&bull\; É\;tica de la inteligencia artificial: responsabilidad moral\, autonomí\;a\, agencia humana y artificial\, delegació\;n de decisiones\, explicabilidad y confianza.
\n&bull\; IA\, polí\;tica y democracia: inteligencia artificial y esfera pú\;blica\, procesos democrá\;ticos\, desinformació\;n\, polarizació\;n\, participació\;n polí\;tica y nuevas formas de poder.
\n&bull\; Gobernanza y regulació\;n de la IA: marcos normativos\, gobernanza algorí\;tmica\, transparencia\, rendició\;n de cuentas\, regulació\;n nacional e internacional y responsabilidad institucional.
\n&bull\; IA\, trabajo y transformaciones sociales: automatizació\;n\, reorganizació\;n del trabajo\, nuevas formas de dependencia tecnoló\;gica y efectos sobre instituciones y prá\;cticas sociales.
\n&bull\; IA\, conocimiento y racionalidad: producció\;n y validació\;n de conocimiento\, epistemologí\;a de los sistemas generativos\, confianza episté\;mica\, testimonio artificial\, desinformació\;n y autoridad cognitiva.
\n&bull\; Agencia\, autonomí\;a y condició\;n humana: transformaciones de la deliberació\;n y el juicio\, interacció\;n humano-má\;quina\, dependencia tecnoló\;gica\, discernimiento y lí\;mites de la delegació\;n cognitiva.
\n&bull\; Desafí\;os filosó\;ficos de los modelos generativos: lenguaje\, comprensió\;n\, creatividad\, intencionalidad\, autorí\;a y estatuto de los productos generados por inteligencia artificial.
\n&bull\; IA en á\;mbitos aplicados: problemas é\;ticos y polí\;ticos vinculados con la salud\, la educació\;n\, la investigació\;n cientí\;fica\, las polí\;ticas pú\;blicas\, las artes y otros dominios de aplicació\;n.
\n&bull\; Perspectivas crí\;ticas sobre inteligencia artificial: economí\;a polí\;tica de la IA\, infraestructuras tecnoló\;gicas\, concentració\;n empresarial\, extractivismo de datos\, impactos ambientales y relaciones entre tecnologí\;a y poder.
ORGANIZER;CN=Eduardo Alejandro Barrio;CN="Diana I. Pérez";CN=Karina Pedace: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20261027T171758Z DTSTART;TZID=America/Argentina/Salta:20261106T120000 DTEND;TZID=America/Argentina/Salta:20261106T123000 SUMMARY:SEMANTICS OF THOUGHT EXPERIMENTS AND AI (...) UID:20261027T172740Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-564d9fbdc7-f8tfj TZID:America/Argentina/Salta LOCATION:Bulnes 642 \, Buenos Aires\, Argentina\, Argentina DESCRIPTION:SEMANTICS OF THOUGHT EXPERIMENTS AND AI (...)
\n\n\nAbstract (ab. 420 words)
\n\n\nThe research question of Semantics of Though Experiments (TE) for a unified but nonreductionist theory of TE is answered by a provisional proposal involving four views\, Extended Argument View (TE Matrix\, TE Diagram)\, Extended Logic View (incl. plausibility logic\, possible worlds semantics PWS)\, Descriptive Semantics View and Progress of Science and Society View (incl. global cross-culturalism and environmental pragmaticism).
\n\nFor the skeptics there are proposed Transformation Rules or Substitution Theses to substitute TE by experiments (TR/ST1) and nonmodal arguments (TR/ST2).
\n\nThe Argument View of TE is defended by extension from TE analyses (as syllogisms\, hypotheticals\, reductios\, counterfactuals\, paradoxes) to an Extended Argument View by exemplification of tacit\, contextual or theoretical premises and presuppositions (axioms\, theorems\, derivations in mathematical thought experiments MTE\, regularities\, laws\, epistemological and scientific principles in empirical sciences).
\n\nThe Extended Argument View embraces Extended Logic View including nonclassical logics as probability logic and PWS. We can hold on to tertium non datur for probability logic is a cognitive apparatus and PWS involves theoretical possible worlds PW as available and accessible constituents of theories in mathematics and empirical sciences which satisfy premises and conclusions of TE arguments unto positive truth values (T) on a bivalent logic.
\n\nAs the PW of TE arguments (premises and conclusions) pick out accessible possible worlds (as from \; axioms to principles) unto the argument is both formally and informally logically validated (i.e. logical inference is valid\, premises and conclusions are true&mdash\;so\, argument is sound)\, we don't need to prescribe any forcing formal validation function. (Descriptive Semantics View).
\n\nOn Progress of Science and SocietyView a fallible theory (as after e.g. Karl Popper) is proposed (including error correction in the heuristic process of picking out available and accessible PW) that defines TE as cognitive mental tests designed to resolve (predefined) problems. Subtheses of global cross-culturalism and environmental pragmaticism criticize and substitute cultural\, economic\, moral and scientific biases.
\n\nThe semantic TE theory is successfully applied to over ten examples of TE from mathematics\, philosophy of mind (consciousness studies) and philosophy of natural sciences (classical and relativity physics) with help of TE Matrix\, a TE specific logical notation and procedure\, involving bracketing of TE from [TE]RS\, [TE]BS to [TE]EX \; (resp. restricted\, broad\, extended TE arguments) until TE have been fully developed into valid and sound formal logical arguments.
\n\nIn the research formal logic is applied\, one of the generally acknowledged techniques of AI (Artificial Intelligence) since it is a simulation of human intelligence by mathematical symbolism\, and (possibly after computerization) procedures outlined in this abstract may be considered algorithms.
\n\n ORGANIZER;CN=Eduardo Alejandro Barrio;CN="Diana I. Pérez";CN=Karina Pedace: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR