BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260411T105748Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260426T234500
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260426T234500
SUMMARY:Fragility and the Aesthetics of Sensitivity 
UID:20260414T205343Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-f5d4878dd-dnjxp
TZID:Europe/London
LOCATION:55-59 Penrhyn Rd\, Kingston upon Thames\, London\, United Kingdom\, KT1 2EE
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong>Call for Contributions: Fragility and the Aesthetics of Sensitivity</strong>&nbsp\;</p>\n<p><strong>Keynote Presenters:&nbsp\;</strong></p>\n<p>Andrew Goffey (University of Nottingham)</p>\n<p>Brigitte Hart (Sound artist\, Shortwave Collective)</p>\n<p>When crisis becomes a permanent state rather than an exceptional rupture\, fragility assumes the form of an existential condition visible across social\, ecological\, and political domains. Under such circumstances\, the production of knowledge increasingly shifts toward anticipatory regimes&mdash\;risk modelling\, foresight studies\, and adaptive infrastructures designed to navigate instability. Contemporary problems appear as hybrid entities: complex issues that exceed the grasp of any single discipline and demand collaborative investigation capable of rendering them perceptible and registering fragile relations that cannot be stabilised or fixed.</p>\n<p>In this context\, the problem of disciplinarity&mdash\;of relations between disciplines and collaboration across them&mdash\;acquires renewed urgency. Contemporary ecological frameworks in the humanities further intensify this concern by grounding the crossing of boundaries in an existential condition. This expansion of the problematic invites a reconsideration of an older question: what do the prefixes inter-\, trans-\, non-\, or post- differentially signify when applied to disciplinarity? Which form of disciplinarity adequately captures our present condition?</p>\n<p>While the laboratory has served as a central model&mdash\;a metonym for interdisciplinary collaboration\, anchoring the emergent mode of scientific praxis called &ldquo\;research&rdquo\;&mdash\;today research also unfolds across privately funded para-institutions\, hybrid platforms\, and transient project-based networks. However\, collaborations between artists and social theorists with natural scientists remain structurally asymmetrical: artistic practice is often reduced to the visualization of scientific data\, while social theory has long remained under pressure to imitate the methods of the hard sciences. In this context\, the symposium seeks to examine the tangible forms of contemporary cross-disciplinary collaboration and the conceptual frameworks that sustain them.</p>\n<p>The symposium approaches this question under the long shadow of post-1968 French philosophy\, whose insistence on the inherent intertwinement of politics and aesthetics continues to shape contemporary thought. As a guiding reference\, we take the framework developed by Bruno Latour\, approached here through the twin themes of&nbsp\;<strong>fragility and the aesthetics of sensitivity</strong>. Latour may be seen as the synthetic inheritor of this philosophical trajectory\, insofar as his anthropology of laboratory science leads to a non-disciplinary\, transversal form of social ontology that immanently connects science\, aesthetics\, and politics. His model advances a form of collective pragmatism oriented toward the proposal of new entities for social existence&mdash\;entities defined relationally as fragile networks of attachments. Scientific instruments function as sensitive devices that inscribe and thereby render these entities visible\, thereby making them open to collective concern.</p>\n<p>The symposium is thus both a call for dialogue and an invitation to rethink disciplinarity under the increasingly urgent\, deteriorating\, and transitional conditions of the present. We are interested in contemporary artistic and theoretical practices\, particularly those that combine the two and critically reflect on their disciplinary\, institutional\, and methodological conditions. If\, as F&eacute\;lix Guattari reminds us\, &ldquo\;there is no general pedagogy relative to the constitution of a living transdisciplinarity\,&rdquo\; then where and how might such a transdisciplinarity be practiced today?&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>Possible contributions might focus on:&nbsp\;</p>\n<ul>\n<li>Contemporary collective artistic practices experimenting with scientific approaches and methods.</li>\n<li>New (para-)\, (non-) institutional\, methodological and disciplinary models of research\, collaboration and knowledge production.</li>\n<li>The problematics of sensitivity\, visualization\, and representation across science\, politics\, and art.</li>\n<li>Disciplinary praxis under conditions of social\, economic\, institutional and ecological crises.&nbsp\;</li>\n<li>Fragility as a methodological and institutional condition in the production of social knowledge.</li>\n<li>Fragility in experimental and interdisciplinary forms of knowledge production.</li>\n<li>Scientific instruments and sensing technologies as aesthetic devices of perception\, operating both as instruments of biopolitical control and as instruments of resistance.</li>\n<li>Reflections on forms of collectivity and collective practice at the crossroads of aesthetic and political concerns\, including the inflation of the term &ldquo\;collective&rdquo\; to describe practices whose institutional status remains indeterminate.</li>\n<li>Transdisciplinary practices that challenge conventional notions of authorship\, expertise\, or institutional authority.