ&sigma\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;\, &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Mu\;&eta\;&delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\;ό&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Pi\;&alpha\;&nu\;&tau\;ό&sigmaf\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&theta\;ώ&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Chi\;ά&omicron\;&upsilon\;&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &Tau\;ά&xi\;&eta\;&sigmaf\;\, ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &tau\;&omicron\; &Mu\;&eta\;&delta\;έ&nu\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &sigma\;&eta\;&mu\;&alpha\;ί&nu\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &alpha\;&nu\;&upsilon\;&pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&xi\;ί&alpha\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &delta\;&eta\;&mu\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &delta\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&alpha\;&tau\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;\, έ&nu\;&alpha\; &pi\;&rho\;&omicron\;-&omicron\;&nu\;&tau\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό &beta\;ά&theta\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&pi\;ό &tau\;&omicron\; &omicron\;&pi\;&omicron\;ί&omicron\; &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&delta\;ύ&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&omicron\; &Pi\;ά&nu\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&epsilon\;&chi\;ή&sigmaf\; &phi\;&alpha\;&nu\;έ&rho\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\;\, &epsilon\;&nu\;ώ &tau\;&omicron\; &Chi\;ά&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &alpha\;&pi\;&lambda\;ή &alpha\;&tau\;&alpha\;&xi\;ί&alpha\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &pi\;&epsilon\;&delta\;ί&omicron\; &Delta\;&eta\;&mu\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή&sigmaf\; &Alpha\;&beta\;&epsilon\;&beta\;&alpha\;&iota\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\;\, &eta\; &alpha\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&chi\;&tau\;ή &mu\;ή&tau\;&rho\;&alpha\; &tau\;&omega\;&nu\; &mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;ώ&nu\;\, &alpha\;&pi\;ό &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &omicron\;&pi\;&omicron\;ί&alpha\; &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&delta\;ύ&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &eta\; &Tau\;ά&xi\;&eta\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &pi\;&rho\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omega\;&rho\;&iota\;&nu\;ή &mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;&omicron\;&pi\;&omicron\;ί&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\;\, &gamma\;&iota\;&alpha\; &nu\;&alpha\; &epsilon\;&pi\;&iota\;&sigma\;&tau\;&rho\;έ&psi\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &pi\;ά&lambda\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\; &Chi\;ά&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &mu\;έ&sigma\;&alpha\; &sigma\;&epsilon\; έ&nu\;&alpha\;&nu\; &rho\;&upsilon\;&theta\;&mu\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;&omicron\;-&upsilon\;&pi\;&epsilon\;&rho\;&beta\;&alpha\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό &kappa\;ύ&kappa\;&lambda\;&omicron\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&mu\;ό&rho\;&phi\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\;&sigmaf\;\, &gamma\;&epsilon\;&gamma\;&omicron\;&nu\;ό&sigmaf\; &pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&alpha\;&nu\;&tau\;ά &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &eta\;&rho\;&alpha\;&kappa\;&lambda\;&epsilon\;ί&tau\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&alpha\; &alpha\;&rho\;&mu\;&omicron\;&nu\;ί&alpha\; &tau\;&omega\;&nu\; &alpha\;&nu\;&tau\;&iota\;&theta\;έ&tau\;&omega\;&nu\;\, &tau\;&omicron\; &delta\;&eta\;&mu\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό &chi\;ά&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Nu\;ί&tau\;&sigma\;&epsilon\;\, &tau\;&eta\; &zeta\;&omega\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &omicron\;&rho\;&mu\;ή &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Mu\;&pi\;&epsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;&kappa\;&sigma\;ό&nu\;\, &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &pi\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&lambda\;&alpha\;&pi\;&lambda\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Nu\;&tau\;&epsilon\;&lambda\;έ&zeta\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\; &sigma\;ύ&gamma\;&chi\;&rho\;&omicron\;&nu\;&eta\; &epsilon\;&pi\;&iota\;&sigma\;&tau\;&eta\;&mu\;&omicron\;&nu\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &kappa\;&alpha\;&tau\;&alpha\;&nu\;ό&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;&omicron\;-&omicron\;&rho\;&gamma\;ά&nu\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &Pi\;&rho\;ί&gamma\;&kappa\;&omicron\;&zeta\;&iota\;&nu\;.
\n&Mu\;έ&sigma\;&alpha\; &sigma\;&epsilon\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ή &tau\;&eta\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&delta\;&iota\;&kappa\;&alpha\;&sigma\;ί&alpha\;\, &omicron\; &Kappa\;ό&sigma\;&mu\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;&eta\;&chi\;&alpha\;&nu\;&iota\;&sigma\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό &sigma\;ύ&sigma\;&tau\;&eta\;&mu\;&alpha\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;&omicron\;-&pi\;&omicron\;&iota\;&eta\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &delta\;&eta\;&mu\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;ί&alpha\;\, &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &zeta\;&omega\;&nu\;&tau\;&alpha\;&nu\;ή &rho\;&omicron\;ή ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &tau\;&omicron\; ά&mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;&omicron\; &gamma\;ί&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;ή &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &eta\; &mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;ή &epsilon\;&pi\;&iota\;&sigma\;&tau\;&rho\;έ&phi\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\; ά&mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;&omicron\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; έ&tau\;&sigma\;&iota\; &eta\; ύ&pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&xi\;&eta\; &epsilon\;&mu\;&phi\;&alpha\;&nu\;ί&zeta\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &gamma\;&epsilon\;&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή\, &sigma\;&chi\;&epsilon\;&sigma\;&iota\;&alpha\;&kappa\;ή &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &pi\;&omicron\;&iota\;&eta\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή. &Eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;-&phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &sigma\;&tau\;ά&sigma\;&eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&tau\;&omicron\;&pi\;ί&zeta\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &tau\;&omicron\; &kappa\;έ&nu\;&tau\;&rho\;&omicron\; &alpha\;&pi\;ό &tau\;&eta\; &gamma\;&nu\;ώ&sigma\;&eta\; &pi\;&rho\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &tau\;&eta\; &Beta\;&iota\;&omega\;&mu\;&alpha\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &Sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\;\, ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &eta\; &alpha\;&lambda\;ή&theta\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&alpha\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &alpha\;&pi\;&lambda\;ώ&sigmaf\; &epsilon\;&nu\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &epsilon\;&mu\;&pi\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&rho\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&mu\;&mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&omicron\;&chi\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή\, &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&tau\;ά&sigma\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&eta\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\;&iota\;&sigma\;&mu\;&omicron\;ύ &mu\;&epsilon\; &tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &rho\;&upsilon\;&theta\;&mu\;ό &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &kappa\;ό&sigma\;&mu\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &epsilon\;&delta\;ώ &epsilon\;&mu\;&phi\;&alpha\;&nu\;ί&zeta\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &eta\; &Upsilon\;&pi\;έ&rho\;&beta\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &Gamma\;&lambda\;ώ&sigma\;&sigma\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&theta\;ώ&sigmaf\; &eta\; &alpha\;&lambda\;ή&theta\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&alpha\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &mu\;&pi\;&omicron\;&rho\;&epsilon\;ί &nu\;&alpha\; &pi\;&epsilon\;&rho\;&iota\;&omicron\;&rho\;&iota\;&sigma\;&tau\;&epsilon\;ί &sigma\;&epsilon\; &omicron\;&rho\;&iota\;&sigma\;&mu\;&omicron\;ύ&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &delta\;ό&gamma\;&mu\;&alpha\;&tau\;&alpha\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &beta\;&iota\;ώ&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; ά&mu\;&epsilon\;&sigma\;&eta\; &pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&sigma\;ί&alpha\;\, ό&pi\;&omega\;&sigmaf\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&phi\;&alpha\;ί&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &Sigma\;&omega\;&kappa\;&rho\;ά&tau\;&eta\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\; &phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &tau\;&rho\;ό&pi\;&omicron\; &zeta\;&omega\;ή&sigmaf\;\, &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&sigmaf\; &Sigma\;&tau\;&omega\;&iota\;&kappa\;&omicron\;ύ&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &tau\;έ&chi\;&nu\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &beta\;ί&omicron\;&upsilon\;\, &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &Zeta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\; &mu\;&eta\;-&epsilon\;&nu\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &epsilon\;&pi\;ί&gamma\;&nu\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\;\, &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; Wittgenstein &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&alpha\; ό&rho\;&iota\;&alpha\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &gamma\;&lambda\;ώ&sigma\;&sigma\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; Heidegger ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &eta\; &sigma\;&kappa\;έ&psi\;&eta\; &pi\;&lambda\;&eta\;&sigma\;&iota\;ά&zeta\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\; &sigma\;&iota\;&omega\;&pi\;ή &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\;. &Eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;-&phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\;\, &epsilon\;&pi\;&omicron\;&mu\;έ&nu\;&omega\;&sigmaf\;\, &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&gamma\;&kappa\;&rho\;&omicron\;&tau\;&epsilon\;ί &kappa\;&lambda\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&sigma\;&tau\;ό &sigma\;ύ&sigma\;&tau\;&eta\;&mu\;&alpha\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά έ&nu\;&alpha\;&nu\; &Alpha\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&chi\;&tau\;ό &Omicron\;&rho\;ί&zeta\;&omicron\;&nu\;&tau\;&alpha\;\, &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&rho\;&kappa\;ή &kappa\;ί&nu\;&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\; &pi\;&rho\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &tau\;&omicron\; Ά&pi\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&rho\;&omicron\; ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &eta\; &epsilon\;&nu\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &omicron\;&mu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&omicron\;&mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;ί&alpha\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &Kappa\;&alpha\;&theta\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &Epsilon\;&nu\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;/&Pi\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&lambda\;&alpha\;&pi\;&lambda\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;\, &delta\;&eta\;&lambda\;&alpha\;&delta\;ή &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &epsilon\;&nu\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &epsilon\;&kappa\;&delta\;&eta\;&lambda\;ώ&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;έ&sigma\;&alpha\; &alpha\;&pi\;ό &tau\;&eta\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&phi\;&omicron\;&rho\;&omicron\;&pi\;&omicron\;ί&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &pi\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&lambda\;&alpha\;&pi\;&lambda\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;\, &gamma\;&epsilon\;&gamma\;&omicron\;&nu\;ό&sigmaf\; &pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&delta\;έ&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;&epsilon\; &tau\;&eta\; &sigma\;ύ&mu\;&pi\;&tau\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&omega\;&nu\; &alpha\;&nu\;&tau\;&iota\;&theta\;έ&tau\;&omega\;&nu\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &Nu\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό&lambda\;&alpha\;&omicron\; &Kappa\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&zeta\;&alpha\;&nu\;ό\, &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &epsilon\;&xi\;&epsilon\;&lambda\;&iota\;&kappa\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &epsilon\;&nu\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; Teilhard de \;Chardin\, &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &pi\;&omicron\;&lambda\;ύ&pi\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&kappa\;&eta\; &sigma\;&kappa\;έ&psi\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; Morin\, &tau\;&eta\; &delta\;&eta\;&mu\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &phi\;&alpha\;&nu\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&iota\;&alpha\;&kappa\;ή &theta\;έ&sigma\;&mu\;&iota\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; Castoriadis &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\; &phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &pi\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&lambda\;&alpha\;&pi\;&lambda\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; Deleuze.
\n&Sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\; &beta\;&alpha\;&theta\;ύ&tau\;&epsilon\;&rho\;&omicron\; &epsilon\;&pi\;ί&pi\;&epsilon\;&delta\;&omicron\;\, &eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;-&phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\; &omicron\;&delta\;&eta\;&gamma\;&epsilon\;ί &sigma\;&tau\;&eta\; &Sigma\;&iota\;&omega\;&pi\;&eta\;&lambda\;ή &Epsilon\;&pi\;ί&gamma\;&nu\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\;\, ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &eta\; &gamma\;&nu\;ώ&sigma\;&eta\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &pi\;&lambda\;έ&omicron\;&nu\; &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&lambda\;&upsilon\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&chi\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&sigma\;ί&alpha\; &mu\;έ&sigma\;&alpha\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\; &Mu\;&upsilon\;&sigma\;&tau\;ή&rho\;&iota\;&omicron\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &epsilon\;&delta\;ώ &eta\; &phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&tau\;&rho\;έ&pi\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&epsilon\; &sigma\;&tau\;ά&sigma\;&eta\; &delta\;έ&omicron\;&upsilon\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&pi\;έ&nu\;&alpha\;&nu\;&tau\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\; ά&rho\;&rho\;&eta\;&tau\;&omicron\;\, ό&pi\;&omega\;&sigmaf\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; Pascal &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&sigmaf\; &lambda\;ό&gamma\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&sigmaf\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&rho\;&delta\;&iota\;ά&sigmaf\;\, &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; Meister Eckhart &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &epsilon\;&sigma\;&omega\;&tau\;&epsilon\;&rho\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &sigma\;&iota\;&omega\;&pi\;ή\, &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; Levinas &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&omicron\; ά&pi\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&rho\;&omicron\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; Ά&lambda\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; Blanchot &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&omicron\; ό&rho\;&iota\;&omicron\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &gamma\;&lambda\;ώ&sigma\;&sigma\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\;. Έ&tau\;&sigma\;&iota\;\, &eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;-&phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &sigma\;&kappa\;έ&psi\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Kappa\;&alpha\;&rho\;&pi\;&omicron\;ύ&zeta\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&delta\;ύ&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &omicron\;&nu\;&tau\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;ί&alpha\; &delta\;&eta\;&mu\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή&sigmaf\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&mu\;ό&rho\;&phi\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ό&chi\;&rho\;&omicron\;&nu\;&alpha\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &upsilon\;&pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&xi\;&iota\;&alpha\;&kappa\;ό&sigmaf\; &tau\;&rho\;ό&pi\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &zeta\;&omega\;ή&sigmaf\;\, ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &eta\; &pi\;&rho\;&alpha\;&gamma\;&mu\;&alpha\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &alpha\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&chi\;&tau\;ή\, &sigma\;&chi\;&epsilon\;&sigma\;&iota\;&alpha\;&kappa\;ή &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &pi\;&omicron\;&iota\;&eta\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή\, &eta\; &gamma\;&nu\;ώ&sigma\;&eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;ώ&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&epsilon\; &sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\;\, &eta\; &epsilon\;&nu\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &phi\;&alpha\;&nu\;&epsilon\;&rho\;ώ&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &pi\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&lambda\;&alpha\;&pi\;&lambda\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &omicron\; ά&nu\;&theta\;&rho\;&omega\;&pi\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&lambda\;&epsilon\;ί&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &nu\;&alpha\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;έ&chi\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&delta\;&eta\;&tau\;ά &sigma\;&tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &kappa\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&mu\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&delta\;&iota\;&kappa\;&alpha\;&sigma\;ί&alpha\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &delta\;&eta\;&mu\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;ί&alpha\;&sigmaf\;\, &beta\;&iota\;ώ&nu\;&omicron\;&nu\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\; &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &Alpha\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&chi\;&tau\;ή &Omicron\;&lambda\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&delta\;&iota\;ά&kappa\;&omicron\;&pi\;&eta\; &kappa\;ί&nu\;&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;έ&sigma\;&alpha\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\; ά&pi\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&rho\;&omicron\; &mu\;&upsilon\;&sigma\;&tau\;ή&rho\;&iota\;&omicron\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; ύ&pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&xi\;&eta\;&sigmaf\;.