</li>\n<li>Critical reflections on the conceptual and institutional limits of different forms of disciplinarity.&nbsp\;</li>\n<li>Pedagogical experiments in transdisciplinarity and collective learning.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Submission Guidelines:</strong></p>\n<p><strong>Abstract:&nbsp\;</strong>max. 300 words</p>\n<p><strong>Presentation length:&nbsp\;</strong>20 minutes&nbsp\;with time reserved for discussion.</p>\n<p>Please send an abstract (max. 300 words) and a short biographical note to:&nbsp\;<a target="_blank">k2035920@kingston.ac.uk</a></p>\n<p><strong>Deadline for submissions:</strong>&nbsp\;26 April 2026<br><strong>Notification of acceptance:</strong>&nbsp\;10 May 2026</p>\n<p>The event is organised as a&nbsp\;PhD student-led symposium supported by the Techne AHRC Doctoral Training Partnership.</p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260411T105748Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260605T093000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260605T170000
SUMMARY:CRMEP Graduate Conference | Title: Reading Capital 60 Years On
UID:20260414T205344Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-f5d4878dd-dnjxp
TZID:Europe/London
LOCATION:55-59 Penrhyn Road\, London\, United Kingdom
DESCRIPTION:<p>The publication of <em>Reading Capital</em>&nbsp\;[<em>Lire le capital</em>] marked an event in the full philosophical sense of the term: at the same time a rupture and irreversible beginning. A collaborative\, seminary effort between multiple authors - convened by Louis Althusser - the text proposed a radical new reading of <em>Das Kapital</em>\, one that was intentionally partial and unorthodox\, and all the more productive for being so. Its almost immediate success within both domestic and international circles inaugurated a new tradition of philosophical thought under the banner of structural Marxism\, thematising notions such as symptomatic reading\, militant science\, structural causality and theoretical anti-humanism. The precocious seminary contributors invariably went on to become hugely influential forces themselves\, from Pierre Macherey\, Jacques Ranciere\, and Roger Esablet\, to the beloved\, one-time Professor at the CRMEP\, Etienne Balibar.</p>\n<p>On the occasion of its 60-year anniversary\, this conference seeks to revisit the intellectual legacy of <em>Reading Capital</em>\, investigating its contemporary relevance\, as well as the polemics that have emerged since its publication. We thereby invite papers that critically reflect on this legacy\, drawing attention to the limits of the work as well as its unexplored potentials. We would also like to welcome papers that engage with<em>&nbsp\;Capital</em>&nbsp\;itself\, and the various other readings that have become canonised in the intervening decades. Papers will therefore be categorised into the following streams:</p>\n<p>1.&nbsp\;<strong>Reading </strong><strong><em>Capital</em></strong><strong></strong></p>\n<p>This panel invites papers that directly engage with Marx&rsquo\;s <em>Capital</em>&nbsp\;project as a critical text\, focusing on unresolved problems of interpretation\, translations\, intellectual histories\, lacunae and tensions\, and so on.</p>\n<p>2.&nbsp\;<strong>Reading </strong><strong><em>Reading Capital</em></strong><strong></strong></p>\n<p>Readings of <em>Reading Capital</em>&nbsp\;itself\, attending to thematics raised by one or more of its component texts\, the continuity/discontinuity of the project as a whole\, the resulting trajectories of its individual authors\, or the circumstances of its production and reception histories.</p>\n<p>3.&nbsp\;<strong>Reading readings of </strong><strong><em>Capital</em></strong><strong></strong></p>\n<p>Finally\, readings of one or more of the various interpretative traditions to which <em>Capital</em>&nbsp\;- and Marx&rsquo\;s wider corpus - have given rise\, evaluated in critical relation to structural Marxism. These could include\, but are not limited to: Postcolonial and feminist readings\, German Critical Theory\, the Neue-Marx Lekture\, Value-Form Theory\, Operaismo and Autonomia Operaia\, the &lsquo\;State debates&rsquo\;\, Legal Form Theory\, Political Marxism\, Social Reproduction Theory.</p>\n<p>We are currently accepting abstracts for papers that are no longer than 15-20 minutes in length(1950-2250 words). Presenters must be either currently pursuing a PhD or enrolled in an equivalent intensive research program. If you are interested in presenting\, please email an abstract (max 300 words) and a brief personal bio to <a href="mailto:crmepgradconference@gmail.com"><u>crmepgradconference@gmail.com</u></a>&nbsp\;by March 28th. We look forward to reading your submissions!</p>\n<p>Disclaimer: This event is organised by PhD students at the now independent institution\, Centre for Research in Modern European Philosophy.</p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260411T105748Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260612T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260612T170000
SUMMARY:Fragility and the Aesthetics of Sensitivity 
UID:20260414T205345Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-f5d4878dd-dnjxp
TZID:Europe/London
LOCATION:55-59 Penrhyn Rd\, Kingston upon Thames\, London\, United Kingdom\, KT1 2EE