ORGANIZER;CN=Abhijith Jose: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260429T210000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20261126T170000 SUMMARY:Séminaire Arendt 2026 UID:20261024T121836Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:Le Ré\;seau Arendtien Francophone\, cré\;é\; en 2024\, vise à\; favoriser une synergie entre celles et ceux qui\, des amateurs aux chercheuses\, fré\;quentent la pensé\;e de Hannah Arendt. Dans cette optique\, nous cherchons à\; mettre en place un rendez-vous ré\;gulier pour en discuter les diffé\;rents interpré\;tations et aspects.
\nDu fait de l&rsquo\;é\;tendue de la francophonie\, ces sé\;minaires auront lieu en ligne. Leur principe sera le suivant : les participant-e-s auront tous et toutes pré\;alablement lu un article ou un chapitre ré\;cent\, lequel sera pré\;senté\; trè\;s rapidement par souci de prioriser les é\;changes (10 minutes) par son autrice ou auteur. À\; partir de celui-ci\, un-e membre du ré\;seau ouvrira (5 min) à\; un dé\;bat plus large afin de discuter\, outre l&rsquo\;article\, les diffé\;rents interpré\;tations et aspects de l&rsquo\;&oelig\;uvre d&rsquo\;Arendt (1h30).
\nProgramme 2026\nEn 2026\, nous proposons quatre sé\;ances ordinaires du sé\;minaire et une sé\;ance spé\;ciale : «\; Arendt et la science é\;conomique »\;\, «\; Arendt et le travail »\;\, «\; Liberté\;\, volonté\;\, politique »\;\, «\; Arendt et la violence »\;\, «\; Philosophie\, é\;ducation et politique »\;.
\nLe sé\;minaire est ouvert à\; toutes et tous sans inscription pré\;alable \; n&rsquo\;hé\;sitez pas à\; venir y assister et y participer. Les articles et textes discuté\;s sont disponibles sur le site du RAF. N&rsquo\;hé\;sitez pas non plus à\; nous contacter pour toute demande d&rsquo\;information complé\;mentaire.
\nLe RAF ?\nLe Ré\;seau Arendtien Francophone (RAF) se veut un espace divers et pluriel\, rassemblant une communauté\; de doctorant-e-s\, enseignant-e-s\, chercheurs/ses\, intellectuel-le-s et toute personne inté\;ressé\;e ou engagé\;e dans l'é\;tude et la diffusion de la pensé\;e d'Hannah Arendt en France et le monde francophone. À\; travers cette plateforme\, nous souhaitons favoriser les é\;changes intellectuels\, offrir une visibilité\; accrue aux travaux de recherche et cré\;er des liens solides entre francophones s'inté\;ressant à\; et puisant dans l'&oelig\;uvre de cette autrice majeure du XXe siè\;cle.
\nOutre l&rsquo\;organisation de ce sé\;minaire et d'é\;vè\;nements acadé\;miques lié\;s à\; la pensé\;e d'Arendt\, le ré\;seau actualise continuellement un site web qui met à\; disposition : une bibliographie des textes de langue franç\;aise consacré\;s à\; Arendt ou la mobilisant\, un annuaire des membres du ré\;seau\, un agenda des activité\;s francophones qui lui sont dé\;dié\;es et une lettre d'information mensuelle.
\nN'hé\;sitez pas à\; rejoindre le ré\;seau ou à\; nous contacter pour rejoindre l&rsquo\;é\;quipe d&rsquo\;animation !
\n ORGANIZER;CN="Rémi Zanni": METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20260604T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20261024T170000 SUMMARY:Stanley Cavell at 100. An International Centennial Conference UID:20261024T121837Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:Europe/Paris LOCATION:Roma\; Paris\; Boston\, Italy DESCRIPTION:Stanley Cavell at 100 \; An International Centennial Conference \; \;
Paris: \;4-5 June 2026 \;| Organized by Sandra Laugier\, Université\; Paris 1 Panthé\;on Sorbonne \; Rome: 8-9 June 2026 \;| Organized by Piergiorgio Donatelli\, Sapienza Università\; di Roma \; Boston: 23-24 October 2026 \;| Organized by Juliet Floyd\, Boston University \; \; \;
In 2026\, we mark the centenary of \;Stanley Cavell (1926&ndash\;2026)\, one of the \;most original and wide-ranging American philosophers of the twentieth century. Cavell&rsquo\;s work traversed traditional disciplinary boundaries&mdash\;engaging deeply with philosophy\, literature\, film\, opera\, psychoanalysis\, politics\, and both American and European traditions of thought. In the spirit of his intellectual breadth and transnational sensibility\, we are organizing a three-part international conference to celebrate his life\, work\, and legacy in Paris\, Rome\, and Boston.
\nWhy This Conference Matters
\nStanley Cavell transformed philosophy into an act of acknowledgment&mdash\;of self\, of others\, and of the everyday. His writings on skepticism\, language\, film\, and the ordinary remain vital at a time when trust in both language and human connection faces renewed challenges. From \;Must We Mean What We Say? \;to \;The Claim of Reason\, from \;The World Viewed \;to \;Pursuits of Happiness\, and through his readings of Emerson and Thoreau\, Cavell helped redefine the scope and style of philosophical writing and teaching.
\nHis engagement with Wittgenstein and Austin reinvigorated the ordinary language tradition\, while his interests in modernism\, cinema\, and American transcendentalism forged a philosophical voice that responded to&mdash\;and often transcended&mdash\;the academic context.
\nThis centennial conference will bring together philosophers\, literary scholars\, and critics to reflect on Cavell&rsquo\;s legacy and extend the conversations he began.
\nThis call for papers concerns all three installments&mdash\;Paris\, Rome\, and Boston&mdash\;of the Cavell at 100 conference.
\nSuggested Themes:
\nWe welcome proposals that engage with the following themes or propose new directions for exploring Cavell&rsquo\;s thought.
\nConference Foci:
\nParis will focus especially on Ordinary Language Philosophy\, Film\, and Popular Culture.
\nRome will center mainly on Ethics\, Politics\, and Forms of Life.
\nBoston will treat primarily Philosophy and Literature\, Tragedy\, Music\, and the Idea of America.
\nSome themes&mdash\;such as skepticism\, modernism\, the ordinary&mdash\;cut across all three conferences.
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=America/Chicago:20260817T090000 DTEND;TZID=America/Chicago:20261204T170000 SUMMARY:Fall 2026 Tulane German Philosophy Workshop Series UID:20261024T121838Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:America/Chicago LOCATION:New Orleans\, United States DESCRIPTION:The Tulane German Philosophy Workshop is based out of Tulane University&rsquo\;s Philosophy department. It is aimed at promoting the discussion of scholarship about the German philosophical tradition and the establishment of relations between philosophers and departments that focus on the German philosophical tradition. It welcomes scholars interested in the many ways to engage with this rich tradition and the specific projects and concerns of its many representatives&mdash\;from Leibniz to Wittgenstein\, Kant to Gadamer\, Hegel to Habermas&mdash\;as well as the reception of this tradition.
ORGANIZER;CN=Jeffrey Patrick Colgan;CN=Nicolas Day: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260901T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20261215T170000 SUMMARY:Inquiry Network WIP Talks UID:20261024T121839Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:The Inquiry Network WIP Talks feature presentations of work in progress related to inquiry\, broadly understood. For example\, presentations might discuss (but are not limited to): the epistemology of inquiry\, the metaphysics of inquiry\, ethical norms of inquiry\, historical perspectives on inquiry\, or the structure of scientific inquiry.
We aim to foster the sharing of ideas in an inclusive\, welcoming and low-pressure environment. Papers that are already accepted for publication will not be accepted. We aim to be sensitive to the needs of early-career scholars.
The group meets biweekly on Zoom during each of the Fall and Spring semesters. Meeting times are determined shortly before the beginning of each semester with the goal of finding a time that works for as many members as possible. Special consideration is given to finding a meeting time that works for presenters of accepted papers.
Applications are open for Foundations and Frontiers of Analytical Sociology\, a doctoral-level course hosted by Institute for Analytical Sociology\, Linkö\;ping University. The course is organized around an international lecture series featuring many of the scholars who have shaped analytical sociology and continue to define its contemporary development.
\nConfirmed speakers include:
\nPeter Bearman\, Delia Baldassarri\, Elizabeth Bruch\, Damon Centola\, Diego Gambetta\, Peter Hedströ\;m\, Gianluca Manzo\, Michael Macy\, Arnout van de Rijt\, Duncan Watts\, and Petri Ylikoski.
\nThe course explores central questions concerning social mechanisms\, explanation\, social interaction\, networks\, diffusion\, collective action\, computational social science\, and the relationship between theory and empirical research. Particular attention is devoted to the role of mechanism-based explanations in the social sciences and to philosophical questions concerning explanation\, causation\, and social scientific inquiry.
\nThe lecture series is accompanied by readings and highly participatory seminars in which participants critically discuss the lectures\, the assigned literature\, and connections to their own research. The course culminates in an individual paper in which participants develop an independent analysis of a research question using the theories\, concepts\, and explanatory models discussed throughout the course. Participants are encouraged to connect this assignment directly to their doctoral projects.
\nThe course is open to doctoral students and researchers from sociology\, philosophy\, political science\, economics\, computational social science\, and related disciplines.
\nFor more information\, contact the course organizer and seminar leader \;Josef Ginnerskov at josef.ginnerskov(at)liu.se
\nSyllabus:
https://forskarstudier.liu.se/en/kurs/7FIEI26/2026V/1624499#syllabus
Registration:
https://forms.cloud.microsoft/e/eFsbLUXnfk
Join us for a weekly close reading of Gramsci&rsquo\;s Prison Notebooks! The group has a twofold goal: first\, to analyze contemporary political events through the categories formulated in the text\; and second\, to critically examine potential blind spots in Gramsci&rsquo\;s work regarding race\, gender\, and empire\, while keeping in mind the historical context in which he wrote.
TIME
THURSDAYS: weekly\, beginning September 24\, 2026.
5-6 PM Eastern US Time.
FACILITATOR
Giusi \;Russo is an associate professor of History at Montgomery County Community College in the greater Philadelphia area. Her research focuses on the relationship between the Italian left and internal colonialism\, as well as the entanglements between bodies and European empires. She is the author of \;Women\, Empires\, and Body Politics at the United Nations\, 1946&ndash\;1975 \;(University of Nebraska Press\, 2023) and has published extensively on the colonial history of the United Nations and on the construction of colonial and post-colonial narratives. She is currently working on a book project under contract with Routledge\, titled\, \;The Aesthetics of Third-Worldism in Italy: Bodies\, Spaces\, and Oppression.
ABOUT INCITE SEMINARS
We are a mix of rogue scholars\, disgruntled academics\, disenchanted buddhists\, enchantment-hungry anarchists\, radical therapists\, and general weirdos looking to create autonomous and accessible forms of &ldquo\;higher education.&rdquo\;
We offer online seminars and reading groups to incite personal exploration and inspire community action. Incite Seminars offers an educational experience. We do so by gathering an engaged group of participants for a dynamic exchange of ideas\, led by skilled facilitators. All of our facilitators have a deep relationship to a subject or topic through intensive study or practice.
Incite Seminars is a 100% member-supported learning community. We depend on member contributions to continue holding space for radical study and practice groups\, putting on rigorous seminars and courses\, and providing our facilitators and organizers with fair compensation. If you are unable to pay the full amount for a session or membership at this time\, we invite you to join us at reduced or no cost with our Solidarity option.
Call for Abstracts for The Zicklin Center Normative Business Ethics Workshop Series
\nOver the 2026-2027 academic year\, the Zicklin Center for Governance and Business Ethics at the Wharton School\, University of Pennsylvania\, will convene a regular works-in-progress series for scholars working in normative business ethics (NBE). In particular\, the Series will workshop papers pursuing business ethics issues from a normative perspective\, or papers in moral or political philosophy with implications for the market\, distributive justice\, labor relations\, the role of business in society\, etc.
\nWorkshop Objectives
\nThe Series is part of an effort to foster normative business ethics in the academy and the public sphere. This particular initiative has two key objectives: First\, it endeavors to provide a regular forum for scholars working on business ethics from a normative perspective. The community of such scholars is relatively small\, and dispersed across numerous institutions\, and there are few opportunities for these individuals to convene and share work. This Series is an effort to connect these scholars and to enrich their shared intellectual life. Second\, the Series aims to be especially valuable to junior faculty and advanced graduate students\, by providing them with feedback from\, and opportunities to interact with\, more established members of the normative business ethics community. To that end\, we hope to have (at least) one junior author and one senior author at each session.
\nWorkshop Format
\nThe workshop will meet six times over the academic year. Any academic or practitioner with an interest in normative business ethics is invited to attend the sessions. Attendees are expected to read the papers in advance\, and to come with feedback for the paper authors. To maximize the opportunity for paper improvement\, authors will not present their papers\; we will instead spend our time together on questions and comments for the author.
\nSessions will be held on Fridays\, beginning at 1:00 pm unless otherwise indicated. We will discuss two to three papers at each session. Attendees are expected to read the papers in advance\, and to come prepared to offer feedback.
\nWe plan to hold all sessions in-person\, on the campus of the University of Pennsylvania\, in Philadelphia.
\nSession Dates:
\nSeptember 25th\, 2026
\nOctober 30th\, 2026
\nJanuary 29th\, 2027
\nFebruary 26th\, 2027
\nMarch 19th\, 2027
\nApril 16th\, 2027
\nCall for Abstracts
\nWe invite abstract submissions from \;faculty and post-docs\, and from graduate students who have advanced to the ABD stage. \;Preferential treatment will be given to those who have not presented work at the Series before\, and we especially welcome submissions from women and under-represented minorities.
\nThe abstract should propose a paper in normative business ethics\, as described above. We ask that submissions offer a fairly detailed sense of the paper without exceeding 500 words.
\nWe ask that applicants identify three of the above dates\, in order of preference\, at which they would like to present their work. Please send your abstract to Brian Berkey &ndash\; bberkey@wharton.upenn.edu -- by July 15th\, 2026. Individuals will be notified about whether their paper has been selected for presentation by August 3rd\, 2026.
\nInformation for Selected Authors
\nThe Zicklin Center will cover reasonable travel and accommodation expenses for paper authors for the session at which their paper will be discussed.
\nReimbursement for travel expenses is subject to two conditions. By accepting the offer to workshop a paper\, the paper author pledges that:
\n1. \; \; \; \; The paper they will share is at a stage of development where the author can incorporate feedback gained at the workshop (e.g.\, the paper is not yet in page proofs or in print)\; and
\n2. \; \; \; \; The paper author will send their draft paper to the organizers no fewer than 14 days before their presentation date.
\nFor co-authored papers\, we can ordinarily only provide travel funding for one of the authors\, though other co-authors are welcome to attend.
\nPlease address any questions about the CFA or the workshop to one of the organizers: Brian Berkey (bberkey@wharton.upenn.edu)\, Amy Sepinwall (sepin@wharton.upenn.edu)\, Julian Jonker (jonker@wharton.upenn.edu)\, or Paul Forrester (pforr@wharton.upenn.edu).
ORGANIZER;CN=Brian Berkey;CN=Amy J. Sepinwall;CN=Julian Jonker;CN=Paul Forrester: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20261001T000000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20270630T170000 SUMMARY:STAL Seminar UID:20261024T121843Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:Slurring Terms Across Languages (STAL) is an international and interdisciplinary network whose primary aim is to promote work on slurs\, pejoratives\, expressives and evaluative terms in general\, from languages that have been seldom discussed in the recent philosophical and semantic literature\, and in particular\, from sign languages and non-Indo-European languages. Its main aim is to bring to light new empirical data and uncover novel interesting phenomena that may have the potential to challenge current theories. Empirical studies of the expressions mentioned from such languages\, comparisons with English slurs\, as well as wider cross-linguistic approaches and developments of extant theories in application to the new data or previously neglected phenomena are encouraged too.
\nThe network's coordinators are Isidora Stojanovic (Pompeu Fabra University/CNRS-Institut Jean Nicod) &\; Dan Zeman (University of Porto). More information about the network and its activities can be found at https://sites.google.com/view/stalnetwork. To contact the network coordinators\, please write to stalnetwork@gmail.com.
\nThe STAL Seminar features monthly\, online talks by researchers tackling issues related to the study of slurs\, pejoratives\, expressives and evaluative terms in general\, from less studied languages. The meetings in the 2026-2027 academic year take place on MONDAYS\, 14:30-16:00 Central European Time (CET). The list of speakers is the following (exact dates and titles to be provided soon):
\n- OCTOBER 12\, 2026: Martina Wiltschko (ICREA/Pompeu Fabra University)
\n- NOVEMBER 30\, 2026: Daniel James (Technical University Berlin)
\n- DECEMBER 14\, 2026: Jennifer Saul (University of Waterloo)
\n- JANUARY 2027: Muhammad Owais Raza (Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University) \;
\n- FEBRUARY 2027: Chris Cousens (University of Glasgow)
\n- MARCH 2027: Jessica Keiser (University of North Carolina)
\n- APRIL 19\, 2027: Cornelia Loos (University of Cologne)
\n- MAY 2027: Marcin Lewiński (NOVA University of Lisbon)
\n- JUNE 2027: TBA.
ORGANIZER;CN=Isidora Stojanovic;CN=Dan Zeman: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Bucharest:20261001T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Bucharest:20270731T170000 SUMMARY:DFT-CELFIS research seminar\, University of Bucharest UID:20261024T121844Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:Europe/Bucharest LOCATION:Splaiul Independenței 204\, Bucharest\, Romania DESCRIPTION:We're delighted to invite you to the research seminar of the Department of Theoretical Philosophy at the University of Bucharest. These are organized in partnership with CELFIS\, the Center for Logic\, Philosophy and History of Science at UB. For details\, don't hesitate to reach out at andrei.marasoiu@filosofie.unibuc.ro.
\nFall 2026
\nOctober 27\, 5pm: Bradley Armour-Garb (State University of New York at Albany\, f2f)\, \;"A Pretense Account of Property-Talk for Property Deflationists"
\nNovember 17\, 4pm: Cătălin Teoharie &\; Nansi Lungu (University of Bucharest\, f2f)\, "What is Consciousness? A View from Predictive Processing"
\nNovember 24\, 5pm: Matt Duncan (Rhode Island College\, hybrid)\, \;"Experiencing Ourselves in the World"
\nDecember 8\, 4pm: Andreea Eșanu (New Europe College\, f2f)\, "A defeasible and relational account of epistemic trust? &ndash\; Some reflections on the epistemology of deep-learning AI"
\nDecember 14\, 9am: Michael Kirchhoff (University of Wollongong\, hybrid)\, "Idealization\, Computation and Cognition"
\nSpring 2027
\nPii Telakivi (University of Helsinki)
\nMiklos Redei (London School of Economics)
\nPrevious events in the series are available at: \;
\n2021-22: https://philevents.org/event/show/93365 \;
\n2022-23: https://philevents.org/event/show/105249 \;
\n2023-24: \;https://philevents.org/event/show/115878
\n2024-25: \;https://philevents.org/event/show/127766
\n2025-26: https://philevents.org/event/show/141649
\nhttps://filosofie.unibuc.ro/category/seminar-cercetare-dft/ \;
\nhttps://icub.unibuc.ro/2022/06/14/workshop-semantic-cognition-and-truth/ \;
\nFor those of you who would like to join some of the meetings but have overlapping commitments\, we will do our best to record the meetings whenever everyone in attendance consents to it\, and to then upload the recordings on the Department's YouTube channel. Previous talks are available here:
\nhttps://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOgUq3dN8CXI4L6DhZT1f_Q
\nStay tuned\, as there will be weekly announcements concerning the titles and abstracts of upcoming talks on the Facebook page titled "Seminarul Departamentului de Filosofie Teoretica UniBuc". \;
\nhttps://www.facebook.com/p/Seminarul-Departamentului-de-Filosofie-Teoretica-UniBuc-100063082908977/
ORGANIZER;CN="Andrei Mărăşoiu": METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20261001T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20270430T170000 SUMMARY:Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence: Foundations\, Challenges and Applications UID:20261024T121845Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:Europe/Warsaw LOCATION:Krakow\, Poland DESCRIPTION:We are living in a breakthrough period of human history. The dynamic development of artificial intelligence\, its application to successive areas of our lives: science\, industry\, education\, culture\, and everyday life\, makes us face a range of practical challenges as well as questions about this phenomenon that we do not understand. Questions concerning intelligence\, cognition\, agency\, responsibility\, truth\, ethics\, and the future of humanity have become central to understanding the role of AI in contemporary society. We recommend participation in our Program: \;Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence: Foundations\, Challenges and Applications to all those who want to understand and become familiar with this new form of intelligence and reflect on how our lives may change with its emergence.
ORGANIZER;CN=Roman Krzanowski: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20261001T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20270531T170000 SUMMARY:UK XPHI Online: 2026 Series UID:20261024T121846Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:We are delighted to announce the next series of UK XPHI Online. This is a monthly online workshop devoted to discussion of work in progress in experimental philosophy (broadly construed). We feature work from all areas of experimental philosophy\, by researchers at all career stages\, from the UK and all over the world. The workshop meets once a month on Teams\, typically the second Wednesday of each month (16:00-18:00 UK time)\, for a two-hour session that typically features two talks (each 40 minutes plus 15 minutes Q&\;A). \;
\nOct 14\, 16-18 UK
\nRedesigning Ethical Thought Experiments: Reassessing the Experimental Challenge to Moral Intuition\, Pietro Tunesi (Trinity College Dublin)
\nWhat people (don't) want to know in the moral domain\, Jordan Wylie (Cornell University)\, Nathan Liang (Cornell University)\, and Charlotte Austin (Cornell University)
\nNov 11\, 16-18 UK
\nMoral Encroachment and Doxastic Wronging: An Experimental Investigation\, Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen (Aarhus University)\, Kevin Reuter (University of Gothenburg)\, Somogy Varga (Aarhus University)\,
\n(CANCELLED) The Side-Effect Effect and &ldquo\;Intentionally&rdquo\;\, Lilian O&rsquo\;Brien (Tampere University\, University of Helsinki)\, Svetlana Vetchinnikova (University of Helsinki).
\nDec 9\, 16-18 UK
\nMischaracterization Objection 2.0\, David Bordonaba-Plou (Universidad Complutense de Madrid)\, Krzysztof Sękowski (University of Warsaw)
\nFrom Thought Experiments to Experimental Evidence: Transparency and Quality of Reporting in Experimental Philosophy: Bartosz Maćkiewicz (University of Warsaw)\, Katarzyna Kuś (University of Warsaw)\, Joanna Gęgotek (University of Warsaw)\, Monika Gurak (University of Warsaw)\, and Franciszek Kittel (University of Warsaw).
\nJan 13\, 16-18 UK
\nNARRABODY: Narrative and Body in Post-Stroke Selfhood. A Longitudinal Qualitative Study\, Camille Lé\;pingle (ENS de Lyon)
\nA cross-cultural\, qualitative study on HPV vaccination intention\, Konrad Henne (University of Heidelberg)\, Alejandra Petino Zappala (Ruhr University Bochum)\, Nora Heinzelmann (University of Heidelberg)
\nFeb 10\, 16-18 UK
\nDo subjects have revelation intuitions?\, Marcus Ashby (King&rsquo\;s College London)
\nCorrect\, incorrect\, or neither? Demonstrating and explaining variation in folk normative objectivism\, Mikló\;s Kü\;rthy (University of Graz)\, Geoffrey Goodwin (University of Pennsylvania)\, Paulo Sousa (Queen's University Belfast).
\nTo submit for future series\, please email the organizers an abstract of up to 500 words by Dec 15\, 2026 to james.andow@manchester.ac.uk.
\nThis series is organised by:
\nEugen Fischer (UEA)
\nJoanna Demaree-Cotton (Oxford)
\nJames Andow (Manchester)
ORGANIZER;CN=James Andow;CN=Joanna Demaree-Cotton;CN=Eugen Fischer: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20261004T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20261025T170000 SUMMARY:(Un)Timely Blanchot UID:20261024T121847Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:a 4-session seminar with Philippe Lynes\, Alex Obrigewitsch\, Kim Schoof &\; Carlos A. Segovia
SEMINAR DESCRIPTION
Blanchot&rsquo\;s work delves into how thinking and writing both reflect and un-reflect our relation to life and death\, challenging conventional notions of presence and temporality. By tracing his influence on Derrida and Nancy\, and exploring the simultaneous timeliness and untimeliness of his thought\, we can ask how reading Blanchot today continues to transform our understanding of language\, life\, and being.