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong>Call for Contributions: Fragility and the Aesthetics of Sensitivity</strong></p>\n<p><strong>Keynote Presenters:&nbsp\;</strong></p>\n<p>Andrew Goffey (University of Nottingham)</p>\n<p>Brigitte Hart (Sound artist\, Shortwave Collective)</p>\n<p>When crisis becomes a permanent state rather than an exceptional rupture\, fragility assumes the form of an existential condition visible across social\, ecological\, and political domains. Under such circumstances\, the production of knowledge increasingly shifts toward anticipatory regimes&mdash\;risk modelling\, foresight studies\, and adaptive infrastructures designed to navigate instability. Contemporary problems appear as hybrid entities: complex issues that exceed the grasp of any single discipline and demand collaborative investigation capable of rendering them perceptible and registering fragile relations that cannot be stabilised or fixed.</p>\n<p>In this context\, the problem of disciplinarity&mdash\;of relations between disciplines and collaboration across them&mdash\;acquires renewed urgency. Contemporary ecological frameworks in the humanities further intensify this concern by grounding the crossing of boundaries in an existential condition. This expansion of the problematic invites a reconsideration of an older question: what do the prefixes inter-\, trans-\, non-\, or post- differentially signify when applied to disciplinarity? Which form of disciplinarity adequately captures our present condition?</p>\n<p>While the laboratory has served as a central model&mdash\;a metonym for interdisciplinary collaboration\, anchoring the emergent mode of scientific praxis called &ldquo\;research&rdquo\;&mdash\;today research also unfolds across privately funded para-institutions\, hybrid platforms\, and transient project-based networks. However\, collaborations between artists and social theorists with natural scientists remain structurally asymmetrical: artistic practice is often reduced to the visualization of scientific data\, while social theory has long remained under pressure to imitate the methods of the hard sciences. In this context\, the symposium seeks to examine the tangible forms of contemporary cross-disciplinary collaboration and the conceptual frameworks that sustain them.</p>\n<p>The symposium approaches this question under the long shadow of post-1968 French philosophy\, whose insistence on the inherent intertwinement of politics and aesthetics continues to shape contemporary thought. As a guiding reference\, we take the framework developed by Bruno Latour\, approached here through the twin themes of&nbsp\;<strong>fragility and the aesthetics of sensitivity</strong>. Latour may be seen as the synthetic inheritor of this philosophical trajectory\, insofar as his anthropology of laboratory science leads to a non-disciplinary\, transversal form of social ontology that immanently connects science\, aesthetics\, and politics. His model advances a form of collective pragmatism oriented toward the proposal of new entities for social existence&mdash\;entities defined relationally as fragile networks of attachments. Scientific instruments function as sensitive devices that inscribe and thereby render these entities visible\, thereby making them open to collective concern.</p>\n<p>The symposium is thus both a call for dialogue and an invitation to rethink disciplinarity under the increasingly urgent\, deteriorating\, and transitional conditions of the present. We are interested in contemporary artistic and theoretical practices\, particularly those that combine the two and critically reflect on their disciplinary\, institutional\, and methodological conditions. If\, as F&eacute\;lix Guattari reminds us\, &ldquo\;there is no general pedagogy relative to the constitution of a living transdisciplinarity\,&rdquo\; then where and how might such a transdisciplinarity be practiced today?&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>Possible contributions might focus on:&nbsp\;</p>\n<ul>\n<li>Contemporary collective artistic practices experimenting with scientific approaches and methods.</li>\n<li>New (para-)\, (non-) institutional\, methodological and disciplinary models of research\, collaboration and knowledge production.</li>\n<li>The problematics of sensitivity\, visualization\, and representation across science\, politics\, and art.</li>\n<li>Disciplinary praxis under conditions of social\, economic\, institutional and ecological crises.&nbsp\;</li>\n<li>Fragility as a methodological and institutional condition in the production of social knowledge.</li>\n<li>Fragility in experimental and interdisciplinary forms of knowledge production.</li>\n<li>Scientific instruments and sensing technologies as aesthetic devices of perception\, operating both as instruments of biopolitical control and as instruments of resistance.</li>\n<li>Reflections on forms of collectivity and collective practice at the crossroads of aesthetic and political concerns\, including the inflation of the term &ldquo\;collective&rdquo\; to describe practices whose institutional status remains indeterminate.</li>\n<li>Transdisciplinary practices that challenge conventional notions of authorship\, expertise\, or institutional authority.</li>\n<li>Critical reflections on the conceptual and institutional limits of different forms of disciplinarity.&nbsp\;</li>\n<li>Pedagogical experiments in transdisciplinarity and collective learning.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Submission Guidelines:</strong></p>\n<p><strong>Abstract:&nbsp\;</strong>max. 300 words</p>\n<p><strong>Presentation length:&nbsp\;</strong>20 minutes&nbsp\;with time reserved for discussion.<strong></strong></p>\n<p>Please send an abstract (max. 300 words) and a short biographical note to: &nbsp\; k2035920@kingston.ac.uk</p>\n<p><strong>Deadline for submissions:</strong>&nbsp\;26 April 2026<br><strong>Notification of acceptance:</strong>&nbsp\;10 May 2026</p>\n<p>The event is organised as a&nbsp\;PhD student-led symposium supported by the Techne AHRC Doctoral Training Partnership.</p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