Session I (&ldquo\;Blanchot Today?\,&rdquo\; with Alex Obrigewitsch) will explore Blanchot&rsquo\;s considerations of writing and literature in their exposure of alterity\, disturbance of temporality\, and their inscription of the anonymous and impersonal&mdash\;for it is the ineluctable binding of writing and mortality which Blanchot has exposed to us\, suspending &ldquo\;today&rdquo\; in the double exposure of a coming future which intersects with a &ldquo\;terrifyingly ancient&rdquo\; past. The title of this opening session\, expresses the double question of the (un)timeliness of Blanchot&rsquo\;s work. If we agree with Jacques Derrida&rsquo\;s claim that &ldquo\;never as much as today have I imagined him so far ahead of us as today. Awaiting us\, still to come\, to be read\, to be reread by those very same ones that do it ever since they knew how to read and thanks to him\,&rdquo\; then it is from Blanchot &ldquo\;himself&rdquo\; that we might learn the double sense of our titular question. What can Blanchot teach us that bears the mark of today? Blanchot has never been more timely to read and think with than today\, insofar as &ldquo\;today&rdquo\; is only ever the mobile limit inscribed between a future to come and a past never present. There is no &ldquo\;today\,&rdquo\; no &ldquo\;contemporaneity&rdquo\; for literature\, and its very writing alters our relation to life\, suspending it in a void from whence all emerges and in which all must efface itself.
Session II (&ldquo\;Blanchot &\; Derrida\,&rdquo\; with Philippe Lynes) will\, for its part\, trace the history of Blanchot&rsquo\;s influence on Derrida\, as well as instances of a reciprocal influence in Blanchot&rsquo\;s own work. When discussing the &lsquo\;violent&rsquo\; relationship of deconstruction to its three biggest influences&mdash\;Martin Heidegger\, Emmanuel Levinas and Maurice Blanchot&mdash\;Jacques Derrida explains that Blanchot resists this violence best. In the final interview before his death\, Derrida insisted that a notion of &lsquo\;survivance&rsquo\; or &lsquo\;living-on&rsquo\; lay at the heart of his entire philosophical trajectory\, evoking Blanchot&rsquo\;s notion of &ldquo\;a survival which is not one\, a death which does not put an end to anything.&rdquo\; Derrida&rsquo\;s most sustained engagement with Blanchot takes place in the mid 1970s with the publication of &ldquo\;Pas\,&rdquo\; as well as the second year of his just-published La Chose seminar (1975-1977). Blanchot&rsquo\;s thought also features importantly in &ldquo\;Discourses of the End&rdquo\;&mdash\;Derrida&rsquo\;s 1983 conversations on the apocalypse and the disaster with Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe and Jean-Luc Nancy\, as well as his final seminar\, The Beast and the Sovereign (2002-2003).
In turn\, Session III (&ldquo\;Blanchot &\; Nancy\,&rdquo\; with Kim Schoof) will explore how it is possible that such contrasting perspectives on literature and the experience it offers us of being&rsquo\;s origin emanate from one another. It will do so exploring how Blanchot and Nancy write (occasionally in direct response to one another) about literature\, community\, ontology and &ldquo\;the neuter.&rdquo\; For Blanchot\, literature opens us onto the &ldquo\;Outside&rdquo\; where being originates\, where &ldquo\;I am not [&hellip\;]\; no one is there\, but the impersonal is: the outside\, as that which prevents\, precedes\, and dissolves the possibility of any personal relation.&rdquo\; Yet\, it is Blanchot&rsquo\;s perspective on literature that has inspired Jean-Luc Nancy to view literature as an exemplary way of being in the world. In Nancy&rsquo\;s perspective\, literature is the &ldquo\;coming of the world&rdquo\; or\, in the words of Aukje van Rooden\, &ldquo\;the point at which connections are made\, in which (the world) is created as being\, time and again\, a set of relations in which and by which we live.&rdquo\;
Lastly\, Session IV (&ldquo\;Blanchot Unreceived\,&rdquo\; with Carlos A. Segovia) will focus on how Blanchot seems to approach the question of the relation between language and reality à\; rebours of much contemporary thought\, which\, in repudiating their once-assumed transparency\, tends instead to affirm their reciprocal opacity. For Blanchot\, however\, language is neither the thing named nor its mere absence\, but the tentative recovery of its presence through its very loss\; just as in Mallarmé\;&rsquo\;s &ldquo\;Sonnet in -yx\,&rdquo\; for instance\, anguish is neither the one felt in the chest by the poet&mdash\;which lacks a voice and hence proves at once present to him as something real but absent due to its silence&mdash\;nor the one named through the universal notion that would conventionally be assigned to it&mdash\;before whose trivial presence the anguish thus felt would recede into absence: it is rather that thing of hard (whether white or black) &ldquo\;nails&rdquo\; like &ldquo\;onyx&rdquo\; by virtue of which word and world become mutually supplementary and translucent to one another. This will be examined both at the crossroads of today&rsquo\;s thought\, thinkable\, and unthought and along with Blanchot&rsquo\;s re-inscription of being as otherness.
TIME
5 SUNDAYS\, weekly\, beginning October 4\, 2026.
10:00-12:00 Eastern US Time.
SESSIONS
1) Blanchot Today?
The Interminable Default\, Between a Coming Future and a &ldquo\;Terrifyingly Ancient&rdquo\; Past with Alex Obrigewitsch
2) Blanchot &\; Derrida
La Mort La Chose
with Philippe Lynes
3) Blanchot &\; Nancy
Literature: Being (In and) Outside (of the World)
with Kim Schoof
4) Blanchot Unreceived
Transparency\, Opaqueness\, Translucence
with Carlos A. Segovia
ABOUT INCITE SEMINARS
We are a mix of rogue scholars\, disgruntled academics\, disenchanted buddhists\, enchantment-hungry anarchists\, radical therapists\, and general weirdos looking to create autonomous and accessible forms of &ldquo\;higher education.&rdquo\;
We offer online seminars and reading groups to incite personal exploration and inspire community action. Incite Seminars offers an educational experience. We do so by gathering an engaged group of participants for a dynamic exchange of ideas\, led by skilled facilitators. All of our facilitators have a deep relationship to a subject or topic through intensive study or practice.
Incite Seminars is a 100% member-supported learning community. We depend on member contributions to continue holding space for radical study and practice groups\, putting on rigorous seminars and courses\, and providing our facilitators and organizers with fair compensation. If you are unable to pay the full amount for a session or membership at this time\, we invite you to join us at reduced or no cost with our Solidarity option.
Computational methods and simulations have become a fruitful methodology for philosophers\, particularly for understanding how social relations\, norms\, and communicative structures could and should shape inquiry. Work in computational social philosophy has illuminated phenomena ranging from the epistemic value of diversity and the dynamics of epistemic belonging to the emergence and erosion of norms and processes of polarization.
\nGenerative and agentic AI tools stand to profoundly reshape computational social philosophy in at least two ways:
\nAs objects of study for computational social philosophy. Generative and agentic AI are increasingly embedded in epistemic life: as sources of information\, interlocutors\, surrogates for social participants\, gatekeepers within epistemic communities\, and even partially autonomous epistemic actors. This should motivate a broadening of purview in social epistemology\, which has tended to focus primarily on personal\, interpersonal\, and institutional factors that impact inquiry\, but comparatively less on technological factors. \;
\nAs tools of study for computational social philosophy. These systems can lower the technical barriers to computational work. More interestingly\, they may expand the range of social phenomena philosophers can model\, including richer representations of agents&rsquo\; beliefs and behavior\, more complex interactions and environments\, and even digital-twin-style models of particular communities or institutions.
\nThis cluster brings together philosophers working in\, or seriously engaging with\, computational social philosophy. We are eager to gather a cohort who can bring rigor\, clarity\, and intellectual generosity to advancing understanding in relation to the above themes.
\nWe&rsquo\;re particularly interested in philosophical contributions that engage one or more of the following cross-cutting threads:
\nModeling of AI systems as socio-epistemic phenomena: How might explicitly modeling the effects of AI systems within social epistemic processes challenge\, deepen\, or expand existing understanding in social epistemology and philosophy of science?
\nModeling of socio-epistemic phenomena with AI-based tools: What new forms of social epistemological phenomena can AI-based tools help us represent and investigate beyond traditional methods\, such as typical agent-based models?
\nUnderstanding aims and tradeoffs: How should we think about the tradeoffs between promises of AI-based tools (e.g.\, flexibility\, expressive power\, scale) and other desiderata (e.g.\, robustness\, justification\, tractability\, understanding) that have long been central to computational social philosophy? What can we learn about these issues from the use of AI-based tools in other disciplines such as computational social science?
\nMethodological standards: What standards should guide reliable\, reproducible\, and more generally epistemically and ethically responsible philosophical inquiry using AI-based methods in computational social philosophy?
\nPlease note that\, while we welcome expressions of interest from all disciplines\, this is not a general workshop about AI or AI-based simulations. It is a workshop about how deeper engagement with AI systems as objects of modeling studies and as a modeling tool can ultimately enrich and expand philosophical inquiry.
\nTalks
\nDate: September 21\, 2026 \;
\nDate: October 5\, 2026
\nDate: October 19\, 2026
\nDate: November 2\, 2026
\nFormat
\nThe series will consist of bi-weekly virtual meetings\, in the style of CSPS\, starting in October 2026.The meetings are on Mondays at 11:30am ET.
\nApplications
\nYou can submit your application to join the seminars by using this application form: https://forms.gle/SC2iqbZUBU6iB52v6 \;
\nThe application form includes:
\nBasic details: Your name\, email address\, affiliation\, career stage
\nExtended abstracts of up to 750 words and prepared for anonymous review (no identifying information in the abstract itself).
\nThe submission deadline for applications is July 27th\, 2026 [CLOSED].
\nOrganizers
\nSina Fazelpour (Northeastern)
\nLuca Garzino Demo (UPenn) \;
\nPlease direct inquiries to lgarzino@sas.upenn.edu
ORGANIZER;CN=Sina Fazelpour;CN=Luca Garzino Demo: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20261006T110000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20270706T170000 SUMMARY:Emotion and Society Lab's Works-In-Progress Series (2026-27) UID:20261024T121849Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:Philosophers working on emotions want to produce good work. But good work is never done alone. The WIP Series is an opportunity to learn what emotion scholars are working on as well as present works in progress and receive valuable feedback to improve them &mdash\; all in a casual\, friendly environment.
\nThe WIP series is virtual and takes place the first Tuesday of the month from October-July (with no meetings January) from 11:00-12pm Pacific/ 2-3pm Eastern.
At this time\, sessions are for faculty\, graduate students\, &\; independent scholars only.
Register for the zoom link below.
ORGANIZER;CN=Myisha Cherry;CN=Rachel Fredericks: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Madrid:20261009T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Madrid:20270115T170000 SUMMARY:Technology and citizenship - V IF Conference · First International Conference UID:20261024T121850Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:Europe/Madrid LOCATION:Gijón\, Spain\, Gijón\, Spain DESCRIPTION:Hello! We are the IF Group (Engineering and Philosophy - Ingenierí\;a y Filosofí\;a)\, a working group of the MediaLab at the University of Oviedo that develops its work from a hybridization between the two branches of knowledge that give us our name. We have a great invitation for you: come to Gijó\;n on March 29\, 30\, and 31\, 2027.
\nWe are preparing the V IF Conference (our first international conference!)\, in which\, once again\, we will address technological issues from a hybrid\, reflective\, and collaborative perspective. The title for this edition is IF 9.0: Technology and Citizenship. We want to open a space to discuss different technological and engineering issues that affect citizenship in a broad sense. We will debate questions\, problems\, and possible solutions that technology offers to people. We will listen to researchers\, but also to companies\, teachers\, civil society organizations\, and anyone interested in reflecting on technology and its relationship with people. The general reflections will revolve around questions such as the following: can we make fairer technologies?\; are our designs the most appropriate for people and the environment?\; do we lead and control the technologies we use?\; does technology serve people\, or do people serve technology?\; what capabilities does it provide us and which ones do we give up by delegating more and more decisions to it?\; who is behind the dominant technologies\, and how do they use them to dominate us?\; and what about more horizontal\, democratic\, accessible\, belligerent...\, in short\, human technological approaches?
\nFor this reason\, we have proposed the following thematic axes:
\nEducation: technologies and tools that transform teaching and learning processes\, as well as the forms of access\, participation\, and knowledge creation.
\nHealth: the influence of technology on care\, well-being\, prevention\, and the improvement of people's quality of life.
\nDesign: criteria\, processes\, and practices to develop more accessible\, usable\, inclusive\, and responsible technologies.
\nAutonomy\, governance\, and politics: relationships between technology\, decision-making capacity\, power\, and citizenship\, promoting transparent\, responsible management models oriented towards the public interest.
\nSustainability and territory: responsible models that integrate environmental\, social\, and economic challenges with the inequalities and technological transformations of the territory and the spaces inhabited by humans and other species.
\nDo you want to participate? We encourage you to submit contributions that analyze these phenomena from interdisciplinary\, critical perspectives aimed at imagining more habitable digital futures. If you develop research or teaching\, political\, business\, social\, artistic\, or relational activities linked to the aforementioned topics\, you can send us a proposal in text format (maximum 500 words) through the following form before January 15\, 2027. We hope to see you soon!
\nYou can find more information and learn more about us on our website.
\nWe thank you in advance for your time and collaboration in disseminating this event. We remain at your entire disposal for any questions or queries.
\nKind regards\,
\nIF Group (Engineering and Philosophy) MediaLab\, University of Oviedo
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Prague:20261022T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Prague:20261024T170000 SUMMARY:Rationality and Normativity Conference UID:20261024T121851Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:Europe/Prague LOCATION:nám. Svobody 331/2\, Hradec Králové\, Czech Republic DESCRIPTION:The conference is on the nature of rationality and its relation to normativity\, especially on how rationality and reasons generate norms for what to believe\, trust or doubt. Rationality provides norms governing our thinking\, not only in general (do not form incoherent beliefs)\, but also in specific cases (do not trust that obvious conman). Which reasons the agent does or does not possess\, and their quality\, is also important. This conference aims at bringing together experts on these topics and shed light on these phenomena.
\nGetting a clear picture of what rationality and reasons are and what norms they place on our thinking can aid with applied philosophical issues as well. For example\, is conspiracy thinking\, distrust towards scientific experts or falling for fake news irrational? If so\, which rational norms are violated exactly\, and under which circumstances? What does the rational standing of people who engage in these potentially irrational processes teach us about why they engage in them\, and what if anything we should do to combat these phenomena?
\nOrganization
\nOrganization committee: \;
\nAuke Montessori\, Jaroslav Malí\;k\, Zuzana Votavová\; \;
\nContact:
\nhttps://ff.uhk.cz/rationalityandnorms/#contact \;
\nThis conference is organized by the Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences\, Faculty of Philosophy\, University of Hradec Krá\;lové\;\, as part of the project:
\nKnowledge in the Age of Distrust
\nFunded by the Ministry of Education\, Youth and Sports (Czech Republic). Co-funded by the European Union.
ORGANIZER;CN=Auke Montessori: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Lisbon:20261022T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Lisbon:20261024T170000 SUMMARY:12th Iberian Meeting on Aesthetics: Modalities of Aesthetic Attention UID:20261024T121852Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:Europe/Lisbon LOCATION:Via Panorâmica Edgar Cardoso s / n\, 4150-564 Porto\, Porto\, Portugal DESCRIPTION:The organization of the twelfth edition of the Iberian Meeting on Aesthetics invites researchers in philosophical aesthetics and in related disciplinary areas to submit proposals for papers. The submission of abstracts will be open until April 1st.
\nDates &\; Venue
The Meeting will take place on October 22\, 23\, and 24\, 2026\, with institutional hosting by the Institute of Philosophy of the University of Porto\, Research Group Aesthetics\, Politics and Knowledge (APK).
Theme: Modalities of Attention: Contemplation\, Critical Virtues\, and Agency
One of the problems of our contemporary world is that of attention: paying attention to things requires time and energy\, resources increasingly mobilised almost exclusively for consumption or incessant productivity. The sweeping technological and cultural transformations we face &mdash\; or are imposed upon us &mdash\; are accompanied by equally profound changes in how we attend\, how we experience things\, and even how we conceive of and value attention and experience themselves. This concerns our practical life\, as much as it does aesthetic theory.
Although contemporary aesthetics goes beyond the experience of art\, encompassing our relation to a degraded natural world and to an everyday life that is ever more massified\, gentrified\, and touristified\, attention is the knot in which all these strands converge. Thus\, a fundamental and enduring value of at least some works of art lies in their capacity to show us new ways of attending to things and of reconfiguring our experience of the world.
\nAs a philosophical concept\, aesthetic attention has been the object of debate and\, in particular\, of incisive criticism across various traditions of thought. Whatever perspective we adopt on the nature of aesthetic value and its role in human well-being\, what we attend to\, and how we attend\, will continue to be a decisive aspect of what it means to be the subject of a life.
\nWe invite researchers in aesthetics and the theory of the arts to submit proposals for papers within the following thematic lines:
\nTHEMATIC LINES
\nHow art teaches us to see and to listen: aesthetics and the education of the senses.
\nAttention as action: authorship\, interpretation\, and completion.
\nAffective attention: the role of emotions in aesthetic experience.
\nAttention and memory: the role of memory in aesthetic experience.
\nThe prosaic and the mundane: aesthetic attention beyond art.
\nAesthetic attention and the environment: from contemplation to the construction of nature.
\nArchitecture\, urbanism\, and aesthetic attention: life in cities and the experience of dwelling.
\nAesthetic attention in education: philosophical perspectives.
\nTechnology and politics: challenges to aesthetic attention\, from hyperconnectivity to AI.
\nFrom aesthetic attention to critical attention: whatever became of the philosophy of art criticism?
\nAesthetics and virtues: contemporary aretaic perspectives on attention.
\nFrom Critical Theory to the present: the political dimension of aesthetic attention.
\nPopular culture: from collective protest to memes.
\nDigital art and new media: dispersion\, fragmentation\, and recentring.
\nAesthetics and epistemology: are there collective forms of aesthetic attention?
\nTranscultural perspectives: aesthetic attention in non-Western contexts.
\nABSTRACTS
\nDocument 1: anonymous
\nTitle of the proposal
\nAbstract (maximum 500 words)
\nBibliography (maximum of five references)
\nFive keywords and the thematic line to which the proposal is assigned
\nDocument 2: non-anonymous
\nTitle of the proposal
\nBrief biographical note of no more than 200 words
\nInstructions for sending:
Both documents (Word) will be named with the title &ndash\; or a part of it &ndash\; plus its corresponding numbering (Example: Title_1 and Title_2\, depending on whether it is anonymous or not) and will be sent to the following e-mail address: encontroibe.porto@letras.up.pt \;
Important information:
The selection will be made taking into account the scientific quality and the relevance to the theme of the Meeting.
The presentation time for each paper will be 20 minutes\, plus 10 minutes for discussion.
The official languages will be Portuguese\, Spanish\, and English.
IMPORTANT DATES
\nApril 1: Deadline for submission of abstracts
\nFrom May 15: Acceptance reply
\nMay 30 - June 30: Speaker registration
\nJuly 15: Program announcement
\nUntil September 30: Attendee registration
\nOctober 22-24: Congress date
\nREGISTRATION
\nSpeaker registration: 70 &euro\;
\nSpeaker registration (SEyTA member): 50 &euro\;
\nAttendee registration: 50 &euro\;
\nAttendee registration (SEyTA member) or student: 40 &euro\;
\nGrants for PhD students
Three grants of 200 &euro\; each will be awarded.
To be eligible\, it is necessary to be a member of SEyTA or a PhD student in Portugal and to justify the relation between the theme of the congress and the theme of the thesis.
The grant is awarded retrospectively\, once the PhD student submits the certificate of participation to SEyTA.
ORGANIZERS
\nSociedad Españ\;ola de Esté\;tica y Teorí\;a de las Artes
\nFaculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto
\nInstituto de Filosofia da Universidade do Porto
\nGrupo de investigaç\;ã\;o Aesthetics\, Politics &\; Knowledge
\nORGANIZING COMMITTEE
\nVí\;tor Guerreiro
\nUniversidade do Porto
\nDomingos Faria
\nUniversidade do Porto
\nSí\;lvia Bento
\nUniversidade do Porto
\nPablo Seoane
\nUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela
\nTECHNICAL COMMITEE
\nSusana Costa
\nUniversidade do Porto
\nVanessa Pelerigo
\nUniversidade do Porto
\nPaula Lima
\nUniversidade do Porto
\nJoana Rego
\nUniversidade do Porto
\nMarco Dias
\nUniversidade do Porto
\nSCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE
\nAna Marí\;a Rabe
\nUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela
\nCarlos Valente
\nUniversidade da Madeira
\nCarla Carmona
\nUniversidad de Sevilla
\nErika Rodrigues
\nUniversidade do Porto
\nCarlos Vara Sanchez
\nUniversidad Complutense de Madrid
\nFilipa Afonso
\nUniversidade de Lisboa
\nJoaquí\;n Macarro
\nUniversidad de Salamanca
\nMaria de Fá\;tima Lambert
\nEscola Superior de Educaç\;ã\;o do Instituto
\nPolité\;cnico do Porto
\nMagda Polo Pujadas
\nUniversidad de Barcelona
\nMá\;rio Correia
\nUniversidade do Porto
\nRosa Bené\;itez
\nUniversidad de Salamanca
\nTiago Sousa
\nUniversidade do Minho
\nCONTACT:
encontroibe.porto@letras.up.pt \;
An International Centennial Conference honoring the monumental contributions of philosopher Stanley Cavell. Join the global academic community for three commemorative meetings in Paris\, Rome\, and Boston.
The concluding centennial conference at Boston University\, treating Cavell's \; work on philosophy and literature\, tragedy\, and perfectionist visions of America.
North American Sartre Society
31st \;Annual Meeting
\nCall for Abstracts
\n\;
\n23-24 October 2026
\nVirtual Zoom Conference \;
\nSubmission Deadline: June 15\, 2026
\n\;
\nTheme
\nA.I.\, Virtual Worlds\, and Digital Existentialism
\nThe North American Sartre Society invites proposals for our 31st \;meeting. \; \;Our conference theme is A.I.\, Virtual Worlds\, and Digital Existentialism. We encourage papers that explore existentialism as it relates to A.I.\, social media\, data centers\, and virtual worlds. We encourage papers on topics and questions such as: \;
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \;How does artificial intelligence reshape our understanding of selfhood\, agency\, and responsibility?
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \;Can virtual worlds provide authentic forms of meaning\, identity\, and community\, or are they structurally alienating?
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \;What does &ldquo\;existence&rdquo\; mean when one&rsquo\;s social\, emotional\, and creative life is increasingly mediated by A.I. systems and platforms?
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \;Do A.I.-generated personas and avatars challenge distinctions between authenticity and bad faith?
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \;How should we understand freedom and choice when algorithmic systems increasingly guide behaviors\, desires\, and commitments?
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \;What ethical obligations do creators of A.I. and virtual worlds have toward users&rsquo\; existential well-being and sense of meaning?
\nWe invite proposals from any area of Sartre studies and from any disciplinary background. In the spirit of Sartre&rsquo\;s eclectic thinking\, we encourage proposals that address philosophy\, literature\, theater\, aesthetics\, psychology\, politics\, intellectual history\, art\, music\, and other disciplines. Aiming to foster diverse and pluralistic approaches\, we understand Sartre Studies broadly to indicate work in the existentialist tradition\, including work emerging from thinkers like Simone de Beauvoir\, Maurice Merleau-Ponty\, Frantz Fanon\, Richard Wright\, Angela Davis\, Albert Camus\, Anna Julia Cooper\, Harriet Ann Jacobs\, Lewis R. Gordon\, Frederick Douglass\, Kathryn Sophia Belle\, Steve Biko\, Naomi Zack\, Chabani Manganyi\, Emilio Uranga\, Jorge Portilla\, W.E.B. Du Bois\, Aimé\; Cé\;saire\, Keiji Nishitani\, Azzedine Haddour\, Martin Buber\, Hannah Arendt\, Martin Heidegger\, Gabriel Marcel\, Emmanuel Levinas\, Sara Ahmed\, danielle davis\, bell hooks\, Kamau Brathwaite\, Nathalie Etoke\, Achille Mbembe\, Suzanne Cé\;saire\, James Baldwin and others. \;
\n\;
\n\;
\n\;
\nKeynote Speaker: Stefano Gualeni
\n\;
\nTitle: Existential Immersion and Care in Virtual Worlds
\nStefano Gualeni is a Full Professor at the Institute of Digital Games\, University of Malta. His academic books include \;Virtual Worlds as Philosophical Tools \;(Palgrave\, 2015)\, \;Virtual Existentialism \;(Palgrave Pivot\, 2020\, with Daniel Vella)\, and \;Fictional Games: A Philosophy of Worldbuilding and Imaginary Play \;(Bloomsbury\, 2023\, with Riccardo Fassone). Stefano&rsquo\;s games\, essays and philosophical fictions can be found on his webpage at \;www.gua-le-ni.com
\nStefano&rsquo\;s philosophical fictions include \;The Clouds: An Experiment in Theory-Fiction \;(Routledge\, 2024)\, \;What We Owe the Dead \;(Set Margins'\, 2025)\, \;Scholar's Codex \;(Tune and Fairweather\, 2026)\, and \;Errata Corpora \;(Set Margins'\, forthcoming in 2027)
\nThe submission process:
\n● \; \; \; \; \; \;The submission deadline is May 15. \;
\n● \; \; \; \; \; \;We are accepting abstracts of 300-500 words. Reading time for papers is 20-25 minutes. \;
\n● \; \; \; \; \; \;We will accept proposals for both individual papers and panel proposals. Please indicate if you are interested in the teaching existentialism session. \;
\n● \; \; \; \; \; \;English or French is acceptable.
\n● \; \; \; \; \; \;Please submit your abstract (or any questions) by email to NASS President\, Dane Sawyer\, \;dsawyer@laverne.edu
\n● \; \; \; \; \; \;Graduate students are encouraged to submit.
\n● \; \; \; \; \; \;All proposals will be forwarded to the program committee for review.
\nContacts:
\n● \; \; \; \; \; \;Dane Sawyer\, NASS President: dsawyer@laverne.edu
\n● \; \; \; \; \; \;Paul Gyllenhammer\, NASS Co-President: \;gyllenhp@stjohns.edu
\n● \; \; \; \; \; \;Kiki Berk\, NASS Past-President k.berk@snhu.edu
\n● \; \; \; \; \; \;Kimberly Engels\, NASS Treasurer: kengels@molloy.edu \;
\n● \; \; \; \; \; \;Damon Boria\, NASS Member-at-Large: damon.boria@gmail.com \;
\n● \; \; \; \; \; \;T Storm Heter\, NASS Member at Large: sheter@esu.edu \;
\n● \; \; \; \; \; \;James Sares\, NASS Member-at-large: james.sares@uky.edu
\n● \; \; \; \; \; \;Tom Meagher: NASS Member-at-large: tjm101@shsu.edu
\n● \; \; \; \; \; \;Thomas Payre\, NASS Member-at-large: thp42@aber.ac.uk
\n● \; \; \; \; \; \;Varun Chandrasekhar\, NASS Member-at-Large: c.varun@wustl.edu
\n● \; \; \; \; \; \;NASS Webpage: \;https://www.northamericansartresociety.org
\n● \; \; \; \; \; \;NASS Knowledge Commons Page: \;https://hcommons.org/groups/north-american-sartre-studies-society/
\n● \; \; \; \; \; \;NASS Facebook: \; \;https://www.facebook.com/SartreSociety/
\n● \; \; \; \; \; \;Sartre Studies International \;https://www.berghahnjournals.com/view/journals/sartre-studies/sartre-studies-overview.xml
ORGANIZER;CN=Dane Sawyer: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Shanghai:20261023T171500 DTEND;TZID=Asia/Shanghai:20261025T170000 SUMMARY:NYU Shanghai Kant Workshop UID:20261024T121855Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:Asia/Shanghai LOCATION:567 Yangsi St West\, Shanghai\, China DESCRIPTION:This workshop will focus on different aspects of Kant's philosophy.
\nMore updates on the event will be provided closer to the date.
ORGANIZER;CN=Damian Melamedoff-Vosters: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20261023T090000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20261024T170000 SUMMARY:The Kristeva Circle UID:20261024T121856Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:America/New_York LOCATION:Buffalo\, United States DESCRIPTION:We are pleased to announce that the next annual meeting of The Kristeva Circle will be held at the University at Buffalo\, SUNY\, on October 23-24\, 2026. \;
\nThe Kristeva Circle meeting is an international conference that advances scholarship on\, or influenced by\, philosopher\, psychoanalyst\, and novelist Julia Kristeva. The two-day conference will host a variety of speakers from the United States and abroad. \;
\nIn its 11th iteration\, the theme of the 2026 conference will broadly focus on embodiment. However\, given the tenant of the work of this year&rsquo\;s two keynote speakers we \;encourage submissions that address the work of Julia Kristeva in relation to disability\, gender\, sexuality\, and race.
\nWe are delighted to share that we have two keynote speakers confirmed for this year&rsquo\;s conference. They are as follows: \;
\nWe are seeking abstracts that develop the work of Julia Kristeva\, with preference given to submissions that address embodiment broadly construed\, and more specifically disability\, gender\, sexuality\, and/or race.
\nPlease submit abstracts of 500 words\, prepared for anonymous review\, by April 30\, 2026\, to kristevacircle@gmail.com. In a separate document\, include a short author bio with contact info. For more information on the conference\, please write to the local host\, Elisabeth Paquette\, at epaquette@buffalo.edu.
ORGANIZER;CN=Elisabeth Paquette: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20261023T090000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20261024T170000 SUMMARY:Media\, Press Freedom\, and Cultural Production in an Authoritarian Age UID:20261024T121857Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:America/New_York LOCATION:953 Danby Rd\, Ithaca\, United States\, 14850 DESCRIPTION:The Union for Democratic Communications\, Project Censored\, and the Park Center for Independent Media\, in a spirit of collaboration and coalition-building\, seek to bring together activists\, artists\, researchers\, and legislators to foster critical approaches that support reimagining an infrastructure rich in equitable and democratic possibilities\, where a healthy media ecosystem can thrive. We invite communication researchers\, journalists\, cultural producers\, policy analysts\, academics\, and activists to submit abstracts that examine our theme\, Media\, Press Freedom\, and Cultural Production in an Authoritarian Age.
\n\nFounded in 1976\, Project Censored celebrates its 50th Anniversary in an era of misinformation\, where press freedom and media independence are under unprecedented attack. At this critical juncture\, Project Censored&rsquo\;s advocacy for freedom of the press\, media literacy and critical thinking\, and the Union for Democratic Communications&rsquo\; critical analysis of communications industries and the fight to democratize them are more crucial than ever. Together\, we are proud to co-host the conference &ldquo\;Media\, Press Freedom and the Fight for Democracy in an Authoritarian Age\,&rdquo\; October 23-24 2026\, at Ithaca College in Ithaca\, New York.
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20261023T093000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20261025T170000 SUMMARY:9th New England Workshop on Metaphysics: Philosophy in the Age of Technology UID:20261024T121858Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:America/New_York LOCATION:600 Mount Pleasant Ave\, Providence\, United States\, 02908 DESCRIPTION:Friday\, October 23
\n9:30-11: Robert Howell (Rice University): \;&ldquo\;Boredom\, Creativity and the Limits of Creative Artificial Intelligence&rdquo\; \;- \;Comments: Anna Pautz-Bjurman (Rhode Island College)
\n11:15-12:45: Julia Netter (Brown University): \;&ldquo\;Reconfiguring trust: privacy and our (new) digital relationships&rdquo\; \;- \;Comments: Justin Caouette (Providence College)
\n2-3:30: Andrew Lee (University of Toronto): \;&ldquo\;Substrate Independence&rdquo\; - \;Comments: \;Sharon Casu (University of Fribourg)
\n*
\nSaturday\, October 24
\n9:30-11: Branden Fitelson (Northeastern University): \;&ldquo\;A 2-Dimensional Theory of Argument Strength\, with Applications&rdquo\; \;- \;Comments: \;Katia Vavova (Mount Holyoke College)
\n11:15-12:45: Gabrielle Kerbel (University of Michigan\, Ann Arbor): \;&ldquo\;LLMs and Weak Belief&rdquo\; \;- \;Comments: Jack Spencer (MIT)
\n2-3:30: Jack Spencer (MIT): \;&ldquo\;Inanimate Psychology&rdquo\;
\n*
\nSunday\, October 25
\n9:30-11: Heather Demarest (University of Colorado\, Boulder) &\; Zachary Miller (AI Digest): \;&ldquo\;Evidence that LLMs aren&rsquo\;t aware of their thoughts&rdquo\; \;- \;Comments: Brendan Fleig-Goldstein (Brown University)
\n11:15-12:45: Louis Gularte (Rhode Island College): \;&ldquo\;What would it take for AI to understand emotion?&rdquo\; \;- \;Comments: Laura Sizer (Mount Holyoke College)
\n*
\nRegistration is free but required.
\nReasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities with 72 hours notice.
ORGANIZER;CN=Sharon Casu;CN=Matt Duncan: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=America/Chicago:20261023T090000 DTEND;TZID=America/Chicago:20261025T170000 SUMMARY:Hegel and Time - 28th Biennial Meeting of the Hegel Society of America UID:20261024T121859Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:America/Chicago LOCATION:Evanston\, United States DESCRIPTION:CALL FOR PAPERS
\n"Hegel and Time"
\nfor the 28th Biennial Meeting of the Hegel Society of America
\nOctober 23-25\, 2026 (tentative)Evanston\, IL
\nDeadline for submission of papers:
\nJanuary 14\, 2026
\nWhile explicit discussions of time appear only periodically in Hegel&rsquo\;s writings\, questions about time\, temporality\, and history are pervasive in Hegel&rsquo\;s thought. For our 2026 Biennial Meeting\, the Hegel Society of America invites papers that address questions about time and their relation to any dimension of Hegel&rsquo\;s philosophy. Papers might address Hegel&rsquo\;s explicit discussions of time within or across different works\, consider his accounts of history\, of the present\, or of the future\, examine the relationship between Hegel&rsquo\;s position and those of other thinkers\, or speak to themes of time or temporality in a variety of other ways. We are open to many different approaches to Hegel&rsquo\;s work in multiple disciplines\, including (but not limited to) philosophy\, theology\, history\, legal and political theory\, sociology\, environmental studies\, gender studies\, and literary studies.
\nSubmissions are limited to 6\,000 words (excluding notes)\, and any later adjustments must remain within this limit. They must be complete essays\; draft proposals will not be accepted. Submissions must be in English\, in Word or PDF format\, prepared for blind review\, and accompanied by an abstract of no more than 300 words.
\nNote: Although papers presented at meetings of the Hegel Society of America are usually published either in a collection of essays or in The Owl of Minerva&mdash\;The Journal of the Hegel Society of America\, publication cannot be guaranteed. By submitting a paper\, however\, the author agrees to reserve publication of their essay for an HSA proceedings volume or in The Owl of Minerva if the paper is accepted for the program.
\nPlease send papers to:
\nTim Brownlee\, Program Chair
\nbrownleet [@] xavier.edu
\nhttps://www.hegel.org/post/cfp-on-hegel-time-for-the-hsa-s-biennial-meeting-submission-deadline-jan-14-2026
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=America/Chicago:20261023T090000 DTEND;TZID=America/Chicago:20261024T170000 SUMMARY:20th Annual SIUE Undergraduate Philosophy Conference UID:20261024T121900Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:America/Chicago LOCATION:Edwardsville\, United States DESCRIPTION:Undergradutae philosophy conference with Dr. David Gunkel of Northern Illinos University giving a keynote address entitled\, "Person\, Thing\, Robot" \;
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20261023T090000 DTEND;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20261025T170000 SUMMARY:20th Annual Conference of the Leibniz Society of North America UID:20261024T121901Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:America/Los_Angeles LOCATION:Riverside\, United States DESCRIPTION:For the CFP\, please see the link to the website of the LSNA.
ORGANIZER;CN=Adam Harmer: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Vienna:20261023T193000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Vienna:20261024T170000 SUMMARY:Postfaktisch? Über die Zukunft der Wahrheit: Edith Stein Tagung 2026 UID:20261024T121902Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:Europe/Vienna LOCATION:Wollzeile 2\, Vienna\, Austria\, 1010 DESCRIPTION:Programme Friday
\n19:30 &mdash\; Sarah Spiekermann-Hoff
10 Regeln fü\;r die Digitale Welt auf der Basis der 10 Gebote
In diesem Vortrag werden die von der
Saturday
\n09:30 &mdash\; Dr. Monika Adamczyk-Enriquez
Zur Beziehung von Werterkenntnis und personaler Verwirklichung bei Scheler und Stein
Edith Stein Archiv Kö\;ln
Max Scheler gehö\;rt zu den bedeutendsten Vertretern der phä\;nomenologischen Wertethik. Edith Stein greift seine Ü\;berlegungen auf\, entwickelt sie jedoch in entscheidenden Punkten weiter. Der Vortrag geht der Frage nach\, worin dieser eigenstä\;ndige Beitrag Edith Steins besteht. Im Mittelpunkt stehen das Verhä\;ltnis von Person und Wert\, die Bedeutung des Wertempfangs und der Wertverwirklichung sowie die Frage\, wie Werte das personale Leben prä\;gen. Dabei wird deutlich\, dass Edith Stein die Wertphilosophie Schelers nicht nur ü\;bernimmt\, sondern sie im Horizont ihrer eigenen Anthropologie und ihres Personverstä\;ndnisses weiterfü\;hrt.
\n11:00 &mdash\; HS-Prof. Dr. Małgorzata Bogaczyk-Vormayr
Ethos &ndash\; Eidos &ndash\; Imagination: Wahrheit als Wiedererinnerung
Universitä\;t Posen
Mein Vortrag bietet einen Beitrag aus der Wissenschaftstheorie und Bildungsphilosophie an. Ich werde mich auf die antike (Platon\, Aristoteles) und mittelalterliche (Roger Bacon) Lehre von Erkenntnis und Wissen beziehen sowie auf ihre Rezeption in den Naturwissenschaften im 20. und 21. Jahrhundert hinweisen\, um schließ\;lich diese Stellungnahmen mit dem Bildungskonzept von Edith Stein zu konfrontieren (ESGA B. 13 u. 16). Der Ausgangspunkt meines Vortrags ist eine wissenschaftliche\, entmythologisierte Darlegung der Anamnese-Lehre\, die ein frü\;hes Konzept der Kognitionsforschung darstellt. Aus dieser leite ich die wesentliche Unterscheidung von &bdquo\;Erfinden&ldquo\; und &bdquo\;Entdecken&ldquo\; ab. Ich will aufzeigen\, dass es sich beim Wissensfortschritt\, bei jeder Innovation und Transformation darum handelt\, eine menschliche Grunddisposition zu entfalten: die Imagination. Dabei werden jedoch Fragen nach den Grenzen des innovativen Handelns gestellt\, nach der Verwirklichung des inneren Sinns des Wissens: der Wahrheit.
\n14:30 &mdash\; Prim. Dr. David Oberreiter\, MBA
Soziale Medien in einer postfaktischen Welt &ndash\; Fluch oder Segen?
Kepler Universitä\;tsklinikum Linz
16:00 &mdash\; Dr. Pia Lilienstein
Schö\;nheit und Wahrheit &ndash\; umstrittene Werte in Philosophie und Kunst
Universitä\;t Nü\;rnberg-Erlangen
Als Zeitgenossin von Roman Ingarden und der kunsthistorischen Epoche der Modernen Kunst hielt Edith Stein an der klassischen Auffassung von Kunst fest\, die dem Wahren\, Schö\;nen und Guten verpflichtet ist. In der Kunst setzte sich jedoch die Auffassung durch\, dass die wahrheitsgetreue Abbildung und optische Ü\;bereinstimmung mit der Wirklichkeit nicht die einzigen Mittel sein sollten\, um etwas Wahres auszudrü\;cken. Die Frage nach der Wahrheit von Bildern berü\;hrt unmittelbar die Frage nach deren Wirkung auf unser Bewusstsein. Der moderne Zweifel am Wert der Schö\;nheit und an der Wahrheit von Bildern wird durch digitale Sehgewohnheiten und KI-generierte Bilderwelten zur Selbstverstä\;ndlichkeit. Gleichzeitig schä\;rft sich in der Kunst das Bewusstsein fü\;r den Wert leiblicher Wahrnehmungen und ä\;sthetischer Erfahrungen als Erkenntniszugä\;nge.
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20261023T170000 DTEND;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20261025T170000 SUMMARY:The Twentieth Annual Conference of the Leibniz Society of North America UID:20261024T121903Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:America/Los_Angeles LOCATION:900 University Ave\, Riverside\, United States\, 92523 DESCRIPTION:Leibniz Society Website: \;https://leibnizsociety.org/conferences/
\nOnline Program: https://bit.ly/LeibnizProgram
\nUCR Calendar (including Zoom access information): https://bit.ly/LeibnizConf
ORGANIZER;CN=Adam Harmer: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20261024T070000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20261024T073000 SUMMARY:Imaginative Ideas and Political Cohesion: Spinoza on the Hebrew Commonwealth UID:20261024T121904Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:Europe/Berlin LOCATION:Berlin\, Germany DESCRIPTION:Imaginative Ideas and Political Cohesion: Spinoza on the Hebrew Commonwealth
\nSpinoza is often portrayed as a philosopher committed to the supremacy of reason over imagination. In the Ethics\, imaginative ideas are described as inadequate\, partial\, and confused forms of cognition. Yet his political writings suggest a more complex relationship between imagination and human flourishing. The Theological-Political Treatise in particular indicates that imagination is not merely a source of epistemic limitation but also a condition of collective political life.
\nThis paper argues that Spinoza&rsquo\;s account of the Hebrew Commonwealth reveals a constructive political role for imaginative ideas. The cohesion of the ancient Hebrew state depended upon a network of shared narratives\, religious symbols\, collective memories\, rituals\, and beliefs that shaped the imagination of its citizens. The covenant between God and Israel\, the authority of Moses\, and the idea of divine election did not derive their political force from rational demonstration. Rather\, they operated through the imagination\, organizing affects\, sustaining loyalty\, and fostering obedience to common laws.
\nBy examining the Hebrew Commonwealth as a political order grounded in imagination\, the paper challenges interpretations that treat imaginative ideas solely as cognitive deficiencies destined to be superseded by reason. While reason remains the highest form of knowledge\, Spinoza recognizes that political communities cannot be maintained through rational insight alone. Most individuals are guided primarily by imaginative representations\, and stable institutions therefore depend upon shared images\, narratives\, and symbols capable of generating solidarity and commitment to a common political project.
\n\nThe Hebrew Commonwealth thus serves as a privileged case through which Spinoza demonstrates the enduring political significance of imagination. Far from being merely a mark of human imperfection\, imaginative ideas provide many of the symbolic and affective resources necessary for political cohesion. Spinoza&rsquo\;s analysis\, therefore\, offers a distinctive account of the relationship between imagination\, affect\, and political order\, one that remains relevant to contemporary discussions of collective identity and social integration.
ORGANIZER;CN=Oliver Toth;CN=Domenica Romagni;CN=Leonardo Moauro: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20261024T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20261025T170000 SUMMARY:Spinoza and Imaginative Ideas UID:20261024T121905Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:Europe/Berlin LOCATION:Berlin\, Germany ORGANIZER;CN=Oliver Toth;CN=Domenica Romagni;CN=Leonardo Moauro: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20261024T093000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20261024T170000 SUMMARY:Kant’s Political Philosophy UID:20261024T121906Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:Europe/Zurich LOCATION:Fribourg\, Switzerland DESCRIPTION:We are pleased to invite you to a Workshop on Kant&rsquo\;s Political Philosophy\, taking place on 24 October 2026 at the University of Fribourg\, MIS04 4112 (Salle Jä\;ggi).
\n\nThe programme includes:
\n\n&bull\; \;Nicholas Vrousalis (Rotterdam): &ldquo\;Kant and Marx: Rethinking the Intersection&rdquo\;
\n&bull\; \;Marie Newhouse (Surrey): &ldquo\;Kant&rsquo\;s Conflict of the Faculties and Universities&rsquo\; Constitutional Crisis&rdquo\;
\n&bull\; \;Ralf Bader (Fribourg): &ldquo\;Kant on Self-Ownership&rdquo\;
\n&bull\; \;Stephan Zimmermann (Bonn): &ldquo\;Kant on Juridical Legislation as the Conceptual Foundation of Political Philosophy&rdquo\;
\n\nAll are welcome. Please register by email at paul.keller@unifr.ch
\n\nFor more information please visit https://agenda.unifr.ch/e/de/20412/
\n\nWe hope to see you there.
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20261024T093000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20261025T170000 SUMMARY:Spinoza and Imaginative Ideas UID:20261024T121907Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:Europe/Berlin LOCATION:Schönhauser Allee 10-11\, Berlin\, Germany\, 10119 DESCRIPTION:Spinoza and Imaginative Ideas
\nHybrid workshop
\nHuman Abilities Center\, Humboldt University Berlin
\nRoom 4.17
\nSchö\;nhauser Allee 10-11\, 10119 Berlin
\n\;
\n24&ndash\;25 October 2026
\n\;
\n\;
\n24th \;of October
\n\;
\n09:00-09:30 &ndash\; Welcome coffee and breakfast
\n\;
\n09:30&ndash\;10:15 &ndash\; Henry Kwok (Cornell): The Composition of Representational Content and Error in Spinoza
\n\n10:30&ndash\;11:15 &ndash\; Daniel Bella (Hamburg): Imagination and Disposition: Searching for an Objective Foundation
\n\n11:30&ndash\;13:00 &ndash\; Ursula Renz (Graz): On the Threshold to Modernity: Spinoza&rsquo\;s Views on History
\n\n13:00-14:15 &ndash\; Lunch break
\n\n14:15&ndash\;15:45 &ndash\; Eric Schliesser (Amsterdam): Spinoza as a Machiavellian Comparative Modeler in the Political Treatise
\n\n15:45-16:15 &ndash\; Coffee and tea break
\n\n16:15&ndash\;17:00 &ndash\; Kevin Jobe (Texas-Rio Grande Valley): Borders as Terminus: Spinoza's Political Epistemology of Images (online)
\n\n17:15&ndash\;18:00 &ndash\; Marie Wuth (Eichstä\;tt-Ingolstadt): The Accursed Body Politic: Spinoza on Sacred Expulsion and Governmental Hate
\n\n18:15&ndash\;19:00 &ndash\; Johanna Alt (Aberdeen): Spinoza and the Problem of Attention
\n\n\n\n25th \;of October
\n\;
\n09:00-09:30 &ndash\; Welcome coffee and breakfast
\n\;
\n9:30&ndash\;11:00 &ndash\; Kristin Primus (Berkeley): The Two Sides of an Imaginative Idea
\n\n11:15&ndash\;12:00 \; \;&ndash\; Aliza Ashraf (St Andrews): Why we need to be more imaginative: the case of 'pity' in Spinoza
\n\n12:15&ndash\;13:00 &ndash\; Andrew Lopez (Colorado State): Despising Beasts: Spinoza&rsquo\;s Antipathy Toward Animals
\n\n13:00-14:15 &ndash\; Lunch break
\n\n14:15&ndash\;15:00 &ndash\; Luce deLire (Cologne): The Role of Imagination in Spinoza's Methodology
\n\n15:15&ndash\;16:00 &ndash\; Lois Niemeyer (Vienna): Spinoza and the Uncanny in Imagination: Futurity\, Affect\, Ambivalence
\n\n16:15&ndash\;17:00 &ndash\; Dafna Mark Ben Shabbat (UC San Diego): The conatus as an interactive power increase: how inadequate ideas are necessary for successful striving
\n\n17:00-17:30 &ndash\; Coffee and tea break
\n\n17:30&ndash\;19:00 &ndash\; Martin Lenz (Hagen): Reading the Ethics: Geometrical Imagination and the Transformation of Readers
\n\;
\n\nOrganization: Leonardo Moauro (HU Berlin)\, Domenica Romagni (Colorado/HU Berlin)\, Oliver Toth (Heidelberg)
\n\nThe conference is generously funded by ESEMP\, Spinoza-Gesellschaft\, DFG.
\n\nThe conference is free and open to all. Please email us at \;
Bringing together scholars in the field of philosophy\, this one-day conference aims to provide a welcoming venue for graduate students in philosophy to present their work and engage with other students on a variety of topics and inquiries. We will be hosting a variety of talks ranging from aesthetics\, feminist philosohpy\, phenomenology\, and AI ethics.
\n\nWe are excited to have Dr. Kimberley Brownlee as our keynote speaker for the event.
\n\n ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20261024T083000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20261024T170000 SUMMARY:Workshop on the Naturalized Metaphysics of Physics UID:20261024T121909Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:America/New_York LOCATION: University of Pittsburgh\, 4200 Fifth Avenue\, Pittsburgh\, United States\, 15260 DESCRIPTION:Workshop on the Naturalized Metaphysics of Physics
\nOctober 24 @ 8:30 am - 5:30 pm EDT
\nVenue and Date: Center for Philosophy of Science\, University of Pittsburgh - October 24\, 2026
\nIn light of radical ontological revision demanded by relativity and quantum mechanics\, naturalized metaphysics of physics seeks to develop metaphysical accounts by taking the content\, practice\, and empirical successes of contemporary physical theories as the primary evidence and constraint. It rejects approaches that rely primarily on a priori reasoning or intuitions disconnected from scientific practice\, while recognizing the study of the topics traditionally under the purview of metaphysics (ontology\, fundamentality\, laws\, space and time\, etc.) as critical for understanding of the picture of the world entailed by our best physical theories.
\nSpeakers will share research exploring questions related to the following key themes.
\n1. \; The analysis of the fundamental properties of putative entities and the laws of nature governing their behavior\, especially within the particularly conceptually fraught areas of quantum field theory. While most of the established literature has focused on axiomatic quantum field theory\, newer approaches are paying more attention to the intricacies of actual model building practices in theoretical particle physics. How do the usual lines of debate regarding particle and field interpretation change in light of these modeling practices\, over and above the mathematical foundations? For both particle and field interpretations\, what do these higher order modeling practices entail for our understanding of the fundamental properties and law-like behavior of these entities?
\n2. \; The nature of scale-dependent\, non-fundamental ontologies and their relationship to putative fundamental ones: Do the various the complexities of current physical theories and their modeling practices problematize or mesh with traditional notions of reduction\, emergence\, levels and composition? Can we accept the possibility of the study of scientific ontology\, without the need for a complete final theory in hand? If so\, what precautionary steps are fitting to the ontology of effective\, non-final theories? Does structural realism provide sufficient precautions? How do the finer details of specific mathematical structures (from the algebraic structure of fundamental interactions\, to the group representation structures for matter degrees of freedom) advance or stymie the project of structural realism? \;
\nOrganizing Committee
\n\nAssistant Professor\, Department of History and Philosophy of Science\, University of Pittsburgh
\n\nGraduate Student\, Philosophy
\nSpeakers
\n\nProfessor of Philosophy\, Duke University
\n\nAssociate Professor of Philosophy\, Affiliated Faculty of Halicioglu Data Science Institute\, Affiliated Faculty of Chinese Studies\, University of California\, San Diego\, Fellow\, John Bell Institute for the Foundations of Physics
\n\nStuart Professor of Philosophy\, Princeton University
\n\nAssociate Professor of Philosophy\, UC San Diego
\nProgram: \; \;https://www.centerphilsci.pitt.edu/event/workshop-on-the-naturalized-metaphysics-of-physics/
ORGANIZER;CN=Marian J. R. Gilton;CN=Edouard Machery: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=America/Denver:20261024T090000 DTEND;TZID=America/Denver:20261024T170000 SUMMARY:University of Utah Graduate Philosophy Conference UID:20261024T121910Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:America/Denver LOCATION:Carolyn Tanner Irish Humanities Building\, Salt Lake City\, United States DESCRIPTION:The University of Utah philosophy graduate students are excited to open submissions for our 2026 conference\, which will be held in-person on Saturday\, October 24th. \;We welcome submissions from all areas of philosophy but are particularly interested in topics that match the interests of our current graduate students.
\nSome of these areas are philosophy of science\, aesthetics\, political philosophy\, social epistemology\, formal epistemology\, applied philosophy broadly construed\, and ethics.
\nKeynote Speaker: \;
\nEliya Cohen (The University of Utah)
\nTo apply\, please submit a 300-500 word abstract (as a pdf) to: \;uofuphilgradconference@gmail.com \;
\nAbstracts must be anonymous. \;
\nSubmission Deadline: September 1st\, 2026. \;
\nNotification of Acceptance: September 8th\, 2026.
\nQuestions can be directed to: \;uofuphilgradconference@gmail.com
ORGANIZER;CN=Lola Warnick: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20261024T160000 DTEND;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20261024T173000 SUMMARY:Atomism in Du Châtelet\, Wolff\, and Leibniz UID:20261024T121911Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:America/Los_Angeles LOCATION:900 University Ave\, Riverside\, United States\, 92523 ORGANIZER;CN=Adam Harmer: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20261025T230000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20261025T230000 SUMMARY:Negative Social Action: Silence\, Salience\, and the Politics of Absence UID:20261024T121912Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:Europe/Berlin LOCATION:Gabelsbergerstraße 62\, Munich\, Germany DESCRIPTION:DEADLINE for Abstract Submission: 25 October 2026
\nLanguage is the specifically human alternative to physical violence. As speaking animals\, human beings are capable of inflicting harm through words alone\, and this capacity has driven scholars across philosophy of language\, linguistics\, and related disciplines to investigate verbal violence and hate speech: if we can do things with our words\, then we can also do harm with them (Austin 1962\; Langton 1993\; Maitra and McGowan 2012\; Kukla 2014\; Bianchi 2018\; Langton 2018).
\nYet what is said is only part of the picture. What happens when harm is produced not by what is said\, but by what is left unsaid\, unanswered\, unnoticed\, or absent? Silence is commonly understood as the mere absence of speech\, a neutral gap in communication\, or simply the failure to act. However\, scholars across different disciplines have increasingly challenged this conception\, arguing that silence and related forms of communicative absence are active\, socially structured\, and consequential phenomena (Maitra 2007\; Langton 2007\; Kurzon 2011\; Schrö\;ter 2013\; Tanesini 2018\; Klieber 2024). Silence can communicate\, subordinate\, exclude\, and harm (Bird 2002\; Langton 2007\; Maitra 2009\; Klieber 2024)\; it can be strategically deployed to maintain ambiguity or plausible deniability (Anthonissen 2008\; Schrö\;ter 2013\, 2019\, 2022)\, or emerge from socially organised patterns of inattention that marginalise certain voices\, perspectives\, and experiences (Fricker 2007\; Dotson 2011\; Pohlhaus 2012\; Medina 2013\; Smith and Archer 2020).
\nThis workshop takes as its starting point two converging lines of inquiry. The first concerns silence as a communicative act: a socially embedded practice capable of conveying meaning\, performing social functions\, and shaping relations (Langton 2007\; Schrö\;ter 2013\; Tanesini 2018\; Klieber 2024). The second concerns what we call the politics of absence: the socially structured forms of inattention\, non-response\, and selective salience through which collective patterns of noticing and overlooking are produced and maintained (Watzl 2017\; Wu 2024\; Kaeslin 2024\; Caprioglio Panizza 2022).
\nBy bringing these perspectives into dialogue\, the workshop extends questions traditionally associated with philosophy of language and communication studies towards philosophy of mind\, ethics and moral philosophy\, and philosophy of perception. Taken together\, they point towards a broader theoretical framework centred on negative social action: socially significant actions performed not through explicit speech or overt intervention\, but through absences\, omissions\, silences\, failures of uptake\, and organised forms of non-attention.
\nWe want to investigate cases in which harm is produced through what remains unsaid\, unacknowledged\, unanswered\, unnoticed\, or excluded from personal and collective awareness. Such harm frequently operates indirectly and diffusely\, with a high degree of deniability (Maitra 2007\; Zerubavel 2006\; Saul 2018). Rather than treating silence and inattention as passive phenomena\, the workshop examines their role in producing social meanings\, epistemic environments\, political realities\, and forms of harm.
\nWe ask how absences communicate\, how they shape what becomes collectively visible or invisible\, and how responsibility should be understood when harms arise not from what someone does or says\, but from what is omitted\, neglected\, or left unnoticed (Ayala-Ló\;pez and Vasilyeva 2016\; Smith and Archer 2020). We also welcome empirical work examining how patterns of silence\, non-response\, and inattention shape collective responses to harmful speech\, including their effects on perceived social norms and the recognition of harm (Zapata et al. 2024).
\nMore information:
ORGANIZER;CN=Irene Lo Faro;CN=Jimena Zapata: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20261025T234500 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20261025T234500 SUMMARY:On Self-Transformation in Response to Disruptive Experience: Phenomenological and Interdisciplinary Perspectives UID:20261024T121913Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:Europe/London LOCATION:Royal Holloway\, London\, United Kingdom DESCRIPTION:On Self-Transformation in Response to Disruptive Experience: Phenomenological and Interdisciplinary Perspectives
\nRoyal Holloway\, University of London Central London Campus\, UK 2
\n8/29th of January 2027
\nFree \;
\nCall for Abstracts \;
\nThe two-day workshop &ldquo\;On Self-Transformation in Response to Disruptive Experience: Phenomenological and Interdisciplinary Perspectives&rdquo\; will take place on 28 and 29 January 2027 at Royal Holloway&rsquo\;s central London campus. The keynote speakers are Sophie Grace Chappell\, Elizabeth Burns\, Pablo Andreu\, and Justin Moll. The British Society for Phenomenology and the organisers warmly invite applications for thirty-minute presentations from eight additional speakers through this call for abstracts. \;
\nThe workshop focuses on self-transformation in response to disruptive experiences that challenge our ability to make sense of the world. Contributors are asked to engage with: \;
\nThe phenomenological structure of self-transformation in response to disruptive experiences. Potential topics include: \;
\nThe phenomenological structure of the emergence of a new self
\nThe question of agency in the emergence of a new self
\nThe experience of otherness in the process of self-transformation
\nThe affective dimensions of self-transformation \;
\nInterdisciplinary accounts of self-transformation. Potential topics include: \;
\nThe neurocognitive dimensions of self-transformation
\nReligious dimensions of self-transformation
\nSpecific contexts in which self-transformations occur \;
\nTo apply\, please see the event overview for a detailed description of the topic and submit a 300-word abstract via the BSP submission system by the 25th of October 2026. \;
\nGo to the &lsquo\;On Self-Transformation in Response to Disruptive Experience:Phenomenological and Interdisciplinary Perspectives&rsquo\; homepage and submit an abstract \;
\nEveryone will be informed whether their abstract has been selected by the 15th of November. \;
\nIt is also possible to attend the event without presenting. General registration will open late November 2026. \;
ORGANIZER;CN=Daniel Whistler;CN=Nat Rutherford;CN=Justin Moll: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20261026T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20261028T170000 SUMMARY:World Conference on Civil Engineering and Infrastructure UID:20261024T121914Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:Europe/Berlin LOCATION:Frankfurt am Main\, Germany ORGANIZER;CN=Jianhui Hu: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20261026T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20261028T170000 SUMMARY:World Conference on Civil Engineering and Infrastructure UID:20261024T121915Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:Europe/Berlin LOCATION:Frankfurt am Main\, Germany ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20261026T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20261028T170000 SUMMARY:World Conference on Civil Engineering and Infrastructure UID:20261024T121916Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:Europe/Berlin LOCATION:Frankfurt am Main\, Germany ORGANIZER;CN=Jianhui Hu: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20261026T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20261030T170000 SUMMARY:Paris School on Conditionals UID:20261024T121917Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:Europe/Paris LOCATION:65 rue des Grands Moulins\, Paris\, France DESCRIPTION:Conditionals &ndash\; Theory\, Typology\, Diachrony and Corpora
\nINALCO\, 65 rue des Grands Moulins\, Paris 13\, France
\nOcotbre 26-30\, 2026
\nFor centuries\, philosophers and logicians have examined conditional constructions&mdash\;statements of the form &ldquo\;if A\, then B&rdquo\;&mdash\;in natural languages\, yielding numerous insights. However\, we still do not have a complete understanding of conditional constructions and their fundamental relationship to reasoning\, specifically the process of inferring B from A. Recently\, scholars from fields such as logic\, linguistics\, cognitive science\, corpora\, and artificial intelligence have begun to shed new light on this area of research.
\nWe are organizing a thematic school with a strong interdisciplinary focus centered on linguistics\, logic\, the role of diachrony in conditional constructions\, and corpus studies. Following three successful thematic schools in \;2019\, \;2022\, and \;2024\, the upcoming Conditionals school will take place at INALCO in Paris from October 26 to 30\, 2026.
\nWhile the school primarily aims to provide French researchers with the latest developments in the logical\, linguistic\, and cognitive aspects of conditional constructions\, it is also open to researchers from around the globe. All are cordially invited to join us! All participants will have the opportunity to present their research work during the poster sessions.
\nThe faculty will include prominent academics such as \;Hadil Karawani \;(Konstanz)\, \;Stefan Kaufmann (Connecticut)\, \;Dean McHugh \;(Edinburgh)\, \;Ezra la Roi \;(Ghent and Leuven)\, and \;Alex Reuneker (Leiden). This comprehensive five-day training program will promote the development and dissemination of research on conditional constructions. The event is financially supported by \;CNRS\, InIdex-EFL\, \;INALCO \;and \;PLIDAM.
\nContact person: Ghanshyam Sharma: paris.conditionals@gmail.com \;
ORGANIZER;CN=Ghanshyam Sharma: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=America/Mexico_City:20261026T090000 DTEND;TZID=America/Mexico_City:20261027T170000 SUMMARY:Innovation and tradition: intersections\, interactions and disputes in culture UID:20261024T121918Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:America/Mexico_City LOCATION:Cuernavaca\, Mexico DESCRIPTION:This colloquium emerges from the need to think and propose new epistemological positions to the cultural frame. From an interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary perspective\, our aim is to bring together researchers from fields like sociology\, communication science\, Cultural Studies\, anthropology\, history\, computational sciences\, political science\, and others\, to explore critical \;reflections on cultural tradition and cultural innovation. \;
ORGANIZER;CN=Omar Cerrillo: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261024T010141Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20261026T234500 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20261026T234500 SUMMARY:The Collective's Fifth Annual Conference\, 24 & 25 June\, Georgetown Law UID:20261024T121919Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-mzshb TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:We are thrilled to issue this \;Call for Papers \;for our Fifth Annual Conference\, which will take place on \;June 24th and 25th\, 2027 at Georgetown University Law School. The event is generously sponsored by Professor Stephanie Barclay\, the Georgetown Center for the Constitution\, and the \;Georgetown Institute for the Study of Markets and Ethics.
\n
We call for papers that philosophically engage with/analyse/critique the law and/or concepts applicable to the conceptual analysis of law\, and will consider papers that are up to 9\,000 words (including footnotes). Submitted papers must be fully anonymised and include an abstract of up to 250 words.
We are also delighted to announce that we are working in partnership with the journal \;Law &\; Philosophy\, which will publish the selected papers\, subject to peer review. If a paper is selected\, the author(s) agree not to submit the paper elsewhere until a decision by Law &\; Philosophy is communicated.
\nThe submission deadline is October 26th \;and we will endeavour to contact selected authors by the end of January 2027. \;To submit a paper for consideration\, please use the following link: https://app.smartsheet.com/b/form/019f8f71c14c727489c6ff115ce2443e
\nFor futher claritifaction or questions\, please contact us at: \;collectivewlp@gmail.com
Please note\, submissions by authors who were featured in our last two conferences - 2025 and 2026 - will not be considered.
Call for Abstracts
\nCategories of Descent-Based Difference: Race\, Ethnicity\, Religion\, and Ethnoreligion
\nTwo-day workshop\, University of Bern
\nOctober 27 &\; 28 2026
\nAcross Europe &ndash\; and elsewhere &ndash\; politically significant boundaries often turn on forms of belonging treated as inherited: ethnic\, religious\, ethnoreligious\, or mixed. The oppression organised through such boundaries is sometimes described as racism\, even when it does not map neatly onto the colour line. This raises a general question about how race\, ethnicity\, religion\, and ethnoreligion relate to one another. Do they name distinct kinds of group\, overlapping forms of classification\, or different configurations of descent-based difference? Under what conditions do ethnic or religious groups become racialised?
\nThis workshop invites papers addressing these questions. Bosnia and Herzegovina offers one revealing example. The categories Bosniak\, Croat\, and Serb draw together national belonging\, religious affiliation\, family history\, and attributed descent. They shape political membership\, yet are neither simply religious nor straightforwardly racial categories. Belief\, practice\, self-identification\, and classification by others need not coincide\, while institutions and social practices may nevertheless treat membership as inherited and enduring. The same problem arises\, in different forms\, well beyond Southeast Europe.
\nOver recent decades\, philosophers have developed sophisticated accounts of race and racialisation. Ethnicity\, religious belonging\, and ethnoreligion have been studied extensively in history\, sociology\, anthropology\, and religious studies. Although philosophers have compared race and ethnicity\, religion and ethnoreligion have seldom been included in the same social-ontological analysis. \; Building on Morning and Manieri&rsquo\;s (2022\, 2024) proposal to compare concepts of descent-based difference\, the workshop asks whether these categories can be analysed within a common frame.
\nOne possible point of comparison is descent-based ascription: the construction of group membership as genealogically inherited and transmitted across generations. This need not involve belief in biological descent. Names\, religious practices\, language\, culture\, place of origin\, and family history may instead become signs of inherited membership. We take this proposal as a starting point for exploring the relations among race\, ethnicity\, and religion\, rather than as a framework to be assumed. What can descent-based ascription explain about these groups\, and which differences does it obscure? How does racialisation interact with ethnic\, religious\, or ethnoreligious classification\, and what follows for debates about racism?
\nSoutheast Europe\, especially former Yugoslavia\, will provide one comparative point of reference. We welcome work on European and extra-European contexts more broadly\, including papers that develop\, challenge\, or mark the limits of the proposed framework.
\nTopics
\nPossible topics include:
\nWe particularly welcome papers that expose the limits of the proposed framework or offer a different account. We also welcome historically and empirically grounded papers that use their cases to develop\, test\, or challenge an explicit conceptual or ontological claim.
\nFormat
\nPapers will be allocated 30 minutes for presentation\, followed by 30 minutes for discussion.
\nConfirmed speakers:
\nAnn Morning (New York University)
\nAdam Hochman (Macquarie University)
\nSandra King-Savić (University of Zurich)
\nVita Zalar (European University Institute)
\nSubmissions
\nPlease submit:
\nSend submissions to descent-bern@protonmail.com by September 6 2026. Decisions will be communicated by September 16.
\nWe especially encourage submissions from early-career researchers\, precariously employed or independent scholars\, and researchers working on regions and traditions underrepresented in contemporary social ontology.
\nFunding
\nFunding covering travel and accommodation costs is available for a limited number of early-career and underfunded researchers. Please indicate in the separate document if your participation depends being partly or fully funded.
\nOrganisation
\nArmin Ma&scaron\;ala\, University of Bern
\nDaniel James\, Freie Universitä\;t Berlin
ORGANIZER;CN=Daniel James;CN="Armin Mašala": METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR